I would like to have the antd slider from high to low, but still from left to right. Let me give you two examples.
What exists:
1---------------|7|-----10
Between 1 and 7 is the filled state.
There is a "reverse"-attribute. But that would only flip the first example to:
10----|7|----------------1
That doesn't help me because the "filled" state is still between 1 and 7.
What I would like to have:
10---------------|3|-----1
where the filled state is between 10 and 3.
Does anyone have a solution for this? I couldn't find anything neither in the antd docs nor in the components. Another framework that supports this would be welcome, but I would prefer antd, because we have it in use already.
Related
I installed the new 5.0 RC Version of Orocommerce and tried to create a configurable Product like I did in the 5.0.0-Beta2 before. The Product itself is working like expected, but the layout of the product in the storefront is wrong.
The configurable part of the product is located outside and over of the actual frame where it normally should be in. (I will upload a picture of it to make it more clear.)
If I create another simple product the product page looks as expected.
Configurable Product wrong layout - Image
Is this a known problem and is there any solution for this?
Thanks in advance.
As far as I know, blocks out of the box always were rendered after the main product image.
Also I have compared 4.2 and 5.0 the result is similar.
So that looks like there may be a problem at your customization.
Could you provide more information to verify what is affecting it?
Also I wonder to know what blocks (block id in layout) you might have moved.
I was wondering if a feature for WxPython existed or if I need to make it.
Here is a sample from a C# program I am trying to achieve with a property grid:
Sample Grid Image
I want this look with a checkbox in front of a PropertyCategory such as Group 0 or Message 0 in PropertyCategoryExample and can include the category. If you include the parent category I want the children categories to also be included.
Basically it acts as the expansion next to it but is a checkbox. I want to be able to still expand and shrink but just an extra checkbox when I go to save to see if the user wanted it included.
I have looked around in the docs and web but can’t find anything related to this. Do I need to make a custom property to do this?
I have asked on the discussion board but I haven't heard anything back
Thanks for your help in advance!!!
Queston: Is there a way in KiCAD to associate components with their respective footprints in a sane manner using CvPcb?
The CvPcb displays three columns that feels comfortable at the first moment but when the component doesn't have the proper value it is very difficult to find the right footprint. I was manually scanning the libraries.
Is there a "search" option hidden somewhere? Is it fine to define specific phrases as the value of the component (since it seems to be the only way to filter)?
No, there is not a search option or function in KiCAD to do this. A thing you can do, is use the filter buttons at the top of the CvPCB window. These buttons help you to find by pin number, description, and library. However, sometimes the footprint is not found when the pin count does not match. For example, if you have a 4 pin push button, you wont find the footprint but you can use the 2 pin footprint. Also, you can create your own footprints using the Footprint editor, then use the Library manager to import your custom library.
For more information, you can look at: https://docs.kicad.org/5.1/en/cvpcb/cvpcb.html#_cvpcb_commands
Best regards.
In more recent versions of Kicad (looking at 5.1 here), there is a 'filter by name' selector and a search box where you can search for footprint names.
You could enter, for example TO-92 in the box which will return a series of THT footprints suitable for a TO-92 device. You need to ensure that none of the other three selector buttons (limit by symbol keyword, library or pincount) are active. You can only search by package name not by device name in CvPCB i.e. you can search for a 'TO-92' footprint but not for a BC548 (a transistor in a TO-92) package.
I've been working my way through the Rastertek DX11 Terrain Tutorials getting to "Tutorial 6: Height Based Movement" Ive read through it and created, complied etc and the tutorial itself is working fine.
At the end of each tutorial it suggests what to do next and I'm stuck when it suggests to
"Place an object that randomly moves around the terrain adjusting its height based on information from the quad tree." I dont have an idea of how to do this properly.
Does anyone have a suggestion of how I would go about doing this? Either a link to a tutorial that explains how to add items as well as a terrain (which I couldn't find on the site) or just pointing me in the right direction! You might have to take a peek at the code there (found here: http://rastertek.com/tertut06.zip). Right now, the closest Ive gotten to is being able to render a 3D image from a file, but when I do that it makes the terain dissapear. So I'm clearly barking up the wrong tree. I've had a google around but that's been to no avail.
Any suggestions would be great as I'm still very new to all this.
I have a batch class (KC8) which is using page/form recognition and separator zones ("Page 1 of" = separator value). It seems like about 50% of the time it will improperly separate the documents, with some not even getting the correct form type, and others breaking off pages 1, 2 and 3 and 4 into 3 separate documents when they should only be one. Of course all of this gets to the Quality Control queue, but when you unreject them they seem to process and release with no problems. Why is this happening? Shouldn't they continuously fail to be recognized and separated properly if they failed the first time? Does anyone have any similar experience or advice for fixing it? Please ask any questions you need to clarify the details of the batch class if you need it.
Thanks,
Matt
I solved the separation issue. Part of the problem was a form id zone located in a place on the form that moved around depending on how much information was entered into one of the fields near the top of the page. Obviously pages like that would not be recognized. I picked a different recognition zone (company logo + text image) that did not move around and everything is fine now.