right now I am setting up Avo to send events tracking to Google Analytics 4 and feeling a bit confused about the process.
I have managed to send events to Avo, but nothing goes to GA4. I include a photo of how I set up the GA4 Destination for more info. Can anyone help me?
I am quite new with GA4 as well, so there might be some problems with setting up GA4 as well.
const initAvoApp = async () => {
console.log('running')
const env = () => {
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') return { inspector: Inspector.AvoInspectorEnv.Dev, avoEnv: AvoEnv.Dev }
if (process.env.NEXT_APP_ENV === 'staging')
return { inspector: Inspector.AvoInspectorEnv.Staging, avoEnv: AvoEnv.Dev }
return { inspector: Inspector.AvoInspectorEnv.Prod, avoEnv: AvoEnv.Prod }
}
const inspector = new Inspector.AvoInspector({
apiKey: 'nbhQNPWSaF9SHA1w1jhk',
env: env().inspector,
version: '1.0.0',
appName: 'My App',
})
const customDestination = {
logEvent: function (eventName: string, eventProperties: object) {
window.gtag('event', eventName, eventProperties)
},
identify: function (userId: string) {
// Todo: Identify user in Google Analytics
window.gtag('event', 'identity', userId)
},
unidentify: function () {
// Todo: Unidentify currently identified user in Google Analytics
window.gtag('event', 'identity', null)
},
revenue: function (amount: number, eventProperties: object) {
window.gtag('event', 'purchase', { ...eventProperties, amount })
},
logPage: function (screenName: string, eventProperties: object) {
window.gtag('event', 'screen_view', {
...eventProperties,
screen_name: screenName,
})
},
}
!!customDestination &&
initAvo(
{
env: env().avoEnv,
inspector: inspector,
reportFailureAs: 'log',
},
[customDestination],
customDestination,
)
}
Destination Setup
Related
Caveat: I am not the author of this project. Whoever originally wrote this is no longer with the organization and I am seemingly the most knowledgeable on this topic at this point.
I know a little about javascript and unit tests, so I successfully added one .spec.js file. I tried adding a second one for another module, reusing a lot of the spec setup, and it immediately broke.
Project resources:
Nodejs 12.16.1
jasmine-node-karma: "^1.6.1"
karma: "^6.3.12"
Contents of ./karma.conf.js:
module.exports = function(config) {
config.set({
basePath: './public',
frameworks: ['jasmine', 'jquery-3.2.1'],
files: [
"../node_modules/angular/angular.js",
"../node_modules/angular-mocks/angular-mocks.js",
"../node_modules/bootstrap/dist/js/bootstrap.js",
"../public/**/*.js",
],
exclude: [
],
preprocessors: {
},
client: {
captureConsole: true
},
browserConsoleLogOptions: {
terminal: true,
level: ""
},
reporters: ['progress'],
port: 9876,
colors: true,
logLevel: config.LOG_INFO,
autoWatch: true,
browsers: ['FirefoxHeadless', 'ChromeHeadlessNoSandbox', 'PhantomJS'],
customLaunchers: {
ChromeHeadlessNoSandbox: {
base: 'ChromeHeadless',
flags: ['--no-sandbox']
},
FirefoxHeadless: {
base: 'Firefox',
flags: ['-headless'],
}
},
singleRun: false,
concurrency: Infinity
})
}
Originally I added ./public/controllers.spec.js to match the existing ./public/controllers.js. These unit tests pass and continue to do so.
Yesterday I added ./public/backups/backupcontrollers.spec.js to match ./public/backups/backupcontrollers.js.
Contents of ./public/backups/backupcontrollers.js:
/**
* Angular controller.
*/
'use strict'
const backupApp = angular.module('backup', [])
const backupTypePath = 'elasticsearch'
backupApp.controller('BackupFormController', ['$scope', '$filter', '$http', function ($scope, $filter, $http) {
console.log('Started BackupFormController')
$scope.itemInstances = []
$scope.fetchStatus = 'Ready!'
$scope.processSelection = function (item, backupType = backupTypePath) {
$scope.currentItem = item.metadata.name
$scope.getBackup(backupType)
console.log('currentItem after selecting from dropdown: ' + $scope.currentItem)
}
$scope.init = function (backupType = backupTypePath) {
$scope.refreshItemInstances(backupType)
console.log('currentItem after loading page for first time: ' + $scope.currentItem)
}
$scope.getBackup = function (backupType = backupTypePath) {
const path = `/v1/backup/${backupType}`
$scope.fetchStatus = `Fetching Backups for Item ${$scope.currentItem}...`
console.log(`Fetching backups for item from ${path}`)
$http.get('/api', { headers: { path: path, item: $scope.currentItem } })
.success(function (data, status, headers, config) {
console.log(`Got data from GET on path ${path}, HTTP status ${status}: ${JSON.stringify(data)}`)
if (typeof data === 'string' || data instanceof String) {
$scope.backups = data.split(/\r?\n/)
} else {
$scope.backups = data
}
$scope.fetchStatus = 'Ready!'
console.log('Done fetching backup list for item:' + $scope.currentItem + '!')
})
.error(function (data, status, header, config) {
console.log(data)
$scope.fetchStatus = 'Ready!'
})
}
// Refresh the list of displayed Item instances
$scope.refreshItemInstances = function (backupType = backupTypePath) {
console.log('Fetching list of all items in the system ...')
$scope.fetchStatus = 'Fetching Items ... '
$http.get('/env')
.success(function (data, status, headers, config) {
console.log(data)
for (let i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
$scope.itemInstances.push(data[i])
}
$scope.currentItem = $scope.itemInstances[0].metadata.name
console.log('Done fetching list of all items!')
console.log('currentItem after fetching list of all items: ' + $scope.currentItem)
$scope.fetchStatus = 'Ready!'
$scope.getBackup(backupType)
})
.error(function (data, status, header, config) {
console.log(data)
$scope.fetchStatus = 'Ready!'
})
}
}])
Contents of ./public/backups/backupcontrollers.spec.js:
describe('BackupFormController', function () {
let $controller, $rootScope, $httpBackend
beforeEach(module('backup'))
const mockBackupString = 'string of backup data'
const mockBackupData = {
body: mockBackupString
}
const mockItemsUnsorted = [
{
metadata: {
name: 'prod-mock-1',
spec: 'asdf',
status: 'ok'
},
notes: []
},
{
metadata: {
name: 'dev-mock-1',
spec: 'asdf',
status: 'ok'
},
notes: []
},
{
metadata: {
name: 'integ-mock-1',
spec: 'asdf',
status: 'ok'
},
notes: []
}
]
beforeEach(inject(function ($injector) {
$rootScope = $injector.get('$rootScope')
const $controller = $injector.get('$controller')
$httpBackend = $injector.get('$httpBackend')
const mockEnv = $httpBackend.when('GET', '/env')
.respond(mockItemsUnsorted)
const mockAPI = $httpBackend.when('GET', '/api')
.respond(mockBackupString)
const createController = function () {
return $controller('BackupFormController', { '$scope': $rootScope })
}
}))
describe('$scope.getBackup', function () {
beforeEach(function () {
spyOn(console, 'log')
})
it('should GET /api and set $scope.backups', function () {
controller = createController()
console.log('Dumping fetchStatus: ', $rootScope.fetchStatus)
$rootScope.init()
$httpBackend.flush()
expect($rootScope.backups).toEqual(mockBackupString)
expect(console.log).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
})
It seems like this new spec isn't working correctly at all; when I run npm test I see the normal successful tests from ./public/controllers.spec.js but also:
Chrome Headless 105.0.5195.125 (Mac OS 10.15.7) BackupFormController $scope.getBackup should GET /api and set $scope.backups FAILED
ReferenceError: createController is not defined
at UserContext.<anonymous> (backup/backupcontrollers.spec.js:51:7)
at <Jasmine>
This is the only output concerning ./public/backups/backupcontrollers.spec.js.
Has anybody run into this before? I found some posts regarding including angular-mocks, but as you can see in karma.conf.js, it's being included.
I successfully installed and loaded kuzzle-device-manager in the backend file:
import { Backend } from 'kuzzle';
import { DeviceManagerPlugin } from 'kuzzle-device-manager';
const app = new Backend('playground');
console.log(app.config);
const deviceManager = new DeviceManagerPlugin();
const mappings = {
updatedAt: { type: 'date' },
payloadUuid: { type: 'keyword' },
value: { type: 'float' }
}
deviceManager.devices.registerMeasure('humidity', mappings)
app.plugin.use(deviceManager)
app.start()
.then(async () => {
// Interact with Kuzzle API to create a new index if it does not already exist
console.log(' started!');
})
.catch(console.error);
But when i try to use controllers from that plugin for example device-manager/device with create action i get an error output.
Here is my "client" code in js:
const { Kuzzle, WebSocket } = require("kuzzle-sdk")
const kuzzle = new Kuzzle(
new WebSocket('KUZZLE_IP')
)
kuzzle.on('networkError', error => {
console.error('Network Error: ', error);
})
const run = async () => {
try {
// Connects to the Kuzzle server
await kuzzle.connect();
// Creates an index
const result = await kuzzle.query({
index: "nyc-open-data",
controller: "device-manager/device",
action: "create",
body: {
model: "model-1234",
reference: "reference-1234"
}
}, {
queuable: false
})
console.log(result)
} catch (error) {
console.error(error.message);
} finally {
kuzzle.disconnect();
}
};
run();
And the result log:
API action "device-manager/device":"create" not found
Note: The nyc-open-data index exists and is empty.
We apologize for this mistake in the documentation, the device-manager/device:create method is not available because the plugin is using auto-provisioning until the v2.
You should send a payload to your decoder, the plugin will automatically provision the device if it does not exists https://docs.kuzzle.io/official-plugins/device-manager/1/guides/decoders/#receive-payloads
I'm create a hook file with the following information, which is Hooks.js
Hooks.js is working to authenticate an actions with JWT when need it, I dont need it in all servies calls.
As my understanding the syntax to call a hook was app/use route/hooks and those hooks were only applied to and specific route and not globally.
module.exports = {
errorHandler: (context) => {
if (context.error) {
context.error.stack = null;
return context;
}
},
isValidToken: (context) => {
const token = context.params.headers.authorization;
const payload = Auth.validateToken(token);
console.log(payload);
if(payload !== "Invalid" && payload !== "No Token Provided"){
context.data = payload._id;
}
else {
throw new errors.NotAuthenticated('Authentication Error Token');
}
},
isValidDomain: (context) => {
if (
config.DOMAINS_WHITE_LIST.includes(
context.params.headers.origin || context.params.headers.host
)
) {
return context;
}
throw new errors.NotAuthenticated("Not Authenticated Domain");
},
normalizedId: (context) => {
context.id = context.id || context.params.route.id;
},
normalizedCode: (context) => {
context.id = context.params.route.code;
},
};
Then I create a file for services and routes, like the following:
const Hooks = require("../../Hooks/Hooks");
const userServices = require("./user.services");
module.exports = (app) => {
app
.use("/users", {
find: userServices.find,
create: userServices.createUser,
})
.hooks({
before: {
find: [Hooks.isValidDomain],
create: [Hooks.isValidDomain],
},
});
app
.use("/users/:code/validate", {
update: userServices.validateCode,
})
.hooks({
before: {
update: [Hooks.isValidDomain, Hooks.normalizedCode],
},
});
app
.use("/users/personal", {
update: userServices.personalInfo,
})
.hooks({
before: {
update: [Hooks.isValidDomain, Hooks.isValidToken],
},
});
};
Why Hooks.isValidToken applies to all my update methods? Even if I'm not calling it?
Please help.
app.hooks registers an application level hook which runs for all services. If you only want it for a specific service and method it needs to be app.service('users').hooks().
I'm using the VM2 package to run user code. I'm trying to intercept console output and have set the NodeVM object's console property to 'redirect':
// Create a new sandbox VM for this request
const vm = new NodeVM( {
console: 'redirect',
timeout: 30000,
sandbox: { request, state, response },
require: {
external: true
}
});
According to the documentation that redirects console output to 'events'. I'm new to NodeJS, how do I hook into those events to capture the console.log messages executed inside the Sandbox?
After digging through the source code, I found this file where the event emit is occuring:
sandbox.js
if (vm.options.console === 'inherit') {
global.console = Contextify.readonly(host.console);
} else if (vm.options.console === 'redirect') {
global.console = {
log(...args) {
vm.emit('console.log', ...Decontextify.arguments(args));
return null;
},
info(...args) {
vm.emit('console.info', ...Decontextify.arguments(args));
return null;
},
warn(...args) {
vm.emit('console.warn', ...Decontextify.arguments(args));
return null;
},
error(...args) {
vm.emit('console.error', ...Decontextify.arguments(args));
return null;
},
dir(...args) {
vm.emit('console.dir', ...Decontextify.arguments(args));
return null;
},
time: () => {},
timeEnd: () => {},
trace(...args) {
vm.emit('console.trace', ...Decontextify.arguments(args));
return null;
}
};
}
All you need to do to listen to these events is to bind an event listener on the vm you've created:
// Create a new sandbox VM for this request
const vm = new NodeVM( {
console: 'redirect',
require: {
external: ['request']
}
});
vm.on('console.log', (data) => {
console.log(`VM stdout: ${data}`);
});
Likewise, you can bind to console.log, console.info, console.warn, console.error, console.dir, and console.trace. Hopefully this will save someone else some time.
I'm replicating EasyNetQ functionality in NodeJS (so that a Node app can communicate with over Rabbit with an EasyNetQ enabled .NET app). I've replicated EasyNetQ's Publish/Subscribe and EasyNetQ's Send/Receive, but i'm having some difficulty with EasyNetQ's Request/Response.
Here is my current Node code:
var rqrxID = uuid.v4(); //a GUID
var responseQueue = 'easynetq.response.' + rqrxID;
Q(Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.assertQueue(responseQueue, { durable: false, exclusive: true, autoDelete: true }))
.then((okQueueReply) =>
Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.consume(responseQueue, (msg) => {
//do something here...
Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.ack(msg);
})
)
.then((okSubscribeReply) => {
Q(Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.assertExchange('easy_net_q_rpc', 'direct', { durable: true, autoDelete: false }))
.then((okExchangeReply) =>
Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.publish(
global.AppConfig.amq.rpc.exchange,
dto.AsyncProcessorCommand.Type,
Play.ToBuffer(command),
{ type: command.GetType() },
(err, ok): void => {
if (err !== null) {
console.warn('Message nacked!');
responseDeferred.reject(err);
}
}
)
)
})
.catch((failReason) => {
console.error(util.format('Error creating response queue: %s', failReason));
return null;
});
Note that the publish works and is received by the .NET code. That code then sends a response and the issue is that the response isn't received. Here's the .NET code:
Bus.Respond<AsyncProcessorCommand, AsyncProcessorCommandResponse>(
request =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Got request: '{0}'", request);
return new AsyncProcessorCommandResponse()
{
ID = Guid.NewGuid(),
ResponseType = "ENQResp"
};
});
I'm sure I'm missing something, but not sure what. Who can help?
UPDATE
I have solved at least part of this. Taking the value of responseQueue and setting that into the options for publish as "replyTo" hooks the response up - nice. Now I just have to figure out how to either not create a new queue each time OR, make the response queue go away...
UPDATE FINAL
So, using the channel setup I had and saving the cinsumerTag (actually, specifying it) allowed me to cancel the consumer and the queue auto-deleted.
Taking my comments from above to answer this.
There are two pieces to this. First, from the code above, create your response queue so that it auto-deletes (when the consumer count drops to 0):
channel.assertQueue(responseQueue, { durable: false, exclusive: true, autoDelete: true }))
Then create/publish to the queue the "server" is listening on - making sure to set "replyTo" for the response queue you just created (the type piece is another bit of ENQ-needed code):
{ type: command.GetType(), replyTo: responseQueue }
So an entire (currently messy as it's "play" code) method for executing this pattern looks like:
private static Request(command: dto.AsyncProcessorCommand): Q.Promise<dto.interfaces.IAsyncProcessorCommandResponse> {
var responseDeferred = Q.defer<dto.interfaces.IAsyncProcessorCommandResponse>();
var consumerTag = uuid.v4();
var rqrxID = uuid.v4();
var responseQueue = 'easynetq.response.' + rqrxID;
var handleResponse = (msg: any): void => {
var respType = null;
switch(command.Action) {
default:
respType = 'testResp';
}
//just sending *something* back, should come from 'msg'
responseDeferred.resolve(new dto.AsyncProcessorCommandResponse(respType, { xxx: 'yyy', abc: '123' }));
}
Q(Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.assertQueue(responseQueue, { durable: false, exclusive: true, autoDelete: true }))
.then((okQueueReply) =>
Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.consume(responseQueue, (msg) => {
handleResponse(msg);
Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.ack(msg);
Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.cancel(consumerTag);
},
{ consumerTag: consumerTag })
)
.then((okSubscribeReply) => {
Q(Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.assertExchange('easy_net_q_rpc', 'direct', { durable: true, autoDelete: false }))
.then((okExchangeReply) =>
Play.AMQ.ConfirmChannel.publish(
'easy_net_q_rpc',
dto.AsyncProcessorCommand.Type,
Play.ToBuffer(command),
{ type: command.GetType(), replyTo: responseQueue },
(err, ok): void => {
if (err !== null) {
console.warn('Message nacked!');
responseDeferred.reject(err);
}
}
)
)
})
.catch((failReason) => {
console.error(util.format('Error creating response queue: %s', failReason));
return null;
});
return responseDeferred.promise
}