I am trying to pass parameters to my backing bean using action (testPlan and rowIndex). But when I run the code it says it can't find the method.
<p:commandLink update=":scriptGroupPopupID" ajax="true"
action="#{workloadScripts.initCurrentGroup(testPlan, rowIndex)}"
immediate="true"
oncomplete="PF('scriptGroupPopup').show();">
<f:param name="insertIndex" value="#{rowIndex}" />
</p:commandLink>
public void initCurrentGroup(String testPlan, String rowIndex) {
...
}
However, if I remove the parameters from initCurrentGroup method only, it does work. What is going on here?
The type of the rowIndexVar variable is an int. You must use a matching method signature. Assuming testPlan is indeed a String, you should use:
public void initCurrentGroup(String testPlan, int rowIndex) {
...
}
Which you can use like:
<p:commandLink update=":scriptGroupPopupID"
action="#{workloadScripts.initCurrentGroup(testPlan, rowIndex)}"
process="#this"
oncomplete="PF('scriptGroupPopup').show();" />
Please note that I've removed ajax="true" (which is default), and replaced immediate="true" with process="#this".
See also:
Understanding PrimeFaces process/update and JSF f:ajax execute/render attributes
Related
I'm using Primefaces in a JSF 2 application. I have a <p:dataTable>, and instead of selecting rows, I want the user to be able to directly execute various actions on individual rows. For that, I have several <p:commandLink>s in the last column.
My problem: how can I pass a row ID to the action started by the command link so that I know which row to act on? I tried using an <f:attribute>:
<p:dataTable value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
...
<p:column>
<p:commandLink actionListener="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:attribute name="id" value="#{item.id}" />
</p:commandLink>
</p:column>
</p:dataTable>
But it always yields 0 - apparently the row variable f is not available when the attribute is rendered (it works when I use a fixed value).
Anyone has an alternative solution?
As to the cause, the <f:attribute> is specific to the component itself (populated during view build time), not to the iterated row (populated during view render time).
There are several ways to achieve the requirement.
If your servletcontainer supports a minimum of Servlet 3.0 / EL 2.2, then just pass it as an argument of action/listener method of UICommand component or AjaxBehavior tag. E.g.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert(item.id)}" value="insert" />
In combination with:
public void insert(Long id) {
// ...
}
This only requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
You can even pass the entire item object:
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert(item)}" value="insert" />
with:
public void insert(Item item) {
// ...
}
On Servlet 2.5 containers, this is also possible if you supply an EL implementation which supports this, like as JBoss EL. For configuration detail, see this answer.
Use <f:param> in UICommand component. It adds a request parameter.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:param name="id" value="#{item.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
If your bean is request scoped, let JSF set it by #ManagedProperty
#ManagedProperty(value="#{param.id}")
private Long id; // +setter
Or if your bean has a broader scope or if you want more fine grained validation/conversion, use <f:viewParam> on the target view, see also f:viewParam vs #ManagedProperty:
<f:viewParam name="id" value="#{bean.id}" required="true" />
Either way, this has the advantage that the datamodel doesn't necessarily need to be preserved for the form submit (for the case that your bean is request scoped).
Use <f:setPropertyActionListener> in UICommand component. The advantage is that this removes the need for accessing the request parameter map when the bean has a broader scope than the request scope.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:setPropertyActionListener target="#{bean.id}" value="#{item.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
In combination with
private Long id; // +setter
It'll be just available by property id in action method. This only requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
Bind the datatable value to DataModel<E> instead which in turn wraps the items.
<h:dataTable value="#{bean.model}" var="item">
with
private transient DataModel<Item> model;
public DataModel<Item> getModel() {
if (model == null) {
model = new ListDataModel<Item>(items);
}
return model;
}
(making it transient and lazily instantiating it in the getter is mandatory when you're using this on a view or session scoped bean since DataModel doesn't implement Serializable)
Then you'll be able to access the current row by DataModel#getRowData() without passing anything around (JSF determines the row based on the request parameter name of the clicked command link/button).
public void insert() {
Item item = model.getRowData();
Long id = item.getId();
// ...
}
This also requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
Use Application#evaluateExpressionGet() to programmatically evaluate the current #{item}.
public void insert() {
FacesContext context = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
Item item = context.getApplication().evaluateExpressionGet(context, "#{item}", Item.class);
Long id = item.getId();
// ...
}
Which way to choose depends on the functional requirements and whether the one or the other offers more advantages for other purposes. I personally would go ahead with #1 or, when you'd like to support servlet 2.5 containers as well, with #2.
In JSF 1.2 this was done by <f:setPropertyActionListener> (within the command component). In JSF 2.0 (EL 2.2 to be precise, thanks to BalusC) it's possible to do it like this: action="${filterList.insert(f.id)}
In my view page:
<p:dataTable ...>
<p:column>
<p:commandLink actionListener="#{inquirySOController.viewDetail}"
process="#this" update=":mainform:dialog_content"
oncomplete="dlg2.show()">
<h:graphicImage library="images" name="view.png"/>
<f:param name="trxNo" value="#{item.map['trxNo']}"/>
</p:commandLink>
</p:column>
</p:dataTable>
backing bean
public void viewDetail(ActionEvent e) {
String trxNo = getFacesContext().getRequestParameterMap().get("trxNo");
for (DTO item : list) {
if (item.get("trxNo").toString().equals(trxNo)) {
System.out.println(trxNo);
setSelectedItem(item);
break;
}
}
}
Thanks to this site by Mkyong, the only solution that actually worked for us to pass a parameter was this
<h:commandLink action="#{user.editAction}">
<f:param name="myId" value="#{param.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
with
public String editAction() {
Map<String,String> params =
FacesContext.getExternalContext().getRequestParameterMap();
String idString = params.get("myId");
long id = Long.parseLong(idString);
...
}
Technically, that you cannot pass to the method itself directly, but to the JSF request parameter map.
I'm using JSF 2.2.8 and primefaces 6.0, and i have a selectCheckBoxMenu i want to retrieve the selected values in my bean.
The selectCheckboxMenu is filled from the database but when i select the attributes and I save nothing happens it does not call the save function
Here is my selectCheckBoxMenu
<p:outputLabel for="ressource" value="Ressource"/>
<h:panelGroup >
<p:selectCheckboxMenu id="ressource" label="Ressource" value="#{affectationBean.selectedRessource}" multiple="true">
<f:selectItems value="#{affectationBean.ressources}" var="r" itemLabel="#{r.nom}" itemValue="r.idt_ressource" />
</p:selectCheckboxMenu>
</h:panelGroup>
<p:commandButton icon="ui-icon-save" actionListener="#{affectationBean.save}" value="Save" update="#affectation" ajax="false" style="display:inline-block;margin-top:5px"/>
Here is the the declaration of the selectedRessource and the actionListener save
private Long [] selectedRessource;
// Getters setters and Construct
public void save(){
for(int i=0 ;i<selectedRessource.length;i++){
system.out.println("id ===> " + selectedRessource[i]);
}
My suggestion would be:
First make sure everything is inside the h:form tag.
don't need to multiple = true as this tag does not take this attribute
i tested with below modification and got the selected multiple value in my bean. The only difference is i am using same value for itemLabel and itemValue but in your case it is object. i am using primefaces 6 also and dont even need to change actionListner to action. It is working as it is.sample xhtml
sample ResourceBean.java
<p:outputLabel for="ressource" value="Ressource"/>
<h:panelGroup >
<p:selectCheckboxMenu id="ressource" label="Ressource" value="#{resourceBean.selectedRessource}">
<f:selectItems value="#{resourceBean.ressources}" var="r" itemLabel="#{r}" itemValue="#{r}" />
</p:selectCheckboxMenu>
</h:panelGroup>
<p:commandButton icon="ui-icon-save" actionListener="#{resourceBean.save}" value="Save" ajax="false" style="display:inline-block;margin-top:5px"/>
The problem is in your p:commandButton, you have 3 options
change your method:
public void save(ActionEvent actionEvent){...}
change your action listener value:
actionListener="#{affectationBean.save()}"
or change your button to use action
action="#{affectationBean.save}"
DISCLAIMER: This is a workaround. It is not intended to be a permanent solution but will allow you to use selectCheckboxMenu and keep working.
There is an issue with this component that prevents it from passing values to the backing bean upon submit.
For some reason the array that should contain the selected values gets cleared out upon submit. Therefore I made an extra array that I did not declare in the tag, and updated in on every change event. Then on submit the values were still there. See below:
BackingBean.java
private String[] sCodes;
private String[] sCodes2; //extra array, not in form.xhtml
public void updateCodes()
{
sCodes2 = sCodes; //keeps the values in the other array
}
public void doSend() throws IOException
{
log.trace("selected codes: {} selected codes2 length: {}", sCodes.length, sCodes2.length);
}
form.xhtml
<p:selectCheckboxMenu id="codeCtl" value="#{bean.SCodes}" label="Codes" filter="true" filterMatchMode="startsWith" panelStyle="width:250px">
<f:selectItems value="#{bean.menuCodes}" />
<p:ajax event="change" listener="#{bean.updateCodes()}" />
</p:selectCheckboxMenu>
<p:commandButton value="submit" actionListener="#{bean.doSend}" id="ctlSubmit" update="appform"/>
I'm using Primefaces in a JSF 2 application. I have a <p:dataTable>, and instead of selecting rows, I want the user to be able to directly execute various actions on individual rows. For that, I have several <p:commandLink>s in the last column.
My problem: how can I pass a row ID to the action started by the command link so that I know which row to act on? I tried using an <f:attribute>:
<p:dataTable value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
...
<p:column>
<p:commandLink actionListener="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:attribute name="id" value="#{item.id}" />
</p:commandLink>
</p:column>
</p:dataTable>
But it always yields 0 - apparently the row variable f is not available when the attribute is rendered (it works when I use a fixed value).
Anyone has an alternative solution?
As to the cause, the <f:attribute> is specific to the component itself (populated during view build time), not to the iterated row (populated during view render time).
There are several ways to achieve the requirement.
If your servletcontainer supports a minimum of Servlet 3.0 / EL 2.2, then just pass it as an argument of action/listener method of UICommand component or AjaxBehavior tag. E.g.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert(item.id)}" value="insert" />
In combination with:
public void insert(Long id) {
// ...
}
This only requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
You can even pass the entire item object:
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert(item)}" value="insert" />
with:
public void insert(Item item) {
// ...
}
On Servlet 2.5 containers, this is also possible if you supply an EL implementation which supports this, like as JBoss EL. For configuration detail, see this answer.
Use <f:param> in UICommand component. It adds a request parameter.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:param name="id" value="#{item.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
If your bean is request scoped, let JSF set it by #ManagedProperty
#ManagedProperty(value="#{param.id}")
private Long id; // +setter
Or if your bean has a broader scope or if you want more fine grained validation/conversion, use <f:viewParam> on the target view, see also f:viewParam vs #ManagedProperty:
<f:viewParam name="id" value="#{bean.id}" required="true" />
Either way, this has the advantage that the datamodel doesn't necessarily need to be preserved for the form submit (for the case that your bean is request scoped).
Use <f:setPropertyActionListener> in UICommand component. The advantage is that this removes the need for accessing the request parameter map when the bean has a broader scope than the request scope.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:setPropertyActionListener target="#{bean.id}" value="#{item.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
In combination with
private Long id; // +setter
It'll be just available by property id in action method. This only requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
Bind the datatable value to DataModel<E> instead which in turn wraps the items.
<h:dataTable value="#{bean.model}" var="item">
with
private transient DataModel<Item> model;
public DataModel<Item> getModel() {
if (model == null) {
model = new ListDataModel<Item>(items);
}
return model;
}
(making it transient and lazily instantiating it in the getter is mandatory when you're using this on a view or session scoped bean since DataModel doesn't implement Serializable)
Then you'll be able to access the current row by DataModel#getRowData() without passing anything around (JSF determines the row based on the request parameter name of the clicked command link/button).
public void insert() {
Item item = model.getRowData();
Long id = item.getId();
// ...
}
This also requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
Use Application#evaluateExpressionGet() to programmatically evaluate the current #{item}.
public void insert() {
FacesContext context = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
Item item = context.getApplication().evaluateExpressionGet(context, "#{item}", Item.class);
Long id = item.getId();
// ...
}
Which way to choose depends on the functional requirements and whether the one or the other offers more advantages for other purposes. I personally would go ahead with #1 or, when you'd like to support servlet 2.5 containers as well, with #2.
In JSF 1.2 this was done by <f:setPropertyActionListener> (within the command component). In JSF 2.0 (EL 2.2 to be precise, thanks to BalusC) it's possible to do it like this: action="${filterList.insert(f.id)}
In my view page:
<p:dataTable ...>
<p:column>
<p:commandLink actionListener="#{inquirySOController.viewDetail}"
process="#this" update=":mainform:dialog_content"
oncomplete="dlg2.show()">
<h:graphicImage library="images" name="view.png"/>
<f:param name="trxNo" value="#{item.map['trxNo']}"/>
</p:commandLink>
</p:column>
</p:dataTable>
backing bean
public void viewDetail(ActionEvent e) {
String trxNo = getFacesContext().getRequestParameterMap().get("trxNo");
for (DTO item : list) {
if (item.get("trxNo").toString().equals(trxNo)) {
System.out.println(trxNo);
setSelectedItem(item);
break;
}
}
}
Thanks to this site by Mkyong, the only solution that actually worked for us to pass a parameter was this
<h:commandLink action="#{user.editAction}">
<f:param name="myId" value="#{param.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
with
public String editAction() {
Map<String,String> params =
FacesContext.getExternalContext().getRequestParameterMap();
String idString = params.get("myId");
long id = Long.parseLong(idString);
...
}
Technically, that you cannot pass to the method itself directly, but to the JSF request parameter map.
I've the below form:
<h:form>
<h:dataTable value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:column>
<h:selectBooleanCheckbox value="#{item.enabled}" valueChangeListener="#{bean.onchangeEnabled}">
<f:ajax event="change" />
</h:selectBooleanCheckbox>
</h:column>
<h:column>#{item.name}</h:column>
</h:dataTable>
</h:form>
I would like to get #{item} or at least #{item.name} in the value change listener method:
public void onchangeEnabled(ValueChangeEvent e) {
// I would like to get #{item.name} here too.
}
How can I achieve this?
First of all, the valueChangeListener is the wrong tool for the job. Use <f:ajax listener>. Second, event="change" is the wrong choice in case of checkboxes/radiobuttons because their physical value actually never changes. You should use event="click", but this is the default already, so you can just omit it.
All in all, the proper initial code should look like this:
<h:selectBooleanCheckbox value="#{item.enabled}">
<f:ajax listener="#{bean.onchangeEnabled}" />
</h:selectBooleanCheckbox>
with
public void onchangeEnabled(AjaxBehaviorEvent event) { // Note: event argument is optional.
// ...
}
Once fixed it like that, then you can easily make use of EL 2.2 capability to pass method arguments:
<h:selectBooleanCheckbox value="#{item.enabled}">
<f:ajax listener="#{bean.onchangeEnabled(item)}" />
</h:selectBooleanCheckbox>
with
public void onchangeEnabled(Item item) {
// ...
}
See also:
When to use valueChangeListener or f:ajax listener?
What values can I pass to the event attribute of the f:ajax tag?
How can I pass selected row to commandLink inside dataTable?
Understanding PrimeFaces process/update and JSF f:ajax execute/render attributes
For selectBooleanCheckbox it only reacts on the event click and the form should be posted.
so add this to the checkbox
valueChangeListener="#{mybean.myfunction}" onchange="submit();"
it should get fired !
I'm using Primefaces in a JSF 2 application. I have a <p:dataTable>, and instead of selecting rows, I want the user to be able to directly execute various actions on individual rows. For that, I have several <p:commandLink>s in the last column.
My problem: how can I pass a row ID to the action started by the command link so that I know which row to act on? I tried using an <f:attribute>:
<p:dataTable value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
...
<p:column>
<p:commandLink actionListener="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:attribute name="id" value="#{item.id}" />
</p:commandLink>
</p:column>
</p:dataTable>
But it always yields 0 - apparently the row variable f is not available when the attribute is rendered (it works when I use a fixed value).
Anyone has an alternative solution?
As to the cause, the <f:attribute> is specific to the component itself (populated during view build time), not to the iterated row (populated during view render time).
There are several ways to achieve the requirement.
If your servletcontainer supports a minimum of Servlet 3.0 / EL 2.2, then just pass it as an argument of action/listener method of UICommand component or AjaxBehavior tag. E.g.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert(item.id)}" value="insert" />
In combination with:
public void insert(Long id) {
// ...
}
This only requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
You can even pass the entire item object:
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert(item)}" value="insert" />
with:
public void insert(Item item) {
// ...
}
On Servlet 2.5 containers, this is also possible if you supply an EL implementation which supports this, like as JBoss EL. For configuration detail, see this answer.
Use <f:param> in UICommand component. It adds a request parameter.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:param name="id" value="#{item.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
If your bean is request scoped, let JSF set it by #ManagedProperty
#ManagedProperty(value="#{param.id}")
private Long id; // +setter
Or if your bean has a broader scope or if you want more fine grained validation/conversion, use <f:viewParam> on the target view, see also f:viewParam vs #ManagedProperty:
<f:viewParam name="id" value="#{bean.id}" required="true" />
Either way, this has the advantage that the datamodel doesn't necessarily need to be preserved for the form submit (for the case that your bean is request scoped).
Use <f:setPropertyActionListener> in UICommand component. The advantage is that this removes the need for accessing the request parameter map when the bean has a broader scope than the request scope.
<h:commandLink action="#{bean.insert}" value="insert">
<f:setPropertyActionListener target="#{bean.id}" value="#{item.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
In combination with
private Long id; // +setter
It'll be just available by property id in action method. This only requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
Bind the datatable value to DataModel<E> instead which in turn wraps the items.
<h:dataTable value="#{bean.model}" var="item">
with
private transient DataModel<Item> model;
public DataModel<Item> getModel() {
if (model == null) {
model = new ListDataModel<Item>(items);
}
return model;
}
(making it transient and lazily instantiating it in the getter is mandatory when you're using this on a view or session scoped bean since DataModel doesn't implement Serializable)
Then you'll be able to access the current row by DataModel#getRowData() without passing anything around (JSF determines the row based on the request parameter name of the clicked command link/button).
public void insert() {
Item item = model.getRowData();
Long id = item.getId();
// ...
}
This also requires that the datamodel is preserved for the form submit request. Best is to put the bean in the view scope by #ViewScoped.
Use Application#evaluateExpressionGet() to programmatically evaluate the current #{item}.
public void insert() {
FacesContext context = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
Item item = context.getApplication().evaluateExpressionGet(context, "#{item}", Item.class);
Long id = item.getId();
// ...
}
Which way to choose depends on the functional requirements and whether the one or the other offers more advantages for other purposes. I personally would go ahead with #1 or, when you'd like to support servlet 2.5 containers as well, with #2.
In JSF 1.2 this was done by <f:setPropertyActionListener> (within the command component). In JSF 2.0 (EL 2.2 to be precise, thanks to BalusC) it's possible to do it like this: action="${filterList.insert(f.id)}
In my view page:
<p:dataTable ...>
<p:column>
<p:commandLink actionListener="#{inquirySOController.viewDetail}"
process="#this" update=":mainform:dialog_content"
oncomplete="dlg2.show()">
<h:graphicImage library="images" name="view.png"/>
<f:param name="trxNo" value="#{item.map['trxNo']}"/>
</p:commandLink>
</p:column>
</p:dataTable>
backing bean
public void viewDetail(ActionEvent e) {
String trxNo = getFacesContext().getRequestParameterMap().get("trxNo");
for (DTO item : list) {
if (item.get("trxNo").toString().equals(trxNo)) {
System.out.println(trxNo);
setSelectedItem(item);
break;
}
}
}
Thanks to this site by Mkyong, the only solution that actually worked for us to pass a parameter was this
<h:commandLink action="#{user.editAction}">
<f:param name="myId" value="#{param.id}" />
</h:commandLink>
with
public String editAction() {
Map<String,String> params =
FacesContext.getExternalContext().getRequestParameterMap();
String idString = params.get("myId");
long id = Long.parseLong(idString);
...
}
Technically, that you cannot pass to the method itself directly, but to the JSF request parameter map.