Problem to using bash shell with another user [duplicate] - linux

Question

This question already has answers here:
Using variables inside a bash heredoc
(3 answers)
Trouble understanding the non-obvious use of backslash inside of backticks
(1 answer)
Closed 1 year ago.
I can't find out, how to mask the $ in the following shell statement. Any
help is appreciated!
#!/bin/bash
local result=`su -m user1 -c "sqlplus -s / as sysdba <<-EOF
SELECT cdb FROM v\$database;
exit
EOF"
`

Answer 1

You should single-quote EOF, e.g. <<-'EOF'
But then you also need to run the subprocess with $() instead of backquotes.
#!/bin/bash
local result=$(su -m user1 -c "sqlplus -s / as sysdba <<-'EOF'
SELECT cdb FROM v\$database;
exit
EOF")
BashFAQ/082 reports that “Backslashes (\) inside backticks are handled in a non-obvious manner”
$ echo "`echo \\a`" "$(echo \\a)"
a \a
$ echo "`echo \\\\a`" "$(echo \\\\a)"
\a \\a
# Note that this is true for *single quotes* too!
$ foo=`echo '\\'`; bar=$(echo '\\'); echo "foo is $foo, bar is $bar"
foo is \, bar is \\
So if you do not want to use $(...) you need 2 backslashes, i.e. \\$database and if you want to use neither $(...) nor single-quoted EOF, you need no less than 6 backslashes, i.e. \\\\\\$database

Answer 2

Do not use backticks. Use #(...).
local result=$(su -m user1 -c "sqlplus -s / as sysdba <<-EOF
SELECT cdb FROM v\\\$database;
exit
EOF
")
But anyway, if you do not want anything to expand, use single quotes.
local result=$(su -m user1 -c 'sqlplus -s / as sysdba <<-EOF
SELECT cdb FROM v\$database;
exit
EOF
')
And you could, redirect in the parent shell - it's going to be way simpler - and use a quoted stop word.
local result=$(su -m user1 -c 'sqlplus -s / as sysdba' <<-'EOF'
SELECT cdb FROM v$database;
exit
EOF
")