Nott getting same result when trying to get slope from 2 points - python-3.x

I'm trying to make something that would give me the slope and y-intercept from 2 points. Sometimes it would give me the correct values, but other times it would give me something close to correct but wrong.
Anyone know any thing that I could have done wrong? (Also, I feel like I should say that I'm just now starting to learn python)
y2 = input('Y2: ')
y1 = input('Y1: ')
x2 = input('X2: ')
x1 = input('X1: ')
y2 = float(y2)
y1 = float(y1)
x2 = float(x2)
x1 = float(x1)
over = y2-y1
under = x2-x1
m = over/under
y = float(y2)
x = float(x2)
m = float(m)
ym = y-m
b = ym/x
print(f'Y = {m}x + {b}')

it appears as though the mathematics for the intercept b is incorrect.
it would be logical to use the x1, y1 coordinate with the slope to generate b.
assume that you want to find x0, y0 where y0 = b. Then you would do a similar calculation (already having calculated m before as you correctly did).
So (y1-b) / x1 = m. and you can just rearrange this to get:
b = y1 - m*x1.
So this works:
x1, y1 = 1, 1
x2, y2 = 2, 2
over = y2-y1
under = x2-x1
m = over/under
b = y1 - m*x1
print(f'Y = {m}x + {b}')
returns this:
Y = 1.0x + 0.0

Related

How do I calculate the fourth vertex of a tetrahedron given the other three?

I want to calculate the fourth vertex of a regular tetrahedron. I have the coordinates
{0, 0, Sqrt[2/3] - 1/(2 Sqrt[6])}, {-(1/(2 Sqrt[3])), -(1/2), -(1/(2
Sqrt[6]))} and {-(1/(2 Sqrt[3])), 1/2, -(1/(2 Sqrt[6]))}
Can anybody please help?
Find the center of face
cx = (x1 + x2 + x3)/3 and similar for y,z
Get two edge vectors
e2x = x2 - x1
e2y = y2 - y1
e2z = z2 - z1
e3x = x3 - x1
e3y = y3 - y1
e3z = z3 - z1
Calculate edge len
elen = sqrt(e2x*e2x+e2y*e2y+e2z*e2z)
Calculate vector product to get normal to this face
nx = e2y*e3z - e2z*e3y
ny = e2z*e3x - e2x*e3z
nz = e2x*e3y - e2y*e3x
Make unit normal
nlen = sqrt(nx*nx+ny*ny+nz*nz)
nx = nx / nlen
...
Make normal of needed length (tetrahedron height)
lnx = nx * sqrt(2/3) * elen
...
Add this normal to the face center
x4 = cx +/- lnx
y4 = cy +/- lny
z4 = cz +/- lnz
+/- signs correspond to two possible positions of the fourth vertex

TensorFlow - Matrix multiplication of matrices cast to float type takes very long time , why?

The following matrix multiplication in tensorflow 2.x takes a very long time to execute
a = tf.random.uniform(shape=(9180, 3049))
b = tf.random.uniform(shape=(3049, 1913))
a = tf.cast(a ,tf.float16)
b = tf.cast(b ,tf.float16)
tf.matmul(a,b)
but if I simply use the below method, it's fast
a = tf.random.uniform(shape=(9180, 3049))
b = tf.random.uniform(shape=(3049, 1913))
tf.matmul(a,b)
Why is it so? and I need to convert the tensor to float for some purpose.
Actually, in both of your cases, you are attempting Matrix multiplication of floating values. In the first case you are using float16 and in second case you are using float32.
import tensorflow as tf
import time
a = tf.random.uniform(shape=(9180, 3049), seed = 10)
b = tf.random.uniform(shape=(3049, 1913), seed = 10)
1st run
x2 = a
y2 = b
s = time.time()
r2 = tf.matmul(x2,y2)
e = time.time()
print((e-s)*1000)
x1 = tf.cast(a ,tf.float16)
y1 = tf.cast(b ,tf.float16)
s = time.time()
r1 = tf.matmul(x1,y1)
e = time.time()
print((e-s)*1000)
Output:
184.76319313049316
0.0
2nd run after restarting my kernel.
x1 = tf.cast(a ,tf.float16)
y1 = tf.cast(b ,tf.float16)
s = time.time()
r1 = tf.matmul(x1,y1)
e = time.time()
print((e-s)*1000)
x2 = a
y2 = b
s = time.time()
r2 = tf.matmul(x2,y2)
e = time.time()
print((e-s)*1000)
Output:
183.03942680358887
1.0335445404052734
Now if I run the same code again without restarting the kernel again even after changing the values of a and b.
x1 = tf.cast(a ,tf.float16)
y1 = tf.cast(b ,tf.float16)
s = time.time()
r1 = tf.matmul(x1,y1)
e = time.time()
print((e-s)*1000)
x2 = a
y2 = b
s = time.time()
r2 = tf.matmul(x2,y2)
e = time.time()
print((e-s)*1000)
Output:
0.0
0.0
So essentially it is not a problem of TensorFlow. Tensorflow is executed as a graph. When you run it for the first time it initializes the graph with the mentioned data structure and optimizes it for further calculation. Take a look at the final comment in this.
Therefore your second execution for an operation will be faster

How to find the slope: output format ((A,slope), B)

I'm enrolled in a Data Science course, and I'm trying to solve some programming problems, I haven't worked with Python in a long time, but I'm trying to improve my knowledge of the language.
Here is my problem:
def find_slope(x1, y1, x2, y2):
if (x1) == (x2):
return "inf"
else:
return ((float)(y2-y1)/(x2-x1))
Here is my driver code:
x1 = 1
y1 = 2
x2 = -7
y2 = -2
print(find_slope(x1, y1, x2, y2))
This is my output:
0.5
I'm not sure how to get it in the correct format, such as (((1, 2), .5), (3, 4))
NOTE: I wrote the code for the driver.
You can do this:
def find_slope(input):
x1 = input[0][0]
y1 = input[0][1]
x2 = input[1][0]
y2 = input[1][1]
if (x1) == (x2):
slope = "inf"
else:
slope = ((float)(y2-y1)/(x2-x1))
output = (((x1, y1), slope), (x2, y2))
return output
I changed the input to match the input format given in the screenshot.
Now the input is a single tuple, containing two tuples. Each of the inner tuples contain a x coordinate and a y coordinate.
You can call the function using
input = ((1, 2), (-7, -2))
output = find_slope(input)
The output will be in the format ((A, slope), B), where A and B are tuples containing the x and y coords.

Unable to get the simplified coordinates using sympy - python

I have x2, x3, y2, y3, d1, d2, d3 values which is,
x2 = 0
x3 = 100
y2 = 0
y3 = 0
d1 = 100
d2 = 100
d3 = 87
When I use the below script,
from sympy import symbols, Eq, solve
x, y = symbols('x y')
eq1 = Eq((x - x2) ** 2 + (y - y2) ** 2 - d2 ** 2)
eq2 = Eq((x - x3) ** 2 + (y - y3) ** 2 - d3 ** 2)
sol_dict = solve((eq1, eq2), (x, y))
I got the ans as,
sol_dict = [(12431/200, -87*sqrt(32431)/200), (12431/200, 87*sqrt(32431)/200)]
How can I achieve the simplified solution like
sol_dict = [(62.155, -78.33), (62.155, 78.33)]
in python?
You can numerically evaluate the solution to get floats:
In [40]: [[x.evalf(3) for x in s] for s in sol_dict]
Out[40]: [[62.2, -78.3], [62.2, 78.3]]
I would only recommend doing that for display though. If you want to use the values in sol_dict for further calculations it's best to keep them as exact rational numbers.

Programming Secant Method into Python

The sum of two numbers is 20. If each number is added to its square root, the product of the two sums is 155.55. Use Secant Method to approximate, to within 10^(-4), the value of the two numbers.
Based on http://campus.murraystate.edu/academic/faculty/wlyle/420/Secant.htm
#inital guess
x1 = 10
x2 = 50
Epsilon = 1e-4
#given function
def func(x):
return abs(x)**0.5 * (abs(x)+20)**0.5 - 155.55
y1 = func(x1)
y2 = func(x2)
#loop max 20 times
for i in range(20):
ans = x2 - y2 * (x2-x1)/(y2-y1)
y3 = func(ans)
print("Try:{}\tx1:{:0.3f}\tx2:{:0.3f}\ty3:{:0.3f}".format(i,x1, x2, y3))
if (abs(y3) < Epsilon):
break
x1, x2 = x2, ans
y1, y2 = y2, y3
print("\n\nThe numbers are: {:0.3f} and {:0.3f}".format(ans, ans+20))
Based on Your Title
This code works well in most of the cases. Taken from Secant Method Using Python (Output Included)
# Defining Function
def f(x):
return x**3 - 5*x - 9
# Implementing Secant Method
def secant(x0,x1,e,N):
print('\n\n*** SECANT METHOD IMPLEMENTATION ***')
step = 1
condition = True
while condition:
if f(x0) == f(x1):
print('Divide by zero error!')
break
x2 = x0 - (x1-x0)*f(x0)/( f(x1) - f(x0) )
print('Iteration-%d, x2 = %0.6f and f(x2) = %0.6f' % (step, x2, f(x2)))
x0 = x1
x1 = x2
step = step + 1
if step > N:
print('Not Convergent!')
break
condition = abs(f(x2)) > e
print('\n Required root is: %0.8f' % x2)
# Input Section
x0 = input('Enter First Guess: ')
x1 = input('Enter Second Guess: ')
e = input('Tolerable Error: ')
N = input('Maximum Step: ')
# Converting x0 and e to float
x0 = float(x0)
x1 = float(x1)
e = float(e)
# Converting N to integer
N = int(N)
#Note: You can combine above three section like this
# x0 = float(input('Enter First Guess: '))
# x1 = float(input('Enter Second Guess: '))
# e = float(input('Tolerable Error: '))
# N = int(input('Maximum Step: '))
# Starting Secant Method
secant(x0,x1,e,N)

Resources