I am studying Operating Systems, and came across divice controllers.
I gathered that a device controller is hardware whereas a device driver is software.
I also know that a HDD and a SSD both have a small PCB buit into them and I assume those PCB's are the device controllers.
Now what I want to know is if there is another device controller on the PC/motherboard side of the bus/cable connecting the HDD/SSD to the OS?
Is the configuration: OS >> Device Driver >> Bus >> Device Controller >> HDD/SSD
Or is it: OS >> Device Driver >> Device Controler >> Bus >> Device Controller >> HDD/SSD
Or is it some other configuration?
Sites I visited for answers:
Tutorialspoint
JavaPoint
Idc online
Quora
Most hard-disks on desktop are SATA or NVME. eMMC is popular for smartphones but some might use something else. These are hardware interface standards that describe the way to interact electrically with those disks. It tells you what voltage at what frequency and for what amount of time you need to apply (a signal) to a certain pin (a bus line) to make the device behave or react in a certain way.
Most computers are separated in a few external chips. On desktop, it is mostly SATA, NVME, DRAM, USB, Audio Output, network card and graphics card. Even though there is few chips, the CPU would be very expensive if it had to support all those hardware interface standards on the same silicon chip. Instead, the CPU implements PCI/PCI-e as a general interface to interact with all those chips using memory mapped registers. Each of these devices have an external PCI-e controller between the device and the CPU. In the same order as above, you have AHCI, NVME controller, DRAM (not PCI and in the CPU), xHCI (almost everywhere) and Intel HDA (example). Network cards are PCI-e and there isn't really a controller outside the card. Graphics card are also self standing PCI-e devices.
So, the OS detects the registers of those devices that are mapped in the address space. The OS writes at those locations, and it will write the registers of the devices. PCI-e devices can read/write DRAM directly but this is managed by the CPU in its general implementation of the PCI-e standard most likely by doing some bus arbitration. The CPU really doesn't care what's the device that it is writing. It knows that there is a PCI register there and the OS instructs to write it with something so it does. It just happens that this device is an implementation of a standard and that the OS developers read the standard so they write the proper values in those registers and the proper data structures in DRAM to make sure that the device knows what to do.
Drivers implement the standard of the software interface of those controllers. The drivers are the ones instructing the CPU on values to write and writing the proper data structures in DRAM for giving commands to the controllers. The user thread simply places the syscall number in a conventionnal register determined by the OS developers and they call an instruction to jump into the kernel at a specific address that the kernel decides by writing a register at boot. Once there, the kernel looks at the register for the number and determines what driver to call based on the operation.
On Linux and some place else, it is done with files. You call syscalls on files and the OS has a driver attached to the file. They are called virtual files. A lot of transfer mechanisms are similar to the reading/writing files pattern so Linux uses that to make a general driver model where the kernel doesn't even need to understand the driver. The driver just says create me a file there that's not really on the hard disk and if someone opens it and calls an operation on it then call this function that's there in my driver. From there, the driver can do whatever it wants because it is in kernel mode. It just creates the proper data structures in DRAM and writes the registers of the device it drives to make it do something.
Related
In Windows Internal 7th Edition - Book following text is Mentioned Under Windows Kernel Architecture
Device drivers -This includes both hardware device drivers, which translate user I/O function
calls into specific hardware device I/O requests, and non-hardware device drivers, such as file
system and network drivers.
Can anyone please elaborate on hardware device drivers and non-hardware device drivers?
Assume you have multiple layers - e.g. when a process makes a file IO request it goes to a virtual file system layer, which may send a request to a file system layer, which may send request/s to a software RAID layer, which may send requests to a USB mass storage device driver, which may send a request to a USB controller driver.
You can split these layers into 2 main categories:
a) "device drivers", where there's an actual device. For these, the relationships between device drivers tends to mirror the hierarchical relationships between hardware devices (e.g. "PCI bus with controllers plugged in, with various devices plugged into those controllers, with various peripherals plugged into those devices" may become a tree of "parent device driver communicating with none or more child device drivers that are...").
b) "things that do not drive a device, and therefore are not technically device drivers". For the file IO example above, this is the VFS, file systems and software RAID layer. For networking it'll be code to handle a TCP/IP stack (and figure out routing, etc - which network card should send a packet based on the destination IP address). For user input (keyboard, etc) it could be things like Input Method Editors. For sound it can be code to determine how loud the sound should be on which speakers (on which sound card/s) based on a 2D position.
For most operating systems; device drivers need to be treated as "special" because they need to use interfaces (and possibly direct hardware access) that normal software/processes can't use. For example, for monolithic kernels they might be treated as a kernel extension and (dynamically) linked directly into the kernel.
However; "things that do not drive a device, and therefore are not technically device drivers" end up needing similar special support (e.g. the ability to use the same or similar interfaces that normal software/processes can't use but device drivers can use, the ability to be linked into a monolithic kernel, etc). For an OS designer, the differences between device drivers and "things that aren't technically device drivers but need the same access" is relatively insignificant (compared to normal software/processes which don't have/need special access); so it's tempting to use the same word to describe both - e.g. call them all "kernel modules" (regardless of whether they're device drivers or not); or call them all "device drivers" (regardless of whether they're technically device drivers or not).
Note that there's a few things that confuse this even more:
a) There's actually a third category - "virtual devices". In some cases software is trying to emulate a real device (e.g. RAM disks that use software/RAM to emulate a hard drive; printers that use a PDF file format converter to "print" to a file, etc). For these cases, emulation/virtualization necessitates implementation as a device driver (but there's technically no device being driven).
b) To make terminology seem more consistent; some operating systems are biased towards defining interfaces as "virtual devices". If you try hard enough you can pretend anything is some kind of abstract virtual device ("It's not a compression/decompression library, it's a virtual compression/decompression device", "It's not a database management engine, it's a virtual relational data storage device", ...).
c) Some operating systems also try to pretend that everything is a file (e.g. Unix - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_is_a_file ). In this case you might have a directory of "device drivers pretending to be files" (e.g. /dev) and end up with "things that are not device drivers that are pretending to be device drivers that are pretending to be files" slapped into the same directory.
Your question is unclear. If you ask for an example of a non-hardware device driver, an example would be the random number generator device. On Linux, for example, the "/dev/random" device provides a software implementation of a random number generator so systems without the necessary hardware can still have this function
I want to learn how Linux OS understands the underlying hardware.Can anyone suggest me where to start for getting this understanding,As of now i just know the '/dev' sub-directory plays a vital role in that.
It has the device special files which are like a portal to the device driver which then takes it to the physical device.
I read somewhere that Udev daemon listens to the netlink socket to collect this information and Udev device manager detects addition and removal of devices as they occur.
But with these i am just not satisfied with the thought of how Linux reads the hardware.
Please let me know where to start to understand this, i am so thankful to anyone trying to help.
I think at first you need to find out how the memory mapping works. What is the address space and how it relates to physical memory. Then you could read about how the hardware is mapped in address space and how to access it. It is a big amount of docs to read.
Some of those information are in Linux Documentation Project.
Additionally some knowledge about electronic would be helpful.
In general - Linux for communication with devices needs some "channel" of communication. This channel may be for example ISA, PCI, USB, etc bus. For example PCI devices are memory mapped devices and Linux kernel communicates with them via memory accesses. So first Linux needs to see given device in some memory area and then it is able to configure this device and do some communication with it.
In case of USB devices it is a little bit complicated because USB devices are not memory mapped. You need to configure USB host first to be able to communicate with USB devices. Every communication with USB device is achieved via USB host.
There are also devices which are not connected via ISA, PCI or USB. They are connected directly to the processor and visible under some memory address. This solution is usually implemented in embedded devices. For example ARM processors use this approach.
Regarding udev - it is user-space application which listens for events from Linux kernel and helps other applications with recognizing device addition and configuration.
I am currently reading the Linux Module Programming Guide and I have stumbled onto two terms that have confused a bit - device files and device driver. Upon goggling these terms I have come across the following-
A device driver is a piece of software that operates or controls a particular type of device.
A device file is an interface for a device driver that appears in a file system as if it were an ordinary file. In Unix-like operating systems, these are usually found under the /dev directory and are also called device nodes.
What I would like to know is -
1) Are device files an interface between user space programs and the device driver?
2) Does the program access the driver in the kernel via the appropriate device special file?
eg, when using say spidev char dev file, does that allow my userspace program to interact with spi.c and omap2_mcspi.c etc using simple read, write and ioctl calls?
One of the primary abstractions in Unix is the file (source):
Programs, services, texts, images, and so forth, are all files. Input and output devices, and generally all devices, are considered to be files, according to the system.
This lets users treat a variety of entities with a uniform set of operations, even through the implementation of those operations may be wildly different.
As you were getting at with your question, device files are the user facing side of the abstraction. This is what the user sees; a file that they can write to, read from, open, close, etc. The device drivers are the implementation of those operations.
So the user will make a call to a file operation such as write, and then the kernel will then use the device driver to carry out the operation.
Device File like /dev/spidevX.Y is a SW abstraction of a SPI device which exposes Linux low level SPI API to the userspace with syscalls (in Linux driver world known as "file operations"):
That is read(), write(), ioctl()...
spidev.c is a special kind of driver which is registered for generic SPI client(chip) devices, and it's main goal is to export Kernel low level SPI API to userspace.
There is a whole Linux SPI layer in between defined in spi.c
Device driver representing real HW SPI controller is where callbacks (hooks) are implemented and registered to the kernel as a part of spi_master (spi_controller)structure.
Here is a callback initialization for SPI message transfer:
master->transfer_one_message = atmel_spi_transfer_one_message;
everything in linux is a file.
device driver is a software used by operating system to communicate with device.
device driver makes use of device files.
I've finished developing a pcie driver for an FPGA under a linux distributiuon. Everything works fine. But I'm wondering where the base address register in the PCI Endpoint of the FPGA gets the base address. When I've generated the PCIe Endpoint I was able to set up the length of the BAR, but not more.
In the PCIe driver I do the standard functions like pci_enable_device, but I do not set up specifically a base address.
So does the operating system set up the base address during startup? or how does it work?
By the side I would like to know what initialisations the operating system gernerally do if an pcie pcie device is connected. Since I do see my pci device in lspci even if the driver is unloaded.
Kind regards
Thomas
The address allocation for the PCI devices are generally done at the BIOS level. Let us refer to the x86 platform. If we look closely at the system address map, it would be something like this (image taken from BIOS DISASSEMBLY NINJUTSU, by Darmawan Salihun)
On the address map, there is a dedicated space to map the PCI memory regions. The same could be replicated using the output of /proc/iomem.
This implementation is platform dependent, and as the BIOS "knows" about the platform, it would set aside the addresses dedicated to the PCI slots. When a device is plugged into the slot, the BIOS interacts with the firmware on the device and actually sets up the memory regions for the device, such that the OS could make use of it.
Now coming to the drivers part. In Linux, the drivers follow a specific standard known as the 'Linux Device Model', which constitutes a Core Layer(PCI core), Host Controller Drivers(PCI Controller/Masters) and Client Drivers(PCI devices). When the PCI device(client) is plugged into the slot, the corresponding host controller knows about the attachment and it further informs the PCI core about it, and hence appears in the output of lspci.
lspci shows the devices which are identified by the host controller, in which case, it may or may not be tied to a driver. The core further traverses the drivers in the system, finds a matching one, and attaches to this device.
So, the reason you are seeing the device in the output of lspci is because the host controller has identified the device, and has informed the PCI core. It doesn't matter even if any driver is attached to the device or not.
On most consumer grade computers, BAR allocation seem to be done in the BIOS.
I suppose that in a hotplug capable architecture this must be done or at least triggered by the OS.
I'm trying to write a PCI device driver that runs in user space. Not my idea, what the client wants. Target is an embedded Linux board that will never have more than a single user. I'm an experienced C programmer and know Linux, just not familiar with Linux driver development.
Is this really a device driver or just a library? Do I need to use the typical calls pci_register_driver, etc. or can I just access the device using fopen, and using mmap and ioperm to get to it?
Interrupts will be done using the MSI model. Also need to handle DMA transfers. The device will be streaming lots of data to the user.
There's not much info out there on this subject, LDD3 only devotes a couple of pages to it, and there's nothing else that I could find here on SO.
Thanks in advance!
If there is no driver handling the PCI card it would be possible to access it using ioperm (or iopl - depending on the address) if only port accesses are required.
Using DMA and interrupts is definitely impossible without a kernel-mode driver.
By googleing I found some text about something like a "generic kernel-mode driver" that allows writing user-mode drivers (including DMA and interrupts).
You should ask your customer which kind of kernel-mode drivers for accessing PCI cards is installed on the Linux board.
There is now a proper way to do high performance userspace PCI drivers, called vfio. There is not much documentation, but see the kernel docs http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/vfio.txt and the header file /usr/include/linux.vfio.h. It is available since Linux 3.6.