I am trying to get all folders for a SharePoint list using below REST api
_api/web/lists/getbytitle(<list_name)/items?$filter=FSObjType eq 1&$select=ID,FileLeafRef,FileRef
the return JSON contains duplicate ID property with same value:
{
"value": [
{
"Id": 6,
"FileLeafRef": "Folder 1",
"ID": 6,
"FileRef": "/sites/abc/pqr/Folder 1"
},
{
"Id": 16,
"FileLeafRef": "Folder 2",
"ID": 16,
"FileRef": "/sites/abc/pqr/Folder 2"
}
]
}
I want to parse this JSON in power automate where i am getting error due to duplicate ID property
Thanks
Any help appreciated.
Related
I have the below response payload and I just want to check the amount == 1000 if it's matching then I just want to get the entire column as output.
Sample Input:
{
"sqlQuery": "select SET_UNIQUE, amt as AMOUNT from transactionTable where SET_USER_ID=11651 ",
"message": "2 rows selected",
"row": [
{
"column": [
{
"value": "22621264",
"name": "SET_UNIQUE"
},
{
"value": "1000",
"name": "AMOUNT"
}
]
},
{
"column": [
{
"value": "226064213",
"name": "SET_UNIQUE"
},
{
"value": "916",
"name": "AMOUNT"
}
]
}
]
}
Expected Output:
"column": [
{
"value": "22621264",
"name": "SET_UNIQUE"
},
{
"value": "1000",
"name": "AMOUNT"
}
]
The above sample I just want to fetch the entire column if the AMOUNT value will be 1000.
I just tried below to achieve this but no luck.
1. row[*].column[?(#.value==1000)].column
2. row[*].column[?(#.value==1000)]
I don't want to do this by using index. Because It will be change.
Any ideas please?
I think you'd need nested expressions, which isn't something that's widely supported. Something like
$.row[?(#.column[?(#.value==1000)])]
The inner expression returns matches for value==1000, then the outer expression checks for existence of those matches.
Another alternative that might work is
$.row[?(#.column[*].value==1000)]
but this assumes some implicit type conversions that may or may not be supported.
I have a huge text file with blockchain data that I'd like to parse so that I can get the info from the fields I need. I have tried to convert it to json but it says is invalid. After doing some thought, I've realised it is not the best way since I only want 2 or 3 fields. Can someone help me to find the best way of extracting data from the file? There's an example below. I would only want txid size, and hash.
{
"txid": "254d5cc8d2b1889a2cb45f7e3dca8ed53a3fcfa32e8b9eac5f68c4f09e7af7bd",
"hash": "a8e125eb6d7ab883177d8ab228a3d09c1733d1ca49b7b2dff4b057eeb80ff9be",
"version": 2,
"size": 171,
"vsize": 144,
"weight": 576,
"locktime": 0,
"vin": [
{
"coinbase": "02ee170101",
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
"vout": [
{
"value": 12.00000000,
"n": 0,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "OP_HASH160 cd5b833dd43bc60b8c28c4065af670f283a203ff OP_EQUAL",
"hex": "a914cd5b833dd43bc60b8c28c4065af670f283a203ff87",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "scripthash",
"addresses": [
"2NBy4928yJakYBFQuXxXBwXjsLCRWgzyiGm"
]
}
},
{
"value": 5.00000000,
"n": 1,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "OP_HASH160 cd5b833dd43bc60b8c28c4065af670f283a203ff OP_EQUAL",
"hex": "a914cd5b833dd43bc60b8c28c4065af670f283a203ff87",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "scripthash",
"addresses": [
"2NBy4928yJakYBFQuXxXBwXjsLCRWgzyiGm"
]
}
}
],
"hex":
"020000000001010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
ffffffff0502ee170101ffffffff02000000000000000017a914cd5b833dd43bc60b8c28c4065af670f283a
203ff870000000000000000266a24aa21a9ede2f61c3f71d1defd3fa999dfa36953755c69068979996
2b48bebd836974e8cf9012000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000",
"blockhash": "0f84abb78891a4b9e8bc9637ec5fb8b4962c7fe46092fae99e9d69373bf7812a",
"confirmations": 1,
"time": 1590830080,
"blocktime": 1590830080
}
Thank you
#andrewjames is correct. If you have no control over the JSON file, you can address the error by just removing the newline characters:
parsed = json.loads(jsonText.replace("\n", ""))
Then you can access the fields you want like a normal dictionary:
print(parsed['txid'])
[updated 17:15 on 28/09]
I'm manipulating json data of type:
[
{
"id": 1,
"title": "Sun",
"seeAlso": [
{
"id": 2,
"title": "Rain"
},
{
"id": 3,
"title": "Cloud"
}
]
},
{
"id": 2,
"title": "Rain",
"seeAlso": [
{
"id": 3,
"title": "Cloud"
}
]
},
{
"id": 3,
"title": "Cloud",
"seeAlso": [
{
"id": 1,
"title": "Sun"
}
]
},
];
After inclusion in the database, a node.js search using
db.documents.query(
q.where(
q.collection('test films'),
q.value('title','Sun')
).withOptions({categories: 'none'})
)
.result( function(results) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(results, null,2));
});
will return both the film titled 'Sun' and the films which have a seeAlso/title property (forgive the xpath syntax) = 'Sun'.
I need to find 1/ films with title = 'Sun' 2/ films with seeAlso/title = 'Sun'.
I tried a container query using q.scope() with no success; I don't find how to scope the root object node (first case) and for the second case,
q.where(q.scope(q.property('seeAlso'), q.value('title','Sun')))
returns as first result an item which matches all text inside the root object node
{
"index": 1,
"uri": "/1.json",
"path": "fn:doc(\"/1.json\")",
"score": 137216,
"confidence": 0.6202662,
"fitness": 0.6701325,
"href": "/v1/documents?uri=%2F1.json&database=Documents",
"mimetype": "application/json",
"format": "json",
"matches": [
{
"path": "fn:doc(\"/1.json\")/object-node()",
"match-text": [
"Sun Rain Cloud"
]
}
]
},
which seems crazy.
Any idea about how doing such searches on denormalized json data?
Laurent:
XPaths on JSON are supported by MarkLogic.
In particular, you might consider setting up a path range index to match /title at the root:
http://docs.marklogic.com/guide/admin/range_index#id_54948
Scoped property matching required either filtering or indexed positions to be accurate. An alternative is to set up another path range index on /seeAlso/title
For the match issue it would be useful to know the MarkLogic version and to see the entire query.
Hoping that helps,
Hi i'm on a project and want to use Flickr for my image galery, i'm using the photosets.* method but whenever i make a request i don't get images, i only get info.
Json Result:
{
"photoset": {
"id": "77846574839405047",
"primary": "88575847594",
"owner": "998850450#N03",
"ownername": "mr.barde",
"photo": [
{
"id": "16852316982",
"secret": "857fur848c",
"server": "8568",
"farm": 9,
"title": "wallpaper-lenovo-blue-pc-brand",
"isprimary": "1",
"ispublic": 1,
"isfriend": 0,
"isfamily": 0
},
{
"id": "16665875068",
"secret": "857fur848c",
"server": "7619",
"farm": 8,
"title": "white_horses-1280x720",
"isprimary": "0",
"ispublic": 1,
"isfriend": 0,
"isfamily": 0
}
],
"page": 1,
"per_page": "2",
"perpage": "2",
"pages": 3,
"total": "6",
"title": "My First Album"
},
"stat": "ok"
}
Please would like to have actual image URLs returned, how can i do this.
Thanks to the comment by #CBroe
I found this in the Flickr API doc.
You can construct the source URL to a photo once you know its ID, server ID, farm ID and secret, as returned by many API methods.
https://farm{farm-id}.staticflickr.com/{server-id}/{id}_{secret}.jpg
or
https://farm{farm-id}.staticflickr.com/{server-id}/{id}_{secret}_[mstzb].jpg
or
https://farm{farm-id}.staticflickr.com/{server-id}/{id}_{o-secret}_o.(jpg|gif|png)
The final result would then look something like this.
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/2/1418878_1e92283336_m.jpg
Reference: https://www.flickr.com/services/api/misc.urls.html
I'm attempting a fairly basic task in arangodb, using the SUM() aggregate function.
Here is a working query which returns the right data (though not yet aggregated):
FOR m IN pkg_spp_RegMem
FILTER m.memberId == "40289"
COLLECT member = m.memberId INTO g
RETURN { "memberId" : member, "amount" : g[*].m[*].items }
This returns the following results:
[
{
"memberId": "40289",
"amount": [
[
{
"amount": 50,
"description": "some description"
}
],
[
{
"amount": 50,
"description": "some description"
},
{
"amount": 500,
"description": "some description"
},
{
"amount": 0,
"description": "some description"
}
],
[
{
"amount": 0,
"description": "some description"
},
]
]
}
]
I am using Collect to group the results because a given memberId may have multiple'RegMem' objects. As you can see from the query/results, each object has a list of smaller objects called 'items', with each item having an amount and a description.
I want to SUM() the amounts by member. However, adjusting the query like this does not work:
FOR m IN pkg_spp_RegMem
FILTER m.memberId == "40289"
COLLECT member = m.memberId INTO g
RETURN { "memberId" : member, "amount" : SUM(g[*].m[*].items[*].amount) }
It returns 0 because it apparently can't find a field in the expanded items list called amount.
Looking at the results I can sort of understand why: the results are being returned such that items is actually a list, of lists of objects with amount/description. But I don't understand how to reference or expand the un-named list correctly to return the amount field values for the SUM() function.
Ideally the query should return the memberId and total amount, one row per member such that I can remove the filter and execute for all members.
Many thanks in advance if you can help!
Martin
PS I've worked through the AQL tutorial on the arangodb website and checked out the manual but what would really help me is loads more example queries to look through. If anyone knows of a resource like that or wants to share some of their own, 'much obliged. Cheers!
Edited: Misread the question the first time. The first one can be seen in theedit history, as it also contains some hints:
I replicated your data by creating some documents in this format (and some with only one item):
{
"memberId": "40289",
"items": [
{
"amount": 50,
"description": "some description"
},
{
"amount": 500,
"description": "some description"
}
]
}
Based on some of those types of documents, your non-summarized query should indeed be looking like this:
FOR m IN pkg_spp_RegMem
FILTER m.memberId == "40289"
COLLECT member = m.memberId INTO g
RETURN { "memberId" : member, "amount" : g[*].m[*].items }
The data returned:
[
{
"memberId": "40289",
"amount": [
[
{
"amount": 50,
"description": "some description"
},
{
"amount": 0,
"description": "some description"
}
],
[
{
"amount": 50,
"description": "some description"
},
{
"amount": 0,
"description": "some description"
}
],
[
{
"amount": 50,
"description": "some description"
}
],
[
{
"amount": 50,
"description": "some description"
},
{
"amount": 500,
"description": "some description"
}
],
[
{
"amount": 0,
"description": "some description"
}
],
[
{
"amount": 50,
"description": "some description"
},
{
"amount": 500,
"description": "some description"
}
]
]
}
]
Based on the non summarized version, you need to loop through the items of the groups that have been generated by the collect function and do your SUM() there.
In order to be able to SUM the items you must FLATTEN() them into a single list, before summarizing them.
FOR m IN pkg_spp_RegMem
FILTER m.memberId == "40289"
COLLECT member = m.memberId INTO g
RETURN { "memberId" : member, "amount" : SUM(
FLATTEN(
(
FOR r in g[*].m[*].items
RETURN r[*].amount
)
)
)
}
This results in:
[
{
"memberId": "40289",
"amount": 1250
}
]