How to construct a binary tree from a infix string with brackets? - string

A non-empty tree is defined as {L,a,R}, L is left subtree, and R is Right subtree. {} for subtree is empty.
for example, {{{{},3,{}},2,{{},1,{}}},4,{{{},5,{}},6,{}}} constructs an binary tree like the picture.tree constructed from the string
I have found a question for constructs an binary tree from a prefix expression with brackets, but I still have no idea for how to doing this.

I did not get a reply on which data structure or language you expect to use, but here is an implementation of a recursive parser in JavaScript.
It uses a regular expression to tokenise the input into braces and data.
From those tokens it creates instances of a typical Node class.
Finally it outputs that structured tree in a simple, rotated view:
class Node {
constructor(left, value, right) {
this.left = left;
this.value = value;
this.right = right;
}
toString() {
return (this.right ? this.right.toString().replace(/^/gm, " ") + "\n" : "")
+ this.value
+ (this.left ? "\n" + this.left.toString().replace(/^/gm, " ") : "");
}
}
function createTree(s) {
const tokens = s.matchAll(/,([^{},]+),|[{}]|(.)/g);
function getToken(expect) {
let [all, value, error] = tokens.next().value;
value ||= all;
if (error || expect && !expect.includes(all)) throw "Unexpected '" + all + "'";
return value;
}
function dfs(readOpening) {
if (readOpening) getToken("{");
if (getToken("{}") == "}") return null;
const node = new Node(dfs(), getToken(), dfs(true));
getToken("}");
return node;
}
return dfs(true);
}
// Demo
const s = "{{{{},3,{}},2,{{},1,{}}},4,{{{},5,{}},6,{}}}";
const root = createTree(s);
console.log(root.toString()); // rotated view, with root at the left

Thanks for answerign my question. I finally came up with an naive method by myself. I used recursive function to deal with token and create nodes. It used a counter to judge whether brackets is closed. Here is my code in C++.
createTree(string inp){
int leftBracket = 0,rightBracket = 0;
if (inp.length() <= 2) {
return nullptr;
}
else {
for (int i = 1;;i++) {
if (leftBracket == rightBracket && inp[i] >= '0' && inp[i] <= '9') {
treeNode* newNode = new treeNode(inp[i]-'0', createTree(inp.substr(1, i - 2)), createTree(inp.substr(i + 2, inp.length() - i - 3)));
nodeCounter++;
return newNode;
}
else {
if (inp[i] == '{') {
leftBracket++;
}
else if (inp[i] == '}') {
rightBracket++;
}
}
}
}
}

Related

stored exponential value in mongodb [duplicate]

I'm looking for a good JavaScript equivalent of the C/PHP printf() or for C#/Java programmers, String.Format() (IFormatProvider for .NET).
My basic requirement is a thousand separator format for numbers for now, but something that handles lots of combinations (including dates) would be good.
I realize Microsoft's Ajax library provides a version of String.Format(), but we don't want the entire overhead of that framework.
Current JavaScript
From ES6 on you could use template strings:
let soMany = 10;
console.log(`This is ${soMany} times easier!`);
// "This is 10 times easier!"
See Kim's answer below for details.
Older answer
Try sprintf() for JavaScript.
If you really want to do a simple format method on your own, don’t do the replacements successively but do them simultaneously.
Because most of the other proposals that are mentioned fail when a replace string of previous replacement does also contain a format sequence like this:
"{0}{1}".format("{1}", "{0}")
Normally you would expect the output to be {1}{0} but the actual output is {1}{1}. So do a simultaneous replacement instead like in fearphage’s suggestion.
Building on the previously suggested solutions:
// First, checks if it isn't implemented yet.
if (!String.prototype.format) {
String.prototype.format = function() {
var args = arguments;
return this.replace(/{(\d+)}/g, function(match, number) {
return typeof args[number] != 'undefined'
? args[number]
: match
;
});
};
}
"{0} is dead, but {1} is alive! {0} {2}".format("ASP", "ASP.NET")
outputs
ASP is dead, but ASP.NET is alive! ASP {2}
If you prefer not to modify String's prototype:
if (!String.format) {
String.format = function(format) {
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
return format.replace(/{(\d+)}/g, function(match, number) {
return typeof args[number] != 'undefined'
? args[number]
: match
;
});
};
}
Gives you the much more familiar:
String.format('{0} is dead, but {1} is alive! {0} {2}', 'ASP', 'ASP.NET');
with the same result:
ASP is dead, but ASP.NET is alive! ASP {2}
It's funny because Stack Overflow actually has their own formatting function for the String prototype called formatUnicorn. Try it! Go into the console and type something like:
"Hello, {name}, are you feeling {adjective}?".formatUnicorn({name:"Gabriel", adjective: "OK"});
You get this output:
Hello, Gabriel, are you feeling OK?
You can use objects, arrays, and strings as arguments! I got its code and reworked it to produce a new version of String.prototype.format:
String.prototype.formatUnicorn = String.prototype.formatUnicorn ||
function () {
"use strict";
var str = this.toString();
if (arguments.length) {
var t = typeof arguments[0];
var key;
var args = ("string" === t || "number" === t) ?
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)
: arguments[0];
for (key in args) {
str = str.replace(new RegExp("\\{" + key + "\\}", "gi"), args[key]);
}
}
return str;
};
Note the clever Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments) call -- that means if you throw in arguments that are strings or numbers, not a single JSON-style object, you get C#'s String.Format behavior almost exactly.
"a{0}bcd{1}ef".formatUnicorn("FOO", "BAR"); // yields "aFOObcdBARef"
That's because Array's slice will force whatever's in arguments into an Array, whether it was originally or not, and the key will be the index (0, 1, 2...) of each array element coerced into a string (eg, "0", so "\\{0\\}" for your first regexp pattern).
Neat.
Number Formatting in JavaScript
I got to this question page hoping to find how to format numbers in JavaScript, without introducing yet another library. Here's what I've found:
Rounding floating-point numbers
The equivalent of sprintf("%.2f", num) in JavaScript seems to be num.toFixed(2), which formats num to 2 decimal places, with rounding (but see #ars265's comment about Math.round below).
(12.345).toFixed(2); // returns "12.35" (rounding!)
(12.3).toFixed(2); // returns "12.30" (zero padding)
Exponential form
The equivalent of sprintf("%.2e", num) is num.toExponential(2).
(33333).toExponential(2); // "3.33e+4"
Hexadecimal and other bases
To print numbers in base B, try num.toString(B). JavaScript supports automatic conversion to and from bases 2 through 36 (in addition, some browsers have limited support for base64 encoding).
(3735928559).toString(16); // to base 16: "deadbeef"
parseInt("deadbeef", 16); // from base 16: 3735928559
Reference Pages
Quick tutorial on JS number formatting
Mozilla reference page for toFixed() (with links to toPrecision(), toExponential(), toLocaleString(), ...)
From ES6 on you could use template strings:
let soMany = 10;
console.log(`This is ${soMany} times easier!`);
// "This is 10 times easier!"
Be aware that template strings are surrounded by backticks ` instead of (single) quotes.
For further information:
https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/01/ES6-Template-Strings
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/template_strings
Note:
Check the mozilla-site to find a list of supported browsers.
jsxt, Zippo
This option fits better.
String.prototype.format = function() {
var formatted = this;
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
var regexp = new RegExp('\\{'+i+'\\}', 'gi');
formatted = formatted.replace(regexp, arguments[i]);
}
return formatted;
};
With this option I can replace strings like these:
'The {0} is dead. Don\'t code {0}. Code {1} that is open source!'.format('ASP', 'PHP');
With your code the second {0} wouldn't be replaced. ;)
I use this simple function:
String.prototype.format = function() {
var formatted = this;
for( var arg in arguments ) {
formatted = formatted.replace("{" + arg + "}", arguments[arg]);
}
return formatted;
};
That's very similar to string.format:
"{0} is dead, but {1} is alive!".format("ASP", "ASP.NET")
For Node.js users there is util.format which has printf-like functionality:
util.format("%s world", "Hello")
I'm surprised no one used reduce, this is a native concise and powerful JavaScript function.
ES6 (EcmaScript2015)
String.prototype.format = function() {
return [...arguments].reduce((p,c) => p.replace(/%s/,c), this);
};
console.log('Is that a %s or a %s?... No, it\'s %s!'.format('plane', 'bird', 'SOman'));
< ES6
function interpolate(theString, argumentArray) {
var regex = /%s/;
var _r=function(p,c){return p.replace(regex,c);}
return argumentArray.reduce(_r, theString);
}
interpolate("%s, %s and %s", ["Me", "myself", "I"]); // "Me, myself and I"
How it works:
reduce applies a function against an accumulator and each element in the array (from left to right) to reduce it to a single value.
var _r= function(p,c){return p.replace(/%s/,c)};
console.log(
["a", "b", "c"].reduce(_r, "[%s], [%s] and [%s]") + '\n',
[1, 2, 3].reduce(_r, "%s+%s=%s") + '\n',
["cool", 1337, "stuff"].reduce(_r, "%s %s %s")
);
Here's a minimal implementation of sprintf in JavaScript: it only does "%s" and "%d", but I have left space for it to be extended. It is useless to the OP, but other people who stumble across this thread coming from Google might benefit from it.
function sprintf() {
var args = arguments,
string = args[0],
i = 1;
return string.replace(/%((%)|s|d)/g, function (m) {
// m is the matched format, e.g. %s, %d
var val = null;
if (m[2]) {
val = m[2];
} else {
val = args[i];
// A switch statement so that the formatter can be extended. Default is %s
switch (m) {
case '%d':
val = parseFloat(val);
if (isNaN(val)) {
val = 0;
}
break;
}
i++;
}
return val;
});
}
Example:
alert(sprintf('Latitude: %s, Longitude: %s, Count: %d', 41.847, -87.661, 'two'));
// Expected output: Latitude: 41.847, Longitude: -87.661, Count: 0
In contrast with similar solutions in previous replies, this one does all substitutions in one go, so it will not replace parts of previously replaced values.
3 different ways to format javascript string
There are 3 different ways to format a string by replacing placeholders with the variable value.
Using template literal (backticks ``)
let name = 'John';
let age = 30;
// using backticks
console.log(`${name} is ${age} years old.`);
// John is 30 years old.
Using concatenation
let name = 'John';
let age = 30;
// using concatenation
console.log(name + ' is ' + age + ' years old.');
// John is 30 years old.
Creating own format function
String.prototype.format = function () {
var args = arguments;
return this.replace(/{([0-9]+)}/g, function (match, index) {
// check if the argument is there
return typeof args[index] == 'undefined' ? match : args[index];
});
};
console.log('{0} is {1} years old.'.format('John', 30));
JavaScript programmers can use String.prototype.sprintf at https://github.com/ildar-shaimordanov/jsxt/blob/master/js/String.js. Below is example:
var d = new Date();
var dateStr = '%02d:%02d:%02d'.sprintf(
d.getHours(),
d.getMinutes(),
d.getSeconds());
I want to share my solution for the 'problem'. I haven't re-invented the wheel but tries to find a solution based on what JavaScript already does. The advantage is, that you get all implicit conversions for free. Setting the prototype property $ of String gives a very nice and compact syntax (see examples below). It is maybe not the most efficient way, but in most cases dealing with output it does not have to be super optimized.
String.form = function(str, arr) {
var i = -1;
function callback(exp, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) {
if (exp=='%%') return '%';
if (arr[++i]===undefined) return undefined;
exp = p2 ? parseInt(p2.substr(1)) : undefined;
var base = p3 ? parseInt(p3.substr(1)) : undefined;
var val;
switch (p4) {
case 's': val = arr[i]; break;
case 'c': val = arr[i][0]; break;
case 'f': val = parseFloat(arr[i]).toFixed(exp); break;
case 'p': val = parseFloat(arr[i]).toPrecision(exp); break;
case 'e': val = parseFloat(arr[i]).toExponential(exp); break;
case 'x': val = parseInt(arr[i]).toString(base?base:16); break;
case 'd': val = parseFloat(parseInt(arr[i], base?base:10).toPrecision(exp)).toFixed(0); break;
}
val = typeof(val)=='object' ? JSON.stringify(val) : val.toString(base);
var sz = parseInt(p1); /* padding size */
var ch = p1 && p1[0]=='0' ? '0' : ' '; /* isnull? */
while (val.length<sz) val = p0 !== undefined ? val+ch : ch+val; /* isminus? */
return val;
}
var regex = /%(-)?(0?[0-9]+)?([.][0-9]+)?([#][0-9]+)?([scfpexd%])/g;
return str.replace(regex, callback);
}
String.prototype.$ = function() {
return String.form(this, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments));
}
Here are a few examples:
String.format("%s %s", [ "This is a string", 11 ])
console.log("%s %s".$("This is a string", 11))
var arr = [ "12.3", 13.6 ]; console.log("Array: %s".$(arr));
var obj = { test:"test", id:12 }; console.log("Object: %s".$(obj));
console.log("%c", "Test");
console.log("%5d".$(12)); // ' 12'
console.log("%05d".$(12)); // '00012'
console.log("%-5d".$(12)); // '12 '
console.log("%5.2d".$(123)); // ' 120'
console.log("%5.2f".$(1.1)); // ' 1.10'
console.log("%10.2e".$(1.1)); // ' 1.10e+0'
console.log("%5.3p".$(1.12345)); // ' 1.12'
console.log("%5x".$(45054)); // ' affe'
console.log("%20#2x".$("45054")); // ' 1010111111111110'
console.log("%6#2d".$("111")); // ' 7'
console.log("%6#16d".$("affe")); // ' 45054'
Adding to zippoxer's answer, I use this function:
String.prototype.format = function () {
var a = this, b;
for (b in arguments) {
a = a.replace(/%[a-z]/, arguments[b]);
}
return a; // Make chainable
};
var s = 'Hello %s The magic number is %d.';
s.format('world!', 12); // Hello World! The magic number is 12.
I also have a non-prototype version which I use more often for its Java-like syntax:
function format() {
var a, b, c;
a = arguments[0];
b = [];
for(c = 1; c < arguments.length; c++){
b.push(arguments[c]);
}
for (c in b) {
a = a.replace(/%[a-z]/, b[c]);
}
return a;
}
format('%d ducks, 55 %s', 12, 'cats'); // 12 ducks, 55 cats
ES 2015 update
All the cool new stuff in ES 2015 makes this a lot easier:
function format(fmt, ...args){
return fmt
.split("%%")
.reduce((aggregate, chunk, i) =>
aggregate + chunk + (args[i] || ""), "");
}
format("Hello %%! I ate %% apples today.", "World", 44);
// "Hello World, I ate 44 apples today."
I figured that since this, like the older ones, doesn't actually parse the letters, it might as well just use a single token %%. This has the benefit of being obvious and not making it difficult to use a single %. However, if you need %% for some reason, you would need to replace it with itself:
format("I love percentage signs! %%", "%%");
// "I love percentage signs! %%"
+1 Zippo with the exception that the function body needs to be as below or otherwise it appends the current string on every iteration:
String.prototype.format = function() {
var formatted = this;
for (var arg in arguments) {
formatted = formatted.replace("{" + arg + "}", arguments[arg]);
}
return formatted;
};
I use a small library called String.format for JavaScript which supports most of the format string capabilities (including format of numbers and dates), and uses the .NET syntax. The script itself is smaller than 4 kB, so it doesn't create much of overhead.
I'll add my own discoveries which I've found since I asked:
number_format (for thousand separator/currency formatting)
sprintf (same author as above)
Sadly it seems sprintf doesn't handle thousand separator formatting like .NET's string format.
If you are looking to handle the thousands separator, you should really use toLocaleString() from the JavaScript Number class since it will format the string for the user's region.
The JavaScript Date class can format localized dates and times.
Very elegant:
String.prototype.format = function (){
var args = arguments;
return this.replace(/\{\{|\}\}|\{(\d+)\}/g, function (curlyBrack, index) {
return ((curlyBrack == "{{") ? "{" : ((curlyBrack == "}}") ? "}" : args[index]));
});
};
// Usage:
"{0}{1}".format("{1}", "{0}")
Credit goes to (broken link) https://gist.github.com/0i0/1519811
There is "sprintf" for JavaScript which you can find at http://www.webtoolkit.info/javascript-sprintf.html.
The PHPJS project has written JavaScript implementations for many of PHP's functions. Since PHP's sprintf() function is basically the same as C's printf(), their JavaScript implementation of it should satisfy your needs.
I use this one:
String.prototype.format = function() {
var newStr = this, i = 0;
while (/%s/.test(newStr))
newStr = newStr.replace("%s", arguments[i++])
return newStr;
}
Then I call it:
"<h1>%s</h1><p>%s</p>".format("Header", "Just a test!");
I have a solution very close to Peter's, but it deals with number and object case.
if (!String.prototype.format) {
String.prototype.format = function() {
var args;
args = arguments;
if (args.length === 1 && args[0] !== null && typeof args[0] === 'object') {
args = args[0];
}
return this.replace(/{([^}]*)}/g, function(match, key) {
return (typeof args[key] !== "undefined" ? args[key] : match);
});
};
}
Maybe it could be even better to deal with the all deeps cases, but for my needs this is just fine.
"This is an example from {name}".format({name:"Blaine"});
"This is an example from {0}".format("Blaine");
PS: This function is very cool if you are using translations in templates frameworks like AngularJS:
<h1> {{('hello-message'|translate).format(user)}} <h1>
<h1> {{('hello-by-name'|translate).format( user ? user.name : 'You' )}} <h1>
Where the en.json is something like
{
"hello-message": "Hello {name}, welcome.",
"hello-by-name": "Hello {0}, welcome."
}
One very slightly different version, the one I prefer (this one uses {xxx} tokens rather than {0} numbered arguments, this is much more self-documenting and suits localization much better):
String.prototype.format = function(tokens) {
var formatted = this;
for (var token in tokens)
if (tokens.hasOwnProperty(token))
formatted = formatted.replace(RegExp("{" + token + "}", "g"), tokens[token]);
return formatted;
};
A variation would be:
var formatted = l(this);
that calls an l() localization function first.
For basic formatting:
var template = jQuery.validator.format("{0} is not a valid value");
var result = template("abc");
We can use a simple lightweight String.Format string operation library for Typescript.
String.Format():
var id = image.GetId()
String.Format("image_{0}.jpg", id)
output: "image_2db5da20-1c5d-4f1a-8fd4-b41e34c8c5b5.jpg";
String Format for specifiers:
var value = String.Format("{0:L}", "APPLE"); //output "apple"
value = String.Format("{0:U}", "apple"); // output "APPLE"
value = String.Format("{0:d}", "2017-01-23 00:00"); //output "23.01.2017"
value = String.Format("{0:s}", "21.03.2017 22:15:01") //output "2017-03-21T22:15:01"
value = String.Format("{0:n}", 1000000);
//output "1.000.000"
value = String.Format("{0:00}", 1);
//output "01"
String Format for Objects including specifiers:
var fruit = new Fruit();
fruit.type = "apple";
fruit.color = "RED";
fruit.shippingDate = new Date(2018, 1, 1);
fruit.amount = 10000;
String.Format("the {type:U} is {color:L} shipped on {shippingDate:s} with an amount of {amount:n}", fruit);
// output: the APPLE is red shipped on 2018-01-01 with an amount of 10.000
Just in case someone needs a function to prevent polluting global scope, here is the function that does the same:
function _format (str, arr) {
return str.replace(/{(\d+)}/g, function (match, number) {
return typeof arr[number] != 'undefined' ? arr[number] : match;
});
};
For those who like Node.JS and its util.format feature, I've just extracted it out into its vanilla JavaScript form (with only functions that util.format uses):
exports = {};
function isString(arg) {
return typeof arg === 'string';
}
function isNull(arg) {
return arg === null;
}
function isObject(arg) {
return typeof arg === 'object' && arg !== null;
}
function isBoolean(arg) {
return typeof arg === 'boolean';
}
function isUndefined(arg) {
return arg === void 0;
}
function stylizeNoColor(str, styleType) {
return str;
}
function stylizeWithColor(str, styleType) {
var style = inspect.styles[styleType];
if (style) {
return '\u001b[' + inspect.colors[style][0] + 'm' + str +
'\u001b[' + inspect.colors[style][3] + 'm';
} else {
return str;
}
}
function isFunction(arg) {
return typeof arg === 'function';
}
function isNumber(arg) {
return typeof arg === 'number';
}
function isSymbol(arg) {
return typeof arg === 'symbol';
}
function formatPrimitive(ctx, value) {
if (isUndefined(value))
return ctx.stylize('undefined', 'undefined');
if (isString(value)) {
var simple = '\'' + JSON.stringify(value).replace(/^"|"$/g, '')
.replace(/'/g, "\\'")
.replace(/\\"/g, '"') + '\'';
return ctx.stylize(simple, 'string');
}
if (isNumber(value)) {
// Format -0 as '-0'. Strict equality won't distinguish 0 from -0,
// so instead we use the fact that 1 / -0 < 0 whereas 1 / 0 > 0 .
if (value === 0 && 1 / value < 0)
return ctx.stylize('-0', 'number');
return ctx.stylize('' + value, 'number');
}
if (isBoolean(value))
return ctx.stylize('' + value, 'boolean');
// For some reason typeof null is "object", so special case here.
if (isNull(value))
return ctx.stylize('null', 'null');
// es6 symbol primitive
if (isSymbol(value))
return ctx.stylize(value.toString(), 'symbol');
}
function arrayToHash(array) {
var hash = {};
array.forEach(function (val, idx) {
hash[val] = true;
});
return hash;
}
function objectToString(o) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(o);
}
function isDate(d) {
return isObject(d) && objectToString(d) === '[object Date]';
}
function isError(e) {
return isObject(e) &&
(objectToString(e) === '[object Error]' || e instanceof Error);
}
function isRegExp(re) {
return isObject(re) && objectToString(re) === '[object RegExp]';
}
function formatError(value) {
return '[' + Error.prototype.toString.call(value) + ']';
}
function formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, value) {
var stylize = ctx.stylize;
ctx.stylize = stylizeNoColor;
var str = formatPrimitive(ctx, value);
ctx.stylize = stylize;
return str;
}
function isArray(ar) {
return Array.isArray(ar);
}
function hasOwnProperty(obj, prop) {
return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, prop);
}
function formatProperty(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys, key, array) {
var name, str, desc;
desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(value, key) || {value: value[key]};
if (desc.get) {
if (desc.set) {
str = ctx.stylize('[Getter/Setter]', 'special');
} else {
str = ctx.stylize('[Getter]', 'special');
}
} else {
if (desc.set) {
str = ctx.stylize('[Setter]', 'special');
}
}
if (!hasOwnProperty(visibleKeys, key)) {
name = '[' + key + ']';
}
if (!str) {
if (ctx.seen.indexOf(desc.value) < 0) {
if (isNull(recurseTimes)) {
str = formatValue(ctx, desc.value, null);
} else {
str = formatValue(ctx, desc.value, recurseTimes - 1);
}
if (str.indexOf('\n') > -1) {
if (array) {
str = str.split('\n').map(function (line) {
return ' ' + line;
}).join('\n').substr(2);
} else {
str = '\n' + str.split('\n').map(function (line) {
return ' ' + line;
}).join('\n');
}
}
} else {
str = ctx.stylize('[Circular]', 'special');
}
}
if (isUndefined(name)) {
if (array && key.match(/^\d+$/)) {
return str;
}
name = JSON.stringify('' + key);
if (name.match(/^"([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]*)"$/)) {
name = name.substr(1, name.length - 2);
name = ctx.stylize(name, 'name');
} else {
name = name.replace(/'/g, "\\'")
.replace(/\\"/g, '"')
.replace(/(^"|"$)/g, "'")
.replace(/\\\\/g, '\\');
name = ctx.stylize(name, 'string');
}
}
return name + ': ' + str;
}
function formatArray(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys, keys) {
var output = [];
for (var i = 0, l = value.length; i < l; ++i) {
if (hasOwnProperty(value, String(i))) {
output.push(formatProperty(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys,
String(i), true));
} else {
output.push('');
}
}
keys.forEach(function (key) {
if (!key.match(/^\d+$/)) {
output.push(formatProperty(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys,
key, true));
}
});
return output;
}
function reduceToSingleString(output, base, braces) {
var length = output.reduce(function (prev, cur) {
return prev + cur.replace(/\u001b\[\d\d?m/g, '').length + 1;
}, 0);
if (length > 60) {
return braces[0] +
(base === '' ? '' : base + '\n ') +
' ' +
output.join(',\n ') +
' ' +
braces[1];
}
return braces[0] + base + ' ' + output.join(', ') + ' ' + braces[1];
}
function formatValue(ctx, value, recurseTimes) {
// Provide a hook for user-specified inspect functions.
// Check that value is an object with an inspect function on it
if (ctx.customInspect &&
value &&
isFunction(value.inspect) &&
// Filter out the util module, it's inspect function is special
value.inspect !== exports.inspect &&
// Also filter out any prototype objects using the circular check.
!(value.constructor && value.constructor.prototype === value)) {
var ret = value.inspect(recurseTimes, ctx);
if (!isString(ret)) {
ret = formatValue(ctx, ret, recurseTimes);
}
return ret;
}
// Primitive types cannot have properties
var primitive = formatPrimitive(ctx, value);
if (primitive) {
return primitive;
}
// Look up the keys of the object.
var keys = Object.keys(value);
var visibleKeys = arrayToHash(keys);
if (ctx.showHidden) {
keys = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(value);
}
// This could be a boxed primitive (new String(), etc.), check valueOf()
// NOTE: Avoid calling `valueOf` on `Date` instance because it will return
// a number which, when object has some additional user-stored `keys`,
// will be printed out.
var formatted;
var raw = value;
try {
// the .valueOf() call can fail for a multitude of reasons
if (!isDate(value))
raw = value.valueOf();
} catch (e) {
// ignore...
}
if (isString(raw)) {
// for boxed Strings, we have to remove the 0-n indexed entries,
// since they just noisey up the output and are redundant
keys = keys.filter(function (key) {
return !(key >= 0 && key < raw.length);
});
}
// Some type of object without properties can be shortcutted.
if (keys.length === 0) {
if (isFunction(value)) {
var name = value.name ? ': ' + value.name : '';
return ctx.stylize('[Function' + name + ']', 'special');
}
if (isRegExp(value)) {
return ctx.stylize(RegExp.prototype.toString.call(value), 'regexp');
}
if (isDate(value)) {
return ctx.stylize(Date.prototype.toString.call(value), 'date');
}
if (isError(value)) {
return formatError(value);
}
// now check the `raw` value to handle boxed primitives
if (isString(raw)) {
formatted = formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, raw);
return ctx.stylize('[String: ' + formatted + ']', 'string');
}
if (isNumber(raw)) {
formatted = formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, raw);
return ctx.stylize('[Number: ' + formatted + ']', 'number');
}
if (isBoolean(raw)) {
formatted = formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, raw);
return ctx.stylize('[Boolean: ' + formatted + ']', 'boolean');
}
}
var base = '', array = false, braces = ['{', '}'];
// Make Array say that they are Array
if (isArray(value)) {
array = true;
braces = ['[', ']'];
}
// Make functions say that they are functions
if (isFunction(value)) {
var n = value.name ? ': ' + value.name : '';
base = ' [Function' + n + ']';
}
// Make RegExps say that they are RegExps
if (isRegExp(value)) {
base = ' ' + RegExp.prototype.toString.call(value);
}
// Make dates with properties first say the date
if (isDate(value)) {
base = ' ' + Date.prototype.toUTCString.call(value);
}
// Make error with message first say the error
if (isError(value)) {
base = ' ' + formatError(value);
}
// Make boxed primitive Strings look like such
if (isString(raw)) {
formatted = formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, raw);
base = ' ' + '[String: ' + formatted + ']';
}
// Make boxed primitive Numbers look like such
if (isNumber(raw)) {
formatted = formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, raw);
base = ' ' + '[Number: ' + formatted + ']';
}
// Make boxed primitive Booleans look like such
if (isBoolean(raw)) {
formatted = formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, raw);
base = ' ' + '[Boolean: ' + formatted + ']';
}
if (keys.length === 0 && (!array || value.length === 0)) {
return braces[0] + base + braces[1];
}
if (recurseTimes < 0) {
if (isRegExp(value)) {
return ctx.stylize(RegExp.prototype.toString.call(value), 'regexp');
} else {
return ctx.stylize('[Object]', 'special');
}
}
ctx.seen.push(value);
var output;
if (array) {
output = formatArray(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys, keys);
} else {
output = keys.map(function (key) {
return formatProperty(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys, key, array);
});
}
ctx.seen.pop();
return reduceToSingleString(output, base, braces);
}
function inspect(obj, opts) {
// default options
var ctx = {
seen: [],
stylize: stylizeNoColor
};
// legacy...
if (arguments.length >= 3) ctx.depth = arguments[2];
if (arguments.length >= 4) ctx.colors = arguments[3];
if (isBoolean(opts)) {
// legacy...
ctx.showHidden = opts;
} else if (opts) {
// got an "options" object
exports._extend(ctx, opts);
}
// set default options
if (isUndefined(ctx.showHidden)) ctx.showHidden = false;
if (isUndefined(ctx.depth)) ctx.depth = 2;
if (isUndefined(ctx.colors)) ctx.colors = false;
if (isUndefined(ctx.customInspect)) ctx.customInspect = true;
if (ctx.colors) ctx.stylize = stylizeWithColor;
return formatValue(ctx, obj, ctx.depth);
}
exports.inspect = inspect;
// http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code#graphics
inspect.colors = {
'bold': [1, 22],
'italic': [3, 23],
'underline': [4, 24],
'inverse': [7, 27],
'white': [37, 39],
'grey': [90, 39],
'black': [30, 39],
'blue': [34, 39],
'cyan': [36, 39],
'green': [32, 39],
'magenta': [35, 39],
'red': [31, 39],
'yellow': [33, 39]
};
// Don't use 'blue' not visible on cmd.exe
inspect.styles = {
'special': 'cyan',
'number': 'yellow',
'boolean': 'yellow',
'undefined': 'grey',
'null': 'bold',
'string': 'green',
'symbol': 'green',
'date': 'magenta',
// "name": intentionally not styling
'regexp': 'red'
};
var formatRegExp = /%[sdj%]/g;
exports.format = function (f) {
if (!isString(f)) {
var objects = [];
for (var j = 0; j < arguments.length; j++) {
objects.push(inspect(arguments[j]));
}
return objects.join(' ');
}
var i = 1;
var args = arguments;
var len = args.length;
var str = String(f).replace(formatRegExp, function (x) {
if (x === '%%') return '%';
if (i >= len) return x;
switch (x) {
case '%s':
return String(args[i++]);
case '%d':
return Number(args[i++]);
case '%j':
try {
return JSON.stringify(args[i++]);
} catch (_) {
return '[Circular]';
}
default:
return x;
}
});
for (var x = args[i]; i < len; x = args[++i]) {
if (isNull(x) || !isObject(x)) {
str += ' ' + x;
} else {
str += ' ' + inspect(x);
}
}
return str;
};
Harvested from: https://github.com/joyent/node/blob/master/lib/util.js
I have a slightly longer formatter for JavaScript here...
You can do formatting several ways:
String.format(input, args0, arg1, ...)
String.format(input, obj)
"literal".format(arg0, arg1, ...)
"literal".format(obj)
Also, if you have say a ObjectBase.prototype.format (such as with DateJS) it will use that.
Examples...
var input = "numbered args ({0}-{1}-{2}-{3})";
console.log(String.format(input, "first", 2, new Date()));
//Outputs "numbered args (first-2-Thu May 31 2012...Time)-{3})"
console.log(input.format("first", 2, new Date()));
//Outputs "numbered args(first-2-Thu May 31 2012...Time)-{3})"
console.log(input.format(
"object properties ({first}-{second}-{third:yyyy-MM-dd}-{fourth})"
,{
'first':'first'
,'second':2
,'third':new Date() //assumes Date.prototype.format method
}
));
//Outputs "object properties (first-2-2012-05-31-{3})"
I've also aliased with .asFormat and have some detection in place in case there's already a string.format (such as with MS Ajax Toolkit (I hate that library).
Using Lodash you can get template functionality:
Use the ES template literal delimiter as an "interpolate" delimiter.
Disable support by replacing the "interpolate" delimiter.
var compiled = _.template('hello ${ user }!');
compiled({ 'user': 'pebbles' });
// => 'hello pebbles!

How do I check to see if a character is a space character in Swift?

In a program I'm writing, I need to check to see if a character is a space (" "). Currently have this as the conditional but it's not working. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
for(var k = indexOfCharBeingExamined; k < lineBeingExaminedChars.count; k++){
let charBeingExamined = lineBeingExaminedChars[lineBeingExaminedChars.startIndex.advancedBy(k)];
//operations
if(String(charBeingExamined) == " "){
//more operations
}
}
The code below is how I solved this problem with a functional approach in Swift. I made an extension (two, actually), but you could easily take the guts of the function and use it elsewhere.
extension String {
var isWhitespace: Bool {
guard !isEmpty else { return true }
let whitespaceChars = NSCharacterSet.whitespacesAndNewlines
return self.unicodeScalars
.filter { !whitespaceChars.contains($0) }
.count == 0
}
}
extension Optional where Wrapped == String {
var isNullOrWhitespace: Bool {
return self?.isWhitespace ?? true
}
}
The following code works for me. Note that it's easier to just iterate over the characters in a string using 'for' (second example below):
var s = "X yz"
for var i = 0; i < s.characters.count; i++ {
let x = s[s.startIndex.advancedBy(i)]
print(x)
print(String(x) == " ")
}
for c in s.characters {
print(c)
print(String(c) == " ")
}
String:
let origin = "Some string with\u{00a0}whitespaces" // \u{00a0} is a no-break space
Oneliner:
let result = origin.characters.contains { " \u{00a0}".characters.contains($0) }
Another approach:
let spaces = NSCharacterSet.whitespaceCharacterSet()
let result = origin.utf16.contains { spaces.characterIsMember($0) }
Output:
print(result) // true
Not sure what you want to do with the spaces, because then it could be a bit simpler.
just in your code change " " -> "\u{00A0}"
for(var k = indexOfCharBeingExamined; k < lineBeingExaminedChars.count; k++){
let charBeingExamined = lineBeingExaminedChars[lineBeingExaminedChars.startIndex.advancedBy(k)];
if(String(charBeingExamined) == "\u{00A0}"){
//more operations
}
}
To test just for whitespace:
func hasWhitespace(_ input: String) -> Bool {
let inputCharacterSet = CharacterSet(charactersIn: input)
return !inputCharacterSet.intersection(CharacterSet.whitespaces).isEmpty
}
To test for both whitespace and an empty string:
func hasWhitespace(_ input: String) -> Bool {
let inputCharacterSet = CharacterSet(charactersIn: input)
return !inputCharacterSet.intersection(CharacterSet.whitespaces).isEmpty || inputCharacterSet.isEmpty
}

Check if the given string follows the given pattern

A friend of mine just had his interview at Google and got rejected because he couldn't give a solution to this question.
I have my own interview in a couple of days and can't seem to figure out a way to solve it.
Here's the question:
You are given a pattern, such as [a b a b]. You are also given a
string, example "redblueredblue". I need to write a program that tells
whether the string follows the given pattern or not.
A few examples:
Pattern: [a b b a] String: catdogdogcat returns 1
Pattern: [a b a b] String: redblueredblue returns 1
Pattern: [a b b a] String: redblueredblue returns 0
I thought of a few approaches, like getting the number of unique characters in the pattern and then finding that many unique substrings of the string then comparing with the pattern using a hashmap. However, that turns out to be a problem if the substring of a is a part of b.
It'd be really great if any of you could help me out with it. :)
UPDATE:
Added Info: There can be any number of characters in the pattern (a-z). Two characters won't represent the same substring. Also, a character can't represent an empty string.
The simplest solution that I can think of is to divide the given string into four parts and compare the individual parts. You don't know how long a or b is, but both as are of the same length as well as bs are. So the number of ways how to divide the given string is not very large.
Example:
pattern = [a b a b], given string = redblueredblue (14 characters in total)
|a| (length of a) = 1, then that makes 2 characters for as and 12 characters is left for bs, i.e. |b| = 6. Divided string = r edblue r edblue. Whoa, this matches right away!
(just out of curiosity) |a| = 2, |b| = 5 -> divided string = re dblue re dblue -> match
Example 2:
pattern = [a b a b], string = redbluebluered (14 characters in total)
|a| = 1, |b| = 6 -> divided string = r edblue b luered -> no match
|a| = 2, |b| = 5 -> divided string = re dblue bl uered -> no match
|a| = 3, |b| = 4 -> divided string = red blue blu ered -> no match
The rest is not needed to be checked because if you switched a for b and vice versa, the situation is identical.
What is the pattern that has [a b c a b c] ?
Don't you just need to translate the pattern to a regexp using backreferences, i.e. something like this (Python 3 with the "re" module loaded):
>>> print(re.match('(.+)(.+)\\2\\1', 'catdogdogcat'))
<_sre.SRE_Match object; span=(0, 12), match='catdogdogcat'>
>>> print(re.match('(.+)(.+)\\1\\2', 'redblueredblue'))
<_sre.SRE_Match object; span=(0, 14), match='redblueredblue'>
>>> print(re.match('(.+)(.+)\\2\\1', 'redblueredblue'))
None
The regexp looks pretty trivial to generate. If you need to support more than 9 backrefs, you can use named groups - see the Python regexp docs.
Here is java backtracking solution. Source link.
public class Solution {
public boolean isMatch(String str, String pat) {
Map<Character, String> map = new HashMap<>();
return isMatch(str, 0, pat, 0, map);
}
boolean isMatch(String str, int i, String pat, int j, Map<Character, String> map) {
// base case
if (i == str.length() && j == pat.length()) return true;
if (i == str.length() || j == pat.length()) return false;
// get current pattern character
char c = pat.charAt(j);
// if the pattern character exists
if (map.containsKey(c)) {
String s = map.get(c);
// then check if we can use it to match str[i...i+s.length()]
if (i + s.length() > str.length() || !str.substring(i, i + s.length()).equals(s)) {
return false;
}
// if it can match, great, continue to match the rest
return isMatch(str, i + s.length(), pat, j + 1, map);
}
// pattern character does not exist in the map
for (int k = i; k < str.length(); k++) {
// create or update the map
map.put(c, str.substring(i, k + 1));
// continue to match the rest
if (isMatch(str, k + 1, pat, j + 1, map)) {
return true;
}
}
// we've tried our best but still no luck
map.remove(c);
return false;
}
}
One more brute force recursion solution:
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
int res;
res = wordpattern("abba", "redbluebluered");
System.out.println("RESULT: " + res);
}
static int wordpattern(String pattern, String input) {
int patternSize = 1;
boolean res = findPattern(pattern, input, new HashMap<Character, String>(), patternSize);
while (!res && patternSize < input.length())
{
patternSize++;
res = findPattern(pattern, input, new HashMap<Character, String>(), patternSize);
}
return res ? 1 : 0;
}
private static boolean findPattern(String pattern, String input, Map<Character, String> charToValue, int patternSize) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < pattern.length(); i++) {
char c = pattern.charAt(i);
if (charToValue.containsKey(c)) {
sb.append(charToValue.get(c));
} else {
// new character in pattern
if (sb.length() + patternSize > input.length()) {
return false;
} else {
String substring = input.substring(sb.length(), sb.length() + patternSize);
charToValue.put(c, substring);
int newPatternSize = 1;
boolean res = findPattern(pattern, input, new HashMap<>(charToValue), newPatternSize);
while (!res && newPatternSize + sb.length() + substring.length() < input.length() - 1) {
newPatternSize++;
res = findPattern(pattern, input, new HashMap<>(charToValue), newPatternSize);
}
return res;
}
}
}
return sb.toString().equals(input) && allValuesUniq(charToValue.values());
}
private static boolean allValuesUniq(Collection<String> values) {
Set<String> set = new HashSet<>();
for (String v : values) {
if (!set.add(v)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
My Implementation on C#. Tried to look for something clean in C#, couldn't find. So I'll add it to here.
private static bool CheckIfStringFollowOrder(string text, string subString)
{
int subStringLength = subString.Length;
if (text.Length < subStringLength) return false;
char x, y;
int indexX, indexY;
for (int i=0; i < subStringLength -1; i++)
{
indexX = -1;
indexY = -1;
x = subString[i];
y = subString[i + 1];
indexX = text.LastIndexOf(x);
indexY = text.IndexOf(y);
if (y < x || indexX == -1 || indexY == -1)
return false;
}
return true;
}
I solved this as a language production problem using regexen.
def wordpattern( pattern, string):
'''
input: pattern 'abba'
string 'redbluebluered'
output: 1 for match, 2 for no match
'''
# assemble regex into something like this for 'abba':
# '^(?P<A>.+)(?P<B>.+)(?P=B)(?P=A)$'
p = pattern
for c in pattern:
C = c.upper()
p = p.replace(c,"(?P<{0}>.+)".format(C),1)
p = p.replace(c,"(?P={0})".format(C),len(pattern))
p = '^' + p + '$'
# check for a preliminary match
if re.search(p,string):
rem = re.match(p,string)
seen = {}
# check to ensure that no points in the pattern share the same match
for c in pattern:
s = rem.group(c.upper())
# has match been seen? yes, fail, no continue
if s in seen and seen[s] != c:
return 0
seen[s] = c
# success
return 1
# did not hit the search, fail
return 0
#EricM
I tested your DFS solution and it seems wrong, like case:
pattern = ["a", "b", "a"], s = "patrpatrr"
The problem is that when you meet a pattern that already exists in dict and find it cannot fit the following string, you delete and try to assign it a new value. However, you haven't check this pattern with the new value for the previous times it occurs.
My idea is about providing addition dict (or merge in this dict) new value to keep track of the first time it appears and another stack to keep track of the unique pattern I meet. when "not match" occurs, I will know there is some problem with the last pattern and I pop it from the stack and modify the corresponding value in the dict, also I will start to check again at that corresponding index. If cannot be modified any more. I will pop until there is none left in the stack and then return False.
(I want to add comments but don't have enough reputation as a new user.. I haven't implement it but till now I haven't find any error in my logic. I am sorry if there is something wrong with my solution== I will try to implement it later.)
I can't think of much better than the brute force solution: try every possible partitioning of the word (this is essentially what Jan described).
The run-time complexity is O(n^(2m)) where m is the length of the pattern and n is the length of the string.
Here's what the code for that looks like (I made my code return the actual mapping instead of just 0 or 1. Modifying the code to return 0 or 1 is easy):
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.ArrayDeque;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Deque;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
public class StringBijection {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String chars = "abaac";
String string = "johnjohnnyjohnjohncodes";
List<String> stringBijection = getStringBijection(chars, string);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(stringBijection.toArray()));
}
public static List<String> getStringBijection(String chars, String string) {
if (chars == null || string == null) {
return null;
}
Map<Character, String> bijection = new HashMap<Character, String>();
Deque<String> assignments = new ArrayDeque<String>();
List<String> results = new ArrayList<String>();
boolean hasBijection = getStringBijection(chars, string, 0, 0, bijection, assignments);
if (!hasBijection) {
return null;
}
for (String result : assignments) {
results.add(result);
}
return results;
}
private static boolean getStringBijection(String chars, String string, int charIndex, int stringIndex, Map<Character, String> bijection, Deque<String> assignments) {
int charsLen = chars.length();
int stringLen = string.length();
if (charIndex == charsLen && stringIndex == stringLen) {
return true;
} else if (charIndex == charsLen || stringIndex == stringLen) {
return false;
}
char currentChar = chars.charAt(charIndex);
List<String> possibleWords = new ArrayList<String>();
boolean charAlreadyAssigned = bijection.containsKey(currentChar);
if (charAlreadyAssigned) {
String word = bijection.get(currentChar);
possibleWords.add(word);
} else {
StringBuilder word = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = stringIndex; i < stringLen; ++i) {
word.append(string.charAt(i));
possibleWords.add(word.toString());
}
}
for (String word : possibleWords) {
int wordLen = word.length();
int endIndex = stringIndex + wordLen;
if (endIndex <= stringLen && string.substring(stringIndex, endIndex).equals(word)) {
if (!charAlreadyAssigned) {
bijection.put(currentChar, word);
}
assignments.addLast(word);
boolean done = getStringBijection(chars, string, charIndex + 1, stringIndex + wordLen, bijection, assignments);
if (done) {
return true;
}
assignments.removeLast();
if (!charAlreadyAssigned) {
bijection.remove(currentChar);
}
}
}
return false;
}
}
If you are looking for a solution in C++, here is a brute force solution:
https://linzhongzl.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/repeating-pattern-match/
Plain Brute Force, not sure if any optimization is possible here ..
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import org.junit.*;
public class Pattern {
private Map<Character, String> map;
private boolean matchInt(String pattern, String str) {
if (pattern.length() == 0) {
return str.length() == 0;
}
char pch = pattern.charAt(0);
for (int i = 0; i < str.length(); ++i) {
if (!map.containsKey(pch)) {
String val = str.substring(0, i + 1);
map.put(pch, val);
if (matchInt(pattern.substring(1), str.substring(val.length()))) {
return true;
} else {
map.remove(pch);
}
} else {
String val = map.get(pch);
if (!str.startsWith(val)) {
return false;
}
return matchInt(pattern.substring(1), str.substring(val.length()));
}
}
return false;
}
public boolean match(String pattern, String str) {
map = new HashMap<Character, String>();
return matchInt(pattern, str);
}
#Test
public void test1() {
Assert.assertTrue(match("aabb", "ABABCDCD"));
Assert.assertTrue(match("abba", "redbluebluered"));
Assert.assertTrue(match("abba", "asdasdasdasd"));
Assert.assertFalse(match("aabb", "xyzabcxzyabc"));
Assert.assertTrue(match("abba", "catdogdogcat"));
Assert.assertTrue(match("abab", "ryry"));
Assert.assertFalse(match("abba", " redblueredblue"));
}
}
class StringPattern{
public:
int n, pn;
string str;
unordered_map<string, pair<string, int>> um;
vector<string> p;
bool match(string pat, string str_) {
p.clear();
istringstream istr(pat);
string x;
while(istr>>x) p.push_back(x);
pn=p.size();
str=str_;
n=str.size();
um.clear();
return dfs(0, 0);
}
bool dfs(int i, int c) {
if(i>=n) {
if(c>=pn){
return 1;
}
}
if(c>=pn) return 0;
for(int len=1; i+len-1<n; len++) {
string sub=str.substr(i, len);
if(um.count(p[c]) && um[p[c]].fi!=sub
|| um.count(sub) && um[sub].fi!=p[c]
)
continue;
//cout<<"str:"<<endl;
//cout<<p[c]<<" "<<sub<<endl;
um[p[c]].fi=sub;
um[p[c]].se++;
um[sub].fi=p[c];
um[sub].se++;
//um[sub]=p[c];
if(dfs(i+len, c+1)) return 1;
um[p[c]].se--;
if(!um[p[c]].se) um.erase(p[c]);
um[sub].se--;
if(!um[sub].se) um.erase(sub);
//um.erase(sub);
}
return 0;
}
};
My solution, as two side hashmap is needed, and also need to count the hash map counts
My java script solution:
function isMatch(pattern, str){
var map = {}; //store the pairs of pattern and strings
function checkMatch(pattern, str) {
if (pattern.length == 0 && str.length == 0){
return true;
}
//if the pattern or the string is empty
if (pattern.length == 0 || str.length == 0){
return false;
}
//store the next pattern
var currentPattern = pattern.charAt(0);
if (currentPattern in map){
//the pattern has alredy seen, check if there is a match with the string
if (str.length >= map[currentPattern].length && str.startsWith(map[currentPattern])){
//there is a match, try all other posibilities
return checkMatch(pattern.substring(1), str.substring(map[currentPattern].length));
} else {
//no match, return false
return false;
}
}
//the current pattern is new, try all the posibilities of current string
for (var i=1; i <= str.length; i++){
var stringToCheck = str.substring(0, i);
//store in the map
map[currentPattern] = stringToCheck;
//try the rest
var match = checkMatch(pattern.substring(1), str.substring(i));
if (match){
//there is a match
return true;
} else {
//if there is no match, delete the pair from the map
delete map[currentPattern];
}
}
return false;
}
return checkMatch(pattern, str);
}
A solution in Java I wrote (based on this HackerRank Dropbox Challenge practice).
You can play with the DEBUG_VARIATIONS and DEBUG_MATCH flags to have a better understanding of how the algorithm works.
It may be too late now, but you might want to attempt to tackle the problem at HackerRank first before reading through the proposed solutions! ;-)
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
public class Solution {
private static final boolean DEBUG_VARIATIONS = false;
private static final boolean DEBUG_MATCH = true;
static int wordpattern(final String pattern, final String input) {
if (pattern.length() == 1) {
return 1;
}
final int nWords = pattern.length();
final List<List<String>> lists = split(input, nWords);
for (final List<String> words : lists) {
if (DEBUG_VARIATIONS) {
System.out.print("-> ");
for (int i = 0; i < words.size(); i++) {
System.out.printf("%s ", words.get(i));
}
System.out.println();
}
if (matches(pattern, words)) {
return 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
// Return every possible way to split 'input' into 'n' parts
private static final List<List<String>> split(final String input, final int n) {
final List<List<String>> variations = new ArrayList<>();
// Stop recursion when n == 2
if (n == 2) {
for (int i = 1; i < input.length(); i++) {
final List<String> l = new ArrayList<>();
l.add(input.substring(0, i));
l.add(input.substring(i));
variations.add(l);
}
return variations;
}
for (int i = 1; i < input.length() - n + 1; i++) {
final List<List<String>> result = split(input.substring(i), n - 1);
for (List<String> l : result) {
l.add(0, input.substring(0, i));
}
variations.addAll(result);
}
return variations;
}
// Return 'true' if list of words matches patterns
private static final boolean matches(final String pattern, final List<String> words) {
final Map<String, String> patterns = new HashMap<>();
for (int i = 0; i < pattern.length(); i++) {
final String key = String.valueOf(pattern.charAt(i));
final String value = words.get(i);
boolean hasKey = patterns.containsKey(key);
boolean hasValue = patterns.containsValue(value);
if (!hasKey && !hasValue) {
patterns.put(key, value);
} else if (hasKey && !hasValue) {
return false;
} else if (!hasKey && hasValue) {
return false;
} else if (hasKey && hasValue) {
if (!value.equals(patterns.get(key))) {
return false;
}
}
}
if (DEBUG_MATCH) {
System.out.print("Found match! -> ");
for (int i = 0; i < words.size(); i++) {
System.out.printf("%s ", words.get(i));
}
System.out.println();
}
return true;
}
public static void main(final String[] args) {
System.out.println(wordpattern("abba", "redbluebluered"));
}
}
Python solution based on Java solution at: https://www.algo.monster/problems/word_pattern_ii
def helper(pattern, s, idxPattern, idxString, myMap, mySet):
if (idxPattern == len(pattern)) and (idxString == len(s)):
return True
if (idxPattern >= len(pattern)) or (idxString >= len(s)):
return False
thisChar = pattern[idxPattern]
#print ("At Char: ", thisChar, " at location: ", idxPattern)
for idxK in range(idxString + 1, len(s) + 1):
subString = s[idxString:idxK]
if (thisChar not in myMap) and (subString not in mySet) :
myMap[thisChar] = subString
mySet.add(subString)
# print ("Before Map {0}, Set: {1}".format(myMap, mySet))
if helper(pattern, s, idxPattern + 1, idxK, myMap, mySet):
return True
myMap.pop(thisChar)
mySet.remove(subString)
# print ("After Map {0}, Set: {1}".format(myMap, mySet))
elif (thisChar in myMap) and (myMap[thisChar] == subString):
if helper(pattern, s, idxPattern + 1, idxK, myMap, mySet):
return True
def word_pattern_match(pattern: str, s: str) -> bool:
# WRITE YOUR BRILLIANT CODE HERE
print ("Pattern {0}, String {1}".format(pattern, s))
if (len(pattern) == 0) and (len(s) == 0):
return True
if (len(pattern) == 0):
return False
myMap = dict()
mySet = set()
return helper(pattern, s, 0, 0, myMap, mySet)
if __name__ == '__main__':
pattern = input()
s = input()
res = word_pattern_match(pattern, s)
print('true' if res else 'false')
recursively check each combination.
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
/**
* Given a string and a pattern, check if the whole string is following the given pattern.
* e.g.
* string pattern return
* redblueredblue abab a:red, b:blue true
* redbb aba false
*
* Concept:
* Recursively checking
* point_pat:0 point_str:0 a:r point_pat:1 point_str:1 b:e/ed/edb...
* point_pat:0 point_str:1 a:re point_pat:1 point_str:2 b:d/db/dbl...
*/
bool isMatch(const string &str, const string &pattern, unordered_map<char, string> &match_table, int point_str, int point_pat)
{
if (point_pat >= pattern.size() && point_str >= str.size())
return true;
if (point_pat >= pattern.size() || point_str >= str.size())
return false;
if (match_table.count(pattern[point_pat]))
{
auto &match_str = match_table[pattern[point_pat]];
if (str.substr(point_str, match_str.size()) == match_str)
return isMatch(str, pattern, match_table, point_str + match_str.size(), point_pat + 1);
else
return false;
}
else
{
for (int len = 1; len <= str.size() - point_str; ++len)
{
match_table[pattern[point_pat]] = str.substr(point_str, len);
if (isMatch(str, pattern, match_table, point_str + len, point_pat + 1))
{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
bool isMatch(const string &str, const string &pattern)
{
unordered_map<char, string> match_table;
bool res = isMatch(str, pattern, match_table, 0, 0);
for (const auto &p : match_table)
{
cout << p.first << " : " << p.second << "\n";
}
return res;
}
int main()
{
string str{"redblueredblue"}, pattern{"abab"};
cout << isMatch(str, pattern) << "\n";
cout << isMatch(str, "ab") << "\n";
cout << isMatch(str, "ababa") << "\n";
cout << isMatch(str, "cba") << "\n";
cout << isMatch(str, "abcabc") << "\n";
cout << isMatch("patrpatrr", "aba") << "\n";
}
Depending on what patterns are given, you can answer a 'different' question (that really is the same question).
For patterns like [a b b a] determine whether or not the string is a palindrome.
For patterns like [a b a b] determine if the second half of the string equals the first half of the string.
Longer patterns like [a b c b c a], but you still break it up into smaller problems to solve. For this one, you know that the last n characters of the string should be the reverse of the first n characters. Once they stop being equal, you simply have another [b c b c] problem to check for.
Although possible, in an interview, I doubt they'd give you anything more complex than maybe 3-4 different substrings.

scan string operators - javascript

In a calculator I own 4 input type ="number" in particular:
<input type = "number" id ="mol" min="1" max="4">
<input type = "number" id ="div" min="1" max="4">
<input type = "number" id ="add" min="1" max="4">
<input type = "number" id ="min" min="1" max="4">
In a textbox, I insert the mathematical expression for extended.
<input type = "text" id = "exp" readonly>
The numerical values ​​and the operators have gone through the normal buttons.
So, for example, the expression inserted in the textbox is this: 8*5-9/2+3
Now I would want that when I press the equal key, based on the priority that the customer has given to the operands, the expression result changed.
multiplication: 1
division: 4
subtraction: 2
addition: 3
-> 40 - 9 / 2 + 3
-> 31 / 2 + 3
-> 31 / 5
-> = 6.2
I think this is very difficult to achieve.
Get the value of the textbox and evaluate the result based on the priority of the operands is really extreme. What do you propose?
Try using the split method: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/t5az126b(v=vs.94).aspx
Split on the operator with the first priority first, then split each group by the second operator, then for each subgroup split by the third operator, and for each of those sub-subgroups split by the fourth. Then apply the operator to the groups moving upward.
Conceptual example (not the full code you'll need, but should give an idea):
var expression = "8*5-9/2+3"; // Get this from the data
var operator1Groups = expression.split("*"); // Instead of hardcoding this, retrieve which operator has highest priority from the data
for (var i in operator1Groups) {
var operator2Groups = operator1Groups[i].split("+"); // Similarly, don't hardcode the operator
// And so on...
// Once you get to the lowest operator, start applying the operator to each group
}
The way to do this is with an Operator Precedence Parser. They are commonly implemented using Djikstra's Shunting-yard Algorithm. You could specify the precedence by loading the operators and precedences into a list and then running the algorithm:
function parse(inputExpression, operators) {
// Strip out anything that isn't a number or a math operator
var tokens = inputExpression
.replace(/[^0-9+\-*\/()]/g, '')
.split(/([+\-*\/()])/)
.filter(function(x) { return x != ""; });
var outputQ = []; // push = push, pop = pop
var operStk = []; // enqueue = push, dequeue = shift
function top(stack) { return stack[stack.length-1]; }
while(tokens.length !== 0) {
var token = tokens.shift();
if(!isNaN(Number(token))) {
outputQ.push(token);
} else if (operators.hasOwnProperty(token)) {
while(operators[token] >= operators[top(operStk)])
outputQ.push(operStk.pop());
operStk.push(token);
} else if (token == '(') {
operStk.push(token);
} else if (token == ')') {
while(top(operStk) != '(' && operStk.length != 0)
outputQ.push(operStk.pop());
if(operStk.length == 0)
return null;
operStk.pop(); // Get rid of the l-paren
} else {
console.log("Bad token '" + token + "'");
return null;
}
}
while(operStk.length > 0)
outputQ.push(operStk.pop());
return outputQ;
}
function evaluate(parseResult) {
if (parseResult === null) return null;
var valueStack = [];
while(parseResult.length !== 0) {
var op = parseResult.shift();
if(!isNaN(Number(op)))
valueStack.push(Number(op));
else {
var val2 = valueStack.pop();
var val1 = valueStack.pop();
if(op == '+') {
valueStack.push(val1 + val2);
} else if(op == '-') {
valueStack.push(val1 - val2);
} else if(op == '*') {
valueStack.push(val1 * val2);
} else if(op == '/') {
valueStack.push(val1 / val2);
} else {
console.log("Invalid operator '" + op + "'");
return null;
}
}
}
if(valueStack.length !== 1) {
console.log("Invalid stack. Remaining: " + valueStack);
return null;
}
return valueStack.pop();
}
Usage:
var operators = {
"+": 3,
"-": 2,
"*": 1,
"/": 4
};
evaluate(parse("40 - 9 / 2 + 3", operators)); // == 6.2
Note that this will not handle unary minus, because it's difficult to do with Shunting-yard, and because you aren't asking for a precedence for it. On the bright side, it does support parenthesis.
Hope this helps!
Alex

Easy way to search a string for strings

I'm trying to find the easiest way to search a string for an array of possible strings. I know the easy way to do this for characters is to use myString.IndexOfAny(charArray). But how what if I'd like to search my string for strings and not just characters? Are there any .net tricks or methods that make this easier?
Basically, I'd like to do something like this:
string myName = "rahkim";
string[] names = new string[] {"joe","bob","chris"};
if(myName.IndexOfAny(names) >= 0)
{
//success code//
}
I know there are ways to do this with loops, etc. But I was hoping for something inherent in the framework.
You should define if you want to to find equal strings or search for a matching substring. Both ways are easy pre-LINQ and with LINQ.
string myName = "rahkim";
string[] names = new string[] { "joe", "bob", "chris" };
Equal Strings, LINQ
bool contains = names.Contains(myName);
Equal Strings, Pre-LINQ
bool contains = new List<string>(name).Contains(myName);
Substrings, LINQ
bool contains = names.Any(name => name.Contains(myName));
Substring, Pre-LINQ
bool contains = false;
foreach(string name in names)
if (name.Contains(myName))
contains = true;
If anyone else found this while trying to search for a .Net method like String.IndexOfAny(String[]), this is my solution:
C#
public int IndexOfAny(string test, string[] values)
{
int first = -1;
foreach (string item in values) {
int i = test.IndexOf(item);
if (i >= 0) {
if (first > 0) {
if (i < first) {
first = i;
}
} else {
first = i;
}
}
}
return first;
}
VB
Public Function IndexOfAny(test As String, values As String()) As Integer
Dim first As Integer = -1
For Each item As String In values
Dim i As Integer = test.IndexOf(item)
If i >= 0 Then
If first > 0 Then
If i < first Then
first = i
End If
Else
first = i
End If
End If
Next
Return first
End Function
You can do a LastIndexOfAny(String[]) by just switching the
i < first
to
i > first
You can (also) use the static IndexOf method of the Array class:
bool hasName = Array.IndexOf(names, myName) > -1;
int IndexOfAny(String[] rgs) would indeed be nice but it's nominally an O(n^2) operation. If, in your application, the set of strings rgs is large and always the same, the most efficient approach is to load them into a trie data structure once, and then use the trie repeatedly to search for them within the unknown strings given at runtime.
Here is the relevant code, adapted from a C# trie source I found on the web, attributed to "Kerry D. Wong." In my version, each string in the trie has a "payload" of generic type TValue. To use this trie to simply search for substrings, the payload could always be set to true, as illustrated with simple_trie.
The other thing I changed here is that this trie automatically adapts allow for storage of arbitrary Unicode strings. The array at each node—which characterizes a trie—adjusts its base and length to accomodate the range of Unicode characters which need to be stored at that node. This allows for case-sensitive matching, for example.
The C# 3.0 initialization syntax is handy for this trie, but enabling it requires a dummy implementation of IEnumerable in order to compile. The CLR doesn't seem to call GetEnumerator() and I suggest that you don't try to enumerate with its result either.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq; // only used in Main()
class Program
{
// trie with payload of type <String>
static Trie<String> value_trie = new Trie<String>
{
{ "rabbit", "cute" },
{ "giraffe", "tall" },
{ "ape", "smart" },
{ "hippo", "large" },
};
// degenerate case of a trie without payload
static Trie<bool> simple_trie = new Trie<bool>
{
{ "rabbit", true },
{ "giraffe", true },
{ "ape", true },
{ "hippo", true },
};
static void Main(String[] args)
{
String s = "Once upon a time, a rabbit met an ape in the woods.";
// Retrieve payloads for words in the string.
//
// output:
// cute
// smart
foreach (String word in value_trie.AllSubstringValues(s))
Console.WriteLine(word);
// Simply test a string for any of the words in the trie.
// Note that the Any() operator ensures that the input is no longer
// traversed once a single result is found.
//
// output:
// True
Console.WriteLine(simple_trie.AllSubstringValues(s).Any(e=>e));
s = "Four score and seven years ago.";
// output:
// False
Console.WriteLine(simple_trie.AllSubstringValues(s).Any(e => e));
}
}
class TrieNode<TValue>
{
private TrieNode<TValue>[] nodes = null;
private TValue m_value = default(TValue);
private Char m_base;
public Char Base { get { return m_base; } }
public bool IsEnd { get { return !m_value.Equals(default(TValue)); } }
public TValue Value
{
get { return m_value; }
set { m_value = value; }
}
public IEnumerable<TrieNode<TValue>> Nodes { get { return nodes; } }
public TrieNode<TValue> this[char c]
{
get
{
if (nodes != null && m_base <= c && c < m_base + nodes.Length)
return nodes[c - m_base];
return null;
}
}
public TrieNode<TValue> AddChild(char c)
{
if (nodes == null)
{
m_base = c;
nodes = new TrieNode<TValue>[1];
}
else if (c >= m_base + nodes.Length)
{
Array.Resize(ref nodes, c - m_base + 1);
}
else if (c < m_base)
{
Char c_new = (Char)(m_base - c);
TrieNode<TValue>[] tmp = new TrieNode<TValue>[nodes.Length + c_new];
nodes.CopyTo(tmp, c_new);
m_base = c;
nodes = tmp;
}
TrieNode<TValue> node = nodes[c - m_base];
if (node == null)
{
node = new TrieNode<TValue>();
nodes[c - m_base] = node;
}
return node;
}
};
class Trie<TValue> : System.Collections.IEnumerable
{
private TrieNode<TValue> _root = new TrieNode<TValue>();
// This dummy enables C# 3.0 initialization syntax
public System.Collections.IEnumerator GetEnumerator()
{
return null;
}
public void Add(String s, TValue v)
{
TrieNode<TValue> node = _root;
foreach (Char c in s)
node = node.AddChild(c);
node.Value = v;
}
public bool Contains(String s)
{
TrieNode<TValue> node = _root;
foreach (Char c in s)
{
node = node[c];
if (node == null)
return false;
}
return node.IsEnd;
}
public TValue Find(String s_in)
{
TrieNode<TValue> node = _root;
foreach (Char c in s_in)
{
node = node[c];
if (node == null)
return default(TValue);
}
return node.Value;
}
public IEnumerable<TValue> FindAll(String s_in)
{
TrieNode<TValue> node = _root;
foreach (Char c in s_in)
{
node = node[c];
if (node == null)
break;
if (node.Value != null)
yield return node.Value;
}
}
public IEnumerable<TValue> AllSubstringValues(String s)
{
int i_cur = 0;
while (i_cur < s.Length)
{
TrieNode<TValue> node = _root;
int i = i_cur;
while (i < s.Length)
{
node = node[s[i]];
if (node == null)
break;
if (node.Value != null)
yield return node.Value;
i++;
}
i_cur++;
}
}
};
Here's the right syntax:
if(names.Contains(myName))
{
//success code//
}
if (names.Contains(myName))
{
//success code//
}

Resources