Hey I want to create a custom header in windows phone that is send when I use the webbrowser1.navigate according to msdn http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc491275.aspx the function has an additionalHeaders argument but I cant get it to work in my app and keep getting a error saying that the webbrowser.navigate don't take 4 arguments. Hope there is something simple I'm doing wrong, or there is another way to add custom headers to the phone:WeBrowser.
You are using the wrong Navigate version, the one you linked is WPF-specific. Use this signature instead WebBrowser.Navigate.
Related
I am trying to get a specific header value from an HTTP request I made in Azure Logic Apps. The relevant logic looks like this:
What do I need to put into the 'value' field if I want to get one spefic header, say 'Set-Cookie'?
Thanks in advance.
This will work for you (as an example of getting Content-Type) ...
outputs('HTTP')['headers']?['Content-Type']
Variable
Result
You need to switch to Code View and write,
#triggerOutputs()?['headers']?['Set-Cookie'].
I was trying to do some simple authorization for ameritrade's developer platform. I was attempting.
According to the platform, the Endpoint I need to access is is:
https://auth.tdameritrade.com/auth?response_type=code&redirect_uri={uri}&client_id={client_id}}%40AMER.OAUTHAP
https://developer.tdameritrade.com/content/simple-auth-local-apps
When looking at the client_id, for the dev application, I was noticing that they may actually be referencing the Applications, Consumer Key instead? So i did just that, but when attempting to query the information, it returns: A third-party application may be attempting to make unauthorized access to your account. The reason why i think it is the consumer key, is listed at: https://developer.tdameritrade.com/content/getting-started
So I ended up doing something like:
from urllib.parse import urlencode, quote_plus
url = "https://auth.tdameritrade.com/auth?response_type=code&redirect_uri={uri}&client_id={client_id}}%40AMER.OAUTHAP".format(
uri=urlencode("http://localhost", quote_via=quote_plus),
client_id="JHBDFGJH45OOUDFHGJKSDBNG" #Sample
)
I dont think this is because I am currently in a different country currently, I think that something else is wrong here.
It doesnt follow through with it, but instead returns a 400 error with that information. Im not sure whats wrong though.
This happens when you copied the callback URI incorrectly. Imagine if this were a client application, and TD detected that the application is trying to send the user to a different URL than the app is configured with. If they send the callback request to that application, it will receive the token and gain full control over your account.
Have you double and triple checked that you're copying the callback URL correctly, protocol name, ports, and trailing slashes and everything? Also, consider using an API library instead of writing your own. You can find documentation about this specific error here.
I had this issue and I solved it using simply using http://127.0.0.1 on the call back URI of the App.
I then used below URL and it worked as expected.
https://auth.tdameritrade.com/auth?response_type=code&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2F127.0.0.1&client_id={MyConsumerKey}%40AMER.OAUTHAP
Just in case anyone is still having this problem, make sure the callback URI is spelled EXACTLY the same as you specified when creating the app. I was having this problem because I set the callback on the TD developer website to "https://localhost/" and used "https://localhost" in the URL instead (missing the slash at the end). As soon as I added the slash at the end, it worked.
I found out that the issue is caused by the way the callback URL is set. It have to be exactly the same as the callback URL you have typed in at the apps details on the TD developer API page. I tried several permutations and indeed to get the authorization to work both have to be the same. eg. https or http.. end with '/' or does not, it matters. There is also no need to URL encode it.
We work on a product that is a series of components that could be installed on different CMSs and provide different services. We take a CMS agnostic approach and try to use the same code in all the CMSs as much as possible (we try to avoid using CMS API as much as we can).
Some part of the code needs to work with the current URL for some redirections so we use Request.Url.ToString() that is something that has worked fine in other environments but in Kentico instead of returning the current page we always get a reference to CMSPages/PortalTemplate.aspx with a querystring parameter aliasPath that holds the real URL. In addition to that, requesting the Template page using a browser gives you a 404 error.
Example:
Real URL (this works fine on a browser):
(1) https://www.customer.com/Membership/Questionnaire?Id=7207f9f9-7354-df11-88d9-005056837252
Request.Url.ToString() (this gives you a 404 error on a browser):
(2) https://www.customer.com/CMSPages/PortalTemplate.aspx?Id=7207f9f9-7354-df11-88d9-005056837252&aliaspath=/Membership/Questionnaire
I've noticed that the 404 error is thrown explicitly by the template code when invoked directly. Please see below code from Page_Init method of PortalTemplate.aspx.cs:
var resolvedTemplatePage = URLHelper.ResolveUrl(URLHelper.PortalTemplatePage);
if (RequestContext.RawURL.StartsWithCSafe(resolvedTemplatePage, true))
{
// Deny direct access to this page
RequestHelper.Respond404();
}
base.OnInit(e);
So, if I comment the above code out my redirection works fine ((2) resolves to (1)). I know it is not an elegant solution but since I cannot / don't want to use Kentico API is the only workaround I could find.
Note that I know that using Kentico API will solve the issue since I'm sure I will find an API method that will return the actual page. I'm trying to avoid that as much as possible.
Questions: Am I breaking something? Is there a better way of achieving what I trying to accomplish? Can you think on any good reason I shouldn't do what I'm doing (security, usability, etc)?
This is kind of a very broad question so I was not able to find any useful information on Kentico docs.
I'm testing all this on Kentico v8.2.50 which is the version one of my customers currently have.
Thanks in advance.
It's not really recommended to edit the source files of Kentico, as you may start to run into issues with future upgrades and also start to see some unexpected behaviour.
If you want to get the original URL sent to the server before Kentico's routing has done its work, you can use Page.Request.RawUrl. Using your above example, RawUrl would return a value of /Membership/Questionnaire?Id=7207f9f9-7354-df11-88d9-005056837252, whereas Url will return a Uri with a value of https://www.customer.com/CMSPages/PortalTemplate.aspx?Id=7207f9f9-7354-df11-88d9-005056837252&aliaspath=/Membership/Questionnaire (as you stated).
This should avoid needing to use the Kentico API and also avoid having to change a file that pretty much every request goes through when using the portal engine.
If you need to get the full URL to redirect to, you can use something like this:
var redirectUrl = Request.Url.GetLeftPart(UriPartial.Authority) + Request.RawUrl;
I am trying to automate some simple updating of a Google spreadsheet and I'm using the gspread library to do so. One task that is critical and not currently supported by gspread is the ability to add comments to a specific cell (there's an open issue for this and even a gist solution but I was getting a 404 error when trying to use it).
I know that the Google Drive API (v3) supports adding comments as described here, but I'm having issues with authenticating and could use some help.
What I have/know:
I have already setup the OAuth 2.0 and registered for the API through Google, as well as have the client_secret.json in my directory, but my knowledge of web requests and responses is limited so going through the Drive API documentation hardly makes sense. I know in order to create the comments I will have to make use of anchors and specify the cell location using column/row numbers.
What I'm stuck on:
When using the Google API Explorer, I'm getting a 400 error with the message: The 'fields' parameter is required for this method. How can I make the POST request using my authentication? I think from there I'd be able to actually add the comments myself.
I'm getting a 400 error with the message: The 'fields' parameter is required for this method
The error is asking for a property which you want returned (these properties are listed in Drive API files resource).
You can just place ' * ' to indicate you want it to return a complete response. That's the quick fix.
I'm trying to Integrating Optimizely with Adobe Analytics. I have followed along with this guide: https://help.optimizely.com/Integrate_Other_Platforms/Integrating_Optimizely_with_Adobe_Analytics with no success.
The props(prop51) and evars(eVar51) that i'm choosing via the experiment integrations in Optimizely are never sent. I check via the wasp chrome add-on and via the Adobe account.
All other data (props & eVars) that we set manually are sent.
We are not using s_code.js but AppMeasurement.js version: 1.5.1. I don't know if we are using custom s variable. I guess not. So I have follow the guide and used:
window.optimizely.push("activateSiteCatalyst"); with no success.
I have also tried: window.optimizely.push(['activateSiteCatalyst', {"sVariable": s_c_il[0].account)}]); where s_c_il[0].account holds the account name, but with no success.
Tried following this guid as well: http://digitalinsightsworld.com/tag-manager/dtm/optimizely-implementation-check-list-adobe-sitecatalyst/
Does anyone have an idea of what is wrong? Or how to go forward?
Br,
Johan
I had the same problem... We're using AngularJS 1.4.x. The default value for sVariable is 's'. Generally stated, Optimizely expects window.s to be the omniture object. Angular abstracts this object to its own injectable item, and is therefore not a standard DOM/element off window. My quick hack was to set window.s = s from within the Omniture directive. I'm still working out the best location to do this assignment, but I can verify that I now see the custom eVar for Optimizely outgoing in our Omniture call (using Omnibug). Hope this helps!