Compiling OpenHMD drivers on Fedora Linux [closed] - linux

Closed. This question is not about programming or software development. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 3 days ago.
Improve this question
Like the title says I'm trying to install OpenHMD drivers.
I get through the build process but after running the install command I only get this output:
[0/1] Installing files.
Installing subprojects/hidapi/libhidapi.so to /usr/local/lib64
Installing libopenhmd.so.0.1.0 to /usr/local/lib64
Installing /home/rackneh/Documents/GitHub/OpenHMD/include/openhmd.h to /usr/local/include/openhmd
Installing /home/rackneh/Documents/GitHub/OpenHMD/build/meson-private/openhmd.pc to /usr/local/lib64/pkgconfig
Installing symlink pointing to libopenhmd.so.0.1.0 to /usr/local/lib64/libopenhmd.so.0
Installing symlink pointing to libopenhmd.so.0 to /usr/local/lib64/libopenhmd.so
Looks like there's no oculus drivers being installed, I'm new to Linux and I have no idea what to do..
This is the driver I'm installing: OpenHMD/Rift-kalman-filter
(Nobara distro Fedora)
If anyone can help a newbie I'd really appreciate it!
Installing the openHMD 6dof Linux drivers, I was expecting it to install the oculus drivers.

Related

Unable to find newly installed svn version on CentOS [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I had sve version 1.7 installed on CentOS and now I installed svn 1.11 using following command -
sudo yum localinstall CollabNetSubversion-client-1.11.1-1.x86_64.rpm
but after hitting svn --version, it still showing 1.7 version. Please guide me to what else I need to do to use latest version 1.11 of svn.
This might be trivial question but I haven't worked on linux environment more. Please help.
You can exec command
rpm -ql CollabNetSubversion-client-1.11.1-1.x86_64
and from the list get the location of new svn. Then you can add the directory where this is installed on the first place in PATH:
export PATH=/here/is/the/location:$PATH
(and add this to ~/.bashrc also)

Installing Anaconda for Linux [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am trying to install Anaconda for Linux (Linux Mint 17.2 Rafaela, 14.04.3 LTS, Trusty Tahr).
I see a warning:
WARNING:
Machine does not appear to be ppc64le. This software was sepicically
build for POWER8 running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
Are sure you want to continue the installation? [yes|no]
What should I do?
Is the machine a power8 or x86? More than likely you have an x86 cpu so you need to install that version of Anaconda. Anaconda Repo. You can use the command uname -a from the command line to print the kernel version. Normally you would see something in the output that says like "x86_64".
As for the anaconda versions, notice the differences between these two file names.
Anaconda2-4.4.0-Linux-x86_64.sh
Anaconda2-4.4.0-Linux-ppc64le.sh
:::EDIT:::
Based on the your warning "WARNING: Machine does not appear to be ppc64le.", it sounds like you have an x86 cpu. To be sure, run the command uname -a.

install pack for Ubuntu [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have to install a package (J-Link: https://www.segger.com/jlink-software.html) into Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Latest 64 bit (4.1.0-x86_64-linode59)), but I am not sure which one I should install:
DEB Installer 64-bit version
RPM Installer 64-bit version
TGZ archive 64-bit version
All three are possible, but
It is probably easiest to install the .deb, assuming it is appropriate for your operating system.
To check the integrity of the deb before installing:
md5sum PACKAGE.deb
and make sure the output matches the md5sum reported on the website from which you downloaded the deb.
Then to install the deb:
dpkg -i PACKAGE.deb

How can I Install gbs from downloaded git gbs clone in my hard disk? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
In my Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 32bit I downloaded a gbs package clone from Server.
git clone git://git.tizen.org/tools/gbs
I now want to install it but the following command doesn't work:
sudo apt-get install gbs
I guess that my config file has problems. Then, how can I install it by using the downloaded files? without Network Connection?
You can find installation instructions for Ubuntu here - no need to clone it from git:
https://developer.tizen.org/dev-guide/2.2.0/org.tizen.platform.development/html/platform_dev_env/gbs_installation.htm

How Do I Install SDL 2.0 for Development On Debian? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have been looking into OpenGL development recently and after watching a tutorial, noticed I was unable to compile my code. References that seem to be two features added specifically in SDL 2.0 are undefined according to Eclipse. I tried searching for a way to install SDL 2.0 on Debian (more specifically I am using #! but it is close enough to Debian that a fix on Debian will work).
The way I keep finding is to type into the terminal:
sudo apt-get install libsdl2-dev
This package is not found by aptitude. Can anyone tell me how to install SDL 2.0 on Debian?
Ok. Thank you to genpfault for telling me that libsdl2-dev was on backports! I would have never figured it out, especially because I have never used backports before!
For those of you stuck on this problem go to the following link if you do not know how to use backports:
http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/
Once you have setup backports, open up your terminal and run the following if you are using wheezy:
apt-get -t wheezy-backports install "package"
For other versions of Debian, I think you just need to put the name of your operating system version in the above code where I put "wheezy".
Remember in your IDE or in your terminal to compile with SDL2 instead of SDL. Best of luck!

Resources