this happens when i start the build on IOS
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// if you want to use a different Application Delegate class from "AppDelegate"
// you can specify it here.
UIApplication.Main(args, null, typeof(AppDelegate));
}
I tried to see if it had to do with the firebase push notification that I started in appDelegate and I also tried to see if it was Xamarin.Essentials but it didn't work.
this code worked in my case
public class Application
{
// This is the main entry point of the application.
[Obsolete]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// if you want to use a different Application Delegate class from "AppDelegate"
// you can specify it here.
UIApplication.Main(args, null, "AppDelegate");
}
}
Related
I’m new in xamarin ios and I need to add view in existing project. Project use mvvmcross framework.
I’ve done:
Created PerevozkiViewModelClass :MvxViewModel in Core project
Add UI View controller with storydoard (P.S. BaseView extends MvxViewController)
public partial class PerevozkiView : BaseView
{
public PerevozkiView() : base("PerevozkiView", null)
{
}
public override void ViewDidLoad()
{
base.ViewDidLoad();
var set = this.CreateBindingSet<PerevozkiView, PerevozkiViewModel>();
set.Apply();
}
}
Delete PerevozkiView.Storyboard
4.Add PerevozkiView.xib and in file owner specify PerevozkiView (I cant choose it from list, so I just hardcode “PerevozkiView as file owner)
After deploy in IOS simulator I’ve got exception:
Foundation.MonoTouchException
Сообщение = Objective-C exception thrown. Name: NSInternalInconsistencyException Reason: -[UIViewController _loadViewFromNibNamed:bundle:] loaded the "PerevozkiView" nib but the view outlet was not set here in Main:
public class Application
{
// This is the main entry point of the application.
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// if you want to use a different Application Delegate class from "AppDelegate"
// you can specify it here.
UIApplication.Main(args, null, "AppDelegate");
}
}
I have no idea what is wrong. Pls help
With MVC4 I was able to create and register a global action filter that would check the model state prior to the action's execution and return the serialized ModelState before any damage could be done.
public override void OnActionExecuting(System.Web.Http.Controllers.HttpActionContext actionContext)
{
if (!actionContext.ModelState.IsValid)
{
actionContext.Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, actionContext.ModelState);
}
}
However, with MVC5, I am having trouble finding Request and therefore CreateErrorResponse
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext nActionExecutingContext)
{
if (!nActionExecutingContext.Controller.ViewData.ModelState.IsValid)
{
nActionExecutingContext.Result = // Where is Request.CreateErrorResponse ?
}
}
I realize that I could create a custom response class to assign to Result but I'd rather use what's built-in if CreateErrorResponse is still available.
Any idea where I can find it relative to an ActionExecutingContext in MVC5 / Web API 2?
I know this is an old question but I recently had the same problem and solved it using
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
if (!context.ModelState.IsValid)
{
context.Result = new BadRequestObjectResult(context.ModelState);
}
}
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I've been trying to get Application Level Pause and Resume similar to an activity's onPause and onResume. I know there's no API that has this functionality.
I try to follow this post: http://curioustechizen.blogspot.com/2012/12/android-application-level-pause-and.html
But I've had no luck so far.
Has anyone been able to achieve this? What paradigm did you use?
Let me know if you need me to paste some code into this question.
Thanks for the help
Another solution to the problem would be to just keep track of the count of onStart() and onStop() calls from every activity. Example:
First, create a class to hold the counts:
public class ActiveActivitiesTracker {
private static int sActiveActivities = 0;
public static void activityStarted()
{
if( sActiveActivities == 0 )
{
// TODO: Here is presumably "application level" resume
}
sActiveActivities++;
}
public static void activityStopped()
{
sActiveActivities--;
if( sActiveActivities == 0 )
{
// TODO: Here is presumably "application level" pause
}
}
}
Then in every activity, simply call the activityStarted() and activityStopped() methods:
#Override
public void onStart() {
super.onStart();
ActiveActivitiesTracker.activityStarted();
}
#Override
public void onStop() {
super.onStop();
ActiveActivitiesTracker.activityStopped();
}
I had the same problem. My aim was to lock the App, if the user abandons it. A simple aim, which i thought would be easy to implement. But all the solutions I found were way to complex. So I came to a simple solution: A time based lock.
Basically it works like this:
Start countdown to lock app in onPause
Stop countdown in onResume
If onResume is not called in time, change to locked
Therefor I created a small little class:
public class ApplicationLock {
private static final String TAG = ApplicationLock.class.getSimpleName();
private static final int LOCK_TIME = 1000; //lock after a second
private static boolean lock = true; //default is locked
private static Handler handler = new Handler();
private static Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
lock = true;
Log.i("ActivityTracker", "App locked");
}
};
public static boolean activityStarted()
{
handler.removeCallbacks(runnable);
if(lock)
{
Log.i(TAG, "App resumed - LOCKED");
return true;
}else{
Log.i(TAG, "App resumed - NOT LOCKED");
return false;
}
}
public static void activityStopped()
{
handler.postDelayed(runnable, LOCK_TIME);
Log.i(TAG, "App paused - Starting countdown");
}
Just call activityStopped() in your activities onPause() and activityStarted() in onResume(). Check the result of activityStarted(). If it returns true, lock your app. If the orientation of the app is changed, onResume will be called very quickly after onPause, so the app will not lock.
This solution might not fit every scenario, but in my case it was the best solution. Additionally you can change the countdown, to increase the user experience (The user pressed a wrong button and returns to the app in a few seconds, no need to lock the app). Hope this is useful to someone else.
I have done something very similar to this in an app which used a service that provided GPS functions by several activities. The idea was to only have the service there when one of the activities that used it is visible, and not there when none are visible. In your case, every activity would hook into a service, and you will know when the entire application was paused or resumed by hooking into the service's onCreate() and onDestroy() methods.
Here is a stripped-down example:
Components needed (these could probably be placed into a utility class if you want to reuse them, or I just had them for each activity class):
private boolean mAppActiveServiceBound = false;
private AppActiveService mAppActiveService = null;
private ServiceConnection mAppActiveConnection = new ServiceConnection() {
public void onServiceConnected( ComponentName className, IBinder service ) {
mAppActiveService = ( (AppActiveService.AppActiveBinder) service ).getService();
}
public void onServiceDisconnected( ComponentName className ) {
mAppActiveService = null;
}
};
Then in your onStart() and onStop() methods for each activity:
#Override
public void onStart() {
super.onStart();
mAppActiveServiceBound = bindService( new Intent( this, AppActiveService.class ), mAppActiveConnection, Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE );
}
#Override
public void onStop() {
super.onStop();
if( mAppActiveServiceBound ) {
unbindService( mAppActiveConnection );
mAppActiveServiceBound = false;
}
}
And finally, the service itself:
public class AppActiveService extends Service {
// Receives interactions from clients:
private final IBinder mBinder = new AppActiveBinder();
/**
* Provides a handle to the bound service.
*/
public class AppActiveBinder extends Binder {
AppActiveService getService() {
return AppActiveService.this;
}
}
#Override
public void onCreate(){
// TODO: Here is presumably "application level" resume
}
#Override
public void onDestroy(){
// TODO: Here is presumably "application level" pause
}
}
i started to work with .net remoting, read myself through tutorials and explanations, saw now at least three examples on the web and they looked all similar to my code. i can't find the reason for the error I get. (RemotingException was unhandled "Attempted to call a method declared on type 'System.IFormattable' on an object which exposes 'HES.MyProcess'.")
I tried to fix this for six hours now, unsuccessfully looking up the internet, reading through lots of pages...
Maybe you guys can help me out ?
MarshalByRefObject deriving class looks like:
public class MyProcess : MarshalByRefObject, IMyProcess
{
//public System.Diagnostics.Process process {get; set;}
public MyProcess()
{
// TODO: Complete member initialization
// this.process = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
}
public string GetProcessId()
{ Console.WriteLine("I'm on..");
return "test";
// return this.process.Id;
}
}
My interface loooks like this:
interface IMyProcess
{
string GetProcessId();
}
My server looks like this:
namespace HES
{
public class HES_Starter
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
// using TCP protocol
TcpChannel channel = new TcpChannel(_port);
//second value is for security settings
ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(channel, false);
Console.WriteLine("HES Server here... on PID: " + Process.GetCurrentProcess().Id);
//Type, objectUri to access the object remotely, mode
RemotingConfiguration.RegisterWellKnownServiceType(
typeof(HES.MyProcess), "HESProcess",
WellKnownObjectMode.Singleton);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
and finally my client like that:
namespace Service_Provider
{
public class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
TcpChannel channel = new TcpChannel();
//second value is for security settings
ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(channel, false);
Console.WriteLine("HES Client here...");
IMyProcess remoteProcess = (IMyProcess)Activator.GetObject(
typeof(IMyProcess), "tcp://localhost:8050/HESProcess");
Console.WriteLine(remoteProcess);
Console.WriteLine(remoteProcess.GetProcessId());
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
does anybody have a clue what i'm doing wrong ?
I mean from the exception I can see that the client knows that the object is an remote object in the 'HES' namespace. And in debug I can see that the object
remoteProcess = {System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.__TransparentProxy}
is a proxy...
I don't know what i'm doing wrong here.
I'm trying to get windows workflows working, and I've become a little stumped.
I've gotten a single workflow working, but now I am trying to do something a little more complex: start a workflow, where each activity itself contains a workflow. (Picture something like the main program starts the activities "Input, logic, and output", and then each of those have additional activities like "prompt user, get input, etc.")
I've had it working fine, with the example from here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg535667.aspx), when I am not passing any parameters from the main program to the activites. My question is, how exactly does the 'Variables' and 'metadata.SetVariablesCollection' work in the NativeActivity, and how to I get the parameters to the low level activities?
This is what I am currently trying:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Activities;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Activities.Statements;
namespace Project1
{
internal class MainProgram
{
internal static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
var act = new SimpleSequence();
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Variables.Add(new Variable<string> ("stringArg", "TEXT"));
WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(act);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
System.Console.WriteLine("EXCEPTION: {0}", ex);
}
}
public class WriteSomeText : CodeActivity
{
[RequiredArgument]
public InArgument<string> stringArg { get; set; }
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context)
{
string output = context.GetValue(stringArg);
System.Console.WriteLine(output);
}
}
public class SimpleSequence : NativeActivity
{
Collection<Activity> activities;
Collection<Variable> variables;
Variable<int> current = new Variable<int> { Default = 0 };
public Collection<Activity> Activities
{
get
{
if (this.activities == null)
this.activities = new Collection<Activity>();
return this.activities;
}
set
{
this.activities = value;
}
}
public Collection<Variable> Variables
{
get
{
if (this.variables == null)
this.variables = new Collection<Variable>();
return this.variables;
}
set
{
this.variables = value;
}
}
protected override void CacheMetadata(NativeActivityMetadata metadata)
{
metadata.SetChildrenCollection(this.activities);
metadata.SetVariablesCollection(this.variables);
metadata.AddImplementationVariable(this.current);
}
protected override void Execute(NativeActivityContext context)
{
if (this.Activities.Count > 0)
context.ScheduleActivity(this.Activities[0], onChildComplete);
}
void onChildComplete(NativeActivityContext context, ActivityInstance completed)
{
int currentExecutingActivity = this.current.Get(context);
int next = currentExecutingActivity + 1;
if (next < this.Activities.Count)
{
context.ScheduleActivity(this.Activities[next], this.onChildComplete);
this.current.Set(context, next);
}
}
}
}
}
This ends up throwing the following exception:
EXCEPTION: System.Activities.InvalidWorkflowException: The following errors were encountered while processing the workflow tree:
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
at System.Activities.Validation.ActivityValidationServices.ThrowIfViolationsExist(IList`1 validationErrors)
at System.Activities.Hosting.WorkflowInstance.ValidateWorkflow(WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensionManager)
at System.Activities.Hosting.WorkflowInstance.RegisterExtensionManager(WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensionManager)
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.EnsureInitialized()
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.RunInstance(WorkflowApplication instance)
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.Invoke(Activity activity, IDictionary`2 inputs, WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensions, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.Activities.WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(Activity workflow, TimeSpan timeout, WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensions)
at System.Activities.WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(Activity workflow)
at Project1.MainProgram.Main(String[] args) in c:\users\user\documents\visual studio 2010\Projects\ModelingProject1\Project1\MainProgram.cs:line 25
I know, I only pass 1 parameter, but the exception still says that I am missing 3 parameters. I am missing something as to how to do this properly.
You're correctly declaring stringArg as an InArgument but you're not passing any value to it when calling it inside SimpleSequence.
You can pass something using the constructor, while constructing the all activity itself, like this:
public class WriteSomeText : CodeActivity
{
[RequiredArgument]
public InArgument<string> stringArg { get; set; }
public WriteSomeText(string stringArg)
{
this.stringArg = stringArg;
}
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context
{
string output = context.GetValue(stringArg);
System.Console.WriteLine(output);
}
}
// Calling the activity like this:
internal static void Main(string[] args)
{
var act = new SimpleSequence()
{
Activities =
{
new WriteSomeText("hello"),
new WriteSomeText("world"),
new WriteSomeText("!")
}
};
WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(act);
Console.WriteLine("Press any key to exit");
Console.ReadKey();
}
Also notice that is a best practice to use the constructor to initialize collections:
public SimpleSequence()
{
activities = new Collection<Activity>();
variables = new Collection<Variable>();
}
This way is even more intuitive to initialize the activity:
var act = new SimpleSequence()
{
Activities =
{
new WriteSomeText("hello"),
new WriteSomeText("world"),
new WriteSomeText("!")
},
Variables =
{
new Variable<int>("myNewIntVar", 10),
// ....
}
};
EDIT:
There are a couple of other ways to approach the problem. This is your best friend while starting in the WF4 world.
Check WF\Basic\CustomActivities\Code-Bodied for a little push with this particular case.