I’m trying to work out what permissions for the relevant security role I need.
I’ve got it so that the user can only see tables that I’ve given them access to in PowerApps, but they also need to see it in Dataverse. They don’t have permission to view Dataverse so I’m wondering what is the minimum set of permissions for a security role to view Dataverse?
They need to be a licensed user on Dataverse and have a basic security role assigned.
Related
I have created multiple apps in SPEAK UI and placed all quick access shortcuts on the Sitecore Launchpad.
Now, how can I restrict access for some applications while creating Users, because we have Content Area in Access Viewer?
There are a couple of ways to do this. First you need to open the desktop and switch from the Master to the Core database.
If you just want to restrict access to the shortcuts on the Launchpad - you can do this by setting access rights on the shortcut items:
Create a role that should have access to the users and give that role Read access to the button item.
Another option would be to allow access to the application. If you look at the Path Analyzer you can see that some roles are denied and some granted access:
So add security rights to roles for your SPEAK apps.
Finally when you create users make sure you give them the correct roles to match what they are able to view.
So I am very interested in using Cloudkit but the documentation on anything over the basic features is horrible. I am looking to establish two basic user types: standard user (someone that can read records only) and an Admin user (can create and modify records). I setup security roles to reflect this and changed the access modifiers on each of the record types to include these roles. However, I cannot find anywhere how to change a user from one role to the other. I have implemented an Admin login of sorts in the app. Once they enter in the appropriate credentials, I want to allow that user to start editing records.
Does anyone know how to do this?
Thanks
I think it's still not possible to assign a security role to a user using code. Then this answer is still valid: How do I access security role in cloudkit
I have created a cube including user roles to restrict the access. Checking with Server Data Tools, everything works fine: the user do see limited data of a particular dimension. I added an user from Active Directoy to that role. After deploying the cube including the new created role and connecting with Excel to that cube with Single Sign On (SSO), I do see all data without any limitation.
What is missing?
Regards
Matt
Two possibilities. Adding your own username (who is an SSAS admin I assume) to a role will not lower your permissions. You will still be a SSAS admin and can this see everything. If you want to limit your own permissions in Excel you must edit the connection string in Excel and add Roles=YourRoleName
If you are trying to restrict someone else's permissions make sure that other person:
Doesn't have SSAS admin permissions
Isn't a Windows admin because by default there is a BuiltInAdminsAreServerAdmins=True property in SSAS which would make Windows admins be SSAS admins.
Make sure that user isn't also listed as a member in another role. Permissions across roles are additive in SSAS.
Is there a way to create a group admin using the API?
Someone who is able to add and delete users from the group but not from the general administrator account?
I can see there are only 3 permissions profile that can be assigned to a group, Administrator
Thanks.
Currently DocuSign does not use a tiered administrator structure with either the API or their standard console.
Several DocuSign employee's that I've talked with have suggested that a tiered structure is in the works but they don't have a release date for that as yet.
As a temporary fix to this, if you have an account administrator at DocuSign (and depending upon your account set up) you can request that they create sub-accounts to which you can assign groups of users and limit administrators from reaching other accounts. This is the solution we used for multiple business units that didn't need access to each others documents.
You can create more permissions profiles, but the degree to which your users can access settings remains largely the same.
Hope this helps.
We want some users of one of our SharePoint site to manage permissions on their site but do not want them to give the permission called "Manage Permissions". Because if we do so, the users start assigning the built in permission level “Full Control” to themselves. How can we achieve this?
Please note that the users with the permission level "Manage Permissions" can create and change permission levels on the Web site [Ref: Microsoft]. What we want for them to only be able to create users, groups, and assign certain permissions on the site to those users and groups.
"we want for them ... and assign permissions"
you DO realize that they can just as easily be assigning Full Control to these groups? isn't that what you say you want to AVOID?
manage the permissions for them, and allow them to self manage the GROUP MEMBERS. that way they can add people to the "publishers" group... and net result is that the user has "publish" permissions.
solution 2 can be extrapolated for some very granular needs, but I don't explain how because I wouldn't recommend it.