When I try to run the following command to commit the chaincode,
peer lifecycle chaincode commit -o localhost:7050 --ordererTLSHostnameOverride orderer.example.com --tls $CORE_PEER_TLS_ENABLED --cafile $ORDERER_CA --channelID testchannel --name property --peerAddresses localhost:7051 --tlsRootCertFiles $CORE_PEER_TLS_ROOTCERT_FILE_ORG1 --peerAddresses localhost:9051 --tlsRootCertFiles $CORE_PEER_TLS_ROOTCERT_FILE_ORG2 --version 1.0 --sequence 1 --init-required
I encountered the error as follows even though the org1 approved the chaincode definition,
Error: proposal failed with status: 500 - failed to invoke backing implementation of 'CommitChaincodeDefinition': chaincode definition not agreed to by this org (Org1MSP)
Error Screenshot
I've attached a screenshot of the error.
Both organizations approved the chaincode definition by returning 'true' in this scenario. It still encounters the error "chaincode definition not agreed to by this org (Org1MSP)" after that.
How can I rectify from this?
The checkcommitreadiness uses a contract called product whereas the commit uses a contract called property.
Related
I'm trying to invoke a chaincode function that sets details about a crop.
This function doesn't use date/time, and is logically deterministic. I've checked that the chaincode is successfully installed for each organization of the channel and committed to the channel using peer lifecycle chaincode queryinstalled and peer lifecycle chaincode querycommitted.
However, when I run peer chaincode invoke, it yields an error Error: could not assemble transaction: ProposalResponsePayloads do not match.
There was a broader question that covered some common causes of error, but I'm not completely sure if any of the reasons listed are applicable in my case (Hyperledger Fabric: Error: could not assemble transaction: ProposalResponsePayloads do not match).
This was the invoke command:
peer chaincode invoke -o localhost:7050 --ordererTLSHostnameOverride orderer.example.com --tls --cafile /home/ubuntu/fabric-samples/extended-test-network/organizations/ordererOrganizations/example.com/orderers/orderer.example.com/msp/tlscacerts/tlsca.example.com-cert.pem -C mychannel -n papercontract --peerAddresses localhost:7051 --tlsRootCertFiles /home/ubuntu/fabric-samples/extended-test-network/organizations/peerOrganizations/org1.example.com/peers/peer0.org1.example.com/tls/ca.crt --peerAddresses localhost:9051 --tlsRootCertFiles /home/ubuntu/fabric-samples/extended-test-network/organizations/peerOrganizations/org2.example.com/peers/peer0.org2.example.com/tls/ca.crt --peerAddresses localhost:11051 --tlsRootCertFiles /home/ubuntu/fabric-samples/extended-test-network/organizations/peerOrganizations/org3.example.com/peers/peer0.org3.example.com/tls/ca.crt --peerAddresses localhost:12051 --tlsRootCertFiles /home/ubuntu/fabric-samples/extended-test-network/organizations/peerOrganizations/org4.example.com/peers/peer0.org4.example.com/tls/ca.crt --peerAddresses localhost:13051 --tlsRootCertFiles /home/ubuntu/fabric-samples/extended-test-network/organizations/peerOrganizations/org5.example.com/peers/peer0.org5.example.com/tls/ca.crt -c '{"function":"plant","Args":["bhut jolokia", "ghost pepper farms", "sustainable agriculture company", "two dozen", "three quintal per year", "yes", "polyculture", "organic, pesticide-free", "direct sowing"]}'
Here is what the error message looks like, after adding some newlines and tabs:
Error: could not assemble transaction:
ProposalResponsePayloads do not match -
proposal response: version:1 response:<status:200
payload:"{
\"field1\":\"\",
\"field2\":\"\",
\"field3\":\"\",
\"field4\":\"\",
\"field5\":\"\"}" >
payload:"\n \335-\3101\315<\016\327\324\005\037\202%\360\305\177\2369T\273\334\324X\363\020\302\"f\r6\030\373\022\325\020\n\343\010\022>\n\n_lifecycle\0220\n.\n(namespaces/fields/papercontract/Sequence\022\002\010\016\022\240\010\n\rpapercontract\022\216\010\032\213\010\n\030\000SpiceList\000bhut jolokia\000\032\356\007{
\"field1\":\"\",
\"field2\":\"\",
\"field4\":\"\",
\"splitKey\":[\"bhut jolokia\"],
\"field3\":\"\",
\"field5\":\"\"}"}
\032\330\007\010\310\001\032\322\007{
\"field1\":\"\",
\"field3\":\"\",
\"field4\":\"\",
\"field2\":\"\",
\"field5\":\"\"}"}
\"\022\022\rpapercontract\032\0010" endorsement:<endorser:"\n\007Org4MSP\022\252\006-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----\nMIICKTCCAc+gAwIBAgIRAJhO/KCN82dUT2ZWdlM5uREwCgYIKoZIzj0EAwIwczEL\nMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxEzARBgNVBAgTCkNhbGlmb3JuaWExFjAUBgNVBAcTDVNhbiBG\ncmFuY2lzY28xGTAXBgNVBAoTEG9yZzQuZXhhbXBsZS5jb20xHDAaBgNVBAMTE2Nh\nLm9yZzQuZXhhbXBsZS5jb20wHhcNMjEwNjI1MDQxMjAwWhcNMzEwNjIzMDQxMjAw\nWjBqMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzETMBEGA1UECBMKQ2FsaWZvcm5pYTEWMBQGA1UEBxMN\nU2FuIEZyYW5jaXNjbzENMAsGA1UECxMEcGVlcjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWcGVlcjAub3Jn\nNC5leGFtcGxlLmNvbTBZMBMGByqGSM49AgEGCCqGSM49AwEHA0IABGKB9vyBmDC9\nW9IGOaA7qlpAHUu2zuHxZGhuwcxqQSDY63/6L2Hpxhg3uVBhtxcOiROJvfZmjOxb\nkZxt2P25D9ujTTBLMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIHgDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMCsGA1Ud\nIwQkMCKAIIEDOx3pOppcqaQjtVPfOozh9/NnLuOCB7UWNlSKndMZMAoGCCqGSM49\nBAMCA0gAMEUCIQDkmp/qnb0DpwPlRYSPH6Cv0JE4HkgKgoY9FUAFVR6rpwIgEsXH\nDn2uHMeio475cLoKbayZo87BRDsykM1rBNl1/bI=\n-----END CERTIFICATE-----\n" signature:"0D\002 \013v\273\205\327I >1\212\007\031\233o\276\315v\233\343\345\265r7\366\321\230\355z\361\023\005e\002 `\221\250!\372v\366\247H\213m\236\230\377\246\331\236\000\240< \337\346U\230RV\2040\376\035H" >
Does the output of the invoke command actually return the proposal response payloads? I've noticed that splitKey present in only one payload, and the order of the fields different in the payloads.
How do I get the proposal response payloads to be consistent?
try to use only one peer to endorsement，like these:
peer chaincode invoke -o localhost:7050 --ordererTLSHostnameOverride orderer.example.com --tls --cafile /home/ubuntu/fabric-samples/extended-test-network/organizations/ordererOrganizations/example.com/orderers/orderer.example.com/msp/tlscacerts/tlsca.example.com-cert.pem -C mychannel -n papercontract --peerAddresses localhost:7051 --tlsRootCertFiles /home/ubuntu/fabric-samples/extended-test-network/organizations/peerOrganizations/org1.example.com/peers/peer0.org1.example.com/tls/ca.crt -c '{"function":"plant","Args":["bhut jolokia", "ghost pepper farms", "sustainable agriculture company", "two dozen", "three quintal per year", "yes", "polyculture", "organic, pesticide-free", "direct sowing"]}'```
peer chaincode invoke -o $ORDERER_URL \
--ordererTLSHostnameOverride blockchain-orderer1 \
--tls $CORE_PEER_TLS_ENABLED --cafile $ORDERER_CA \
--channelID $CHANNEL_NAME --name ${CHAINCODE_NAME} \
--peerAddresses $CORE_PEER_ADDRESS_ORG1 --tlsRootCertFiles $CORE_PEER_TLS_ROOTCERT_FILE_ORG1 \
--peerAddresses $CORE_PEER_ADDRESS_ORG2 --tlsRootCertFiles $CORE_PEER_TLS_ROOTCERT_FILE_ORG2 \
--peerAddresses $CORE_PEER_ADDRESS_ORG3 --tlsRootCertFiles $CORE_PEER_TLS_ROOTCERT_FILE_ORG3 \
--isInit -c '{\"function\":\"initLedger\",\"Args\":[]}'
Error: endorsement failure during invoke. response: status:500
message:"make sure the chaincode fabcar has been successfully defined on channel mychannel and try again: chaincode definition for 'fabcar' exists, but chaincode is not installed"
This problem is occur when you package and install chaincode successfully but when querychaincode to get package id from log but package id variable is empty so it will not commit on peer that why this error occur
I saw in byfn that just two peers are used for the code invocation but we have four peers in the network. Why are just two used?
./byfn.md:+ peer chaincode invoke -o orderer.example.com:7050 --tls true --cafile /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/ordererOrganizations/example.com/orderers/orderer.example.com/msp/tlscacerts/tlsca.example.com-cert.pem -C mychannel -n mycc --peerAddresses peer0.org1.example.com:7051 --tlsRootCertFiles /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/peerOrganizations/org1.example.com/peers/peer0.org1.example.com/tls/ca.crt --peerAddresses peer0.org2.example.com:9051 --tlsRootCertFiles /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/peerOrganizations/org2.example.com/peers/peer0.org2.example.com/tls/ca.crt -c '{"Args":["invoke","a","b","10"]}'
./byfn.md:2019-11-24 08:01:03.051 UTC [chaincodeCmd] chaincodeInvokeOrQuery -> INFO 001 Chaincode invoke successful. result: status:200
./byfn.md:===================== Invoke transaction successful on peer0.org1 peer0.org2 on channel 'mychannel' =====================
Because peer0 and peer1 for org1 are actually the same.
They share a gossip protocol and they share the same ledger in the form of a local copy.
Querying and invoking peer0 will get the same output as querying and invoking peer1.
This for org1, but same for org2.
You can for sure invoke all peers and see that you will get the same results.
I was going through the documentation of Hyperledger Fabric v1.2. There was an invoke command and it seems like it is update in v1.2. I found a parameter --peerAddresses in
peer chaincode invoke -o orderer.example.com:7050 --tls true --cafile /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/ordererOrganizations/example.com/orderers/orderer.example.com/msp/tlscacerts/tlsca.example.com-cert.pem -C $CHANNEL_NAME -n mycc --peerAddresses peer0.org1.example.com:7051 --tlsRootCertFiles /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/peerOrganizations/org1.example.com/peers/peer0.org1.example.com/tls/ca.crt --peerAddresses peer0.org2.example.com:7051 --tlsRootCertFiles /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/peerOrganizations/org2.example.com/peers/peer0.org2.example.com/tls/ca.crt -c '{"Args":["invoke","a","b","10"]}'
Anyone know what this parameter does? There was nothing mentioned in the official documentation about this paramete.
You can find the documentation here http://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.2/build_network.html
Topic: Build your first network
Command: Invoke
--peerAddresses introduced in Fabric v1.2 is used to specify a particular peer for endorsement.
Note: This parameter will not override the endorsement policy specified during chaincode instantiation.
I am following along the tutorial at http://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build_network.html
I am copy&pasting along the way and opted for the Node.js variants where choice was offered.
peer chaincode invoke -o orderer.example.com:7050 --tls true --cafile /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/ordererOrganizations/example.com/orderers/orderer.example.com/msp/tlscacerts/tlsca.example.com-cert.pem -C $CHANNEL_NAME -n mycc --peerAddresses peer0.org1.example.com:7051 --tlsRootCertFiles /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/peerOrganizations/org1.example.com/peers/peer0.org1.example.com/tls/ca.crt --peerAddresses peer0.org2.example.com:7051 --tlsRootCertFiles /opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/peer/crypto/peerOrganizations/org2.example.com/peers/peer0.org2.example.com/tls/ca.crt -c '{"Args":["invoke","a","b","10"]}'
When I get to the code above, it gives me the error "Error: unknown flag: --peerAddresses"
Please see below the terminal history:
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/xC5NNQVJyW/
Please do tell if you need additional information
This is sort of a half answer but I think you should be following the tutorial for http://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.1/build_network.html (Note: release-1.1 not latest). The only difference is that the endorsement policy when you instantiate is -P "OR ('Org1MSP.peer','Org2MSP.peer')" instead of -P "AND ('Org1MSP.peer','Org2MSP.peer')" and when you invoke the chaincode you only endorse it against one peer (the default being peer0 of org1).
The CLI being able to get endorsements from multiple peers at once is a new feature (ref: https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric/commit/368b1511e23d55355d572fd267223bb1bd4de890?short_path=6a6833d#diff-6a6833de704771c6c6879904e353c025) and I think the latest docker image for hyperledger/fabric-tools as of this post (1.1.0) does not reflect this change.