React - fill datagrid with json fetch from node backend - TypeError null is not an object - node.js

I try to fill a React DataGrid with data from a JSON provided by node backend.
The backend code looks as follows:
app.get("/articles", (req, res) => {
res.json([
{
"title":"Test Article One",
"timestamp":"09-01-2023",
"text":"Test text one"
},
{
"title":"Test Article Two",
"timestamp":"10-01-2023",
"text":"Test text two"
},
{
"title":"Test Article Three",
"timestamp":"11-01-2023",
"text":"Test text three"
}])
})
The React code looks as follows:
const MemberPage = () => {
const [articles, setArticles] = useState([])
const [articleKeys, setArticleKeys] = useState([])
useEffect(() => {
fetch("http://localhost:3001/articles")
.then((res) => res.json())
.then((data) => {
setArticles(data)
setArticleKeys(Object.keys(data[0]))
})
})
return (
<div id="memberpage-main-container">
<DataGrid columns={articleKeys} rows={articles} />
</div>
)
}
I get the error message TypeError: null is not an object (evaluating 'measuringCell.getBoundingClientRect') in the browser console and the page wouldn't render. I first thought, it is because the DataGrid is rendered before the useEffect fetches the data which I've red in other answers, however, when I write:
const articleKeys = []
const articles = []
it works (I'm mean, it's an empty page then, but I don't get any errors). So, I would expect it not to be a problem when setting useState([]).
Any help is appreciated.

So, I've found a solution by switching from react-data-grid to #mui/x-data-grid.
The code now looks as follows:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react"
import { DataGrid } from "#mui/x-data-grid"
const MemberPage = () => {
const [articles, setArticles] = useState([])
const [articleKeys, setArticleKeys] = useState([])
function parseArticleKeys(keys) {
let tableColumns = []
for (let i = 0; i < keys.length; i++) {
tableColumns.push({field: keys[i], headerName: keys[i], width: 300})
}
return tableColumns
}
useEffect(() => {
fetch("http://localhost:3001/articles")
.then((res) => res.json())
.then((data) => {
setArticles(data)
setArticleKeys(Object.keys(data[0]))
})
})
return (
<div id="memberpage-news-container">
<DataGrid columns={parseArticleKeys(articleKeys)} rows={articles} />
</div>
)
}
export default MemberPage
I tried a similar thing with react-data-grid but couldn't get it to work. If someone has an idea to accomplish that with react-data-grid, it still might be helpful for others but I personally am ok with that solution.

Related

deal with boolean api in js

One of my api response with boolean(with the name: used), my logic is if the response is used will show red_light and green_light if not used.
const red_light = <div className="h-2.5 w-2.5 rounded-full bg-red-700 mr-2"></div>
const green_light = <div className="h-2.5 w-2.5 rounded-full bg-green-400 mr-2"></div>
function lighting(code) {
fetch(`API`)
.then((response) => {
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(
`This is an HTTP error: The status is ${response.status}`
);
}
return response.json();
})
.then((actualData) => {
return (actualData.used ? red_light : green_light)
})}
const MembershipLight = (code) => {
return (
lighting(code)
);
};
export default MembershipLight;
but the page gone blank, which part i am doing wrong?
i try to console.log with the actualData, it shows the whole part of the response including used with true/false, but when i console.log("actualData.used"), it shows undefined in the console.
actureData (from postman)
[
{
"used": true,
"create_date": "1644490502",
"update_date": "1666694655"
}
]
You should probably change approach and declare a used state to store the returned boolean value and use conditional rendering to adjust the class accordingly.
Also, as suggested by #KcH, if your response is an array, you should access the element with an index:
import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
const MembershipLight = (code) => {
const [used, setUsed] = useState(false);
const lighting = () => {
fetch(`API`)
.then((response) => {
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(
`This is an HTTP error: The status is ${response.status}`
);
}
return response.json();
})
.then((actualData) => {
if (actualData.length > 0) {
setUsed(actualData[0].used)
}
})
.catch((err) => console.log(err));
}
useEffect(() => {
lighting();
}, []);
return <div className={`h-2.5 w-2.5 rounded-full mr-2 ${used ? 'bg-red-700' : 'bg-green-400'}`}></div>;
};
export default MembershipLight;
Furthermore, you're not returning anything from your lighting function. You should return the result of the fetch. Currently, your MembershipLight returns undefined due to that.

Nodejs not sending data in Reactjs functional component

When you call it in http://localhost:9000/testApi, it works fine.
testAPI.js
const express = require('express');
var router = express.Router();
router.get("/",function(req,res){
res.send("API is working fine");
});
module.exports = router;
But Calling in ReactJS functional component leads to nothing
import React, {useState, useEffect} from 'react';
import TopicCard from './TopicCard.js'
import './HomePage.css'
function HomePage() {
const [apiResponse,setApiResponse] = useState('Loading..')
const url = "http://localhost:9000/"
useEffect(() => {
fetch(url).then(res => setApiResponse(res.data))
}, [])
return (
<>
<h1>Choose a topic to learn {apiResponse}</h1>
</>
);
Console.log gives this
Promise {}[[Prototype]]: Promise [[PromiseState]]: "rejected"
[[PromiseResult]]: SyntaxError: Unexpected token A in JSON at position
0
While the Class Component is working perfectly fine
import React, {Component} from 'react'
class Test extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { apiResponse: "" };
}
callAPI() {
fetch("http://localhost:9000/testAPI")
.then(res => res.text())
.then(res => this.setState({ apiResponse: res }));
}
componentWillMount() {
this.callAPI();
}
render()
{
return (
<div>
<p className="App-intro">;{this.state.apiResponse}</p>
</div>
);
}
}
export default Test
No differences are between functional and class-based components.
The Problem
You forgot to parse your response as a text in the fetch method.
The Solution
parse your data as a text and then store it on your state variable
useEffect(() => {
fetch(URL)
.then(res => res.text())
.then(res => setApiResponse(res))
.catch(err => console.warn(err))
}, [])
Note: don't forget to use catch method for your asynchronous fetch API.
Explanation
When your data (API call response) is in standard JSON format, you need to parse them with .json() method, and usually, a data property holds the whole response, but in your case (with a text as a response) it's not useful.
Are you confusing routes / end points with file names? testAPI.js is your file name. It's not your endpoint.
You call:
const url = "http://localhost:9000/testAPI"
useEffect(() => {
fetch(url).then(res => setApiResponse(res.data))
}, [])
But your endpoint is - a forward slash '/' i.e. the root (not ROUTE) :
router.get("/",function(req,res){
res.send("API is working fine");
});
Try changing to this:
const url = "http://localhost:9000/"
useEffect(() => {
fetch(url).then(res => setApiResponse(res.data))
}, [])
If you want to fetch const url = "http://localhost:9000/testAPI" from react then change the endpoint to:
const url = "http://localhost:9000/testAPI" else server won't know of it.

React 17.0.1 basic onChange is not updating values into state [duplicate]

I am trying to learn hooks and the useState method has made me confused. I am assigning an initial value to a state in the form of an array. The set method in useState is not working for me, both with and without the spread syntax.
I have made an API on another PC that I am calling and fetching the data which I want to set into the state.
Here is my code:
<div id="root"></div>
<script type="text/babel" defer>
// import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react";
// import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
const { useState, useEffect } = React; // web-browser variant
const StateSelector = () => {
const initialValue = [
{
category: "",
photo: "",
description: "",
id: 0,
name: "",
rating: 0
}
];
const [movies, setMovies] = useState(initialValue);
useEffect(() => {
(async function() {
try {
// const response = await fetch("http://192.168.1.164:5000/movies/display");
// const json = await response.json();
// const result = json.data.result;
const result = [
{
category: "cat1",
description: "desc1",
id: "1546514491119",
name: "randomname2",
photo: null,
rating: "3"
},
{
category: "cat2",
description: "desc1",
id: "1546837819818",
name: "randomname1",
rating: "5"
}
];
console.log("result =", result);
setMovies(result);
console.log("movies =", movies);
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
})();
}, []);
return <p>hello</p>;
};
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<StateSelector />, rootElement);
</script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/#babel/standalone#7/babel.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#17/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#17/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
Neither setMovies(result) nor setMovies(...result) works.
I expect the result variable to be pushed into the movies array.
Much like .setState() in class components created by extending React.Component or React.PureComponent, the state update using the updater provided by useState hook is also asynchronous, and will not be reflected immediately.
Also, the main issue here is not just the asynchronous nature but the fact that state values are used by functions based on their current closures, and state updates will reflect in the next re-render by which the existing closures are not affected, but new ones are created. Now in the current state, the values within hooks are obtained by existing closures, and when a re-render happens, the closures are updated based on whether the function is recreated again or not.
Even if you add a setTimeout the function, though the timeout will run after some time by which the re-render would have happened, the setTimeout will still use the value from its previous closure and not the updated one.
setMovies(result);
console.log(movies) // movies here will not be updated
If you want to perform an action on state update, you need to use the useEffect hook, much like using componentDidUpdate in class components since the setter returned by useState doesn't have a callback pattern
useEffect(() => {
// action on update of movies
}, [movies]);
As far as the syntax to update state is concerned, setMovies(result) will replace the previous movies value in the state with those available from the async request.
However, if you want to merge the response with the previously existing values, you must use the callback syntax of state updation along with the correct use of spread syntax like
setMovies(prevMovies => ([...prevMovies, ...result]));
Additional details to the previous answer:
While React's setState is asynchronous (both classes and hooks), and it's tempting to use that fact to explain the observed behavior, it is not the reason why it happens.
TLDR: The reason is a closure scope around an immutable const value.
Solutions:
read the value in render function (not inside nested functions):
useEffect(() => { setMovies(result) }, [])
console.log(movies)
add the variable into dependencies (and use the react-hooks/exhaustive-deps eslint rule):
useEffect(() => { setMovies(result) }, [])
useEffect(() => { console.log(movies) }, [movies])
use a temporary variable:
useEffect(() => {
const newMovies = result
console.log(newMovies)
setMovies(newMovies)
}, [])
use a mutable reference (if we don't need a state and only want to remember the value - updating a ref doesn't trigger re-render):
const moviesRef = useRef(initialValue)
useEffect(() => {
moviesRef.current = result
console.log(moviesRef.current)
}, [])
Explanation why it happens:
If async was the only reason, it would be possible to await setState().
However, both props and state are assumed to be unchanging during 1 render.
Treat this.state as if it were immutable.
With hooks, this assumption is enhanced by using constant values with the const keyword:
const [state, setState] = useState('initial')
The value might be different between 2 renders, but remains a constant inside the render itself and inside any closures (functions that live longer even after render is finished, e.g. useEffect, event handlers, inside any Promise or setTimeout).
Consider following fake, but synchronous, React-like implementation:
// sync implementation:
let internalState
let renderAgain
const setState = (updateFn) => {
internalState = updateFn(internalState)
renderAgain()
}
const useState = (defaultState) => {
if (!internalState) {
internalState = defaultState
}
return [internalState, setState]
}
const render = (component, node) => {
const {html, handleClick} = component()
node.innerHTML = html
renderAgain = () => render(component, node)
return handleClick
}
// test:
const MyComponent = () => {
const [x, setX] = useState(1)
console.log('in render:', x) // ✅
const handleClick = () => {
setX(current => current + 1)
console.log('in handler/effect/Promise/setTimeout:', x) // ❌ NOT updated
}
return {
html: `<button>${x}</button>`,
handleClick
}
}
const triggerClick = render(MyComponent, document.getElementById('root'))
triggerClick()
triggerClick()
triggerClick()
<div id="root"></div>
I know that there are already very good answers. But I want to give another idea how to solve the same issue, and access the latest 'movie' state, using my module react-useStateRef.
As you understand by using React state you can render the page every time the state change. But by using React ref, you can always get the latest values.
So the module react-useStateRef let you use state's and ref's together. It's backward compatible with React.useState, so you can just replace the import statement
const { useEffect } = React
import { useState } from 'react-usestateref'
const [movies, setMovies] = useState(initialValue);
useEffect(() => {
(async function() {
try {
const result = [
{
id: "1546514491119",
},
];
console.log("result =", result);
setMovies(result);
console.log("movies =", movies.current); // will give you the latest results
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
})();
}, []);
More information:
react-usestsateref
I just finished a rewrite with useReducer, following #kentcdobs article (ref below) which really gave me a solid result that suffers not one bit from these closure problems.
See: https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-to-use-react-context-effectively
I condensed his readable boilerplate to my preferred level of DRYness -- reading his sandbox implementation will show you how it actually works.
import React from 'react'
// ref: https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-to-use-react-context-effectively
const ApplicationDispatch = React.createContext()
const ApplicationContext = React.createContext()
function stateReducer(state, action) {
if (state.hasOwnProperty(action.type)) {
return { ...state, [action.type]: state[action.type] = action.newValue };
}
throw new Error(`Unhandled action type: ${action.type}`);
}
const initialState = {
keyCode: '',
testCode: '',
testMode: false,
phoneNumber: '',
resultCode: null,
mobileInfo: '',
configName: '',
appConfig: {},
};
function DispatchProvider({ children }) {
const [state, dispatch] = React.useReducer(stateReducer, initialState);
return (
<ApplicationDispatch.Provider value={dispatch}>
<ApplicationContext.Provider value={state}>
{children}
</ApplicationContext.Provider>
</ApplicationDispatch.Provider>
)
}
function useDispatchable(stateName) {
const context = React.useContext(ApplicationContext);
const dispatch = React.useContext(ApplicationDispatch);
return [context[stateName], newValue => dispatch({ type: stateName, newValue })];
}
function useKeyCode() { return useDispatchable('keyCode'); }
function useTestCode() { return useDispatchable('testCode'); }
function useTestMode() { return useDispatchable('testMode'); }
function usePhoneNumber() { return useDispatchable('phoneNumber'); }
function useResultCode() { return useDispatchable('resultCode'); }
function useMobileInfo() { return useDispatchable('mobileInfo'); }
function useConfigName() { return useDispatchable('configName'); }
function useAppConfig() { return useDispatchable('appConfig'); }
export {
DispatchProvider,
useKeyCode,
useTestCode,
useTestMode,
usePhoneNumber,
useResultCode,
useMobileInfo,
useConfigName,
useAppConfig,
}
With a usage similar to this:
import { useHistory } from "react-router-dom";
// https://react-bootstrap.github.io/components/alerts
import { Container, Row } from 'react-bootstrap';
import { useAppConfig, useKeyCode, usePhoneNumber } from '../../ApplicationDispatchProvider';
import { ControlSet } from '../../components/control-set';
import { keypadClass } from '../../utils/style-utils';
import { MaskedEntry } from '../../components/masked-entry';
import { Messaging } from '../../components/messaging';
import { SimpleKeypad, HandleKeyPress, ALT_ID } from '../../components/simple-keypad';
export const AltIdPage = () => {
const history = useHistory();
const [keyCode, setKeyCode] = useKeyCode();
const [phoneNumber, setPhoneNumber] = usePhoneNumber();
const [appConfig, setAppConfig] = useAppConfig();
const keyPressed = btn => {
const maxLen = appConfig.phoneNumberEntry.entryLen;
const newValue = HandleKeyPress(btn, phoneNumber).slice(0, maxLen);
setPhoneNumber(newValue);
}
const doSubmit = () => {
history.push('s');
}
const disableBtns = phoneNumber.length < appConfig.phoneNumberEntry.entryLen;
return (
<Container fluid className="text-center">
<Row>
<Messaging {...{ msgColors: appConfig.pageColors, msgLines: appConfig.entryMsgs.altIdMsgs }} />
</Row>
<Row>
<MaskedEntry {...{ ...appConfig.phoneNumberEntry, entryColors: appConfig.pageColors, entryLine: phoneNumber }} />
</Row>
<Row>
<SimpleKeypad {...{ keyboardName: ALT_ID, themeName: appConfig.keyTheme, keyPressed, styleClass: keypadClass }} />
</Row>
<Row>
<ControlSet {...{ btnColors: appConfig.buttonColors, disabled: disableBtns, btns: [{ text: 'Submit', click: doSubmit }] }} />
</Row>
</Container>
);
};
AltIdPage.propTypes = {};
Now everything persists smoothly everywhere across all my pages
React's useEffect has its own state/lifecycle. It's related to mutation of state, and it will not update the state until the effect is destroyed.
Just pass a single argument in parameters state or leave it a black array and it will work perfectly.
React.useEffect(() => {
console.log("effect");
(async () => {
try {
let result = await fetch("/query/countries");
const res = await result.json();
let result1 = await fetch("/query/projects");
const res1 = await result1.json();
let result11 = await fetch("/query/regions");
const res11 = await result11.json();
setData({
countries: res,
projects: res1,
regions: res11
});
} catch {}
})(data)
}, [setData])
# or use this
useEffect(() => {
(async () => {
try {
await Promise.all([
fetch("/query/countries").then((response) => response.json()),
fetch("/query/projects").then((response) => response.json()),
fetch("/query/regions").then((response) => response.json())
]).then(([country, project, region]) => {
// console.log(country, project, region);
setData({
countries: country,
projects: project,
regions: region
});
})
} catch {
console.log("data fetch error")
}
})()
}, [setData]);
Alternatively, you can try React.useRef() for instant change in the React hook.
const movies = React.useRef(null);
useEffect(() => {
movies.current='values';
console.log(movies.current)
}, [])
The closure is not the only reason.
Based on the source code of useState (simplified below). Seems to me the value is never assigned right away.
What happens is that an update action is queued when you invoke setValue. And after the schedule kicks in and only when you get to the next render, these update action then is applied to that state.
Which means even we don't have closure issue, react version of useState is not going to give you the new value right away. The new value doesn't even exist until next render.
function useState(initialState) {
let hook;
...
let baseState = hook.memoizedState;
if (hook.queue.pending) {
let firstUpdate = hook.queue.pending.next;
do {
const action = firstUpdate.action;
baseState = action(baseState); // setValue HERE
firstUpdate = firstUpdate.next;
} while (firstUpdate !== hook.queue.pending);
hook.queue.pending = null;
}
hook.memoizedState = baseState;
return [baseState, dispatchAction.bind(null, hook.queue)];
}
function dispatchAction(queue, action) {
const update = {
action,
next: null
};
if (queue.pending === null) {
update.next = update;
} else {
update.next = queue.pending.next;
queue.pending.next = update;
}
queue.pending = update;
isMount = false;
workInProgressHook = fiber.memoizedState;
schedule();
}
There's also an article explaining the above in the similar way, https://dev.to/adamklein/we-don-t-know-how-react-state-hook-works-1lp8
I too was stuck with the same problem. As other answers above have clarified the error here, which is that useState is asynchronous and you are trying to use the value just after setState. It is not updating on the console.log() part because of the asynchronous nature of setState, it lets your further code to execute, while the value updating happens on the background. Thus you are getting the previous value. When the setState is completed on the background it will update the value and you will have access to that value on the next render.
If anyone is interested to understand this in detail. Here is a really good Conference talk on the topic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aGhZQkoFbQ
I found this to be good. Instead of defining state (approach 1) as, example,
const initialValue = 1;
const [state,setState] = useState(initialValue)
Try this approach (approach 2),
const [state = initialValue,setState] = useState()
This resolved the rerender issue without using useEffect since we are not concerned with its internal closure approach with this case.
P.S.: If you are concerned with using old state for any use case then useState with useEffect needs to be used since it will need to have that state, so approach 1 shall be used in this situation.
If we have to update state only, then a better way can be if we use the push method to do so.
Here is my code. I want to store URLs from Firebase in state.
const [imageUrl, setImageUrl] = useState([]);
const [reload, setReload] = useState(0);
useEffect(() => {
if (reload === 4) {
downloadUrl1();
}
}, [reload]);
const downloadUrl = async () => {
setImages([]);
try {
for (let i = 0; i < images.length; i++) {
let url = await storage().ref(urls[i].path).getDownloadURL();
imageUrl.push(url);
setImageUrl([...imageUrl]);
console.log(url, 'check', urls.length, 'length', imageUrl.length);
}
}
catch (e) {
console.log(e);
}
};
const handleSubmit = async () => {
setReload(4);
await downloadUrl();
console.log(imageUrl);
console.log('post submitted');
};
This code works to put URLs in state as an array. This might also work for you.
With custom hooks from my library, you can wait for the state values to update:
useAsyncWatcher(...values):watcherFn(peekPrevValue: boolean)=>Promise - is a promise wrapper around useEffect that can wait for updates and return a new value and possibly a previous one if the optional peekPrevValue argument is set to true.
(Live Demo)
import React, { useState, useEffect, useCallback } from "react";
import { useAsyncWatcher } from "use-async-effect2";
function TestComponent(props) {
const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);
const [text, setText] = useState("");
const textWatcher = useAsyncWatcher(text);
useEffect(() => {
setText(`Counter: ${counter}`);
}, [counter]);
const inc = useCallback(() => {
(async () => {
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 1000));
setCounter((counter) => counter + 1);
const updatedText = await textWatcher();
console.log(updatedText);
})();
}, []);
return (
<div className="component">
<div className="caption">useAsyncEffect demo</div>
<div>{counter}</div>
<button onClick={inc}>Inc counter</button>
</div>
);
}
export default TestComponent;
useAsyncDeepState is a deep state implementation (similar to this.setState (patchObject)) whose setter can return a promise synchronized with the internal effect. If the setter is called with no arguments, it does not change the state values, but simply subscribes to state updates. In this case, you can get the state value from anywhere inside your component, since function closures are no longer a hindrance.
(Live Demo)
import React, { useCallback, useEffect } from "react";
import { useAsyncDeepState } from "use-async-effect2";
function TestComponent(props) {
const [state, setState] = useAsyncDeepState({
counter: 0,
computedCounter: 0
});
useEffect(() => {
setState(({ counter }) => ({
computedCounter: counter * 2
}));
}, [state.counter]);
const inc = useCallback(() => {
(async () => {
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 1000));
await setState(({ counter }) => ({ counter: counter + 1 }));
console.log("computedCounter=", state.computedCounter);
})();
});
return (
<div className="component">
<div className="caption">useAsyncDeepState demo</div>
<div>state.counter : {state.counter}</div>
<div>state.computedCounter : {state.computedCounter}</div>
<button onClick={() => inc()}>Inc counter</button>
</div>
);
}
var [state,setState]=useState(defaultValue)
useEffect(()=>{
var updatedState
setState(currentState=>{ // Do not change the state by get the updated state
updateState=currentState
return currentState
})
alert(updateState) // the current state.
})
Without any addtional NPM package
//...
const BackendPageListing = () => {
const [ myData, setMyData] = useState( {
id: 1,
content: "abc"
})
const myFunction = ( x ) => {
setPagenateInfo({
...myData,
content: x
})
console.log(myData) // not reflecting change immediately
let myDataNew = {...myData, content: x };
console.log(myDataNew) // Reflecting change immediately
}
return (
<>
<button onClick={()=>{ myFunction("New Content")} }>Update MyData</button>
</>
)
Not saying to do this, but it isn't hard to do what the OP asked without useEffect.
Use a promise to resolve the new state in the body of the setter function:
const getState = <T>(
setState: React.Dispatch<React.SetStateAction<T>>
): Promise<T> => {
return new Promise((resolve) => {
setState((currentState: T) => {
resolve(currentState);
return currentState;
});
});
};
And this is how you use it (example shows the comparison between count and outOfSyncCount/syncCount in the UI rendering):
const App: React.FC = () => {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
const [outOfSyncCount, setOutOfSyncCount] = useState(0);
const [syncCount, setSyncCount] = useState(0);
const handleOnClick = async () => {
setCount(count + 1);
// Doesn't work
setOutOfSyncCount(count);
// Works
const newCount = await getState(setCount);
setSyncCount(newCount);
};
return (
<>
<h2>Count = {count}</h2>
<h2>Synced count = {syncCount}</h2>
<h2>Out of sync count = {outOfSyncCount}</h2>
<button onClick={handleOnClick}>Increment</button>
</>
);
};
Use the Background Timer library. It solved my problem.
const timeoutId = BackgroundTimer.setTimeout(() => {
// This will be executed once after 1 seconds
// even when the application is the background
console.log('tac');
}, 1000);
// replace
return <p>hello</p>;
// with
return <p>{JSON.stringify(movies)}</p>;
Now you should see, that your code actually does work. What does not work is the console.log(movies). This is because movies points to the old state. If you move your console.log(movies) outside of useEffect, right above the return, you will see the updated movies object.

Converting React Functional Component to Hook

While trying to learn full stack development I was trying out this tutorial ( https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/create-a-react-frontend-a-node-express-backend-and-connect-them-together-c5798926047c/ ) on a React-Express-Node basic app. However, it was written using functional components instead of hooks. I'm trying to convert this section to a hook:
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { apiResponse: "" };
}
callAPI() {
fetch("http://localhost:9000/testAPI")
.then(res => res.text())
.then(res => this.setState({ apiResponse: res }));
}
componentWillMount() {
this.callAPI();
}
with this in the render section:
<p className="App-intro">;{this.state.apiResponse}</p>
I tried this:
const [apiResponse, setApiResponse] = useState();
useEffect(() => {
const fetchApiResponse = async () => {
const result = await (
'http://localhost:9000/testAPI'
);
setApiResponse(result);
console.log("apiResponse " + apiResponse);
};
fetchApiResponse();
});
but the console.log of the apiResponse always shows as undefined. I know I must be doing something wrong but I can't figure it out.
You aren't far off in your attempt.
There are two problems:
Problem 1.
In order to get the same effect as componentWillMount (side note - this is a deprecated method, use componentDidMount or the constructor) you need to tell the useEffect to only run once on mount. To do this you give it an empty array of dependencies.
useEffect(() => {
// do stuff
}, []); // empty array as second argument
By not giving a second argument, the effect will run every single render.
Problem 2.
State updates are asynchronous. This means you cannot console log apiResponse immediately after updating it and expect it to contain the new value.
To get around this, just console.log inside the function body outside of the hook.
Here is a simplified example:
const {useState, useEffect} = React;
const Example = () => {
const [apiResponse, setApiResponse] = useState();
useEffect(() => {
const fetchApiResponse = () => {
const result = 'test';
setApiResponse(result);
// Will not be updated
console.log("wrong: apiResponse ", apiResponse);
}
fetchApiResponse();
}, []);
// Will be updated
console.log("right: apiResponse ", apiResponse);
return <span />
}
ReactDOM.render(<Example />, document.getElementById('root'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.4/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.4/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>

How to fetch (Express) data ONLY once the (React) form-submitted data has been successfully received and served?

I'm currently building a league of legends (a MOBA or multiplayer online battle arena game) search-based web app that essentially allows the user to search for their summoner's name and obtain general information regarding their search input. (The data is provided by the game's own third-party api)
I've been able to successfully retrieve the form data and perform the intended backend processes, however, upon the client's initial render, my results-listing component is already trying to fetch the nonexistent processed data.
How do I prevent the server request from firing until the server has actually successfully served the data?
(abridged single-component client example)
the summoner data endpoint is set to http://localhost:3001/api/summoner
server does not contain any additional routes
const App = () => {
const [summName, setSummName] = useState('');
const summonerFormData = new FormData();
// let data;
const findSummoner = () => {
summonerFormData.set('summonerName', summName);
}
// problem here
const data = axios.get('http://localhost:3001/api/summoner');
// axios.get('http://localhost:3001/api/summoner')
// .then(res => {
// data = res;
// });
return (
<div>
<form
method="POST"
action="http://localhost:3001/api/summoner"
onSubmit={findSummoner}
>
<input
value={summName}
name="summName"
onChange={e => setSummName(e.target.value)}
/>
<button type="submit">submit</button>
</form>
{data !== undefined &&
<div className="results">
data.map(match => {
<div>
<p>{match.kills}</p>
<p>{match.deaths}</p>
<p>{match.assists}</p>
</div>
})
</div>
}
</div>
)
}
Here's the Repo for some more context, but please don't hesitate to ask if you need more information or have any questions at all!
I really appreciate any help I can get!
Thanks!
Edits:
I've also tried using the useEffect hook considering the lifecycle point I'm trying to fetch would be componentDidMount, but wasn't quite sure what the solution was. Doing more research atm!
Close, but no cigar. Request gets stuck at 'pending'.
let data;
const fetchData = () => {
axios.get('http://localhost:3001/api/summoner');
};
useEffect(() => {
if (summName !== '') {
fetchData();
}
}, summName);
I tried putting the axios request within an async function and awaiting on the request to respond, and it seems to be working, however, the server is still receiving undefined when the client starts, which then is attempting to be fetched, never allowing the promise to be fulfilled.
const fetchData = async () => {
await axios
.get('http://localhost:3001/api/summoner')
.then(res => {
data = res;
})
.catch(() => {
console.log('error');
});
};
useEffect(() => {
fetchData();
}, [])
So I took the advice and recommendations from #imjared and #HS and I'm literally so close..
I just have one more problem... My data-mapping component is trying to map non-existent data before actually receiving it, giving me an error that it's unable to map match of undefined..
const [modalStatus, setModalStatus] = useState(false);
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const [data, setData] = useState({ hits: [] });
const [summName, setSummName] = useState('');
const [summQuery, setSummQuery] = useState('');
const summonerFormData = new FormData();
const prepareResults = async () => {
await setSummQuery(summName);
};
const findSummoner = async () => {
setLoading(true);
setModalStatus(false);
await summonerFormData.set('summonerName', summQuery);
};
useEffect(() => {
const fetchData = async () => {
if (summQuery) {
setData({ hits: [] });
console.log('fetching');
await axios
.get('http://localhost:3001/api/summoner')
.then(res => {
setData(res.data);
setLoading(false);
setModalStatus(true);
return data;
})
.catch(error => {
console.log(error);
});
}
};
fetchData();
}, [summQuery]);
SUCCESS! Thank you guys! Here's what ended up working for me:
const findSummoner = async () => {
setSummQuery(summName);
};
useEffect(() => {
setData({ hits: [] });
summonerFormData.set('summonerName', summQuery);
const fetchData = async () => {
setModalStatus(false);
setLoading(true);
if (summQuery !== '') {
setLoading(true);
console.log('fetching');
await axios
.get('/api/summoner')
.then(res => {
setData({
hits: res.data,
});
setError(false);
setLoading(false);
setModalStatus(true);
return data;
})
.catch(() => {
setError(true);
console.log('error');
});
}
};
if (summQuery !== '') {
fetchData();
}
}, [summQuery]);
This flow will help you design better -
1. User - input
2. Hit - search
3. Set loading in state - true,
5. Set data in state - empty
6. Call api
7. Get data
8. Then, set data in state
6. Set loading in state - false
Along the side in the render/return -
1. if loading in the state - indicate loading.
2. if loading done( false ) and data is not empty - show data.
3. if loading done and data is empty - indicate 'not-found'.
Coming to the initial render part - the axios.get() calls the api, which should only be initiated once the form is submitted in the case. Therefore, that logic should be moved inside the event-handler.

Resources