Okay, I'm experimenting with node.
var http = require("http");
// function myFunction()
// {
// console.log("Hello");
// }
function newServer(req, res)
{
if (req.url == "/")
{
res.end("default url");
}
else
{
res.end("other url");
console.log("Hello");
//why does this fire no matter what?
//infact if I change it to "req.url == '/f'" this console.log fires twice. WTF!
}
}
var myserver = http.createServer(newServer)
myserver.listen(7000);
The comment I left in the "else" statement basically sums up my issue. As soon as I go to localhost:7000, the console.log message fires. If I use "if(req.url == '/')" it fires immediately once I got to "http://localhost:7000/", if I use "if(req.url =='/f')" it fires twice as soon as I got to "http://localhost:7000/". Not localhost:7000/f, just regular old localhost:7000. If I do go to fire localhost:7000/f, it will fire one more time. What's the deal? It seems it first one every render, and then checks the if statement to see if it should fire again.
Related
I'm trying to create a small plugin to make my day-to-day job easier. I have faced a very strange situation within the popup.js script. The promise function randomly refuses to get executed. I have spent some hours trying to debug or at least understand where the issue could be but without any results.
Here is the skeleton of the code:
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function () {
// some initialization
document.getElementById("signinbutton").addEventListener("click", function(event) {
try {
// some more initialization
var user_email = '';
var advertiserId = '';
var checkibm = '';
user_email = $('#emailfield').val().trim();
advertiserId = $('#advertiseridfield').val().trim();
checkibm = $('#checkibm').is(':checked');
if (advertiserId && checkibm) {
_act = 'getTokenIdByAdvId',
_data = advertiserId
}
else if (advertiserId && !checkibm) {
_act = 'getTokenIdByAdvId',
_data = advertiserId
}
else if (user_email && validateEmail(user_email))
{
_act = 'getTokenIdByEmail',
_data = user_email
}
else
{
throw new Error("Valid input has not been provided");
}
sendMessagePromise({
act : 'getTokenIdByAdvId',
data: '16910'//encodeURIComponent(user_email)
})
.then(responseHandler)
.then(responseReplaceTokenHandler)
.then(show_ok('Done'))
.catch(failureCallback);
}
catch (error){
//doing some error catching here
});
});
The code above works perfectly. However, as soon as I fill in the real values in sendMessagePromise e.g
//_act and _data show the proper values when inspected
sendMessagePromise({
act : _act,
data: _data//encodeURIComponent(user_email)
})
the flow skips execution of sendMessagePromise and any other chained function, except the last one ".then(show_ok('Done'))", i.e the only result is the "Done" message on the screen.
I made sure the values are correct. I'm able to debug step-by-step and see the values being properly supplied. I have also put a bunch of console messages inside the chain promise functions to see where the execution gets stuck, but it seems like it doesn't even start executing sendMessagePromise.
As soon as I replace expression back to hardcoded values i.e
sendMessagePromise({
act : 'getTokenIdByAdvId',
data: '16910'//encodeURIComponent(user_email)
})
it starts working again. I'm really stuck and not sure how to debug or which steps to take further.
Please assist
So I'm working with websockets to process data from website's API. For every new event I also send some http requests back to the website in order to obtain more data. Up untill now everything has worked fine, but now that I started using async requests to speed it up a bit things got a bit different. My code used to process one event and then move on to the next one (these events come in extremely quick - around 10 per second) but now it just seems to ignore the async (non blocking) part and move on to the next event and that way it just skips over half of the code. Note that the code works fine outside the Pusher. I'm using the 'pusher-client' module. My code looks like this:
var Request = require("request");
var requestSync = require('sync-request');
var Pusher = require('pusher-client');
var events_channel = pusher.subscribe('inventory_changes');
events_channel1.bind('listed', function(data)
{
var var2;
//Async request (to speed up the code)
function myFunction(callback){
request("url", function(error, response, body) {
if (!error && response.statusCode == 200)
{
result = JSON.stringify(JSON.parse(body));
return callback(null, result);
}
else
{
return callback(error, null);
}
});
}
myFunction(function(err, data){
if(!err)
{
var2 = data
return(data);
}
else
{
return(err);
}
});
//The part of the code below waits for the callback and the executes some code
var var1 = var2;
check();
function check()
{
if(var2 === var1)
{
setTimeout(check, 10);
return;
}
var1 = var2;
//A CHUNK OF CODE EXECUTES HERE (connected to the data from the callback)
}
});
In conclusion the code works, but not inside the pusher due to the pusher skipping the asynchronous request. How would I make the pusher wait for my async request to finish, before processing the next event (I have no idea)? If you happen to know, please let me know :)
You need to implement a queue to handle events one after another. I'm curious how it worked before, even without Pusher you'd have to implement some queue mechanism for it.
const eventsQueue = []
events_channel1.bind('listed', function(data) {
eventsQueue.push(data)
handleNewEvent()
})
let processingEvent = false
function handleNewEvent() {
if (processingEvent) return // do nothing if already processing an event
processingEvent = true
const eventData = eventsQueue.shift() // pick the first element from array
if (!eventData) return // all events are handled at the moment
... // handle event data here
processingEvent = false
handleNewEvent() // handle next event
}
Also, you should call clearTimeout method to clear your timeout when you don;t need it anymore.
And it's better to use promises or async/await instead of callbacks. Your code will be much easier to read and maintain.
I'm trying to implement and existing solution in node.js, specifically, using express.js framework. Now, the existing solution works as follows:
server exposes a GET service that clients can connect to
when a client calls the GET service, the client number increments (a global variable) and then the number of clients is checked;
if there are not at least 3 clients connected, the service is in endless loop, waiting for other clients to connect
if (or rather, when) the rest of the two clients connect, the service sends respond to everyone that enough clients are connected (a 'true' value).
So what basically happens is, the client connects and the connection is active (in a loop) until enough clients connect, then and only then there is a response (to all clients at the same time).
Now I'm not expert in these architectures, but from what I think, this is not a correct or good solution. My initial thought was: this must be solved with sockets. However, since the existing solution works like that (it's not written in node.js), I tried to emulate such behaviour:
var number = (function(){
var count = 0;
return {
increase: function() {
count++;
},
get: function(){
return count;
}
};
})();
app.get('/test', function(req, res){
number.increase();
while (number.get() < 3) {
//hold it here, until enough clients connect
}
res.json(number.get());
});
Now while I think that this is not a correct solution, I have a couple of questions:
Is there any alternative to solving this issue, besides using sockets?
Why does this "logic" work in C#, but not in express.js? The code above hangs, no other request is processed.
I know node.js is single-threaded, but what if we have a more conventional service that responds immediately, and there are 20 requests all at the same time?
I would probably use an event emitter for this:
var EventEmitter = require('events').EventEmitter;
var emitter = new EventEmitter();
app.get('/', function(req, res) {
// Increase the number
number.increase();
// Get the current value
var current = number.get();
// If it's less than 3, wait for the event emitter to trigger.
if (current < 3) {
return emitter.once('got3', function() {
return res.json(number.get());
});
}
// If it's exactly 3, emit the event so we wake up other listeners.
if (current === 3) {
emitter.emit('got3');
}
// Fall through.
return res.json(current);
});
I would like to stress that #Plato is correct in stating that browsers may timeout when a response takes too much time to complete.
EDIT: as an aside, some explanation on the return emitter.once(...).
The code above can be rewritten like so:
if (current < 3) {
emitter.once('got3', function() {
res.json(number.get());
});
} else if (current === 3) {
emitter.emit('got3');
res.json(number.get());
} else {
res.json(number.get());
}
But instead of using those if/else statements, I return from the request handler after creating the event listener. Since request handlers are asynchronous, their return value is discarded, so you can return anything (or nothing). As an alternative, I could also have used this:
if (current < 3) {
emitter.once(...);
return;
}
if (current === 3) {
...etc...
Also, even though you return from the request handler function, the event listener is still referencing the res variable, so the request handler scope is maintained by Node until res.json() in the event listener callback is called.
Your http approach should work
You are blocking the event loop so node refuses to do any other work while it is in the while loop
You're really close, you just need to check every now and then instead of constantly. I do this below with process.nextTick() but setTimeout() would also work:
var number = (function(){
var count = 0;
return {
increase: function() {
count++;
},
get: function(){
return count;
}
};
})();
function waitFor3(callback){
var n = number.get();
if(n < 3){
setImmediate(function(){
waitFor3(callback)
})
} else {
callback(n)
}
}
function bump(){
number.increase();
console.log('waiting');
waitFor3(function(){
console.log('done');
})
}
setInterval(bump, 2000);
/*
app.get('/test', function(req, res){
number.increase();
waitFor3(function(){
res.json(number.get());
})
});
*/
I have to do an operation that calculate for me something, but I can't use the result of it, because I always stay in a wait state, in fact in my terminal remains in execution my program until I enter ctrl+C.
I have a main in nodejs for my program where I need to use my result calculated in a module.
var myJSONClient = {
"nombre" : "<nombre_cliente>",
"intervalo" : [0,0]
};
var intervalo = gestionar.gestion(myJSONClient,vector_intervalo);
console.log("intervalo: "+intervalo); //return undefined
And this is the module
var gestion = function(myJSON,vector_intervalo) {
var dburl = 'localhost/mongoapp';
var collection = ['clientes'];
var db = require('mongojs').connect(dburl, collection );
var intervalo_final;
function cliente(nombre, intervalo){
this.nombre = nombre;
this.intervalo = intervalo;
}
var cliente1 = new cliente(myJSON.nombre,myJSON.intervalo);
db.clientes.save(cliente1, function(err, saveCliente){
if (err || !saveCliente) console.log("Client "+cliente1.nombre+" not saved Error: "+err);
else console.log("Client "+saveCliente.nombre+" saved");
intervalo_final = calculate(vector_intervalo);
console.log(intervalo_final); //here I can see the right content of the variable intervalo_final
});
console.log(intervalo_final); //this is not executed
return intervalo_final;
}
exports.gestion = gestion;
Welcome to the async world! :)
First of all, you aren't doing blocking operations in Node. Actually, networking in Node is fully asynchronous.
The part you state the console.log works it's because the callback function of the db.clientes.save call. That callback states your mongo save has finished.
What asynchronous networking means?
It means that your save will be processed sometime in the future. The script will not wait for the response to continue the code. The console.log right after the save call will be executed soon as it's reached.
As for the "wait state" of your script, that it never ends, you should take a look at this question. There's the answer.
I got the following code (in a seperate file called page.js):
var page = new function() {
this.getImdbID = function(){
var imdbid = '';
chrome.tabs.getSelected(null, function(tab) {
imdbid='0944835';
});
return imdbid;
};
}
Which gets called by the following code (which is in background.html).
var imdbid = page.getImdbID();
This code only works when I place a breakpoint on the "return imdbid;" row. When I skip the breakpoint it only returns an empty string. Is there anything I have missed?
The fact that it works when you place a breakpoint suggests a timing issue.
In this case, I would suppose that getSelected is an asynchronous operation (hence why it takes a callback), and so you would need to wait for it to complete and the callback to be executed before the variable has the value you want.