I am currently building a REST API using Python and Flask. Most endpoints require some type of interaction with a SQL database (SQL Server, using pyodbc). What is the best way of going around this.
Should I open a single connection (e.g. in a singleton class) and try and reuse it as much as possible?
Should I use different connections? If so, at what granularity? One connection per endpoint? One connection per query?
What role does connection pooling play in all of this and how do I make use of it?
Do I have to worry about concurrent requests?
I would like to make sql/sp calls to multiple databases on the same server. I am using mssql and don't see the "changeUser" option that mysql provides. Do I have to close and reconnect every time I wish to change databases? Seems like this would be a commonly desired behaviour.
Simply having an sql connection for each database is not doable, as the error "Global connection already exists." will occur.
We have architecture problem on our project. This project requires sharding, as soon as we need almost unlimited scalability for the part of services.
Сurrently we use Node.js + MongoDb (Mongoose) and MySQL (TypeORM). Data is separated by databases through the simple 'DB Locator'. So node process needs connections to a lot of DBs (up to 1000).
Requests example:
HTTP request from client with Shop ID;
Get DB IP address/credentials in 'DB Locator' service by Shop ID;
Create connection to specific database with shop data;
Perform db queries.
We tried to implement it in two ways:
Create connection for each request, close it on response.
Problems:
we can't use connection after response (it's the main problem, because sometimes we need some asynchronous actions);
it works slower;
Keep all connections opened.
Problems:
reach simultaneous connections limit or some another limits;
memory leaks.
Which way is better? How to avoid described problems? Maybe there is a better solution?
Solution #1 perfectly worked for us on php as it runs single process on request and easily drops connections on process end. As we know, Express is pure JS code running in v8 and is not process based.
It would be great to close non-used connections automatically but can't find options to do that.
The short answer: stop using of MongoDB with Mongoose 😏
Longer answer:
MongoDB is document-oriented DBMS. The main usage case is when you have some not pretty structured data that you have to store, but you don't need to use too much. There is lazy indexing, dynamic typing and many more things that not allow you to use it as RDBMS, but it is great as a storage of logs or any serialized data.
The worth part here is Mongoose. This is the library that makes you feel like your trashbox is wonderful world with relations, virtual fields and many things that should not to be in DODBMS. Also, there is a lot of legacy code from previous versions that also make some troubles with connections management.
You already use TypeORM that may works instead Mongoose. With some restrictions, for sure.
It works exactly same way as MySQL connection management.
Here is some more data: https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/blob/master/docs/mongodb.md#defining-entities-and-columns
In this case you may use you TypeORM Repository as transparent client that will init connections and close it or keep it alive on demand.
I have the following code in my app.js which runs on server start (npm start)
mongo.mongoConnect('connection_string', 'users').then((x) => {
console.log('Database connection successful');
app.listen(5000, () => console.log('Server started on port 5000'));
})
.catch(err => {
console.error(err.stack);
process.exit(1);
});
process.on('SIGINT', mongo.mongoDisconnect).on('SIGTERM', mongo.mongoDisconnect);
As you can see I open up SIGINT and SIGTERM for closing my connections upon process.exit
I've been reading a lot about how to deal with database connections in mongo and know that I should just invoke it once and have it across my application.
Does that mean that even after save() method when saving data to mongo followed by POST request, I should not be closing my connection? If I close it, how am I going to invoke it again since the connections happens on app start?
I'm asking it since in PHP I had the practice to always open and close my connection after querying MySql database.
Likewise, does it mean that the connection will close only on server shutdown in other words it will always be present since I do not want to shut down my node.js backend instance?
It is formally correct to open a connection, run a query, and then close the connection, but it is not a good practice, because opening a connection is an "expensive" operation and connections can be reused, which is much more efficient. The main restriction on an open connection is that it can only be used by 1 thread at a time. (More accurately, once a request is sent on a connection, no other requests can be sent on that connection until the response to that request is received.)
If your application is short lived or inherently single threaded, as may be the case when running as a "serverless" function, it may be acceptable to open and close a connection on each request.
While in theory it might be acceptable to open a single connection at the start of the program, keep a global reference to that connection, and reuse it, in practice there are common ways in which a connection becomes unusable that you would have to account for, and handling all the possibilities requires complex code. It gets even more complicated when, as is possible with MongoDB replica sets, you are actually connecting to more than one server and want to retry a command on a second server if the first one fails to respond.
That is why the standard and "best" practice is to use a "connection pool" to manage your database connections. A pool opens a set of network connections to the database, verifies and maintains their health, and dynamically assigns virtual database connections to actual network connections as needed. The pool is implemented in a library that will have received a lot of real world testing and is extremely likely to be better than anything you would write yourself. Connection pools have configuration options that would let you set any behavior you want, including opening a new connection for each request and closing it when done, but offer a wide range of performance enhancing capabilities, such a reusing connections and avoiding the overhead of creating them for each request.
This is why for MongoDB, the standard Node.js client already implements a connection pool. I do not know what mongo.mongoConnect in your code refers to; you said in the title that you are using mongoose but it uses connect, not mongoConnect to connect to the database. In general you should either be using the standard client or a JavaScript ORM library like mongoose. Either of them will take care of the connection management issues for you.
Refer to the documentation for the client/library you use for exactly the right way to use it. In general, you would initialize some kind of client object and store it globally before entering your main application handler. Then you would use this object to handle your database operations, and the object will transparently manage the underlying connections via the pool implementation. In this kind of setup, you would only close the connection when exiting the program, and usually the library takes care of that for you automatically, so you really never need to close the connection.
Thus, when using a MongoDB connection pool in NodeJS, you write your program basically the same way you would as if you just opened a connection at startup and then kept reusing it. The libraries take care of isolating you from all the problems that can arise from actually doing this. You do not need to, and in fact should not, close the connection after a database operation when using standard MongoDB NodeJS libraries.
Note that other connection pool implementations exist that do require you to close the connection. What you do with those pools is reserve (or "check out" or "open") a connection, use it, perhaps for multiple operations, and the release (or "check in" or "close") the connection when you are done. This is probably what you were doing in PHP. It is important to read and follow the documentation for the connection pool library you are using to make sure you are using it correctly.
This may not be the exact answer you are looking for, but it is not a good idea to open a new connection for every request and then close it. It is an overhead because it takes some time (even in milliseconds) to create a new connection.
Instead, you should create a pool of connections and use it in your app.
It's a good idea to close your mongo connection when your process dies or is stopped, but you should not need to close your mongoose connection after every successful query.
If you are instantiating a new mongo connection before each query you shouldn't need to be doing that either. You should just need to do that once when booting up your server.
you have two approaches
1) reopen a connection on every call using middle wares
2) you have to save your's query in node sometime later on execute all it onces
We have a project on Node.js that is based on restify and we are using RethinkDB as a database. The problem is that RethinkDB should be accessed from different parts of code (from route handlers, middlewares), but not for all requests. I am wondering what is the best way to connect to RethinkDB in this case?
I see next options:
have one long connection that is stored somewhere (approach we use now),
connect to RethinkDB on each HTTP request, which potentially some of the connections being never used,
connect in each part individually, with potentially several connections per HTTP request, but without useless connections.
I ask this question because I am not sure how well Rethink handle well short/long connections and how expensive they are. For instance MongoDB prefers long connections, but all examples in RethinkDB docs uses one connection per HTTP request.
I recommend a connection pool or one connection per query. Especially if you use feature like changefeeds, which is recommened to be on its own connection.
When you use a single connection for everything, you have to also handle re-connection when the connection timeout/broken. I think it's easier to just use a connection per query, or shared a connection on a request/response.
Just ensure to close your connection after using it, otherwise you will leak connections and new connection cannot be created.
Some driver goes further and doesn't require you to think of connection anymore such as: https://github.com/neumino/rethinkdbdash
Or Elixir RethinkDB: https://github.com/hamiltop/rethinkdb-elixir/issues/32 has an issue to create connection pool.
RethinkDB has an issue related connection pool: https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/281
That's probably what community is heading too.