I have multiple pages in Confluence, each with the same table with different content.
I want to collect all these tables into one table. This works.
Now I want to add the name of the pages into the first column. This works.
But, this column is called pages. I want it to be called Projects.
The underlying table might be expanded and therefore I do not know which nor how many columns the tables have. That is the reason why I use T1.*. I need all that columns that are there, but I want to leave out the Page column.
I am using the Table Transform, which enables me to write a SQL script.
The SQL syntax is ALASQl.
I tried the following, which gives another column called Projekt:
SELECT T1.'Page'AS Projekt, T1.* FROM T
But how do I remove column Page?
There is no rename in asasql in confluence.
Related
I'm trying to create an Excel Pivottable that grabs data from an Access Query and then shows the values grouped by what I want. That part works fine enough, what I would like to know is if it is possible to add text infront of grouped values in a way that is smart? The purpose is to just be able to change which Access database it should grab data from and have a standardised view where no manual changes have to be made.
What I currently have:
What I would to have:
As far as I can see I can add it manually, but there might be new cases of Øxxx types.
I would add reference table with columns sufficient to join to your view and then "prefix text" column that would be appended in front of the existing (quantity in english?) column. Or you could add it to the pivot. This method let's you add/delete rows from the reference table as needed.
If you cannot alter the access side for some reason, then another way is select all the raw data to a sheet and then use VLOOKUP or some other formula to add the prefix. And then pivot this data sheet.
I have an Excel file including thousands rows as follow. First column includes names and second column include group of each. I want to have all names belong to group "A" at another sheet dynamically. because name and group list may be changes. In other words, what command or function I should use to list all names belong to group "A"?
There are 3 ways to do this. The options are below. One thing you did not include in your question is what the results should look like.
Equations like =FILTER(A:B,B:B="A")
Pivot tables to use this convert data to table, then create pivot table. This requires refresh when new data is added.
Power query to use this convert data to table, then go to Data>From Table/Range. This requires refresh when data is added but you can change the "connection properties" under Data>Refresh All˅.
Now if you want all in group "A" to be listed with in one cell, then I would use option 3 with groupby as talk about here.
If the answer works for you the expectation is that you checkmark it and upvote it. If the answer does not work for you add a comment at the bottom and the problem you experience. For your situation you will need to adapt the answer.
I´m currently working with a huge epidemiological dataset with several Excel-files. The files contain pathology and clinical report for almost 30k patients. Each patient can have several pathology and clinical reports. The patients are assigned an unique ID.
I want combine all files into one so that ID for patient X001 would contain all the information form all the files. I cannot just copy/paste because the number of rows (IDs) in the files vary.
Here is an example of what I want to accomplish.
I want to combine two lists as follows.
As you can see that List1 and List 2 vary in row numbers. Also there are IDs in list1 that are not found in list2 and vice versa.
I want to merge them so that they align and match, see image below. Can someone provide a code for this? I cannot do this manually since I have 100k rows in list1 and 30k rows in list2...that would take several weeks to do with a risk of errors.
You can merge tables combined utilizing Excels built in Power Query, which can be found under the Data tab.
Note: Photos are taken from Excel 2016
The first step is to create the queries:
Within the Get & Transform section under the Data click on New Query -> From File -> From Workbook and select the appropriate workbook that has the table you want to merge
Select the appropriate sheets in which your tables are found, and confirm that they are displaying properly
If you notice that the table is not correct, you can make changes to it via the Edit button below.
For example, if you notice that your Column headers are being treated as a normal value, you can click Use First Row as Headers under the Power Query Editor Home -> Transform
I would also recommend changing the name of the query so it makes more sense down the line
Once you are happy with the way the query is looking, click on the Close and Load Dropdown menu under the Power Query Editor Home and select Close and Load To...
Select Only Create Connection to add it into your Workbook Queries without duplicating the table.
Repeat the above steps for each table in which you are looking to merge.
Once you have all of your tables linked via Queries, you can now move on to merging them:
Under the same section of New Query select Combine Queries -> Merge
Select the two queries you are looking to merge in each of the respective boxes
Confirm that they are correct via the preview window (don't worry if not all rows show)
Rule of thumb would also be to select your largest query first, and the smaller second
Next, highlight the columns in which you are looking to merge based on. For your example it would be the ID. This is done simply by clicking on the column within the preview
Finally change the Join Kind to Full Outer and click OK
From here you should be back in the Power Query Editor
The final steps are modifying this merged query to your desired output
You should notice that there is a new column added next to your first original table with the name of the query at the top, next to the name is a button that allows you to expand out this query.
Select the appropriate columns you would like to merge into the other table and click OK
If at any point you make a mistake, you can retrace your changes under Applied Steps within the Query Settings Pane
Once you are happy with the way your newly merged query looks, go ahead and click on Close and Load
Your should now have access to your new merged query that will update based on changes made to the original connected files
If you want to make any additional changes going forward from this point just click anywhere inside of the table and you should see both the Table Tools and Query Tools tabs appear at the top
I am using Power Query in Excel 2016 to combine data from 12 different workbooks within the same folder system into one table, and need to add an additional column in the master table that tracks the status of each row. However, when I refresh the data, the Status column does not follow the rows to which it is initially applied.
I have already looked at [ Inserting text manually in a custom column and should be visible on refresh of the report ] but this solution only works with a unique ID column. Because each of the 12 workbooks is edited separately and because there is no single column that can be guaranteed to have unique values between all of the different spreadsheets, I don't have a key to join the data to the additional column.
I believe there is always a way of finding a Unique ID. If you can get your head around this, it is not that difficult to solve your problem.
See my below example, I used three sample workbooks saved in a Test folder. Depends on the way you add them to the query editor, in my example I used From Folder and follow the prompts without making any changes and combined the tables automatically. Once combined there is a Source.Name column automatically added. I suggest to leave this column in your output table as it can form part of the Unique ID if your data is highly identical across the workbooks.
An optional step (not in my screenshot) is to add an Index column and concatenate the index number with a product/task name so it can make that specific line of data entry even more unique.
Once you added the Status column with data entered manually on the master table, load the master table back to query editor.
Then go back to the original query (Test (Input) in my example) and merge it with the reloaded output query. See my screen-shot for how to 'uniquely' merge the two tables.
The rest is self-explanatory. I think the key is finding elements of the Unique ID and incorporate it in the merge part.
Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers :)
I am using Power Query Editor to create a working file, using multiple tables from several sources.
After I combine these and make my working file, I am using it to make some work on columns I add later on the working file.
I have noticed that the values I enter in the working file are not bound to the main key, lets assume the first column, but they are independent values in a column.
The result is that if one table changes, for example one line is deleted or I change the sorting of the Query, my working file is wrong, since the data changed but the added columns remain as they were.
Is there a way to have the added columns to be bound with a value, as it is for example with VLOOKUP?
How can I make a file that will update from different sourcesbut stil I can work on it without the risk of misplacing the work I do.
I hope I am clear.
Thank you in advance!
This is fairly simple if each line in your table is unique (which in your example you say the first column can serve as a key). Setup your working columns on the table and then load the table into PQ (as a connection only). Then go to your original query that is combining your data and add a merge at the end where you merge against the table you just loaded into PQ and match on your key. Then expand only your working columns from the merge.
This way whenever you refresh your table, it will match lines against it's existing output in your work before updating, so data in your work columns will be maintained. However note this is only going to retain values, not any formulas you may be using in your work columns.