Does anyone knows a good Python library to parse MSDOS files and obtain metadata and start()'s bytecodes? Like an alternative version of pefile library but for MSDOS? I can't seems to find any via Google.
If there isn't, is there a good source to refer to on MSDOS's file format? This way, I can create my own parser instead. I know there are tools like IDA Pro and Reko decompiler but I need a MSDOS file parser to automate some stuff. Thank you in advanced!
Reko decompiler maintainer here. For what it's worth, you can use Reko's MS-DOS source code and translate it to Python. It's not a lot of code and MS-DOS executables aren't that complex to parse -- it's quite a simple format. The relevant files are:
https://github.com/uxmal/reko/blob/master/src/ImageLoaders/MzExe/ExeImageLoader.cs
https://github.com/uxmal/reko/blob/master/src/ImageLoaders/MzExe/MsdosImageLoader.cs
You could also try executing the Reko code directly from Python. The Reko binaries are available as a nuget package: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Reko.Decompiler.Runtime
Use the class Reko.ImageLoaders.MzExe.ExeImageLoader in the Reko.ImageLoaders.MzExe class. Integration could be done with http://pythonnet.github.io/
Related
Is there any python library to generate ean128 barcode. I tried 'python-barcode' , but in that library there is no option for ean128.
The person who originally asked this question may not benefit from this, but this is for those who are still looking for an answer.
Note: Code-128 is not same as GS1-128
I was also stuck with this issue a few days ago, and I finally managed to find a python library which supports the GS1-128(UCC/EAN-128) barcode.
The library I am referring to is called "treepoem". Strange name I agree that's what makes it so hard to find. It is a wrapper for BWIPP library. And it has a dependency on ghostscript as well. About the name; Barcode -> Bark ode -> Tree poem.
Important links:
1) Ghostscript; download and install it and also add its "bin" and "lib" folder to
system's path variable.
https://www.ghostscript.com/download/gsdnld.html
2)treepoem
https://pypi.org/project/treepoem/
3) All-codes; here in the repository you will find all supported barcodes here.
https://github.com/adamchainz/treepoem/blob/master/treepoem/data.py
import treepoem
image = treepoem.generate_barcode(
barcode_type='gs1-128', # One of the BWIPP supported codes.
data='(01)14-digit-product-code')
image.convert('1').save('barcode.png')
I think that EAN 128 is the same thing as Code 128 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_128). It seems to be supported by python-barcode
There is an alternative lib with code 128
I need to read an excel file into Julia. I tried the package "ExcelReaders". However, the package requires additionally the Python or the xlrd package. Although it uses the conda.jl package to install these dependencies automatically, I keep on running into different installation problems. Is there a simple way to read excel into Julia? Has anyone tried the Taro.jl package?
There is only one pure-Julia v1.0-compatible Excel reader available:
XLSX.jl
It has no dependencies on Python or Java. Install it from the package manager by typing ]add XLSX in the console, then load it with using XLSX. Here is the tutorial document.
The Taro.jl package works well to read excel into Julia. You can install the package with Pkg.add(Taro). Once the package is installed, you can load it with using Taro; Taro.init(). You can use Taro.readxl() to read excel files. The following post provides a somewhat nice tutorial on how to read excel files in Julia using Taro.jl:
https://economictheoryblog.com/2018/01/03/how-to-read-an-excel-file-in-julia-language-an-example/
Taro works pretty well (even if I say so myself). You need java installed on the machine, but after that, Pkg.add(Taro) will install all the dependencies for you. And, I think you'll have better luck with Taro with more complex excel files.
If you are fine with saving in the ods format, you could also use the OdsIO.jl package.
It uses a python module (ezodf) as well, but it should install it automatically in both Windows and Linux when you install OdsIO.jl.
If you can save as a .csv then CSV.jl works well.
The ExcelReaders package is also available
https://github.com/davidanthoff/ExcelReaders.jl
I am trying to write source code in one language and have it converted to both native c++ and JS source. Ideally the converted source should be human readable and resemble the original source as best it can. I was hoping haxe could solve this problem for me. So I code in haxescript and have it convert it to its corresponding C++ and JS source. However the examples I'm finding of haxe seems to create the final application for you. So with C++ it will use msbuild (or whatever compiler it finds) and creates the final exe for you from generated C++ code. Does haxe also create the c++ and JS source code for you to view or is it all done internally to haxe and not accessible? If it is accessible then is it possible to remove the building side of haxe so it simply creates the source code and stops?
Thanks
When you generate CPP all the intermediate files are generated and kept wherever you decide to generate your output (the path given using -cpp pathToOutput). The fact that you get an executable is probably because you are using the -main switch. That implies an entry point to your application but that is not really required and you can just pass to the command line a bunch of types that you want to have built in your output.
For JS it is very similar, a single JS file is generated and it only has an entry point if you used -main.
Regarding the other topic, does your Haxe code resembles the generated code the answer is yes, but ... some of the types (like Enum and Abstract) only exist in Haxe so they will generate code that functionally works but it might look quite different. Also Haxe has an always-on optimizer/analyzer that might mungle your code in unexpected ways (the analyzer can be disabled). I still find that it is not that difficult to figure out the Haxe source from the generated code. JS has support for source mapping which is really useful for debugging. So in the end, Haxe doesn't do anything to obfuscate your generated code but also doesn't do much to try to preserve it too strictly.
Is there a kind of "include" directive in RPM spec? I couldn't find an answer by googling.
Motivation: I have a RPM spec template which the build process modifies with the version, revision and other build-specific data. This is done by sed currently. I think it would be cleaner if the spec would #include a build-specific definitions file, which would be generated by the build process, so I don't need to search and replace in the spec.
If there is no include, is there an idiomatic way to do this (quite common, I believe) task?
Sufficiently recent versions of rpmbuild certainly do support %include:
%include common.inc
Unfortunately, they aren't very smart about it -- there is no known set of directories, in which it will look for the requested files, for example. But it is there and variables are expanded, for example:
%include %{_topdir}/Common/common.inc
RPM does not support includes.
I have solved similar problems with either m4 macro processor or by just concatenating parts of spec (when the "include" was at the beginning).
If you only need to pass a few variables at build time, and not include several lines from another file, you can run
rpmbuild --define 'myvar SOMEVALUE' -bb myspec.spec
and you can use %myvar in the spec.
I faced this same issue recently. I wanted to define multiple sub-packages that were similar, but each varied just slightly (they were language-specific RPMs). I didn't want to repeat the same boiler-plate stuff for each sub-package.
Here's a generic version of what I did:
%define foo_spec() %{expand:%(cat '%{myloc}/main-foo.spec')}
%{foo_spec bar}
%{foo_spec baz}
%{foo_spec qux}
The use of %{expand} ensures that %(cat) is only executed a single time, when the macro is defined. The content of the main-foo.spec file is then three times, and each time %1 in the main-foo.spec file expands to each of bar, baz and qux, in turn, allowing me to treat it as a template. You could easily expand this to more than one parameter, if you have the need (I did not).
For the underlying issue, there maybe two additional solutions that are present in all rpm versions that I am aware of.
Subpackages
macro and rpmrc files.
Subpackages
Another alternative (and perhaps the "RPM way") is to use sub-packages. Maximum RPM also has information and examples of subpackages.
I think the question is trying to structure something like,
two spec files; say rpm_debug.spec and rpm_production.spec
both use %include common.spec
debug and production could also be client and server, etc. For the examples of redefining a variable, each subpackage can have it's own list of variables.
Limitations
The main advantage of subpackages is that only one build takes place; This may also be a disadvantage. The debug and production example may highlight this. That can be worked around using strip to create variants or compiling twice with different output; perhaps using VPATH with Gnu Make). Having to compile large packages and then only have simple variations, like with/without developer info, like headers, static libraries, etc. can make you appreciate this approach.
Macros and Rpmrc
Subpackages don't solve the problem of structural defines that you wish for an entire rootfs hierarchy, or larger collection of RPMs. We have rpmbuild --showrc for this. You can have a large amount of variables and macros defined by altering rpmrc and macros when you run rpm and rpmbuild. From the man page,
rpmrc Configuration
/usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/rpmrc
/etc/rpmrc
~/.rpmrc
Macro Configuration
/usr/lib/rpm/macros
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros
/etc/rpm/macros
~/.rpmmacros
I think these two features can solve all the problems that %include can. However, %include is a familiar concept and was probably added to make rpm more full-featured and developer friendly.
Which version are you talking about? I currently have %include filename.txt in my spec file and it seems to work just like the C #include directive.
> rpmbuild --version
RPM version 4.8.1
You can include the *.inc files from the SOURCES directory (%_sourcedir):
Source1: common.inc
%include %{SOURCE1}
In this way they will go automatically into SRPMS.
I've used scripts (name your favorite) to take a template and create the spec file from that. Also, the %files tag can import a file that is created by another process, e.g. Python's bdist-rpm.
I'm trying to test out a library that provides a VC++ example; however, I use gcc/g++ for all of my projects.
Well, the way the VC++ example accesses the library is it uses the #import directive, passing the location of the library DLL, then it does a using namespace LIBRARYNAME, and then it's able to create some undefined type (I'd assume it's defined in the DLL) and create a new instance of it with __uuidof. From then on, to call one of the library functions the example just does a createdObj->foo() and that's that.
Well... g++'s #import is different from VC++'s import (see here), so this example won't work for me.
Is there any way this can be converted to compile under g++, or am I SOL until the library developer provides me with a static library I can try out?
If you are using cygwin, then this page: http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/dll.html will provide you with all the help you need.
If you are using mingw, you can accomplish the same thing, but you probably won't have grep and sed, so you'll have to use some other method of doing the filtering to get your .def file.
If you were using #import in VC++ it means the DLL isn't a regular DLL, it's a COM DLL.
Since gcc doesn't have COM support, you'll just have to wait for the library author to write a non-COM version.
Maybe it could have helped you to use the OLEViewer and "View type information" to extract the basics of the IDL. Or maybe you could just use the VC++ generated .tlh and .tli files and import them into your G++ project.
I guess this answer is way too late, but right now I'm encountering similar issues myself so I just got into this thread. Hope you found the solution on time.
Regards.