How can I make require one of my options from builder object from command
require('yargs')
.usage('Usage: $0 <cmd> [options]')
.command(
'read',
'Read a note',
{
id: {
demand: true,
string: true
},
first: {
demand: true,
boolean: true
}
},
argv => {
note.read(argv.id).then(data => {
console.log('==================note read==================');
console.log(data);
console.log('==================note read==================');
});
}
)
.help()
.strict().argv;
Here I want user to pass either id or first option for read command
Also when running this command with invalid options it doesn't show errors
node app.js read --id=1 --first=1
yargs: ^12.0.5
You may use check API.
// code is written for logic purpose. Not tested.
.check(function (argv) {
if ((argv.id && !argv.first) || (!argv.id && argv.first)) {
return true;
} else if (argv.id && argv.first) {
throw(new Error('Error: pass either id or first option for read command'));
} else {
throw(new Error('Error: pass either id or first option for read command'));
}
})
PS: 1 can be string or boolean for option values
you can use demandOption = true to solve the problem
This is the solution I am currently using. Though I am looking for a better solution.
require('yargs')
.usage('Usage: $0 <cmd> [options]')
.command(
'read',
'Read a note',
yargs =>
yargs
.option('id', {
string: true
})
.option('first', {
boolean: true
})
.check(({ id, first }) => {
if (!id.trim() && !first) {
throw new Error('id or first option is required');
}
return true
}),
argv => {
if (argv.first) {
note.readFirst().then(data => {
console.log('==================note read==================');
console.log(data);
console.log('==================note read==================');
});
} else {
note.read(argv.id).then(data => {
console.log('==================note read==================');
console.log(data);
console.log('==================note read==================');
});
}
}
)
.help()
.strict().argv;
yargs command takes 4 options. Command, description, builder & handler. Builder can be an object or a function. Using function can be used to provide advanced command specific help.
Also I removed demand for both of them as using demand it will ask both the option but I wanted only one.
Also when setting an option to string or boolean what it does it only casts to that type it doesn't validates the type. So here if no option provided argv.first default value will be false & argv.id default value will be '' empty string.
Also when throwing an Error from check function it actually shows the error message of Error object but if we return false it will show the function body in console as message to help trace the error.
Also without accessing argv yargs will not parse.
see https://yargs.js.org/docs/#api-commandcmd-desc-builder-handler, https://yargs.js.org/docs/#api-argv.
Related
I'm trying to write an eslint rule that enforces making sure the name property is defined on any classes that extend from other Error/Exception named classes (and fixes them).
As far as I can tell, it works in the astexplorer.net individually, but when I'm running it alongside other rules, it ends up getting ran multiple times, so the name property ends up being repeated multiple times in the resulting "fixed" file.
Is there anything in particular I can do to prevent it being run multiple times? I'm assuming what's happening is that it's inserting my name = 'ClassName';, then prettier is needing to reformat the code, which it does, but then maybe it's re-running my rule? I'm not sure.
Rule/fix code shown below. I've tried things like using *fix and yield, but that doesn't seem to help either (see commented code below, based on information in the eslint documentation)
module.exports = {
meta: {
hasSuggestions: true,
type: 'suggestion',
docs: {},
fixable: 'code',
schema: [], // no options,
},
create: function (context) {
return {
ClassDeclaration: function (node) {
const regex = /.*(Error|Exception)$/;
// If the parent/superClass is has "Error" or "Exception" in the name
if (node.superClass && regex.test(node.superClass.name)) {
let name = null;
const className = node.id.name;
// Test class object name
if (!regex.test(className)) {
context.report({
node: node,
message: 'Error extensions must end with "Error" or "Exception".',
});
}
// Find name ClassProperty
node.body.body.some(function (a) {
if (a.type === 'ClassProperty' && a.key.name === 'name') {
name = a.value.value;
return true;
}
});
// Name property is required
if (!name) {
context.report({
node: node,
message: 'Error extensions should have a descriptive name',
fix(fixer) {
return fixer.replaceTextRange(
[node.body.range[0]+1, node.body.range[0]+1],
`name = '${className}';`
);
},
// *fix(fixer) {
// name = className;
// yield fixer.replaceTextRange(
// [node.body.range[0]+1, node.body.range[0]+1],
// `name = '${className}';`
// );
//
// // extend range of the fix to the range of `node.parent`
// yield fixer.insertTextBefore(node.body, '');
// yield fixer.insertTextAfter(node.body, '');
// },
});
}
}
},
};
},
};
Turns out I had the AST Explorer set to the wrong parser, so it was showing me the wrong string name for the ClassProperty node. I should have been using PropertyDefinition instead.
I am trying to get a text from an element with Cypress in the first test from the first domain and then type it in the second test in another domain, here is a code
I have to grab code from h4.
I implemented next part of code:
get studentCouponValue() {
return cy.get('h4').then(($span) => {
const couponValue = $span.text();
cy.log(couponValue);
})
}
in logs, I see the correct coupon's value, but when I am trying to type it into the field I get an error
The chain approach doesn't fit my expectation, cause i am going to use it in different tests.
Try this:
get studentCouponValue() {
return cy.get('h4').then(($span) => {
const couponValue = $span.innerText;
cy.log(couponValue);
})
}
i resolved
initStudentCouponValue() {
const self = this;
return cy.get('main > .container-fluid').find('h4').then((span) => {
self.couponValue = span.text();
cy.log('First log '+ self.couponValue);
return new Cypress.Promise((resolve) => {
return resolve(self.couponValue);
});
});
}
getStudentCouponValue() {
return this.couponValue;
}
in the test where we want to use value
let couponValue;
admin.initStudentCouponValue().then(() => {
couponValue = admin.getStudentCouponValue()
});
and later we can use
coupoValue
for inputs
Using test.each in Jest, I'd like to pass in a Boolean that toggles whether I expect something or not.
This is the type of repetitive code I'm trying to avoid:
if (expectFoo) {
expect(anObject).toContainEqual(
expect.objectContaining({
name: "foo"
})
);
} else {
expect(anObject).not.toContainEqual(
expect.objectContaining({
name: "foo"
})
);
}
Here is some pseudocode that illustrates my preferred (cleaner, shorter) approach:
expect(anObject).yesOrNo(expectFoo).toContainEqual(
expect.objectContaining({
name: "foo"
})
);
Is there anything like this in Jest?
Built-in matchers aren't public API but can be imported from the same internal module that is used by Jest:
import matchers from 'expect/build/matchers';
Custom matchers can wrap and compose built-in matchers:
expect.extend({
toContainFoo(received, expectFoo = true) {
const isNot = !expectFoo ? !this.isNot : this.isNot
this.isNot = isNot; // affects error message
const expected = matchers.objectContaining({
name: "foo"
});
const result = matchers.toContainEqual.call(this, received, expected);
result.pass = !isNot; // affects assertion logic
return result;
}
})
I'm trying to get some info out of a API call in Nodejs, structured something like a JSON:
{
"generated":"2019-11-04T09:34:11+00:00",
"event":{
"id":"19040956",
"start_":"2019-11-16T11:30:00+00:00",
"event_context":{
"sport":{
"id":"1",
"name":"Soccer"
}
}
}
}
I'm not sure about the presence of none of these fields(Json could be incomplete).
Is there a better way to get the value of "name" in JSON.event.event_context.sport.name without an ugly if to not get errors like "cannot get field 'sport' of undefined"?
Currently, I'm doing
if(json.event && json.event.event_context && json.event.event_context.sport) {
return json.event.event_context.sport.name;
}
Is there a better way?
Thank you!
what do you mean by saying "I'm not sure about the presence of none of these fields"?
i don't understand what your'e trying to achieve.
Looks like there is also an interesting package that will allow more conditions on searching json :
https://www.npmjs.com/package/jspath
let getNested = (path, obj) => {
return path.split(".").reduce( getPath, obj);
}
let getPath = (path, key) => {
return (path && path[key]) ? path[key] : null
}
let test = {
"foo": "bar",
"baz": { "one": 1, "two": ["to", "too", "two"] },
"event": { "event_context": { "sport": { "name": "soccer" } } }
}
console.log(getNested("none", test))
console.log(getNested("baz.one", test))
console.log(getNested("baz.two", test))
console.log(getNested("event.event_context.sport.name", test))
You can use lodash get to get a potentially deeply-nested value, and also specify a default in case it doesnt exist.
Example
const _ = require('lodash');
const my_object = {
"generated":"2019-11-04T09:34:11+00:00",
"event":{
"id":"19040956",
"start_":"2019-11-16T11:30:00+00:00",
"event_context":{
"sport":{
"id":"1",
"name":"Soccer"
}
}
};
_.get(my_object, 'event.event_context.sport.name'); // "Soccer"
_.get(my_object, 'event.event_context.sport.nonExistentField', 'default val'); // "default val"
Article: https://medium.com/#appi2393/lodash-get-or-result-f409e73e018b
You can check by using a function to check object keys like :
function checkProperty(checkObject, checkstring){
if(!checkstring)
return false;
var propertiesKeys = checkstring.split('.');
propertiesKeys.forEach(element => {
if(!checkObject|| !checkObject.hasOwnProperty(element)){
return false;
} else {
checkObject= checkObject[element];
}
})
return true;
};
var objectToCheck = {
"generated":"2019-11-04T09:34:11+00:00",
"event":{
"id":"19040956",
"start_":"2019-11-16T11:30:00+00:00",
"event_context":{
"sport":{
"id":"1",
"name":"Soccer"
}
}
}
}
if (checkProperty(objectToCheck ,'event.event_context.sport.name'))
console.log('object to find is : ', objectToCheck .event.event_context.sport.name;)
Yeah there are better ways!
For example, you could use lodash's get() method to reach a nested value.
var object = { 'a': [{ 'b': { 'c': 3 } }] };
_.get(object, 'a[0].b.c');
// => 3
But there is also a native solution.
Currently (11.2019) only Babel can handle this.
I am speaking of Optional chaining. It's new in the Ecmascript world.
Why I like it? Look here!
// Still checks for errors and is much more readable.
const nameLength = db?.user?.name?.length;
What happens when db, user, or name is undefined or null? With the optional chaining operator, JavaScript initializes nameLength to undefined instead of throwing an error.
If you are using Babel as a compiler then you could use it now.
Related link: https://v8.dev/features/optional-chaining
I’m trying to use HeroCards along with a prompt choice in a carousel. So the options to be selected by the user are displayed as HeroCards. As soon as the user clicks in the button of a card it should goes to the next waterfall function.
Here is a working example in bot framework v3. It does work as expected.
const cards = (data || []).map(i => {
return new builder.HeroCard(session)
.title(`${i.productName} ${i.brandName}`)
.subtitle(‘product details’)
.text(‘Choose a product’)
.images([builder.CardImage.create(session, i.image)])
.buttons([builder.CardAction.postBack(session, `${i.id.toString()}`, ‘buy’)]);
});
const msg = new builder.Message(session);
msg.attachmentLayout(builder.AttachmentLayout.carousel);
msg.attachments(cards);
builder.Prompts.choice(session, msg, data.map(i => `${i.id.toString()}`), {
retryPrompt: msg,
});
Below I’m trying to do the same with bot framework v4 but it does not work. It never goes to the next function in my waterfall.
How can I do the same with v4?
…
this.addDialog(new ChoicePrompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL));
…
const productOptions: Partial<Activity> = MessageFactory.carousel(
item.map((p: Product) =>
CardFactory.heroCard(
p.productName,
‘product details’,
[p.image || ''],
[
{
type: ActionTypes.PostBack,
title: ‘buy’,
value: p.id,
},
],
),
),
‘Choose a product’,
);
return await step.prompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL, productOptions);
…
UPDATE:
Follow full code with the suggestion from #Drew Marsh
export class ProductSelectionDialog extends ComponentDialog {
private selectedProducts: Product[] = [];
private productResult: Product[][];
private stateAccessor: StatePropertyAccessor<State>;
static get Name() {
return PRODUCT_SELECTION_DIALOG;
}
constructor(stateAccessor: StatePropertyAccessor<State>) {
super(PRODUCT_SELECTION_DIALOG);
if (!stateAccessor) {
throw Error('Missing parameter. stateAccessor is required');
}
this.stateAccessor = stateAccessor;
const choicePrompt = new ChoicePrompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL);
choicePrompt.style = ListStyle.none;
this.addDialog(
new WaterfallDialog<State>(REVIEW_PRODUCT_OPTIONS_LOOP, [
this.init.bind(this),
this.selectionStep.bind(this),
this.loopStep.bind(this),
]),
);
this.addDialog(choicePrompt);
}
private init = async (step: WaterfallStepContext<State>) => {
const state = await this.stateAccessor.get(step.context);
if (!this.productResult) this.productResult = state.search.productResult;
return await step.next();
};
private selectionStep = async (step: WaterfallStepContext<State>) => {
const item = this.productResult.shift();
const productOptions: Partial<Activity> = MessageFactory.carousel(
item.map((p: Product) =>
CardFactory.heroCard(
p.productName,
'some text',
[p.image || ''],
[
{
type: ActionTypes.ImBack,
title: 'buy',
value: p.id,
},
],
),
),
'Choose a product',
);
return await step.prompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL, {
prompt: productOptions,
choices: item.map((p: Product) => p.id),
});
};
private loopStep = async (step: WaterfallStepContext<State>) => {
console.log('step.result: ', step.result);
};
}
PARENT DIALOG BELOW:
...
this.addDialog(new ProductSelectionDialog(stateAccessor));
...
if (search.hasIncompletedProducts) await step.beginDialog(ProductSelectionDialog.Name);
...
return await step.next();
...
MY BOT DIALOG STRUCTURE
onTurn()
>>> await this.dialogContext.beginDialog(MainSearchDialog.Name) (LUIS)
>>>>>> await step.beginDialog(QuoteDialog.Name)
>>>>>>>>> await step.beginDialog(ProductSelectionDialog.Name)
UPDATE
Replacing the ChoicePrompt with TextPromt (as suggested by Kyle Delaney) seems to have the same result (do not go to the next step) but I realised that if remove return from the prompt like this:
return await step.prompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL, `What is your name, human?`); TO await step.prompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL, `What is your name, human?`);
it does work but when I'm returning the original code with ChoicePrompt without return like this:
await step.prompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL, {
prompt: productOptions,
choices: item.map((p: Product) => p.id),
});
I'm getting another error in the framework:
error: TypeError: Cannot read property 'length' of undefined
at values.sort (/xxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/choices/findValues.js:84:48)
at Array.sort (native)
at Object.findValues (/xxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/choices/findValues.js:84:25)
at Object.findChoices (/xxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/choices/findChoices.js:58:25)
at Object.recognizeChoices (/xxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/choices/recognizeChoices.js:75:33)
at ChoicePrompt.<anonymous> (/xxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/prompts/choicePrompt.js:62:39)
at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
at /xxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/prompts/choicePrompt.js:7:71
at new Promise (<anonymous>)
at __awaiter (/xxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/prompts/choicePrompt.js:3:12)
this is the line:
// Sort values in descending order by length so that the longest value is searched over first.
const list = values.sort((a, b) => b.value.length - a.value.length);
I can see the data from my state is coming properly
prompt: <-- the data is ok
choices: <-- the data is ok too
Sometimes I'm getting this error too:
error: TypeError: Cannot read property 'status' of undefined
at ProductSelectionDialog.<anonymous> (/xxxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/componentDialog.js:92:28)
at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
at fulfilled (/xxxx/Workspace/temp/13.basic-bot/node_modules/botbuilder-dialogs/lib/componentDialog.js:4:58)
at <anonymous>
at process._tickDomainCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:228:7)
this line
// Check for end of inner dialog
if (turnResult.status !== dialog_1.DialogTurnStatus.waiting) {
You're using a ChoicePrompt, but when you call prompt you're only passing through an activity (the carousel). ChoicePrompt is going to try to validate the input against a set of choices that you should be passing in when you call prompt. Because you're not doing this, the prompt is not recognizing the post back value as valid and technically should be reprompting you with the carousel again to make a valid choice.
The fix here should be to call prompt with PromptOptions instead of just a raw Activity and set the choices of the PromptOptions to an array that contains all the values you expect back (e.g. the same value you set for the value of the post back button).
This should end up looking a little something like this:
Since you're providing the choices UX with your cards, you want to set the ListStyle on the ChoicePrompt to none
const productsPrompt = new ChoicePrompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL);
productsPrompt.style = ListStyle.none;
this.addDialog(productsPrompt);
Then, set the available choices for the specific prompt:
return await step.prompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL, {
prompt: productOptions,
choices: items.map((p: Product) => p.id),
});
Basically Drew Marsh was right.
I just would like to add some other details that I had to tweak to make it work. In case someone else is going crazy like I was. It could give some insights. It's all about how you handle the returns of nested dialogs.
First change. I had to transform the identifier of the Choice prompt into string:
{
type: ActionTypes.PostBack,
title: 'buy',
value: p.id.toString(),
},
and
return await step.prompt(PRODUCTS_CAROUSEL, {
prompt: productOptions,
choices: item.map((p: Product) => p.id.toString()),
});
Another problem that I found was in the parent dialog:
I was basically trying to do this:
if (search.hasIncompletedProducts) await step.beginDialog(ProductSelectionDialog.Name);
return await step.next();
Which makes no sense, then I changed it to:
if (search.hasIncompletedProducts) {
return await step.beginDialog(ProductSelectionDialog.Name);
} else {
return await step.next();
}
And then the final change in the parent of the parent dialog:
Before was like this:
switch (step.result) {
case ESearchOptions.OPT1:
await step.beginDialog(OPT1Dialog.Name);
break;
default:
break;
}
await step.endDialog();
Which again does not make sense since I should return the beginDialog or endDialog. It was changed to:
switch (step.result) {
case ESearchOptions.OPT1:
return await step.beginDialog(OPT1Dialog.Name);
default:
break;
}