Need to search multiple product codes using using SolrSearchQueryTemplate so that we can get all products in a single solr call
I am able to search one product code at a time using SolrSearchQueryTemplate but not sure how shall modify solr query so that i can pass multiple product codes in solr request
please find below implementation i have done to search single product code using SolrSearchQueryTemplate and it works fine
$productType=testProductType
$ftsQueryBuilder=multiFieldFreeTextQueryBuilder
INSERT_UPDATE SolrSearchQueryTemplate;name[unique=true];ftsQueryBuilder[default=$ftsQueryBuilder];showFacets;restrictFieldsInResponse;indexedType(Identifier)[default=$productType]
;TESTTEMPLATE;;false;true;
INSERT_UPDATE SolrSearchQueryProperty;ftsQuery;indexedProperty(name)[unique=true];searchQueryTemplate(name)[unique=true]
;true;code;TESTTEMPLATE
final PageableData pageableData = createPageableData(0, getSearchPageSize(), null, ShowMode.Page);
final SearchStateData searchState = new SearchStateData();
final SearchQueryData searchQueryData = new SearchQueryData();
searchQueryData.setValue(XSSFilterUtil.filter(prodIdentifier.get(0)));
searchQueryData.setSearchQueryContext(SearchQueryContext.THIRDPARTYINTEGRATION);
searchState.setQuery(searchQueryData);
pageableData.setFlow(MyConstants.THIRDPARTYINTEGRATION);
final ProductSearchPageData<SearchStateData, de.hybris.platform.commercefacades.product.data.ProductData> searchPageData = testCloudProductSearchFacade
.getProductByCodeMafIdBrand(searchState, pageableData, MyConstants.THIRDPARTYINTEGRATION);
List<ProductData> prodFromSolr = searchPageData.getResults();
let me know what modifications are required to be done in this so that i can pass multiple product codes in request
Note:
searchQueryData.setValue(XSSFilterUtil.filter(prodIdentifier.get(0)));
setValue method accepts single parameter of type String
is it possible to send multiple codes separated by some token which SolrSearchQueryTemplate will automatically consider as multiple search terms
Related
I haven't used logic apps a lot, my boss is having trouble stuffing the results of one query into a variable and then using that variable in another query.
Basically, all he wants to do is get a list of of Id's returned from the first query and use that list in the second.
Here is a picture of what his logic app looks like:
You can see at the end of the second query he wants to check if the id is in the list or not. He's out for the day and I'm not sure if that variable is even receiving the list of id's successfully, but is there anything from the picture that you can tell that needs to be corrected? Or any suggestions that he could try, to achieve what he's trying to achieve?
According to the image, no data is getting stored into the variable AppId. While in the query you can just directly use c.EntityId. Below query to check if c.id is present in c.EntityId.
SELECT c.Vechicle.GrossVechicleWeight as GVW, c.EntityId as ApplicationId FROM c where c.RiskTypeId = 1 and c.Discriminator = 'RiskEntity' and c.EntityTypeId = 4500 and c.id in (c.EntityId)
Consider if you are trying to store c.Entity into AppId variable then you can Query SELECT c.EntityId FROM c and then store the result into the variable using Append to array variable action by extracting only c.EntityId using Parse JSON.
Here is my logic app
RESULT:
I've been working on a python3 script that is given an Entity Id as a command line argument. I need to create a query or some other way to retrieve the entire entity based off this id.
Here are some things I've tried (self.entityId is the id provided on the commandline):
entityKey = self.datastore_client.key('Asdf', self.entityId, namespace='Asdf')
query = self.datastore_client.query(namespace='asdf', kind='Asdf')
query.key_filter(entityKey)
query_iter = query.fetch()
for entity in query_iter:
print(entity)
Instead of query.key_filter(), i have also tried:
query.add_filter('id', '=', self.entityId)
query.add_filter('__key__', '=', entityKey)
query.add_filter('key', '=', entityKey)
So far, none of these have worked. However, a generic non-filtered query does return all the Entities in the specified namespace. I have been consulting the documentation at: https://googleapis.dev/python/datastore/latest/queries.html and other similar pages of the same documentation.
A simpler answer is to simply fetch the entity. I.e. self.datastore_client.get(self.datastore_client.key('Asdf', self.entityId, namespace='asdf'))
However, given that you are casting both entity.key.id and self.entityId, you'll want to check your data to see if you are key names or ids. Alternatives to the above are:
You are using key ids, but self.entityid is a string self.datastore_client.get(self.datastore_client.key('Asdf', int(self.entityId), namespace='asdf'))
You are using key names, and entityId is an int self.datastore_client.get(self.datastore_client.key('Asdf', str(self.entityId), namespace='asdf'))
I've fixed this problem myself. Because I could not get any filter approach to work, I ended up doing a query for all Entities in the namespace, and then did a conditional check on entity.key.id, and comparing it to the id passed on the commandline.
query = self.datastore_client.query(namespace='asdf', kind='Asdf')
query_iter = query.fetch()
for entity in query_iter:
if (int(entity.key.id) == int(self.entityId)):
#do some stuff with the entity data
It is actually very easy to do, although not so clear from the docs.
Here's the working example:
>>> key = client.key('EntityKind', 1234)
>>> client.get(key)
<Entity('EntityKind', 1234) {'property': 'value'}>
I know how to connect to Infusionsoft with Python 3 and how to process the following simple example:
#Set up the contact data we want to add
contact = {}; #blank dictionary
contact[“FirstName”] = “John”;
contact[“LastName”] = “Doe”;
contact[“Email”] = "john#doe.com";
contact[“Company”] = “ACME”;
But how do I mass update the WHOLE database? e.g. If I want to update ALL The Phone1 fields with an extra bit of code using IF statements.
Using Infusionsoft API you can only update contacts data one by one, sending a separate request per contact. Exact request depends on which type of API you use: REST or XML-RPC
I'm writing a REST api in node js that will execute a sql query and send the results;
in the request I need to send the WHERE conditions; ex:
GET 127.0.0.1:5007/users //gets the list of users
GET 127.0.0.1:5007/users
id = 1 //gets the user with id 1
Right now the conditions are passed from the client to the rest api in the request's headers.
In the API I'm using sequelize, an ORM that needs to receive WHERE conditions in a particular form (an object); ex: having the condition:
(x=1 AND (y=2 OR z=3)) OR (x=3 AND y=1)
this needs to be formatted as a nested object:
-- x=1
-- AND -| -- y=2
| -- OR ----|
| -- z=3
-- OR -|
|
| -- x=3
-- AND -|
-- y=1
so the object would be:
Sequelize.or (
Sequelize.and (
{x=1},
Sequelize.or(
{y=2},
{z=3}
)
),
Sequelize.and (
{x=3},
{y=1}
)
)
Now I'm trying to pass a simple string (like "(x=1 AND (y=2 OR z=3)) OR (x=3 AND y=1)"), but then I will need a function on the server that can convert the string in the needed object (this method in my opinion has the advantage that the developer writing the client, can pass the where conditions in a simple way, like using sql, and this method is also indipendent from the used ORM, with no need to change the client if we need to change the server or use a different ORM);
The function to read and convert the conditions' string into an object is giving me headache (I'm trying to write one without success, so if you have some examples about how to do something like this...)
What I would like to get is a route capable of executing almost any kind of sql query and give the results:
now I have a different route for everything:
127.0.0.1:5007/users //to get all users
127.0.0.1:5007/users/1 //to get a single user
127.0.0.1:5007/lastusers //to get user registered in the last month
and so on for the other tables i need to query (one route for every kind of request I need in the client);
instead I would like to have only one route, something like:
127.0.0.1:5007/request
(when calling this route I will pass the table name and the conditions' string)
Do you think this solution would be a good solution or you generally use other ways to handle this kind of things?
Do you have any idea on how to write a function to convert the conditions' string into the desired object?
Any suggestion would be appreciated ;)
I would strongly advise you not to expose any part of your database model to your clients. Doing so means you can't change anything you expose without the risk of breaking the clients. One suggestion as far as what you've supplied is that you can and should use query parameters to cut down on the number of endpoints you've got.
GET /users //to get all users
GET /users?registeredInPastDays=30 //to get user registered in the last month
GET /users/1 //to get a single user
Obviously "registeredInPastDays" should be renamed to something less clumsy .. it's just an example.
As far as the conditions string, there ought to be plenty of parsers available online. The grammar looks very straightforward.
IMHO the main disadvantage of your solution is that you are creating just another API for quering data. Why create sthm from scratch if it is already created? You should use existing mature query API and focus on your business logic rather then inventing sthm new.
For example, you can take query syntax from Odata. Many people have been developing that standard for a long time. They have already considered different use cases and obstacles for query API.
Resources are located with a URI. You can use or mix three ways to address them:
Hierarchically with a sequence of path segments:
/users/john/posts/4711
Non hierarchically with query parameters:
/users/john/posts?minVotes=10&minViews=1000&tags=java
With matrix parameters which affect only one path segment:
/users;country=ukraine/posts
This is normally sufficient enough but it has limitations like the maximum length. In your case a problem is that you can't easily describe and and or conjunctions with query parameters. But you can use a custom or standard query syntax. For instance if you want to find all cars or vehicles from Ford except the Capri with a price between $10000 and $20000 Google uses the search parameter
q=cars+OR+vehicles+%22ford%22+-capri+%2410000..%2420000
(the %22 is a escaped ", the %24 a escaped $).
If this does not work for your case and you want to pass data outside of the URI the format is just a matter of your taste. Adding a custom header like X-Filter may be a valid approach. I would tend to use a POST. Although you just want to query data this is still RESTful if you treat your request as the creation of a search result resource:
POST /search HTTP/1.1
your query-data
Your server should return the newly created resource in the Location header:
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Location: /search/3
The result can still be cached and you can bookmark it or send the link. The downside is that you need an additional POST.
Here is the deal, i have a website that is required to search from multiple webservices, then join all the results returned from webservices and display them mixed. I've done the code for search a single place at one
WsPesquisa pesq = new WsPesquisa();
IEnumerable<Objecto> Resultados = pesq.PesquisaObjecto("URL TO SEARCH", "TEXT TO SEARCH");
now i need to use threads to search in multiple places at once but having doubts how to do so.
Can someone please provide a thread sample to call multiple times the code i've used above and then join the results from all threads in a single List of Objectos?
Thanks in advance
One way to do this is to use a standard LINQ query, and use PLINQ to parallelise it.
Assuming you have your query stored in query, a list of the websites you want to search stored in variable called sites, and you have a method SearchSite(string query, string site) that runs the search against a single site, the following should do the trick:
var searchResults = from site in sites.AsParallel()
select SearchSite(query, site);
var resultList = new List<object>();
foreach (var searchResult in searchResults)
{
// process result
resultList.Add(searchResult);
}
This assumes the search query is the same for each site, so:
AsParallel() indicates that you want your LINQ query to be run in parallel
select SearchSite(query, site) - takes your query and runs the SearchSite method on it
PLINQ takes care of waiting for all the results to come in, so you can just process them in a regular for loop