IIS seems to have a limit to the size file it can upload of around 4gb
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/iis/settings-schema/ms689462(v=vs.90)?redirectedfrom=MSDN
How do you upload larger files than this?
Or is IIS just not suitable for an application that needs to be able to do that?
Related
I'm currently creating a Flutter website and I don't quite understand why the browser cache file has a size of about 8.5 MB, although I've only uploaded and use images with a total size of 1.4 MB.
What else does the cache consist of and how can it be reduced?
I don't use many packages and not much code is stored.
Is there anything I need to consider with Firebase hosting that affects the cache size?
Thanks in advance for all answers
I need to upload a large file (140 mb) to Azure file share. Please let me know how much large file I can upload using FileShareClient upload method in C#
The maximum size of a file in a File Share is 4 TiB (Reference) so you can definitely store a 140MB file in Azure File Share.
However you cannot upload a 140MB file in Azure File Share in a single shot. For that you will need to upload it in chunks where each chunk cannot be more than 4MB (Reference).
I have an application which creates the URL and sends a post request to server using IIS.
As per the microsoft library, maxallowedcontentlength is 4GB. But I want to store files more than 4GB, max size will be around 40GB.
Is there any approach to perform this task ?
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks. .
Try to split the file in parts,if you can
I have a few .asp pages which are used for visitors to upload files to my webserver.
They have worked perfectly for years on IIS5/Windows 2000 adv. server.
Now i've changed to IIS6/Server 20003. I after that users can only upload files no bigger than about 120 Kb.
My question is, how/where to increase to a max filesize of say, 10 Mb ?
I found the (easy) solution at http://www.banmanpro.com/support2/File_Upload_limits.asp
Speed and cost in mind.
Say I have a few JS and images files shared for multiple websites. that is not huge images files, this is only few static files like PNG sprites and common JS files.
I'm kind of lost on the choice :
- Should i keep it in my webpackage to release in Azure ?
- Or should i put these in blobs ?
The things I don't know is if i have a lot of hits on the blob solution, it might cost more than the hits on the IIS level of the package ?
Right, wrong ?
Edit : I realize storing JS files on the blob won't deliver it gziped ?
No need for the blobs that I can see. The database round trip isn't adding value. I'd just put the static content on the web server and let it serve it up. Let the web server handle compressing the bytes on the wire for those cases where the client indicates that they can handle GZIP compression.
Will your JS and image files be modified often? If so, putting them into the service package would mean that every time you want to update those files, you will have to recompile the service package and redeploy your instance. If you find yourself needing to update often, this will become cumbersome. From a speed perspective, you're not going to see too much of a difference between service them files up from the blogs or serving them up from the web role (assuming the files are in fact not huge). Last but not least, from a cost perspective, if you look at the cost of blob storage ($0.15 per GB stored per month, $0.01 per 10,000 storage transactions), its really not much. Your site would have to have a lot of traffic for the cost to become significant.