I have a map like this:
root = {
nat = {
pr = {
dev = [{
value: "10.10.10.10",
description: "test1"
},
],
},
pr2 = {
dev = [{
value: "10.10.10.11",
description: "test2"
}],
prod = [],
}
},
cc = {
pr = {
jej = [{
value: "10.10.10.10",
description: "test"
}]
}
},
smt = {
st = [{
value = "10.10.10.10",
description = "test"
}],
s2 = [{
value = "10.10.10.10",
description = "tt"
}]
}
}
Which can be modified in future by adding new nested maps. That map will be in module. I will paste the path(key) in input of module like "root.nat" and will expect in output the array of objects, thats will be all arrays of objects in "root.nat", sample of output:
[{
value = "10.10.10.10",
description = "test1"
},
{
value = "10.10.10.11",
description = "test2"
},
]
The problem is actually, that I cannot know how many nested maps I will have when inputing the path(key). And I can't iterate using for, cause I don't know exact fields.
Is it actually possible?
Terraform isn't designed for this sort of general computation. This particular problem requires unbounded recursion and that in particular isn't available in the Terraform language: Terraform always expects to be dealing with fixed data structures whose shape is known statically as part of their type.
If possible I would suggest using something outside of Terraform to preprocess this data structure into a flat map from dot-separated string key to a list of objects:
{
"root.nat" = [
{
value = "10.10.10.11",
description = "test2"
},
# etc
]
# etc
}
If you cannot avoid doing this transformation inside Terraform -- for example, if the arbitrary data structure you showed is being loaded dynamically from some other service rather than fixed in your configuration, so that it's not possible to pre-generate the flattened equivalent -- then you could use my Terraform provider apparentlymart/javascript as an escape hatch to the JavaScript programming language, and implement your flattening algorithm in JavaScript rather than in the Terraform language.
Since JavaScript is a general-purpose language, you can write a recursive algorithm to re-arrange your data structure into a flat map of lists of objects with dot-separated keys, and then look up those keys in Terraform code using the index operator as normal.
Check my answer for this This Question.
Basically, you can create as many for loops inside each other as you believe it will be necessary.
As long you check for null before proceeding to the next loop the code won't fail.
So in cases like this:
pr2 = {
dev = [{
value: "10.10.10.11",
description: "test2"
}],
prod = [],
prod would not be part of the final array.
Additionally, you can always add try functions in your verification if null to find out if you are in the right "level" of the loop.
Related
I am creating one Voting Smart Contract people can organize one election and voters can vote for their candidate. I have created one function which will return the statistics of ongoing or past elections
///#dev making statistics for all ballot/election
///#return results with all the information of all
function getStatisticsOfAllVote()
public
view
returns (SingleElectionStatistics[] memory )
{
SingleElectionStatistics[] memory results = new SingleElectionStatistics[](BallotArray.length);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < BallotArray.length; i++) {
SingleElectionStatistics memory temp = SingleElectionStatistics(
BallotArray[i]._getName(), //CEO election
BallotArray[i]._getDescription(),//Employees will choose their CEO
BallotArray[i]._getTotalVoteCounted(),//BigNumber { value: "1" }
BallotArray[i]._isVotingEnded(),//true
BallotArray[i]._getWinningProposalName()//John
);
results[i] = temp;
}
return results;
}
Sample returns are added as comments after the function call.
I suppose to get one array of objects. Buts it gave me data unusual format with extra data. Here are the returns data:
[
[
'CEO election',
'Employees will choose their CEO',
BigNumber { value: "1" },
true,
'John',
name: 'CEO election',
description: 'Employees will choose their CEO',
voteCounted: BigNumber { value: "1" },
voteEnded: true,
winningProposalName: 'John'
]
]
Which should return only
[
{
name: 'CEO election',
description: 'Employees will choose their CEO',
voteCounted: BigNumber { value: "1" },
voteEnded: true,
winningProposalName: 'John'
}
]
I may need help from the community. Thanks in advance
I tried with unit tests and also by changing the approaches but it doesn't help at all.
The raw data returned from a node (using eth_call RPC method) is an ABI-encoded byte array, containing each item just once.
The duplication that you see is caused by an offchain framework. Based on other context, I'm assuming that you're using ethers.js.
Their docs page says:
A Result is an array, so each value can be accessed as a positional argument.
Additionally, if values are named, the identical object as its positional value can be accessed by its name.
In your case, the call returns an array of Result types. Since the Solidity return variables are named (your ethers.js instance knows this from the ABI JSON generated during Solidity compilation), each Result type contains both number-indexed and named items.
I want to perform something like this:
rules = [
for i in somethings : {
//actions
},
for s in others : {
//actions
}
]
I need to get in result one list with the result of few iterated loops. The flatten logic I think.
Is it possible?
It really needs flatten
The answer is
rules = flatten([[
for i in somethings : {
//actions
}],
[for s in others : {
//actions
}
],])
The purpose of this question is I want to write some request through pymongo.
For one criterion per field, this is not a difficulty to use input.
find_mongo = {}
key = input("enter a field :")
value = input("enter a criterion :")
find_mongo[key] = value
db.collection.find(find_mongo)#it works without problem.
That's more problematic when I want more complicated criteria.
For instance if I want the value to be in a range:
{"field":{"$lte":1,"$gte":0.5,"$exists:true"}}
Because for the user, who's my own-self, it would be very easier to write this in the shell:
enter a field : size
enter a criterion or criteria : {"$lte":1,"$gte":0.5,"$exists":true"}
the current issue is value returns a string object : '{"$lte":1,"$gte":0.5,"$exists":true"}'
and as far as I know, mongo is not able to find with a str expression but with a dict.
I want this too if I need to write even more complicated requests with "$or" nested in a "$and" expression:
{"$and":[
{"size":{"$lte":100}},
{ $or: [ { quantity: { $lt: 20 } }, { price: 10 } ] }
]
}
and just have to write in an input the following example:
enter your request: {"$and":[
{"size":{"$lte":100}},
{ $or: [ { quantity: { $lt: 20 } }, { price: 10 } ] }
]}
in order to be able to execute:
find_mongo = input("enter your request: ")
db.collection.find(find_mongo)
Sure it's easier from the mongoshell, but if I don't request from mongoshell is because I want to make transformation of the files of the request in python.
Besides I am not searching for a solution to obtain {"$lte":1,"$gte":0.5,"$exists":true"}. Honestly with some reflections, conditions and iterations, I think I am able to find a way. I am really searching if it is possible to enter and return an object, here a dict and not an str one, through the input() user. Just because it's easier for me if such a solution does exist.
Notes: Ubuntu 18.04, Python 3.7.1
I've two models - subscribers and tags
Sample data:
{
subscribers: [
{
name: "User 1",
tags: ["a","b"]
},
{
name: "User 2",
tags: ["c","d"]
}
]
}
I want to filter subscribers based on their tags.
If I give a and b tags, User 1 should list
If I give a and c tags,
both User 1 and User 2 should list
Here is what I tried:
Method 1:
tags is a column in subscribers model with array data type
/subscribers/?filter={"where":{"tags":{"inq":["a","b"]}}} // doesn't work
Method 2:
Created a separate table tags and set subscribers has many tags.
/subscribers/?filter={"where":{"tags":{"inq":["a","b"]}}} // doesn't work
How can I achieve this in Loopback without writing custom methods?
I've Postgresql as the connector
UPDATE
As mentioned in the loopback docs you should use inq not In
The inq operator checks whether the value of the specified property matches any of the values provided in an array. The general syntax is:
{where: { property: { inq: [val1, val2, ...]}}}
From this:
/subscribers/?filter={"where":{"tags":{"In":["a","b"]}}}
To this:
/subscribers/?filter={"where":{"tags":{"inq":["a","b"]}}}
Finally found a hack, using Regex! it's not a performant solution, but it works!!
{ "where": { "tags": { "regexp": "a|b" } } }
(I'm not good eng.)
I use a group to include dates. I want to get the information out in a row. What do i need to do
.group(r.row('time_create').dayOfWeek())
json export
[
{
group: 1,
reduction: [
{
detail: "no",
id: "37751c10-97ea-4a3a-b2c9-3e8b39383b79",
order_id: "15",
status: "Not_Delivery",
time_create: "2018-09-23T15:25:13.141Z"
}
]
}
]
i want change data json to
{
"date":
{
"Sun": [
{
detail: "no",
order_id: "15",
status: "Not_Delivery",
time_create: "2018-09-28 15:25:13"
}
]
}
}
Do i have to give the information out as i want.
Looks like you tried but didn't manage to transform the data from your previous question. ;)
Here is a proposition, this is not the only way of doing it.
First, it seems you want to remove the id field. You may do that in your ReQL using without:
.group(r.row('time_create').dayOfWeek()).without('id')
(You may apply without('id') before group, it should work the same, see this for more details.)
Then, to transform the result array (let's call it queryResult) into an object (let's call it output):
// prepare the skeleton of the output
let output = {
date: {}
};
// walk the result, filling the output in the process
queryResult.forEach((groupData) => {
let key = groupData.group;
if (!output[key]) {
output[key] = [];
}
output.date[key].push(...groupData.reduction);
})
Now you almost have your desired structure in output, the only thing is that day keys are still numbers and not a short day name. In my opinion, this should be handled by the front-end, since you may want to have different languages implemented for your front-end. But anyway, the idea is always the same: having a translation table that maps Rethink's day numbers with human-readable day names:
const translationTable = {
1: 'Mon',
2: 'Tue',
// ...
7: 'Sun'
};
Now if you do that in your front-end, you just replace the data's keys on the fly, when displaying is needed (or retrieve the key from the day name, depending on how you display stuff). Otherwise, if you go for a back-end implementation (which, again, is clearly not the best solution), you can change one line in the code above (assuming you declared translationTable already):
let key = groupData.group;
// becomes
let key = translationTable[groupData.group];
Feel free to ask in comments if there's something you don't understand!