I'm wrote a bash script and I don't have a chance to download pssh. However, I need to run multiple ssh commands in parallel. There is no problem so far, but when I run ssh commands, I want to see the outputs sequentially from the remote machine. I mean one ssh has multiple outputs and they get mixed up because more than one ssh is running.
#!/bin/bash
pid_list=""
while read -r list
do
ssh user#$list 'commands'&
c_pid=$!
pid_list="$pid_list $c_pid"
done < list.txt
for pid in $pid_list
do
wait $pid
done
What should I add to the code to take the output unmixed?
The most obvious way to me would be to write the outputs in a file and cat the files at the end:
#!/bin/bash
me=$$
pid_list=""
while read -r list
do
ssh user#$list 'hostname; sleep $((RANDOM%5)); hostname ; sleep $((RANDOM%5))' > /tmp/log-${me}-$list &
c_pid=$!
pid_list="$pid_list $c_pid"
done < list.txt
for pid in $pid_list
do
wait $pid
done
cat /tmp/log-${me}-*
rm /tmp/log-${me}-* 2> /dev/null
I didn't handle stderr because that wasn't in your question. Nor did I address the order of output because that isn't specified either. Nor is whether the output should appear as each host finishes. If you want those aspects covered, please improve your question.
Related
Usecase:
need to transfer binary files (1Gb) to array of IPs and start executing them upon arrival to their destinations without waiting all binaries to be transferred/executed. Sort of parallel mode.
Situation:
I have 2 functions - transfer and execution (depending on approach it can be shortened to 1 with 2 loops).
for N in "${NODES[#]}"; do
rsync -Pcz -e "ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null" --timeout=10 $FILE user#$N
done
and
for N in "${NODES[#]}"; do
ssh user#$N "cd ~/; ./exec.sh"
done
The point is that in this case i have to wait till all transfers finish first (and there sometimes can be tens of addresses)and just afterwards start the execution.
If i combine the loops into a single one, i have to wait again - this time for transfer+execution per node.
Expectation:
I'd like to transfer a file to the first node, start its execution, and switch to the second node with the same process, and so on. So timing would count for the transfers only, whereas each node executes the file on its own in parallel.
Obstacles:
1- need to be able to have an execution output from each node
2- additional packages, like screen are not an option.
What did i try:
i was thinking about injecting some script to the remote nodes via the loop to control the execution from there. But i'm sure there must be some less barbaric option.
What can be done here?
You should be able to use a single loop, and run the ssh command with a & suffix, which runs it in the background (i.e. without waiting for it to finish), and then after the loop use wait to wait for all of them to finish. Collecting output will be more interesting... I think you'll need to collect each run's output into a file, and then print the files at the end. Something like this (note that I have not tested this properly):
tmpdir="$(mktemp -qd -t "$(basename "$0")")" || {
echo "Error creating temporary directory" >&2
exit 1
}
for nodenum in "${!NODES[#]}"; do
# The ${!array[#]} idiom gets a list of array *indexes*, not elements; get the element by index:
N=${NODES[nodenum]}
# Copy file, and wait for copy to finish:
rsync -Pcz -e "ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null" --timeout=10 $FILE user#$N
# Start the script, and *don't* wait for it to finish:
ssh user#$N "cd ~/ sh exec.sh" >"$tmpdir/$nodenum.out" 2>&1 &
done
# Wait for all of the scripts to finish
wait
# Print all of the outputs (in order)
for nodenum in "${!NODES[#]}"; do
echo
echo "Output from ${NODES[nodenum]}:"
cat "$tmpdir/$nodenum.out"
done
# Clean up the temp directory
rm -R "$tmpdir"
BTW, the remote command "cd ~/ sh exec.sh" doesn't make sense. Is there supposed to be a semicolon in there? Also, I recommend using lower or mixed-case variable names to avoid conflicts with the many all-caps variables that have some sort of special meaning, and putting double-quotes around variable references (i.e. rsync ... "$FILE" "user#$N" instead of rsync ... $FILE user#$N).
EDIT: this assumes you want to start the script on each host as soon as that particular copy is done; if you want to wait until all copies are done, then fire all scripts at once, use two loops: one to do the copies, then a second that does the ssh commands in the background (collecting output as above), then wait for those to all finish, then print all of the outputs.
You could do the transfer and script as a single background task, so that the script on a particular host starts as soon as its transfer is complete
for N in "${NODES[#]}"; do
(rsync -Pcz -e "ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null" --timeout=10 $FILE user#$N
ssh user#$N "cd ~/; ./exec.sh") > ${N}.log 2>&1 &
done
You then collect all of the hostname.log files
I have a bash script with a loop of processes that I want to run in parallel:
for i in {1..5}
do
echo Running for simulation $i
python script.py $i > ./outlogs/$i.log 2>&1 &
done
But when I do this the file redirection doesn't work, so $i.log just stays empty. The redirection only works when I do not use the & at the end, but then the script waits for each process to finish before starting the next one, which I don't want.
I tried a solution using script -c, but this does not update in realtime, only once the process ends. Does anyone have better suggestions, where the file redirection works in this script but it still updates in realtime?
You need simply add -u option so it will look like this:
python -u script.py $i > ./outlogs/$i.log 2>&1 &
Option -u is for unbuffered binary stdout and stderr
This is the first question that I post here. I tried to do a throughout search, but if I haven't (and the answer is obvious somewhere else), please just let me know.
I have a script that runs a program for me, here it is:
csv_file=../data/teste_nohup.csv
trace_file=../data/gnp.trace
declare -i n=100
declare -i p=1
declare -i counter=0
while [ $counter -lt 3 ];
do
n=100
while true
do
nice -19 sage gnptest.py ${n} ${p} | tee -a ${csv_file}
notify-send "finished test gnp ${n} ${p}"
done
done
So, what I'm trying to do is run the gnptest.py program a few times, and have the result be written to the csv_file.
The problem is, that depending on the input, the program may take a long time to complete. So I'd like to connect to the server over ssh, start the program, close the terminal, and check the output file from time to time.
I've tried nohup and disown. Nohup creates a huge nohup.out file, full with errors that I don't get while normally running the script (it complains about using the -lt operand, for example). But the biggest problem that I'm facing is that no command (nohup ou disown -h) is executing the program and sending the output to the file that I've specified in the csv_file variable, which is being done using the tee command. Also, none of them seem to continue running after I logout...
Any help will be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance!!
i hv just joined so cannt add comment
Please try by using redirection instead of tee in script
And to get rid of Nohup.out use following to run script
nohup script.sh > /dev/null 2>&1 &
If above produces error use
nohup script.sh > /dev/null 2>&1 </dev/null &
Hope this will help.
I have a basic script that outputs various status messages. e.g.
~$ ./myscript.sh
0 of 100
1 of 100
2 of 100
...
I wanted to wrap this in a parent script, in order to run a sequence of child-scripts and send an email upon overall completion, e.g. topscript.sh
#!/bin/bash
START=$(date +%s)
/usr/local/bin/myscript.sh
/usr/local/bin/otherscript.sh
/usr/local/bin/anotherscript.sh
RET=$?
END=$(date +%s)
echo -e "Subject:Task Complete\nBegan on $START and finished at $END and exited with status $RET.\n" | sendmail -v group#mydomain.com
I'm running this like:
~$ topscript.sh >/var/log/topscript.log 2>&1
However, when I run tail -f /var/log/topscript.log to inspect the log I see nothing, even though running top shows myscript.sh is currently being executed, and therefore, presumably outputting status messages.
Why isn't the stdout/stderr from the child scripts being captured in the parent's log? How do I fix this?
EDIT: I'm also running these on a remote machine, connected via ssh using pseudo-tty allocation, e.g. ssh -t user#host. Could the pseudo-tty be interfering?
I just tried your the following: I have three files t1.sh, t2.sh, and t3.sh all with the following content:
#!/bin/bash
for((i=0;i<10;i++)) ; do
echo $i of 9
sleep 1
done
And a script called myscript.sh with the following content:
#!/bin/bash
./t1.sh
./t2.sh
./t3.sh
echo "All Done"
When I run ./myscript.sh > topscript.log 2>&1 and then in another terminal run tail -f topscript.log I see the lines being output just fine in the log file.
Perhaps the things being run in your subscripts use a large output buffer? I know when I've run python scripts before, it has a pretty big output buffer so you don't see any output for a while. Do you actually see the entire output in the email that gets sent out at the end of topscript.sh? Is it just that while the processes run you're not seeing the output?
try
unbuffer topscript.sh >/var/log/topscript.log 2>&1
Note that unbuffer is not always available as a std binary in old-style Unix platforms and may require a search and installation for a package to support it.
I hope this helps.
I have 20 machines, each running a process. The machines are named:
["machine1", "machine2", ...., "machine20"]
To inspect how the process is doing on machine1, I issue the following command from a remote machine:
ssh machine1 cat log.txt
For machine2, I issue the following command:
ssh machine2 cat log.txt
Similarly, for machine20, I issue the following command:
ssh machine20 cat log.txt
Is there a bash command that will allow me to view the output from all machines using one command?
If the machines are nicely numbered like in your example:
for i in {1..20} ; do ssh machine$i cat log.txt; done
If you have the list of machines in a file, you can use:
cat machinesList.txt | xargs -i ssh {} cat log.txt
You could store all your machine names in an array or text file, and loop through it.
declare -a machineList=('host1' 'host2' 'otherHost') # and more...
for machine in ${machineList[#]}
do
ssh $machine cat log.txt
done
I assume your machines aren't literally named 'machine1', 'machine2', etc.
Some links:
bash Array Tutorial
GNU Bash Array Documentation
for i in {1..20}
do
ssh machine$i cat log.txt
done
Use a loop?
for i in {1..20}
do
ssh machine$i cat log.txt
done
But note that you're running cat within a remote shell session, not the current one, so this might not quite work as you expect. Try it and see.
Put your hosts in a file and use a while loop as shown below. Note the use of the -n flag on ssh:
while read host; do ssh -n $host cat log.txt; done < hosts-file
Alternatively you can use PSSH:
pssh -h hosts-file -i "cat log.txt"
I would recommend using a program called Shmux. Despite the name, it works really well. I've used it with more than 100 machines with good results. It also gracefully handles machine failures for you which could be a disadvantage with a bash for loop approach.
I think the coolest thing about this program is the ability to issue multiple threads for your commands which allows to run the commands on all 20 machines in parallel.
Aside from the suggestions for using a loop, you might want to take a look at tools, like pssh or dsh, designed for running commands on multiple clients.