Please I need Compulsory Answer How To Check Which Country Vpn Is Connected?
Related
I need to provide white list for Genymotion, so that only allowed apps could use internet access.
As I need my own VPN application, the apps which need VPN access are not useful.
Also I have try DroidWall and Android Firewall but some Genymotion devices like :Samsung Galaxy S8 and Google Nexus9 don't provide root access to firewall apps (It seems they are not rooted) and the other devices rule don't work since apps which are not in white list still have internet access when Firewall is Enabled.
It is possible to register a domain name with the IP address of the wifi network to use it later in iis.
I've tried the website is only Displayed for computers That Same are connected to the WiFi network does not Appear in the other network.
It's POSSIBLE to do this, but why would you want to? Most WiFi "network" devices are Wireless Access Points and/or hubs that already have an embedded port80/443 web service. You would be pointing a domain to a pre-existing (and non-modifiable) host.
Can you be more specific about what you want to do?
I use microsoft azure virtual network with a VPN gateway, I want to connect to a checkpoint site to site VPN.
The other party asks what is my VPN device name. Which I dont have an answer to. Are they asking a brand name?
Azure portal says VPN type: route based. But it does not show a device name anywhere. How to solve this? thanks a lot in advance.
The other party asks what is my VPN device name.
Azure VPN gateway does not provide VPN device name, you could give your VPN gateway Public IP Address to checkpoint manager.
More information about how to create site-to-site VPN between Azure and checkpoint please refer to this link.
Also, you could create site-to-to VPN by using Azure Portal, please refer to this link.
I want to create a group using the createGroup() method. The P2P group has the gateway and DNS set to 192.168.49.1. I want to set the DNS to a custom IP rather than what is assigned by the method. How is this possible??
My ultimate aim is to give internet connectivity to the P2P group.
On Azure, http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/virtual-networks-create-site-to-site-cross-premises-connectivity/
the following is stated in relation to site to site connectivity.
A VPN device with a public IPv4 address. You'll need the IP address in
order to complete the wizard.
The VPN device cannot be located behind a network address translator
(NAT) and must meet the minimum device standards.
I'm assuming this is accurate, but could anyone confirm? it seems very limiting, since my peer vpn device can support NAT-T. Does the Azure VPN g/w device support IPsec NAT-T?
Is the same restriction applicable to point to site, where my peer is the point and I want to connect/be connected to by the Azure VPN gateway device with VNet behind the Azure VPN g/w device.
thank you.
I don't see to be limiting at all. And yes, this is the case. It is on the official documentation before all.
When talk about Point-to-Site, I believe you missunderstand the service a bit. Azure Point-to-Site connectivity allows a single computer or laptop (named Point) to connect to Azure VPN Gateway (Site). In that case, the client only has to be connected to the internet.
When you connect to Azure VPN Gateway, you will be part of the whole Azure Virtual Network that Gateway connects.
To tell you the truth I am not sure that the Azure VPN gateway device supports IPSec NAT of any kind at all, whether Point-to-Site or Site-to-Site. Below are my findings. My best lead so far is finding #4.
In all my research over the past week, it seems like it’s presently impossible to achieve this with Azure. See https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/19eb5ac0-5fb1-4afa-8081-5afc32cb04fd/is-nat-supported-within-an-ipsec-vpn-connection?forum=WAVirtualMachinesVirtualNetwork. According to this, “At the moment there cannot be a IPSec VPN connection established when either of the devices involve NAT. . .you cannot have an on premise VPN device behind a NAT and this cannot be applied on a VNet gateway since customers will not have access to configuring such rules for a VPN gateway.” That was April 2017.
In fact, in February 2017, Microsoft seemed to discard any chances we have of applying NAT over VPN. On their feedback forum at https://feedback.azure.com/forums/217313-networking/suggestions/5525129-please-make-site-to-site-vpn-avaiable-for-devices, an Azure Networking Team member declines the possibility of Site-to-Site VPN for devices behind a NAT. So Site-to-Site is not expected, which is where it makes the most sense because it would help resolve common subnet overlap issues between a cloud virtual network and an on-premises hardware network. I'm not so sure how NAT over VPN would benefit a Point-to-Site situation (what's the application?)
Then, contradictorily as of December 2017 (later that year), Microsoft seems to announce they’re just now in the planning stages to implement this for Azure (see https://feedback.azure.com/forums/217313-networking/suggestions/15488244-offer-nat-as-a-service).
Only on http://nullsession.com/2015/02/02/connecting-to-your-azure-site-to-site-vpn-over-nat/, I found a method from 2017 that is, “unsupported by Microsoft – but works according to RFC.” I’m still processing this but I’m not convinced I should try it because it’s unsupported.
Let me know what you think because I am personally trying to get a satisfactory solution for this too.