This question already has answers here:
Multiple glibc libraries on a single host
(11 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I'm using openCV in my project. When I've tested in Red Hat instance, I have exception " /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found".
So, how I can install glibc 2.15 in Red Hat?
I fond rpm(not 2.15(I hope new version can help me)), but I need some dependencies. Can I install glibc from some repo?
thx!
Can I install glibc from some repo?
Not likely: distributions usually don't ever update the major/minor version of glibc from the one they originally shipped with, because the likelihood of breaking applications is too great.
You may have to build glibc-2.15, or better current glibc-2.24 from source and install it into non-default location. See this answer.
If you are registered to satellite , Just run :
yum install glibc
this should take care of all .
If you are installing using rpms manually, you need dependent rpms as well.
Hope this helps.. Good luck.
Related
i'm learning linux kunnel programming. however, i faced problem that gcc version is too high to execute 2.4kunnel "make" command(make bzImage), I try to find solution. but in debian case solution does not exist, just for ubuntu, centOs ect... please help me Or, link that about my problem.
P.S ) What i want version of gcc is 3.3 version, it doesn't work use command apt-get install gcc-3.3
Why would you learn based on 2.4?
Your question is wrong anyway. You will likely need other old tools. The way to go is to download an entire debian system and chroot inside. This can be achieved with debootstrap.
However, as noted earlier, you should not stick to 2.4 in the first place.
I am trying to install pycairo 1.10 for Python 3.3 on redhat 6. There are no packages in the official repo, and when I try building it myself it says glibc is out of date. I have the latest glibc from the official the repo, and am somewhat hesitant to go on updating it through other means. Are there any other packages that can help, or is there some way to get this working with an older version (we have tried back to cairo 1.8).
redhat 6 is clearly out of date. Of course it can be done bringing rh6 up to date with downloading and compiling your own 3.x kernel with all what's needed to meet the requirments for pycairo 1.10....
BUT it would be easier and nicer to install a more modern Linux Distribution which goes nicely with an old computer. Linux Mint 16 (Petra) provides a distro with replaxed requirments and window managers in i386 mode.
I don't see any meaning in trying to get up to date code on such an old os version running. Every replacement hardware you can get hold on ebay will do better than that.
cheers,
Christian
I want to add Doxygen plugin to QtCreator.
I am using QtCreator 2.5.2 in ubuntu 12.10 and the latest Doxygen version for QT is 2.4.0.
I've changed the doxygen.pluginspec file to get rid of version error.
But now I've got another error:
can not load library libdoxygen.so (libQtconcurrent.so can not open shared object file:No such file or directory)
Any suggestion would be appreciated.
I hope you are no longer stuck, but if not, I will still try to help.
Yes, the quick install binaries are available only for QtCreator 2.4, but the plugin stays easy to install without it : you have to download the sources and build them yourself, as written in the wiki.
Moreover, you have to build it with the same version of Qt4 as the one that was used for build your QtCreator (have a look here)
It became compatible with QtCreator 2.7 and Qt5 at the end of March, and I succeeded in installing in in QtCreator2.8-beta.
If you have any other question, I guess it would be better to ask them in the plugin forum where developpers always answer to people in need.
Hope this helps (you and other people in need).
You can install Doxywizard wich provides an user interface to use Doxygen.
I'm not shure I'm using fedora to install I used.
yum install doxygen-doxywizard.x86_64.
For Ubuntu it should be if the package name is the same.
apt-get install doxygen-doxywizard.x86_64
(as root)
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to upgrade libpng from version 1.2 to 1.5. I need to do so because of this: libpng warning: Application built with libpng-1.2.26 but running with 1.5.2. I am using Lubuntu 11.10 and in the Canonical repositories libnpg 1.5 is not still released although at Debian ones there are testing packages (http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libpng) that at first they would fit to me. I added the Debian repositories to Synaptec and I was able to install libpng15, but those packages do not replace libpng12, son when it comes to compile some source code the IDE uses libpng12 instead of libpng15.
To try to solve this I downloaded the libpng15 deb package, uncompressed it and changed the Replaces, Conflicts and Provides tags of the control file with the libpng15 text. Then, I executed the modified deb, but what I only got was a GDebi error and a general system failure because (I think) libpng12 was uninstalled with no replacement and Lubuntu heavily depends on it, which forced me to reinstall Lubuntu because the computer did not boot again in Linux. Yes, this solution is not the neatest way I think.
So, is there any way to upgrade a package and replace the old version whose newer version exists but it is not still in the distribution repository? I found ubuntu repository for libpng and How to upgrade a package in linux that was built from source?. Although not very determinant so far.
I have not found out how to upgrade and replace a package whose newer version is not still in the distribution repository. But I have realized that if some library X relies on a given version of other library Y, there is no way to change the version of that dependence unless you make some change onto the source code of X, that is it, the library X is recompiled to point to the desired version (usually with the help of some configuration tag). Even though some trick could be done as by modifying the symlink of the library Y to point to the newer version. Then, the compiler will complain and ask for the old version.
Maybe this looks obvious now. But if the software that has to be recompiled requires many hours, has unresolved dependences or gives built errors you will try to avoid the compilation no matter if you are violating thermodynamics laws.
So in my case I had to recompile Qt and by using the -system-libpng configuration tag Qt understood it had to use system libpng libraries, not in-built ones. And after 8 hours of compiling I got a successfully built which solved this libpng problem.
Thanks everyone for the comments and suggests.
For all of the trouble you're going through, it might be easier to simply compile from source, and install to /usr/local (instead of /usr, as debs do). I've done this for several library dependencies for programs I've compiled (with make build systems) without any trouble. However, it sounds like the program(s) you're compiling are having trouble choosing the right version of the package. In my opinion, that is the real issue. Having multiple versions of a library installed simultaneously is supported, but perhaps not by apt in the case of mixing Debian and Ubuntu repos.
When you compile your program, use gcc -lpng15 instead of -lpng. According to the gcc info manual, an option of -lname causes the linker to look for libname.a in the lib folders. On my system (Ubuntu 10.04), libpng.a is a symlink to libpng12.a. This is why your program is choosing the wrong lib.
Try adding this ppa: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/overlay. It contains libpng1.5 for Oneiric.
You can install it by running
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:linaro-maintainers/overlay
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libpng1.5
To properly link against libpng15, you will also need to install libpng15-dev.
I'm attempting to build a binary package that can be run on multiple Linux distributions. It's currently built on Ubuntu 10.04, but it fails on Ubuntu 8.04 with the following error:
./test: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' not found (required by ./test)
./test: /usr/lib/libstdc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by ./test)
What's the preferred way to solve this problem? Is there a way to install an old glibc on a new box and build against it, or do I have to build on an old distribution? And if I build against an old glibc, will it work on a new glibc?
Or, alternatively, are there just some handy compiler flags or packages I could install to solve the problem?
The best solution I've found is to install a virtual machine running Debian stable, and build on that. Debian stable is old enough that any packages built with it will run on any other Debian-based distribution like Ubuntu. You may have to work around non-critical bugs that have been fixed in later versions of various software but not backported to Debian stable.
If you really want to make sure it runs on every recent distribution, you might also consider statically linking against a libC you select. However you may then still run into problems if you use features that are only provided by newer kernels (newer system calls e.g.).