Can anyone point me to a doc on how to get Subsonic's 2.2 scaffolding working in MVC 1. Or, does Subsonic's 2.2 scaffolding even work in MVC 1?
Love this software btw...Thanks Rob and others.
The scaffold stuff is a Server Control so in short - it won't work (MVC doesn't support controls).
That said you can use the MVC tooling to create what you need in short order...
Related
I am looking at the WinUI3 framework with native C++ support for desktop applications.I cannot see any MVVM support as in C#. Should I expect it will be never supported and go i.e. with MVP with some code behind, or I am missing something?I cannot find any sample.
When you are talking about automatic tooling for XAML than you have to wait until 2024 to use it with C++. This is the estimated timeline from MS as they first hebr yo push a reflection API into the C++2023 standard.
But the MVVM fundamentals are perfectly working. Just write it out by hand and enjoy a developer experience last seen in 2006.
You can do MVVM by implementing interfaces such as INotifyPropertyChanged manually. Check out this sample which showcases how to implement the interface.
The cppxaml library (part of the unpackaged NuGet package) has been providing some help with MVVM though it's very barebones compared to MVVM frameworks available for .NET apps.
I am developing asp.net mvc5 project and now I want to use text editor in the project so I have downloaded richtexteditor from nuget to the mvc project but I do not know how to use thisin the prohect .please help me to solve this problem
Ajax Control Toolkit can not be used in ASP.NET MVC projects, only non-MVC ASP.NET projects.
Our company is developing e-portal solutions for the government in Vietnam. We are using Liferay Community Edition. We are considering switching to Enterprise Edition.
From a programmer's perspective, is there something LP EE can do that LP CE cannot (performance, security, functionality, etc.)? We would like to hear from the experiences of programmers who have worked with both LP CE and EE before.
Thank you so much.
Linh
In addition to what the others already mentioned, Liferay EE is supported for ~5 years after release, while you won't get upgrades for major CE versions once the next release is out - so you need to upgrade less often. Support includes patches for problems that you discover (on a service level) as well as cumulative fixpacks, typically more often than on CE.
For clustering - especially for bigger clusters - there are some additional clustering options in EE that optimize the cluster communication in order to scale better.
Liferay Sync can synchronize multiple document libraries on EE, compared to a single document library in CE
Liferay Developer Studio, the commercial extension of eclipse, works with more application servers - especially the "big iron" servers while the CE/Open Source version Liferay IDE works with the open source appservers/servletcontainers.
Plus, you're supporting further development of the product directly.
That being said, however you decide, please get involved in the Liferay community and help to make the product even better
That is no prommical question, but I can say that EE get early bugfixes and EE is altogether robustly that CE.
Also, Liferay Portal EE has access to EE only marketplace applications, such as:
Kaleo Workflow Designer
Kaleo Workflow Forms
Auditing portlet
Reporting portlet
There may be more EE only applications but that is all I can think of right now.
I want to use entity framework 5.0 with sharepoint 2013. When I deploy a simple web part I get "entity framework 5 could not load file or assembly entityframework version 5.0" error.
Can I use entity framework with sharepoint 2013? If so what is the problem?
Thank you.
Note:I can use ef5 in web projects, in addition I have another machine setted up sp2010 and entity framework 4.0. They work fine.
on the package manifest add the entity framework to the safe controls, this will add the safe control in the web.config of the corresponding sharepoint web application.
I made a work around and use WCF services to connect database.
Was curious if it will work with MVC 1.0? Looks like the mvc powerpack works with MVC 3 and 4.
ServiceStack hasn't been tested with MVC v1.0 (and wont be supported). The recommended versions are MVC 3/4+. If you need something more lightweight than this, consider using servicestack on its own e.g. razor.servicestack.net.