There is a lot about the "procedure" LINUX undertakes when a reboot or 'imminent shutdown' is underway. I wish to understand, programmatically, and react to, that a REBOOT IS IMMINIENT.
My application gets sent TERM and HUP signals which is all good and understood.
How can I tell the difference between a signal for immediate REBOOT reasons or just from another user?
CONTEXT:
If the system is 100% rebooting then my application will SAVE IT's STATE for LOAD on BOOT.
If however, a user, even "root" arbitrately kills my application then I DO NOT WISH to save the STATE.
I am using RedHat if it makes a difference.
I have attempted to research this quite extensively but so far I have not got the solution.
So you know... calling STACK OVERFLOW!
Thank you in-advance.
Related
I am a newbie to Linux. I am going through the file system in Linux. Though there are many links in Google stating the difference between /etc/init and /etc/inittab, I am really confused between both. Can anyone give me a clear explanation exactly what is the difference between these both.
Inittab is a file that controls everything that happens when a system is rebooted. (http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/103722/unix-how-to-linux-etcinittab-file)
Init is the first process that boots when booting or rebooting the system and is the parent of every other process, direct or indirect. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Init)
Linux n00b here. How does one switch from User Mode to Kernel Mode? I'm running Linux Ubuntu 12.10. Is there an interrupt that I can call using inline assembly code that will do this? If not, how can it be done?
I'm asking this question because I am wishing to write a SCTP (network)protocol stack which has access to the kernel and runs in the background constantly though the UI cannot directly access the kernel. Never done anything like this before so tips from pros would definitely be appreciated.
All switches to kernel mode are made via system calls. In the case of network protocols these system calls are socket, listen, accept, ioctl, read, write, recvmsg, etc.
You write a Linux kernel module. There is already a SCTP protocol stack for Linux though. You would likely be better off modifying it to do what you want.
Once you have written and compiled your module you can load it into the kernel using insmod and rmmod. In my experience you rarely get a chance to use rmmod because if you made a mistake the system crashes or freezes. So use a virtual machine for your testing. It is faster to reboot, you lose less data, and it is easier to hook up a virtual serial console for debugging.
I am sure this question is a duplicate by the way. You can find a lot of questions on this topic.
While shutting down QNX neutrino using phshutdown(either reboot or shutdown),system hangs while killing message queues(mqueue).the message displayed on screen is
Shutting down service providers(mqueue)
What could be the reason for this ?
This happens from time to time when you issue shutdown from the command line as well.
Some of the reasons I've seen on the web are:
Hardware issue
Driver issue
Kernel told to shut down when it didn't want to
From what I've cobbled together (and this is by no means definitive, but seems to be plausible), basically, any program that is waiting for the hardware or OS to reply has a chance of hanging the shutdown if the thing it is waiting on gets killed before it does.
A possible mitigation is to slay all your apps/servers (especially those touching hardware devices or shared memory queues) prior to issuing a shutdown, wait for a second or two, then go ahead with your shutdown.
We have about 40 computers running identical hardware and software. They all run Ubuntu 11.10. They all have just one user account to log in. The .profile file is set up to launch a daemon process. The code for the daemon is written in C.
Once in a few weeks, we get a report that the daemon is no longer running. This does not happen on all computers but just one or two. We cannot reproduce the problem consistently.
Looking at the code, the application quits when it receives either SIGHUP or SIGTERM.
As I understand, SIGHUP is generated when a user logs off. In our case, the user never logs off. I am wondering if it is possible that SIGHUP could have been generated for some other reason. Any other thought would be appreciated.
Well, there are a couple of things to note about SIGHUP. Firstly, its origin is from the concept of a hang-up, i.e. loss of connection to a console over something like a modem. In modern parlance this generally means it has lost its controlling tty. Unless you've taken care to detach from your tty, any program started in a given terminal will receive a SIGHUP when the terminal is closed. See here for details on how to do this in your program. Other options include:
running your program inside screen or tmux
run your program with nohup or some other daemonising framework
The other possibility is something is deliberately sending your process a SIGHUP which by "tradition" is often used to signal a process that it should re-read its configuration.
Signals can be sent using kill utility or kill syscall.
Of course, you can try and find out who is sending that signal or disconnecting your terminals or network connections, but there is simpler practical way to fix your problem.
When code is supposed to run as a daemon, but really isn't (just like yours), there is a wrapper that can turn any program into daemon. Surprise - this wrapper is called daemon! It has lots of options, probably most importantly for you, option to automatically restart your utility should it ever die for any reason.
If this command is not installed on your Ubuntu, just sudo apt-get install daemon, and man daemon to get started.
A linux machine freezes few hours after booting and running software (including custom drivers). I'm looking a method to debug such problem. Recently, there has been significant progress in Linux Kernel debugging techniques, hasn't it?
I kindly ask to share some experience on the topic.
If you can reproduce the problem inside a VM, there is indeed a fairly new (AFAIK) technique which might be useful: debugging the virtual machine from the host machine it runs on.
See for example this:
Debugging Linux Kernel in VMWare with Windows host
VMware Workstation 7 also enables a powerful technique that lets you record system execution deterministically and then replay it as desired, even backwards. So as soon as the system crashes you can go backwards and see what was happening then (and even try changing something and see if it still crashes). IIRC I read somewhere you can't do this and debug the kernel using VMware/gdb at the same time.
Obviously, you need a VMM for this. I don't know what VMM's other than VMware's VMM family support this, and I don't know if any free VMware versions support this. Likely not; one can't really expect a commercial company to give away everything for free. The trial version is 30 days.
If your custom drivers are for hardware inside the machine, then I suppose this probably won't work.
SystemTap seems to be to Linux what Dtrace is to Solaris .. however I find it rather hostile to use. Still, you may want to give it a try. NB: compile the kernel with debug info and spend some time with the kernel instrumentation hooks.
This is why so many are still using printk() after empirically narrowing a bug down to a specific module.
I'm not recommending it, just pointing out that it exists. I may not be smart enough to appreciate some underlying beauty .. I just write drivers for odd devices.
There are many and varied techniques depending on the sort of problems you want to debug. In your case the first question is "is the system really frozen?". You can enable the magic sysrq key and examine the system state at freeze and go from there.
Probably the most directly powerful method is to enable the kernel debugger and connect to it via a serial cable.
One option is to use Kprobes. A quick search on google will show you all the information you need. It isn't particularly hard to use. Kprobes was created by IBM I believe as a solution for kernel debugging. It is essentially a elaborate form of printk() however it allows you to handle any "breakpoints" you insert using handlers. It may be what you are looking for. All you need to do is write and 'insmod' a module into the kernel which will handle any "breakpoints" hit that you specify in the module.
Hope that can be a useful option...
How I debug this kind of bug, was to run my OS inside the VirtualBox, and compile the kernel with kgdb builtin. Then I setup a serial console on the VirtualBox so that I can gdb to the kernel inside the VirtualBox's OS via the serial console. Anytime the OS hang, just like magic sysrq key, I can enter ctrl-c on the gdb to stop and understand the kernel at that point in time.
Normally kernel stack tracing is just too difficult to pinpoint the culprit process, so the best way I think is still generic "top" command, just looking at the application logs to see what are the cause of hanging - this will need a reboot to see the log of course.