I am writing an IFTTT applet that has a webhook with JSON payload as the trigger. In the filter code, I can parse the JSON and get any of the data out of it that I want. In my mapped action, however, I can only use the ingredients that came from the original trigger: EventName, JsonPayload, and OccurredAt.
Ideally I'd like to create new ingredients in the Filter code and have them available in the action template. Is this possible?
I have tried the following as filter code but neither the customer type nor the associated object of that type appear in the action template.
let payload = JSON.parse(MakerWebhooks.jsonEvent.JsonPayload)
// Payload looks like this:
// {
// "dataSource": "Enphase",
// "systemName": "My House",
// "periodStart": "2022-05-05T00:00:00-04:00",
// "periodEnd": "2022-05-05T23:59:59.999999999-04:00",
// "periodEndDate": "05/05/2022",
// "energyProduced": 99999
// }
type SolarStatsEvent = {
dataSource: string;
systemName: string;
periodStart: string;
periodEnd: string;
periodEndDate: string;
energyProduced: number;
};
function fromJson(payload: any) : SolarStatsEvent {
let newEvent: SolarStatsEvent = {
dataSource: payload.dataSource,
systemName: payload.systemName,
periodStart: payload.periodStart,
periodEnd: payload.periodEnd,
periodEndDate: payload.periodEndDate,
energyProduced: payload.energyProduced
}
return newEvent;
}
let solarStats = fromJson(payload);
NOTE: This has been asked before but not at a time when IFTTT had the filter capability. See IFTTT webhook to google sheets.
Related
I am creating an event in AWS that when a file is dropped into S3, this rule is triggered and starts a step function (SfnStateMachine)
I have some cdk code (node.js) where I add the SfnStateMachine as a target of that rule.
I want to take the payload of the S3 event and use inputPathsMap to map to a readable format, then I can use the inputTemplate to set the payload that will be sent to the Step Function.
const inputTemplate = {
Payload: {
TriggerType: "<detailType>",
TriggerReason: "<reason>",
Version: "<versionId>"
},
}
rule.addTarget(new events_targets.SfnStateMachine(mystateMachine.stateMachine, {
input: events.RuleTargetInput.fromObject({
inputPathsMap: {
detailType: "$.detail-type",
reason:"$.detail.reason",
versionId:"$.detail.object.version-id"
},
inputTemplate: JSON.stringify(inputTemplate) }),
role,
}))
When I use this, it is literally sending the value within withObject
I have looked at the docs and the RuleTargetInput.bind() seems like what I want to use, but I can't see an example of how its used. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/api/v1/docs/#aws-cdk_aws-events.RuleTargetInput.html
I wanted to do something like
rule.addTarget(new events_targets.SfnStateMachine(ddStateMachine.stateMachine, {
input: events.RuleTargetInput.bind(),
role,
}))
but I don't know where to set the inputTemplate or the inputPathsMap because they are the return type rather than the input.
Use the EventField helpers to define input, which defines the Step Function payload:
rule.addTarget(
new events_targets.SfnStateMachine(ddStateMachine.stateMachine, {
input: events.RuleTargetInput.fromObject({
detailType: events.EventField.detailType,
reason: events.EventField.fromPath("$.detail.reason"),
versionId: events.EventField.fromPath("$.detail.object.version-id"),
}),
role,
})
);
Building the InputPathMap and InputTemplate is a job for the CDK. The event target construct's synthesized output in the Rule > Targets resource definition is:
"InputTransformer": {
"InputPathsMap": {
"detail-type": "$.detail-type",
"detail-reason": "$.detail.reason",
"detail-object-version-id": "$.detail.object.version-id"
},
"InputTemplate": "{\"detailType\":<detail-type>,\"reason\":<detail-reason>,\"versionId\":<detail-object-version-id>"
I'm struggling to make the fields of my request DTOs case insensitive.
export class ExampleDto {
dateOfBirth?: string
}
Now I want to accept
{ "dateofbirth": "19880101" }
{ "dateOfBirth": "19880101" }
{ "DATEOFBIRTH": "19880101" }
My first thought was to implement a middleware which just looks at the incoming body and "extends it" with lower & upper case mappings for all incoming fields.
But that doesn't meet my requirements due to camel case, which I definitely want to keep as the default.
Any ideas on how to do this?
You could create a custom Pipe where you try the different options and finally return the Dto instance:
export class CaseInsensitiveExampleDtoPipe implements PipeTransform{
transform(body: any, metadata: ArgumentMetadata): ExampleDto {
const dto = new ExampleDto();
dto.dateOfBirth = body.dateOfBirth || body.dateofbirth || body.DATEOFBIRTH;
return dto;
}
In your controller you can then use it as follows:
#UsePipes(new CaseInsensitiveExampleDtoPipe())
async postNewExample(#Body() exampleDto: ExampleDto) {
// ...
}
Since JavaScript properties start existing after their initialization, you cannot "see" the definition of dateOfBirth?: string and therefor you won't be able to match it against the received JSON.
A possible solution for that is to enforce the creation of the properties of all of your DTO's with a constructor:
export class ExampleDto {
dateOfBirth: string
constructor(dateOfBirth: string){
this.dateOfBirth = dateOfBirth;
}
}
Then, you'll be able to iterate over the ExampleDto's properties and match them with a pipe (the received type can be derived from metadata):
#Injectable()
export class IgnoreCasePipe implements PipeTransform {
transform(value: any, metadata: ArgumentMetadata) {
const dto = new metadata.metatype;
const dtoKeys = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(dto);
Object.keys(value).forEach(key => {
const realKey = dtoKeys.find(dtoKey => dtoKey.toLocaleLowerCase() === key.toLocaleLowerCase());
if (realKey) {
dto[realKey] = value[key];
}
});
return dto;
}
}
Either inject it globally in main.ts or wherever it's needed - just bear in mind that you'll need to create a constructor for each DTO.
Note: this would work for a single-level class. If you want to support something like people: PersonDto[] in your classes then you'll need to recursively find all of the nested keys and match them - something like this.
I'm using Bot Framework SDK with nodejs to implement a disamibuation flow.
I want that if two intents predicted by Luis are close to each other, ask the user from which of them are the one they want. I have done the validator but, I have a problem with the flow.
It is a waterfall Dialog with 3 steps:
FirstStep: Calls Orchestrator and Luis to get intents and entities. It pass the data with return await step.next({...})
Disamiguation Step: Checks if it is necessary to disambiguate, and, in that case, prompts the options. If not, it pass the data like the first step.
Answer step: If it has a disambiguation flag in the data it receives in step.result, it prompts the answer acordingly with the user response. Elsewhere, it uses the data in step.result that comes from the first step.
The problem is that, when it prompts user to say the intent, I lost the data of the FirstStep since I cannot use step.next({...})
¿How can I maintain both the data from the first step and the user answer in the prompt?
Here are the basic code:
async firstStep(step) {
logger.info(`FinalAnswer Dialog: firstStep`);
let model_dispatch = await this.bot.get_intent_dispatch(step.context);
let result = await this.bot.dispatchToTopIntentAsync(step.context, model_dispatch.model)
// model_dispatch = orchestrator_model
// result = {topIntent: String, entities: Array, disamibiguation: Array}
return await step.next({ model_dispatch: model_dispatch, result: result})
}
async disambiguationStep(step) {
logger.info(`FinalAnswer Dialog: disambiguationStep`);
if (step.result.result.disambiguation) {
logger.info("We need to disambiguate")
let disambiguation_options = step.result.result.disambiguation
const message_text = "What do you need";
const data = [
{
"title": "TEXT",
"value": disambiguation_option[0]
},
{
"title": "TEXT",
"value": disambiguation_option[1]
},
]
let buttons = data.map(function (d) {
return {
type: ActionTypes.PostBack,
title: d.title,
value: d.value
}
});
const msg = MessageFactory.suggestedActions(buttons, message_text);
return await step.prompt(TEXT_PROMPT, { prompt: msg });
return step.next(step.result) //not working
}
else {
logger.info("We dont desambiguate")
return step.next(step.result)
}
}
async answerStep(step) {
logger.info(`FinalAnswer Dialog: answerStep`);
let model_dispatch = step.result.model_dispatch
let result = step.result.result
//Show answer
return await step.endDialog();
}
You can use the step dictionary to store your values. The complex dialogs sample on GitHub is excellent for demonstrating this. https://github.com/microsoft/BotBuilder-Samples/blob/main/samples/javascript_nodejs/43.complex-dialog/dialogs/topLevelDialog.js
You can save data in the context with whatever name you want:
step.values['nameProperty'] = {}
This will be accessible within the entire execution context of the waterfall dialog:
const data = step.values['nameProperty'] // {}
I know this is a general question but I have exhausted google and tried many approaches.Any feedback is appreciated.
The HTTPClient is Angular 5+ so it returns an object created from the response JSON data. I get a massive JSON response from an endpoint I have no control over and I want to use about 20% of the response in my app and ignore the rest.
I am really trying hard to avoid using a series of templates or export objects or whatever and trying to force this massive untyped Observable into a typed object with hundreds of fields many being Arrays. All I need for the app is just a Array of very small objects with 3 fields per object. The 3 fields are all over within the JSON response and I want to map them to my object .map only seems to work when you are using the full response object and I can't find an example where .map does custom work besides in the case where you are mapping a few fields to 1 object and I am trying to map to an Array of my small objects.
UPDATED
Basically I want this service to return an object of Type DislayData to the module that subscribes to it but I get just an Object back. This is not what I ultimately need to do but if I can prove I can map the body of the response to my needed return type I can then start to break down the response body and return an Array of the Type I really need based on my silly DisplayData object. Thanks again!
export interface DislayData {
body: any;
}
...
export class DataService {
constructor(private http: HttpClient) { }
/** GET data from the black box */
getData(): Observable<DislayData> {
return this.http.get<HttpResponse<any>>(searchUrl, { observe: 'response' })
.pipe(
map(res => {
return res.body as DislayData;
}
tap(res => console.log(//do stuff with entire respoonse also)),
catchError(err => this.handleError(err)));
}
private handleError(error: HttpErrorResponse) {
...
Do you know the structure of the answering object?
If yes, you can do something like this:
item$ = new BehaviorSubject<any>({});
item = {
foo: 'a',
bar: 'b',
iton: [1, 2, 3],
boo: {
far: 'c'
}
};
logNewItem() {
this.item$
.pipe(
map(response => {
if (response.foo
&& response.iton
&& response.iton.length >= 3
&& response.boo
&& response.boo.far) {
let newItem = {
foo: response.foo,
iton2: response.iton[2],
far: response.boo.far
};
console.log(newItem); // output: Object { foo: "a", iton2: 3, far: "c" }
}
})
)
.subscribe();
this.item$.next(this.item);
}
Basically, you can simply make sure the properties exist, call them directly and map them to a better fitting object.
I heavily recommend creating an interface for the object you're receiving and an interface or class for the object you're mapping to. In that case you can also write the code more compact like this:
[...]
map(response: MyAPIResponse => {
let newItem = new NewItem(response);
console.log(newItem); // output: Object { foo: "a", iton2: 3, far: "c" }
}
})
[...]
class NewItem {
foo: string;
iton2: string;
far: string;
constructor(apiResponse: MyAPIResponse) {
//Validate parameter first
this.foo = apiResponse.foo;
this.iton2 = apiResponse.iton[2];
this.far = apiResponse.boo.far;
and make your code a lot more readable.
I am wondering if it is possible to fetch a job by requisitionId in Google Cloud Talent Solution. requisitionId has to be unique across jobs so it seems like a natural candidate for looking a job up.
When a job is created the api returns a job name that can be used to look the job up:
You can retrieve the details of a previously inserted job by sending a GET request to the Cloud Talent Solution. The URI should include the previously inserted job name returned by the original create request, as a URL parameter.
I'd like to avoid storing these names if possible. In my view storing them adds unnecessary complexity since I already have a unique requisitionId. To be clear the API does not let you add jobs with a duplicate requisitionId:
Job projects/{my_app_id}/jobs/{google_assigned_id} already exists. Request ID for tracking: ... Related Job requisition ID: ...
So can I look up jobs by requisitionId?
I could parse the error message that's returned to get the job name..but that seems pretty brittle.
It turns out the list method takes requisitionId so for a full, read-create-update cycle we can do:
const listRequest = {
parent: `projects/${projectId}`,
'filter': `companyName="${companyName}" AND requisitionId="${requisitionId}"`
}
const listResult = await jobService.projects.jobs.list(listRequest)
const existingJobs = listResult.data.jobs || [];
let existingJob = null
if (existingJobs && existingJobs.length > 0) {
existingJob = existingJobs[0]
}
let googleJob
if (!existingJob) {
const createRequest = {
'parent': `projects/${projectId}`,
'resource': {
'job': {
companyName,
requisitionId,
title,
description,
applicationInfo: {
emails: ['email#example.com']
}
}
}
}
googleJob = await jobService.projects.jobs.create(createRequest)
.then(result => result)
.catch(resp => {
console.error("ERROR")
console.error(resp)
})
} else {
const patchRequest = {
'name': existingJob.name,
'resource': {
'job': {
companyName,
requisitionId,
title,
description,
applicationInfo: {
emails: ['email#example.com']
}
}
}
}
googleJob = await jobService.projects.jobs.patch(patchRequest)
.then(result => result)
.catch(resp => {
console.error("ERROR")
console.error(resp)
})
}
Docs: https://cloud.google.com/talent-solution/job-search/docs/reference/rest/v3/projects.jobs/list?authuser=0&hl=de
Notes:
The double quotes in the filter parameter are important. It will not accept single quotes and will give a cryptic error message.
The patch request cannot take a parent parameter even though everything else requires a parent parameter...
one can add it as custom attribute:
Map<String, CustomAttribute> attributes = new HashMap<>();
attributes
.put("requisitionId", new CustomAttribute().setStringValue(requisitionId)
.setFilterable(true));
Job job = new Job()
...
.setCustomAttributes(attributes);
Job jobCreated = createJob(job);
String jobName = jobCreated.getName();
and then search for requisitionId with a custom attribute filter:
JobQuery jobQuery = new JobQuery().setCustomAttributeFilter(filter);
this is a little redundant, but JobQuery has no method .setRequisitionId().
here's the documentation.