I have 2 objects. I cut the head off the model and I want to add Einstein's head, but models are animated before. When the animation works, head and body is separating. I am using blender.
You can merge objects using Ctrl+J or searching "Join" in the "Space" key menu. After that, you can enter in Edit Mode, and manualy connect rthe neck and the head, or use "Bridge Loops"
But all the non-active objects will be "assimilated" into the active one, the new object will have the active objects name, animations and many other properties. So the joined objects will lost their own animations, and the head will move together with the body.
If you want to keep them together, but also move the head, you may parent the head to the body, and modify the head's animation to avoid separation, or use an armature.
Related
Think of an RPG game where you might need to present a list of buttons. A user might enter a room where they have to select from a series of options (buttons). Is there a type of container/panel that would show clickable buttons horizontally, but wrap if needed?
The best analogy I can think of to picture the situation is, Imagine needing to click on an item in a backpack, but each item is potentially a different width. (I can make them all the same height but the width then varies)
.---[My Backpack]------.
| aaa bbb cccc ddd |
| ee fff g |
| |
| |
`----------------------'
(The options come from a database, so its unknown at compile time how many options might be in a room, so I am going to need to programmatically add options.)
The very bottom of this godot document introduces custom container layouts, but it's unclear to me how this would work in practice
Flow container for Godot 3.5 or newer
Godot 3.5 (currently in beta) introduces HFlowContainer and VFlowContainer that will serve the propuse described.
The HFlowContainer will fill a row and when they overflow, it will add a new row and continue there. The VFlowContainer will work on a similar fashion but with columns.
Flow containers before Godot 3.5
For older versions of Godot you can use the HFlowContainer addon which you can find it in the asset library (here). Note that there is no VFlowContainer counterpart.
As everything on the asset library it is free and open source, so feel free to read the code and modify it, which can be serve as starting point if you want to make your own custom Container.
Making your own custom Container
The gist of making a custom Container is that it must position its children.
For that effect you react to NOTIFICATION_SORT_CHILDREN in the _notification method. You might also want to react to NOTIFICATION_RESIZED.
You can have a method - which I'll call layout - that you call when you get the notifications:
func _notification(what):
if what == NOTIFICATION_SORT_CHILDREN:
layout()
And also call layout from the setters (setget) of the properties that define how the Container must organize its children. To call layout from anywhere other than _notification, you might want to use call_deferred("layout") to prevent any possible re-layout loops from hanging or crashing the game.
The layout method would iterate over the visible children Controls and use get_combined_minimum_size to figure out their size.
Something like this:
func layout() -> void:
# …
for child in get_children():
var control := child as Control
if not is_instance_valid(control) or not control.visible:
continue
var size := control.get_combined_minimum_size()
# …
Then using that information compute the position and size for the children Controls. When there is room for the Controls to grow, you may want to split it among them according to their size_flags_stretch_ratio.
Once you have the position and size for a Control decided, use fit_child_in_rect to position them, which will take into account grow and size flags.
Thus - barring the simplest Containers - you will need to iterate over the children Controls twice. And for that you might find useful to have an auxiliary data structure to temporarily store them.
What should be the best UX for a situation where one set of record cannot exist without another.
Take a scenario in an application where a child can be connected to zero or more parents.
If a user of our application finds himself filling a form to create a child but the parent for the child does not exist yet, what is the best approach to creating the parent and then attaching that parent to the child.
Should the child be created without the parent, but updates can be done to add parent to child, note that this also has its own issues as the page where the addition will occur might also need to create the parent.
Have a link on the child page that says "create parent", and route back the user back to the child page after creating the parent.
Have a button bring up a modal that has the parent form and allow the user to create the parent before returning.
I don't like any one of these three options and I am hoping there are better approach out there.
Sorry for any typos or ambiguity, in bit of a rush, also not sure if this is the right place to ask the question.
Since the records are depending on each other I would make sure the user submits these together but make it look like 2 different elements on the same page.
You could use a tab-menu to switch between the child and parent but both should be filled in before submitting. Some inspiration even though you don't need to fill in multiple tabs here. Just make sure it's easy for the user to see that he needs to fill in both tabs.
Another option could be to have the child form collapse when finished/closed like a drop-down menu with an expand arrow button incase you want to edit it again. And the same with a parent box below it. Something that looks a little like this.
They could both be closed at the loading of the page so the user sees both boxes.
i am new to GWT and GWTP and the question sounds stupid.. Can I make an abstract PresenterWidget or similiar?
Like in normal Java extending the "class" and reuse / extend the logic. But not only the class, the whole thing of View and Presenter. I try to explain my initial situation and maybe you have another idea.
The image hopefully helps to explain it. The "Main-Tab" and every other tab consists of a collection of views which have the same base structure and the same logic.
the base structure consists of
border around EVERYTHING
an image (the wwitch)
a title
a textarea
a PresenterWidget which is added to a contentSlot of the parent (the menu left)
and below the base are view specific components like buttons, text or any other widget. So a main part of the view with logic is repeading. If the switch is "toggled" the view is hidden (the textarea and any childs / view specific components) like the lowest view in the picture. Furthermore the PresenterWidget left changes the color.
The logic is working, but now I am searching a proper way to solve this without repeading code and the possibility to add child elements which are hidden as well by toggling the switch. Can I add to a PresenterWidget child widgets and define where there should be added? like: Even if this is possible, it feels a bit inconvenient.
Thanks in advance.
I just want to post the solution:
I have now a simple Composite (KPICommonView) for the switch, title and the description. It got another FlowPanel below the description, where the specific components will be added later. For this the Composite implements "HasWidgets" and overrides the "add(Widget w)"-method which is called by UiBinder if the Widget is added and has child elements.
<own:KPICommonView title="First Header" description="I am a happy description :)" anchorToken="{nameAnchors.getFirst}">
<g:Label>child component</g:Label>
</own:KPICommonView>
I am not sure if I do a PresenterWidget for every segment and every PresenterWidget has one of the KPICommonView added, or if I do one normal Presenter which adds more than one of the CommonViews.
The CommonView furhter creates the PresenterWidget for the menu item on the side. It gets the attributes from the constructor (anchorToken, title) and adds it to the slot (which happens ugly, because the View has hard coded the parent saved to call "addInSlot()". The repeading code for the switch is handled by the KPICommonView.
I have a question regarding coded ui UIMap.
Every time I record an action on the same application, coded ui generates a new object for the same window in the application.
It looks like:
UIAdminWindow
UIAdminWindow1
UIAdminWindow2
and so on...
every window class holds different buttons, even though it's the same window.
Thus it's very hard to keep code maintenance.
What i would like is that every time i perform actions and records on a window, even if not at the same time, the already generated class for this window, will be updated with the new controls.
any suggestions to why it happens?
Thanks a lot!
You can clean up your UIMaps by doing two things:
Use the UIMap Toolbox (from codeplex) to move controls within the UIMap so they are all under one control tree.
When you have duplicate UI controls, go to the properties for the action that references the duplicate control and change the UI Control property to point to the original control in the UIMap.
The duplicate trees should now be unreferenced and you can delete it from your map, keeping things clean.
And yes, it's a pain to do, but it's worth it for maintainability.
In UIMap.uitest you can change the action name and the control name for better maintenance.
For example: you can set UIAdminWindow as FirstAcessWindow or other name that will express comfortably the control or the action.
What I can guess is that there is some randomly generated content or element identification data such as class or title that may be causing it. This may be caused by different username for example. Also you can update the element from UI map element tree.
I want to use the Watir to click a link that looks like a button attached the image.
I use the following method,but doesn't works:
#browser.div(:id,"NetworkAnalysisTabPanel").div(:index,1).div(:index,1).ul(:index,1).li(:index,1).link(:index,2).click
Note:
#browser.div(:id,"NetworkAnalysisTabPanel").div(:index,1).div(:index,1).ul(:index,1).li(:index,1).link(:index,2).flash
is working fine but click is not working in IE and FF
Link looks like this:
And HMTL like this:
Note: I am able to click on the element using selenium IDE with clickAt method
Try this (not tested):
browser.link(:class => "x-tab-strip-menu").click
If you can flash the link, but click does not do what you want, see this: How to find out which JavaScript events fired?
FYI what you have are links that are using standard background images controlled via CSS magic that keys on the class of the link to know what background to set. That's where the image comes from, and why you don't see it as part of the link in the HTML.
In that control, each tab is a list item element (li) in an unordered list (ul), and each list item has an ID, so that's the easiest way to tell it which tab you are trying to click inside.
Try identifying things starting with the LI that is the tab container, as within that container there is only one instance of each link of a given class. Of the 4 links, only one is without any kind of easy identifier, and if you need to click that one you'd need to use :index, but for the other 3 links using :class ought to work. This should result in code that is less brittle and subject to being broken if the order of tabs changes, or the page is refactored.
#browser.li(:id,"NetworkAnalysisTabPanel__ext-comp-1038").link(:class, "x-tab-strip-menu").click
If the number at the end of the ID is subject to change, you can try a regular expression to match the part you can predict and is unique from the others
#browser.li(:id,/NetworkAnalysisTabPanel__ext-comp-/).link(:class, "x-tab-strip-menu").click
If you can reliably identify the object and use .flash but .click does not seem to do anything, you may have to use .fire_event('onclick') instead or .click.
#browser.li(:id,/NetworkAnalysisTabPanel__ext-comp-/).link(:class, "x-tab-strip-menu").fire_event('onclick')
If that does not work, then you need to start experimenting with likely events that the control might be looking for (which will not necessarily show up in the HTML btw.. it may be in javascript or CSS etc)
UPDATE
This is where having an live example of the control that we can interact with is critical. doing some googling on the class names I was able to find one here and that let me play with it a little, and what I discovered is that it is looking for onmousedown. so, on that site, this works
browser.li(:id, 'TabPanel1__ctl07').link(:class, 'x-tab-strip-menu').fire_event('onmousedown')
Now since those ID's may not be the best identifier, a bit more digging (using .text on the li that holds the tab parts) found me some text, which in a menu like that ought to be unique.. SO, we can change this to make things a bit more robust and clearer as to what tab I'm clicking on (this will also be less subject to breaking if the tabs change around.
browser.li(:text, 'Menu 1').link(:class, 'x-tab-strip-menu').fire_event('onmousedown')
Lastly, since the click is causing client side code to execute, you may need a brief pause (a one or two second sleep) to wait for that portion of the page to re-render etc.