I have a web page and custom extension that goes with it. The extension is a normal browser extension - not a neutralinojs extension. I can load my extension from the command line (without neutrinojs) with chrome and msedge using the --load-extension=<path-to-extension> option. Extension and page work fine.
I'm having difficulty figuring out how to achieve the same thing with neutralinojs.
I've tried passing the option via the neutralino.config.json config file [example below] and starting the page with neu run. The page loads, but the extension isn't loaded. Near the top of the JSON file, I specify "chrome" as the mode. I'm certain it is starting chrome.
"chrome": {
"width": 500,
"height": 700,
"args": "--load-extension=C:\\project\\my-extension",
"nativeBlockList": [
"filesystem.*",
"os.*"
]
}
I also tried a more direct approach with neutralino-win_x64.exe --chrome-args="--load-extension=C:\project\my-extension". It seems the JSON file isn't read in when I try it this way, and it's not clear to me how to format the other options that need to be passed to it.
How should I go about getting my custom extension loaded when starting in chrome mode? And could I also get neutralinojs to start with msedge instead of chrome with additional chrome options passed to it.
Related
I have a Chrome extension that creates a new Chrome window and loads a URL in the newly created window.
This works as expected, but the URL that is being loaded in the new window is seeing errors that prevent the Javascript on the page from executing. The same URL works without any errors when loaded in a Chrome window created manually.
I have tried loading the URL in a regular Chrome window and in a Chrome window created programmatically by my Chrome extension. I have also removed ALL other functionality from the Chrome extension to verify that our Chrome extension does not have any other impact.
Here is how I'm creating the new window and loading the URL:
chrome.windows.create({
url: 'https://...',
type: 'normal',
top: 0,
left: 0,
width: window.screen.width || 1000,
height: window.screen.height || 600
}, function(newWindow) {
The URL should load exactly the same whether manually by pasting the URL in a Chrome window created by going to File > New Window and those created programmatically via a Chrome extension.
What is the difference between the Chrome windows created by going to File > New Window and those created programmatically via a Chrome extension? What might cause the URL to load or execute Javascript differently in windows created by the Chrome extension?
Is there any way to debug chrome extension using debugger ( break points and step in/out)
beside console.log ?
Chrome 70.x debugging of chrome background scripts is broken, especially when you dynamically load them and they are not in the manifest. Have a ticket open to get it fixed; however they have not been very helpful; however found a work around...
Put a console.log("yourvariablenamehere") in your background.js script.
Hit F12 to open the dev tools, anchored to the bottom of the web page.
Load the background script via a button in your popup.html. Something like this from a button event...
var guid = CreateGuid();
chrome.tabs.executeScript(null, { file: "script/jquery-3.3.1.js" }, function () {
$.get("script/scrollPage.js?ver=" + guid, function (sScriptBody, textStatus, jsXHR) {
chrome.tabs.executeScript(null, { code: sScriptBody });
}, "text");
});
In the dev tools console you should see your logged variable. On the same line as the logged message is a VM with a number tacked onto it, a virtual script page. Select that VM page and then you get to the background script! Now put a breakpoint in the virtual script page, click the same button in your popup.html and it gets hit. And when you reload the popup and execute the background script that breakpoint is hit!
Hope this helps.
If you want to inspecting content scripts, a great method I found is using Console by selecting your extension in javascript context:
By selecting the extension you will have access to the global objects within that extension.
Reference:
Using the Developer tools to debug your extension
Is this still valid?
"app": {
"launch": {
"local_path": "window.html",
"container": "tab"
}
},
I'm using Chrome v46 and it works but I'd like to be sure it is not a bug.
I cannot see anything like this in the manifest file reference
Your manifest snippet (containing app.launch.local_path) describes a legacy packaged app. These are deprecated and not officially supported any more.
If you want to have an icon in the app launcher, then you need to create a Chrome app (if you want to host the content in the package) or a hosted app (if you want to host the content online).
If you don't want to create an app, but an extension, then you could use a browser action button to add a button to the toolbar, and then open a page in a new tab using chrome.tabs.create. Or, if your actual goal is replacing the new tab page, use chrome_url_overrides to override newtab.
I have downloaded this chrome extension https://github.com/jeffreyiacono/penalty-blox
When I load it via load unpacked extension it gives me this error
1.manifest_version key must be present and set to 2
I solved it via adding manifest_version in manifest.json
2.After this when I reload it,The icon is coming but when I click on it nothing is working(looks like background.html is not working)
What changes should I do so that it workes perfectly?
Ok, so just the other day I learned that you can inspect the devtools if it is in its own window(explained here). I also learned that you can style the devtools with your own css by editing the Custom.css file in your profile on your computer(more on that here).
What I want to do is not only add css, but also javascript, via a chrome extension. I am very aware of devtools pages, but those do not do what I want. Pretty much I want to get a content script to run on the devtools inspector itself. I found one extension that does exactly this, but for the life of me I have not been able to replicate it(even when copy-pasting the code!!). The extension is the "Discover DevTools Companion extension" from Code School(on the webstore). They even explain how it works, but I still have had no luck. That was the only extension I have found that does what I want. So I guess what I'm really asking is if its just me that cannot get it to work or if others that try are having trouble also.
Usually, you cannot create a Chrome extension which injects code in a devtools page.
The "Discover DevTools Companion" extension from now on, referred to as DDC is allowed to do this, because this extension is whitelisted in the source code of Chromium: (this is no longer the case)
// Whitelist "Discover DevTools Companion" extension from Google that
// needs the ability to script DevTools pages. Companion will assist
// online courses and will be needed while the online educational programs
// are in place.
scripting_whitelist_.push_back("angkfkebojeancgemegoedelbnjgcgme");
If you want to publish an extension in the Chrome Web Store with these capabilities, give up.
If you want to create such an extension for personal / internal use, read further.
Method 1: Impersonate the DDC a whitelisted extension
The easiest way to create an extension with such permissions is to create an extension with the extension ID of a whitelisted extension (e.g. ChromeVox). This is achieved by copying the "key" key of its manifest file to your extension's manifest (see also: How to get the key?). This is a minimal example:
manifest.json
{
// WARNING: Do NOT load this extension if you use ChromeVox!
// WARNING: Do NOT load this extension if you use ChromeVox!
// WARNING: This is a REALLY BIG HAMMER.
"content_scripts": [{
"js": [ "run_as_devtools.js" ],
"matches": [ "<all_urls>" ]
}],
// This is the key for kgejglhpjiefppelpmljglcjbhoiplfn (ChromeVox)
"key": "MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDEGBi/oD7Yl/Y16w3+gee/95/EUpRZ2U6c+8orV5ei+3CRsBsoXI/DPGBauZ3rWQ47aQnfoG00sXigFdJA2NhNK9OgmRA2evnsRRbjYm2BG1twpaLsgQPPus3PyczbDCvhFu8k24wzFyEtxLrfxAGBseBPb9QrCz7B4k2QgxD/CwIDAQAB",
"manifest_version": 2,
"name": "Elevated Devtools extension",
"version": "1.0"
}
run_as_devtools.js
if (location.protocol === 'chrome-devtools:') (function() {
'use strict';
// Whatever you want to do with the devtools.
})();
Note: This method is truly a hack. Since the extension shares the same ID as ChromeVox, both extensions cannot co-exist. And if Chrome decides to remove the whitelisted extension, then your permissions will evaporate.
Instead of filtering via the content script, you can also use the include_globs key to restrict the content script to devtools only.
Method 2: Modify resources.pak
I suggest to go with method 1 if possible. When method 1 fails (e.g. because the extension is no longer whitelisted), use the next method.
Get paktools.py, unpack.py and pack.py from DennisKehrig/patch_devtools (on Github).
Locate your Chrome directory containing resources.pak.
Run python2 unpack.py resources.pak, which creates a directory resources containing all files (all file names are numbers).
Locate the file containing a script which runs in the context of the developer tools. Add your desired code there.
Remove resources.pak
Run python2 pack.py resources to create the new resources.pak file.
Note: resources.pak may be replaced when Chrome is updated, so I suggest to create a script which automates my described algorithm. That shouldn't be too difficult.
If you're interested, you can look up the .pak file format in ui/base/resource/data_pack_literal.cc (description in human language).
For those googlers who end up at this page (as I did) looking for something else, this page answers the question of manipulating DevTools ITSELF - not adding jQuery to DevTools, or injecting javaScript onto a web page. For those, see here instead:
Inject jQuery into DevTools (Chrome or Firefox):
Firefox DevTools: Automatically injecting jQuery
Inject your own javascript/css onto any web page:
How to edit a website's background colors