I like my code formatted like this:
WithDataContext.Execute(
delegate(DataContext dataContext)
{
// code goes here.
});
ReSharper wants to auto-format it like this:
WithDataContext.Execute(
delegate(DataContext dataContext)
{
// code goes here.
});
What options do I need to tweak to get what I want?
ReSharper -> Options -> C# -> Formatting Style -> Braces Layout -> Anonymous method declaration
Set to "At next line (BSD style)"
ReSharper -> Options -> C# -> Formatting Style -> Other -> Align Multiline Constructs
Uncheck "Call Arguments" and you'll get what you're looking for.
There isn't an option to format quite like that that I can find, but take a look at ReSharper|Options: Languages|C#|Formatting Style|Braces Layout. It has a number of options like anonymous type format.
Related
How can I emphasize an impex macro if it is part of a string?
We can do something like this:
$prefix=alpha
$contentCatalog=$prefixContentCatalog
... and $contentCatalog will return "alphaContentCatalog".
Can I make the macro more explicit with something like:
$contentCatalog={$prefix}ContentCatalog
... so that I can immediately see that the macro is $prefix? Is there a syntax for this? (NOTE: The curly brace is just an example. This syntax/symbol doesn't exist for this purpose)
Another example: If I have something like below, it becomes confusing:
$prefix=electronics
$contentCatalog=$prefixContentCatalog
$contentCatalogFolderName=$contentCatalogFolder
But it can be easier to understand if it can be written as:
$prefix=electronics
$contentCatalog={$prefix}ContentCatalog
$contentCatalogFolderName={$contentCatalog}Folder
Hhmmm, unfortunately I don't think there is anything for this. I only see some workarounds like special naming for macro variables:
$_prefix_=electronics
$_contentCatalog_=$_prefix_ContentCatalog
$contentCatalogFolderName=$_contentCatalog_Folder
there is an alternate way to customize the micro via injecting property in local.properties and using ConfigPropertyImportProcessor.
UPDATE GenericItem[processor = de.hybris.platform.commerceservices.impex.impl.ConfigPropertyImportProcessor]; pk[unique = true]
$contentCatalog = $config-ly.br.content.catalog
$contentCV = catalogVersion(CatalogVersion.catalog(Catalog.id[default = $contentCatalog]), CatalogVersion.version[default = Staged])[default = $contentCatalog:Staged]
and entries should be added in local.properties.
ly.br.content.catalog=TestContentCatalog
Note:This is useful when we have multi-country.
is there something like if then else in Ruta available? I'd like to do something like:
if there's at least one term from catA, then label the document with "one"
else if there's at least one term from catB, then label the document with "two"
else label the document with "three".
All the best
Philipp
There is no language structure for if-then-else in UIMA Ruta (2.7.0).
You need to duplicate some parts of the rule in order to model the else part, e.g., something like the following:
Document{CONTAINS(CatA) -> One};
Document{-CONTAINS(CatA), CONTAINS(CatB) -> Two};
Document{-CONTAINS(CatA), -CONTAINS(CatB) -> Three};
You could also check if the previous rule has matched and depend on that.
How the rule should actually look like depends mainly on the type system and how you want to model the information (features?).
DISCLAIMER: I am a developer of UIMA Ruta
I think you are asking about If-else-if in Ruta. This is possible using "ONLYFIRST"
PACKAGE uima.ruta.example;
DECLARE CatA,CatB,CatC;
"CatA"->CatA;
"CatB"->CatB;
"CatC"->CatC;
DECLARE one,two,three;
ONLYFIRST Document{}{
Document{CONTAINS(CatA) -> one};
Document{CONTAINS(CatB) -> two};
Document{CONTAINS(CatC) -> three};
}
I need to update one field of a very large default record.
As the default may change I don't want to rebuild the entire record manually.
Now I have come across the following way of doing this, but I am not sure how it works:
unaggregate :: MyResult -> MyResult
unaggregate calc#MyResult{..} = calc{ the_defaults = the_override
`mappend` the_defaults }
where
the_override = create ("aggregation" := False)
I have tried searching for 'Haskell # operator' in Google but it does not return immediately useful information.
I saw somewhere calc#MyResult{..} does pattern matching on variables but I don't see what variable calc does for the MyResult record...
Also I have looked up mappend (and Monoids) and I am not sure how these work either...
Thank you for any help
The # symbol is called an "as-pattern". In the example above, you can use calc to mean the whole record. Usually you'd use it like this: calc#(MyResult someResult) -- so you can have both the whole thing and the pieces that you're matching. You can do the same thing with lists (myList#(myHead:myTail)) or tuples (myTuple#(myFst, mySnd). It's pretty handy!
MyResult{..} uses RecordWildcards. Which is a neat extension! BUT RecordWildcards doesn't help you update just one field of a record.
You can do this instead: calc { theFieldYouWantToUpdate = somethingNew }.
I have a lot of text like this:
(((((WORD1 Some text tokenA)))))
(((((WORD2 Some text tokenA)))))
(((((WORD3 Some text tokenB)))))
and etc.
I need match only "WORD№" blocks. I try some code like this:
ANY[5,5]{REGEXP("(") -> MARK(Begin)};
ANY[5,5]{REGEXP(")") -> MARK(End)};
Begin ANY+? {-> MARK(WordB)} tokenB;
but it marks all text from first Begin to first tokenA. How I can mark only WORDB ?
===========
I have a lot of text like this:
)))))WORD tokenA. A lot of text.
(((((
)))))WORD tokenB. A lot of text.
(((((
)))))WORD tokenC. A lot of text.
(((((
)))))WORD tokenA. A lot of text.
(((((
and etc, with a lot of different WORDs and a lot of different tokens. What I need? I need mark every WORD by its tag.
My code:
DECLARE Begin, End, tokenA, wordA;
ANY[5,5]{REGEXP(">") -> MARK(Begin)};
ANY[5,5]{REGEXP("<") -> MARK(End)};
W{REGEXP("tokena") -> MARK(tokenA)};
Begin ANY+? {-> MARK(wordA)} tokenA;
My bug:
http://postimg.org/image/9rudzlz7j/
==========================
Thank you, "and the ANY+? by a wildcard "#"" working like a charm for me!
for convenience in grouping couchdb functions
i created a file format that groups separate things together using yaml
it basically contains entries in the form of name.ext: |
followed by a intended block of code in the language fitting to .ext
for more pleasant editing i'd like to have vim use the correct syntax highlighters for them
edit
some code examples as requested
simple:
map.coffee: |
(doc) ->
for item in doc.items:
emit [doc.category, item], null
return
reduce: _count
more complex:
map.coffee: |
(doc) ->
emit doc.category, {items: 1, val: doc.value}
return
reduce.coffee: |
(keys, values, rereduce) ->
ret = {items: 0, val: 0}
for v in values
ret.items += doc.items
ret.val += doc.val
return ret
I believe that what you want it to make use of Vim's syntax regions (:help syn-region). But regions take delimiters as parameters.
You have a well defined start but not a defined end, maybe you could work your way around by establishing some conventions here like "2 empty new lines at the end".
There are similar answers that might give you a hint (including the docs) on how to implement a solution, like: Embedded syntax highligting in Vim
Also interesting and similar approach is this Vimtip: http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Different_syntax_highlighting_within_regions_of_a_file
You have to write your own syntax file, and define a syntax region for each of your entries. Inside that region, you can then syntax-include the corresponding language as defined by your ext. Read all the details at :help :syn-include.
If that sounds too complicated, check out my SyntaxRange plugin. It is based on the Vimtip mentioned by alfredodeza. With it, you can quickly assign a syntax to a range of lines, e.g. :11,42SyntaxInclude perl