I have this mongoose schema, and I want to query all IP attributes as a string array.
like [IP,IP,IP,IP] this, not [ { ip : ip} ]
const proxyIpSchema = new Schema<IProxyIp>({
ip: {
type: String,
required: true,
//ignore duplicate ip
unique: true,
},
port: {
type: Number,
required: false,
default: null
},
reason: {
type: String,
required: true,
default: 'Unknown Detection.'
}
},
{
timestamps: true,
}
);
I cant use a map function because it will eat the backend processing power. like this
I want all ips as a string array
//get all ips from mongo db and push to redis
await ProxyIp.find({}, { ip: 1 }).then(async (docs) => {
docs.map(async (doc) => {
await this.RedisClient?.sAdd(redisTable, doc.ip);
});
}).catch((err) => {
});
Here's one way you can put all the "ip"s into a single array (within an object).
db.ProxyIp.aggregate([
{
"$group": {
"_id": null,
"ips": {
"$push": "$ip"
}
}
},
{
"$unset": "_id"
}
])
Example output:
[
{
"ips": [
"102.118.108.76",
"34.234.240.83",
"123.76.73.33",
"134.81.197.85",
"193.122.45.195",
"54.25.18.14",
"185.68.124.193",
"3.105.130.68",
"52.72.204.78",
"117.212.118.167",
"199.155.140.226",
"64.194.68.59",
"57.4.147.57",
"190.116.4.243",
"179.111.74.98",
...
]
}
[
Try it on mongoplayground.net.
Forgive my limited knowledge im about a week into using Sequelize,
Models.PlannerModel.Builds.findAll({
raw: true,
where: {
ProposedDelivery: { [Op.gt]: moment().format("YYYY-MM-DD") },
description: { [Op.ne]: null },
description: { [Op.ne]: " " },
description: { [Op.not]: null },
},
include: [
{
model: Models.PlannerModel.Unit,
required: true
},
],
the result from the above is as you would expect except all the keys for the fields in the includes are as strings so referencing them in my Pug template/class has to be done with brackets
overall not the end of the world just wondering if im doing something wrong ?
Cheers!
Turn off raw to get nested model objects and also to get plain objects use get({ plain: true}) for each returned model instance:
const builds = await Models.PlannerModel.Builds.findAll({
where: {
ProposedDelivery: { [Op.gt]: moment().format("YYYY-MM-DD") },
[Op.and]: [{
description: { [Op.ne]: null },
}, {
description: { [Op.ne]: " " },
}, {
description: { [Op.not]: null },
}
]
},
include: [
{
model: Models.PlannerModel.Unit,
required: true
},
]
})
const plainBuilds = builds.map(x => x.get({ plain: true }))
Please pay attention that I changed conditions with description. In your version of conditions only the last one will work because JS saves only the last key if there are several same keys in the same object.
I have been trying to use updatemany with mongoose. I want to update the values in database using an array of objects.
[
{
"variantId": "5e1760fbdfaf28038242d676",
"quantity": 5
},
{
"variantId": "5e17e67b73a34d53160c7252",
"quantity": 13
}
]
I want to use variantId as filter.
Model schema is:
let variantSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
variantName: String,
stocks: {
type: Number,
min: 0
},
regularPrice: {
type: Number,
required: true
},
salePrice: {
type: Number,
required: true
}
})
I want to filter the models using variantId and then decrease the stocks.
As you need to update multiple documents with multiple criteria then .updateMany() wouldn't work - it will work only if you need to update multiple documents with same value, Try this below query which will help you to get it done in one DB call :
const Mongoose = require("mongoose");
let variantSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
variantName: String,
stocks: {
type: Number,
min: 0
},
regularPrice: {
type: Number,
required: true
},
salePrice: {
type: Number,
required: true
}
})
const Variant = mongoose.model('variant', variantSchema, 'variant');
let input = [
{
"variantId": "5e1760fbdfaf28038242d676",
"quantity": 5
},
{
"variantId": "5e17e67b73a34d53160c7252",
"quantity": 13
}
]
let bulkArr = [];
for (const i of input) {
bulkArr.push({
updateOne: {
"filter": { "_id": Mongoose.Types.ObjectId(i.variantId) },
"update": { $inc: { "stocks": - i.quantity } }
}
})
}
Variant.bulkWrite(bulkArr)
Ref : MongoDB-bulkWrite
I don't think this can be done with a single Model.updateMany query. You will need to loop the array and use Model.update instead.
for (const { variantId, quantity } of objects) {
Model.update({ _id: variantId }, { $inc: { stocks: -quantity } });
}
To run this in a transaction (https://mongoosejs.com/docs/transactions.html), the code should look something like this (however I have not tried or tested this):
mongoose.startSession().then(async session => {
session.startTransaction();
for (const { variantId, quantity } of objects) {
await Model.update({ _id: variantId }, { $inc: { stocks: -quantity } }, { session });
}
await session.commitTransaction();
});
I'm having trouble 'upserting' to my array. The code below creates duplicates in my answers array which I definitely do not want and by now it's apparent $push will not work. I have tried using the different methodologies I see on SO for a while now but none are working for me. With this web app, users are allows to view a question on the website and respond with a 'yes' or 'no' response and they are allowed to change(upsert) their response at any one time meaning a sort of upsert takes place on the db at different times. How do get around this?
var QuestionSchema = Schema ({
title :String,
admin :{type: String, ref: 'User'},
answers :[{type: Schema.Types.Mixed, ref: 'Answer'}]
});
var AnswerSchema = Schema ({
_question :{type: ObjectId, ref: 'Question'},
employee :{type: String, ref: 'User'},
response :String,
isAdmin :{type: Boolean, ref: 'User'}
})
var UserSchema = Schema({
username : String,
isAdmin : {type: Boolean, default: false}
});
module.exports = mongoose.model('Question', QuestionSchema);
module.exports = mongoose.model('Answer', AnswerSchema);
module.exports = mongoose.model('User', UserSchema);
Question.update(
{_id: req.body.id},
{$push: {answers: {_question: req.body.id,
employee: req.body.employee,
response: req.body.response, //this variable changes (yes/no/null)
isAdmin: req.body.isAdmin}}},
{safe: true, upsert: true},
function(err, model) {
}
);
As I see it you seem a little confused and it's reflected in your schema. You don't seem to fully grasp the differences between "embedded" and "referenced" since your schema is actually an invalid "mash" of the two techniques.
Probably best to walk you through both of them.
Embedded Model
So instead of the schema you have defined, you should in fact have something more like this:
var QuestionSchema = Schema ({
title :String,
admin :{type: String, ref: 'User'},
answers :[AnswerSchema]
});
var AnswerSchema = Schema ({
employee :{type: String, ref: 'User'},
response :String,
isAdmin :{type: Boolean, ref: 'User'}
})
mongoose.model('Question', questionSchema);
NOTE: Question is the only actual model here. The AnswerSchema is completely "embedded".
Note the clear definition of the "schema" where the "answers" property in Question is defined as an "array" of AnswerSchema. This is how you do embedding and keep control of the types within the object inside the array.
As for the update, there is a clear logic pattern but you are simply not enforcing it. All you need to do is "tell" the update that you do not want to "push" a new item if something for that "unique" "employee" in the array already exists.
Also. This is NOT and "upsert". Upsert implies "creating a new one", which is different to what you want. You want to "push" to the array of an "existing" Question. If you leave "upsert" on there, then something not found creates a new Question. Which is of course wrong here.
Question.update(
{
"_id": req.body.id,
"answers.employee": { "$ne": req.body.employee },
}
},
{ "$push": {
"answers": {
"employee": req.body.employee,
"response": req.body.response,
"isAdmin": req.body.isAdmin
}
}},
function(err, numAffected) {
});
That will look to check that the "unique" "employee" in the array members already and will only $push where it is not already there.
As a bonus, if you intend to allow the user to "change their answer" then we do this incantation with .bulkWrite():
Question.collection.bulkWrite(
[
{ "updateOne": {
"filter": {
"_id": req.body.id,
"answers.employee": req.body.employee,
},
"update": {
"$set": {
"answers.$.response": req.body.response,
}
}
}},
{ "updateOne": {
"filter": {
"_id": req.body.id,
"answers.employee": { "$ne": req.body.employee },
},
"update": {
"$push": {
"answers": {
"employee": req.body.employee,
"response": req.body.response,
"isAdmin": req.body.isAdmin
}
}
}
}}
],
function(err, writeResult) {
}
);
This effectively puts two updates in one. The first to attempt to alter an existing answer and $set the response at the matched position, and the second to attempt to add a new answer where one was not found on the question.
Referenced Model
With a "referenced" model you actually have the real members of the Answer within their own collection. So instead the schema is defined like this:
var QuestionSchema = Schema ({
title :String,
admin :{type: String, ref: 'User'},
answers :[{ type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'Answer' }]
});
var AnswerSchema = Schema ({
_question :{type: ObjectId, ref: 'Question'},
employee :{type: String, ref: 'User'},
response :String,
isAdmin :{type: Boolean, ref: 'User'}
})
mongoose.model('Answer', answerSchema);
mongoose.model('Question', questionSchema);
N.B The other ref's here to User such as :
employee :{type: String, ref: 'User'},
isAdmin :{type: Boolean, ref: 'User'}
These are also really incorrect, and also should be of Schema.Type.ObjectId as they will "reference" the actual _id field of User. But this is actually outside of the scope of this question as asked, so if you still don't grasp that after this read, then Ask a New Question so someone can explain. On with the rest of the answer.
That's the "general" shape of the schema though, with the important thing being the "ref" to the 'Anwser' "model", which is by the registered name. You can optionally just use your "_question" field in modern mongoose versions with a "virtual", but I'm skipping over "Adavanced Usage" for now and keeping it simple with an array of "references" still in the Question model.
In this case, since the Answer model is actually in it's own "collection", then the operations actually become "upserts". Where we only want to "create" when there is no "employee" response to the given "_question" id.
Also demonstrating with a Promise chain instead:
Answer.update(
{ "_question": req.body.id, "employee": req.body.employee },
{
"$set": {
"response": req.body.reponse
},
"$setOnInsert": {
"isAdmin": req.body.isAdmin
}
},
{ "upsert": true }
).then(resp => {
if ( resp.hasOwnProperty("upserted") ) {
return Question.update(
{ "_id": req.body.id, "answers": { "$ne": resp.upserted[0]._id },
{ "$push": { "answers": resp.upserted[0]._id } }
).exec()
}
return;
}).then(resp => {
// either undefined where it was not an upsert or
// the update result from Question where it was
}).catch(err => {
// something
})
This is actually a simple statement since "when matched" we want to change the "response" data with the payload of the request, and really only when "upserting" or "creating/inserting" is when we actually change other data such as the "employee" ( which is always implied for create as part of the query expression ) and the "isAdmin" which clearly should not change with each update request we then explicitly use $setOnInsert so it only writes those two fields on an actual "create".
In the "Promise Chain" we actually look to see if the update request to Answer actually resulted in an "upsert", and when it does we want to append to the array of Question where it does not already exist. In much the same way as the "embedded" example, it's best to look to see if the array actually has the item before modifying with the "update". Alternately you could $addToSet here and just let the query match the Question by _id. To me though, that's a wasted write.
Summary
Those are your different approaches to how you handle this. Each has their own use cases for which you can see a general summary some other answers of mine in:
Mongoose populate vs object nesting which is an overview of the different approaches and reasons behind them
How to Model a “likes” voting system with MongoDB which gives a bit more detail on the "unique array upserts" technique for "embedded" models.
Not "required" reading, but it may help expand your insight into which approach is best for your particular case.
Working Example
Copy these and put them in a directory and do an npm install to install local dependencies. The code will run and create the collections in the database making the alterations.
Logging is turned on with mongoose.set(debug,true) so you should look at the console output and see what it does, along with the resulting collections where answers will be recorded to the related questions, and overwritten instead of "duplicating" where that was also the intent.
Change the connection string if you have to. But that is all you should change in this listing for it's purpose. Both approaches described in the answer are demonstrated.
package.json
{
"name": "colex",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "",
"main": "index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1"
},
"keywords": [],
"author": "",
"license": "ISC",
"dependencies": {
"async": "^2.4.1",
"mongodb": "^2.2.29",
"mongoose": "^4.10.7"
}
}
index.js
const async = require('async'),
mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Schema = mongoose.Schema,
ObjectId = require('mongodb').ObjectID
mongoose.Promise = global.Promise;
mongoose.set('debug',true);
mongoose.connect('mongodb://localhost/coltest');
const userSchema = new Schema({
username: String,
isAdmin: { type: Boolean, default: false }
});
const answerSchemaA = new Schema({
employee: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'User' },
response: String,
});
const answerSchemaB = new Schema({
question: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'QuestionB' },
employee: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'User' },
response: String,
});
const questionSchemaA = new Schema({
title: String,
admin: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'User' },
answers: [answerSchemaA]
});
const questionSchemaB = new Schema({
title: String,
admin: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'User' },
answers: [{ type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'AnswerB' }]
});
const User = mongoose.model('User', userSchema);
const AnswerB = mongoose.model('AnswerB', answerSchemaB);
const QuestionA = mongoose.model('QuestionA', questionSchemaA);
const QuestionB = mongoose.model('QuestionB', questionSchemaB);
async.series(
[
// Clear data
(callback) => async.each(mongoose.models,(model,callback) =>
model.remove({},callback),callback),
// Create some data
(callback) =>
async.each([
{
"model": "User",
"object": {
"_id": "594a322619ddbd437193c759",
"name": "Admin",
"isAdmin": true
}
},
{
"model": "User",
"object": {
"_id": "594a323919ddbd437193c75a",
"name": "Bill"
}
},
{
"model": "User",
"object": {
"_id": "594a327b19ddbd437193c75b",
"name": "Ted"
}
},
{
"model": "QuestionA",
"object": {
"_id": "594a32f719ddbd437193c75c",
"admin": "594a322619ddbd437193c759",
"title": "Question A Model"
}
},
{
"model": "QuestionB",
"object": {
"_id": "594a32f719ddbd437193c75c",
"admin": "594a322619ddbd437193c759",
"title": "Question B Model"
}
}
],(data,callback) => mongoose.model(data.model)
.create(data.object,callback),
callback
),
// Submit Answers for Users - Question A
(callback) =>
async.eachSeries(
[
{
"_id": "594a32f719ddbd437193c75c",
"employee": "594a323919ddbd437193c75a",
"response": "Bills Answer"
},
{
"_id": "594a32f719ddbd437193c75c",
"employee": "594a327b19ddbd437193c75b",
"response": "Teds Answer"
},
{
"_id": "594a32f719ddbd437193c75c",
"employee": "594a323919ddbd437193c75a",
"response": "Bills Changed Answer"
}
].map(d => ([
{ "updateOne": {
"filter": {
"_id": ObjectId(d._id),
"answers.employee": ObjectId(d.employee)
},
"update": {
"$set": { "answers.$.response": d.response }
}
}},
{ "updateOne": {
"filter": {
"_id": ObjectId(d._id),
"answers.employee": { "$ne": ObjectId(d.employee) }
},
"update": {
"$push": {
"answers": {
"employee": ObjectId(d.employee),
"response": d.response
}
}
}
}}
])),
(data,callback) => QuestionA.collection.bulkWrite(data,callback),
callback
),
// Submit Answers for Users - Question A
(callback) =>
async.eachSeries(
[
{
"_id": "594a32f719ddbd437193c75c",
"employee": "594a323919ddbd437193c75a",
"response": "Bills Answer"
},
{
"_id": "594a32f719ddbd437193c75c",
"employee": "594a327b19ddbd437193c75b",
"response": "Teds Anwser"
},
{
"_id": "594a32f719ddbd437193c75c",
"employee": "594a327b19ddbd437193c75b",
"response": "Ted Changed it"
}
],
(data,callback) => {
AnswerB.update(
{ "question": data._id, "employee": data.employee },
{ "$set": { "response": data.response } },
{ "upsert": true }
).then(resp => {
console.log(resp);
if (resp.hasOwnProperty("upserted")) {
return QuestionB.update(
{ "_id": data._id, "employee": { "$ne": data.employee } },
{ "$push": { "answers": resp.upserted[0]._id } }
).exec()
}
return;
}).then(() => callback(null))
.catch(err => callback(err))
},
callback
)
],
(err) => {
if (err) throw err;
mongoose.disconnect();
}
)
Here was my quick work around before Neill updated his answer (I used a $pull & $push). Works just as his but I'll mark his correct as I believe it's more efficient.
Question.update(
{_id: req.body.id},
{$pull: {answers: { employee: req.body.employee}}},
{safe: true, multi:true, upsert: true},
function(err, model) {
}
);
Question.update(
{_id: req.body.id},
{$push: {answers: {_question: req.body.id,
employee: req.body.employee,
response: req.body.response,
isAdmin: req.body.isAdmin}}},
{safe: true, upsert: true},
function(err, model) {
}
);
I'm trying to update the nested document. The query is returning the correct document, but the property isn't being updated.
Model:
{
_id: '560b072434b72aa4050fff9f',
trips: [
{
tripId: '561581ef9387780e76469e96',
startDate: "2015-11-17T06:00:00.000Z",
endDate: "2015-11-18T06:00:00.000Z"
},{
tripId: '5617d1bb1d42c4da90d3bdea',
startDate: "2015-10-17T06:00:00.000Z",
endDate: "2015-10-18T06:00:00.000Z"
}
],
}
Query:
UserData.update(
{ '_id': req.query._id, 'trips.tripId': req.query.tripId },
{ '$set': { 'trips.$.startDate' : req.query.newStartDate,
'trips.$.endDate' : req.query.newEndDate} },
{ 'multi': true },
function(e, doc){
console.log(doc);
}
);
Schema:
var userDataSchema = {
name: String,
trips: Array
};
#BlakesSeven led me to the answer. I added:
var ObjectId = require('mongodb').ObjectID;
before my app.route in server.js, installed mongodb using npm, then changed
{ '_id': req.query._id, 'trips.tripId': req.query.tripId },
to
{ '_id': ObjectId(req.query._id), 'trips.tripId': ObjectId(req.query.tripId) },.
Everything updates as it should now. Thanks Blakes Seven!