So I have a question where I am checking if a string has every letter of the alphabet in it. I was able to check if there is alphabet in the string, but I'm not sure how to check if there is EVERY alphabet in said string. Here's the code
fun isPangram (pangram: Array<String>) : String {
var panString : String
var outcome = ""
for (i in pangram.indices){
panString = pangram[i]
if (panString.matches(".^*[a-z].*".toRegex())){
outcome = outcome.plus('1')
}
else {outcome = outcome.plus('0')}
}
return outcome
}
Any ideas are welcomed Thanks.
I think it would be easier to check if all members of the alphabet range are in each string than to use Regex:
fun isPangram(pangram: Array<String>): String =
pangram.joinToString("") { inputString ->
when {
('a'..'z').all { it in inputString.lowercase() } -> "1"
else -> "0"
}
}
Hi this is how you can make with regular expression
Kotlin Syntax
fun isStrinfContainsAllAlphabeta( input: String) {
return input.lowercase()
.replace("[^a-z]".toRegex(), "")
.replace("(.)(?=.*\\1)".toRegex(), "")
.length == 26;
}
In java:
public static boolean isStrinfContainsAllAlphabeta(String input) {
return input.toLowerCase()
.replace("[^a-z]", "")
.replace("(.)(?=.*\\1)", "")
.length() == 26;
}
the function takes only one string. The first "replaceAll" removes all the non-alphabet characters, The second one removes the duplicated character, then you check how many characters remained.
Just to bounce off Tenfour04's solution, if you write two functions (one for the pangram check, one for processing the array) I feel like you can make it a little more readable, since they're really two separate tasks. (This is partly an excuse to show you some Kotlin tricks!)
val String.isPangram get() = ('a'..'z').all { this.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) }
fun checkPangrams(strings: Array<String>) =
strings.joinToString("") { if (it.isPangram) "1" else "0" }
You could use an extension function instead of an extension property (so it.isPangram()), or just a plain function with a parameter (isPangram(it)), but you can write stuff that almost reads like English, if you want!
Related
if my string is lets say "Alfa1234Beta"
how can I convert all the number in to "_"
for example "Alfa1234Beta"
will be "Alfa____Beta"
Going with the Regex approach pointed out by others is possibly OK for your scenario. Mind you however, that Regex sometimes tend to be overused. A hand rolled approach could be like this:
static string ReplaceDigits(string str)
{
StringBuilder sb = null;
for (int i = 0; i < str.Length; i++)
{
if (Char.IsDigit(str[i]))
{
if (sb == null)
{
// Seen a digit, allocate StringBuilder, copy non-digits we might have skipped over so far.
sb = new StringBuilder();
if (i > 0)
{
sb.Append(str, 0, i);
}
}
// Replace current character (a digit)
sb.Append('_');
}
else
{
if (sb != null)
{
// Seen some digits (being replaced) already. Collect non-digits as well.
sb.Append(str[i]);
}
}
}
if (sb != null)
{
return sb.ToString();
}
return str;
}
It is more light weight than Regex and only allocates when there is actually something to do (replace). So, go ahead use the Regex version if you like. If you figure out during profiling that is too heavy weight, you can use something like the above. YMMV
You can run for loop on the string and then use the following method to replace numbers with _
if (!System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.IsMatch(i, "^[0-9]*$"))
Here variable i is the character in the for loop .
You can use this:
var s = "Alfa1234Beta";
var s2 = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(s, "[0-9]", "_");
s2 now contains "Alfa____Beta".
Explanation: the regex [0-9] matches any digit from 0 to 9 (inclusive). The Regex.Replace then replaces all matched characters with an "_".
EDIT
And if you want it a bit shorter AND also match non-latin digits, use \d as a regex:
var s = "Alfa1234Beta๓"; // ๓ is "Thai digit three"
var s2 = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(s, #"\d", "_");
s2 now contains "Alfa____Beta_".
Let's assume we have a multiline string, like
var s:String = "my first line\nmy second line\nmy third line\nand so on!";
What is the best way to get (only) the first line of this string in Haxe? I know I can do something like:
static function getFirstLine(s:String):String {
var t:String = s.split("\n")[0];
if(t.charAt(t.length - 1) == "\r") {
t = t.substring(0, t.length - 1);
}
return t;
}
However I'm wondering if there is any easier (predefined) method for this ...
Caveat that #Gama11's answer works well and is more elegant than this.
If your string is long, split will iterate over the whole thing and allocate an array containing every line in your string, both of which are unnecessary here. Another option would be indexOf:
static function getFirstLine(s:String):String {
var i = s.indexOf("\n");
if (i == -1) return s;
if (i > 0 && s.charAt(i - 1) == "\r") --i;
return s.substr(0, i);
}
There's no built-in utility in the standard library for this that I know of, but you make it a bit more elegant and avoid the substring() handling for \r by splitting on a regex:
static function getFirstLine(s:String):String {
return ~/\r?\n/.split(s)[0];
}
The regex \r?\n optionally matches a carriage return followed by a line feed character.
I want to make a function which compares strings.
I don't want to use equal operators (==), I want it worked only with Swift language.
First I made a function which takes 2 strings, and returns bool type.
then I looped these strings with for in syntax.
And want to compare these characters, if strings have equal value, it should return true, if not, then false. Is there any better way?
func isEqual(str1:String, str2:String) -> Bool {
var result = false
for char in str1 {
}
for char2 in str2 {
}
//Compare characters.
return result
}
== works fine with Strings in Swift. For educational purposes
(as I conclude from your comment "because I'm practicing...")
you can implement it as:
func myStringCompare(str1 : String, str2 : String) -> Bool {
if count(str1) != count(str2) {
return false
}
for (c1, c2) in zip(str1, str2) {
if c1 != c2 {
return false
}
}
return true
}
zip(str1, str2) returns a sequence of pairs from the given
sequences, this is a convenient way to enumerate the strings
"in parallel".
Once you have understood how it works, you can shorten it,
for example to:
func myStringCompare(str1 : String, str2 : String) -> Bool {
return count(str1) == count(str2) && !contains(zip(str1, str2), { $0 != $1 })
}
Comparing the string length is necessary because the zip() sequence
terminates as soon as one of the strings is exhausted. Have a look at
#drewag's answer to In Swift I would like to "join" two sequences in to a sequence of tuples
for an alternative Zip2WithNilPadding sequence.
If you don't want to use the built-in zip() function (again for
educational/self-learning purposes!) then you can use the fact
that Strings are sequences, and enumerate them in parallel using
the sequence generator. This would work not only for strings but
for arbitrary sequences, as long as the underlying elements can
be tested for equality, so let's make it a generic function:
func mySequenceCompare<S : SequenceType where S.Generator.Element : Equatable>(lseq : S, rseq : S) -> Bool {
var lgen = lseq.generate()
var rgen = rseq.generate()
// First elements (or `nil`):
var lnext = lgen.next()
var rnext = rgen.next()
while let lelem = lnext, relem = rnext {
if lelem != relem {
return false
}
// Next elements (or `nil`):
lnext = lgen.next()
rnext = rgen.next()
}
// Are both sequences exhausted?
return lnext == nil && rnext == nil
}
Tests:
mySequenceCompare("xa", "xb") // false
mySequenceCompare("xa", "xa") // true
mySequenceCompare("a", "aa") // false
mySequenceCompare("aa", "a") // false
My solution differ a little as I didn't know about the zip operator, I guess is not as efficient as the one post by Martin great use of tuple.
Great question alphonse
func isEqual(str1:String, str2:String) -> Bool {
if count(str1) != count(str2){
return false
}
for var i = 0; i < count(str1); ++i {
let idx1 = advance(str1.startIndex,i)
let idx2 = advance(str2.startIndex,i)
if str1[idx1] != str2[idx2]{
return false
}
}
return true
}
As pointed by Martin each string needs its own index, as explained by him:
"The "trick" is that "🇩🇪" is an "extended grapheme cluster" and consists of two Unicode code points, but counts as one Swift character."
Link for more details about extended grapheme cluster
How to truncate string in groovy?
I used:
def c = truncate("abscd adfa dasfds ghisgirs fsdfgf", 10)
but getting error.
The Groovy community has added a take() method which can be used for easy and safe string truncation.
Examples:
"abscd adfa dasfds ghisgirs fsdfgf".take(10) //"abscd adfa"
"It's groovy, man".take(4) //"It's"
"It's groovy, man".take(10000) //"It's groovy, man" (no exception thrown)
There's also a corresponding drop() method:
"It's groovy, man".drop(15) //"n"
"It's groovy, man".drop(5).take(6) //"groovy"
Both take() and drop() are relative to the start of the string, as in "take from the front" and "drop from the front".
Online Groovy console to run the examples:
https://ideone.com/zQD9Om — (note: the UI is really bad)
For additional information, see "Add a take method to Collections, Iterators, Arrays":
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-4865
In Groovy, strings can be considered as ranges of characters. As a consequence, you can simply use range indexing features of Groovy and do myString[startIndex..endIndex].
As an example,
"012345678901234567890123456789"[0..10]
outputs
"0123456789"
we can simply use range indexing features of Groovy and do someString[startIndex..endIndex].
For example:
def str = "abcdefgh"
def outputTrunc = str[2..5]
print outputTrunc
Console:
"cde"
To avoid word break you can make use of the java.text.BreakIterator. This will truncate a string to the closest word boundary after a number of characters.
Example
package com.example
import java.text.BreakIterator
class exampleClass {
private truncate( String content, int contentLength ) {
def result
//Is content > than the contentLength?
if(content.size() > contentLength) {
BreakIterator bi = BreakIterator.getWordInstance()
bi.setText(content);
def first_after = bi.following(contentLength)
//Truncate
result = content.substring(0, first_after) + "..."
} else {
result = content
}
return result
}
}
Here's my helper functions to to solve this kinda problem. In many cases you'll probably want to truncate by-word rather than by-characters so I pasted the function for that as well.
public static String truncate(String self, int limit) {
if (limit >= self.length())
return self;
return self.substring(0, limit);
}
public static String truncate(String self, int hardLimit, String nonWordPattern) {
if (hardLimit >= self.length())
return self;
int softLimit = 0;
Matcher matcher = compile(nonWordPattern, CASE_INSENSITIVE | UNICODE_CHARACTER_CLASS).matcher(self);
while (matcher.find()) {
if (matcher.start() > hardLimit)
break;
softLimit = matcher.start();
}
return truncate(self, softLimit);
}
I'm building a short quiz where the user needs to input the meaning of an acronym.
This means I need to compare a long string (usually a sentence) typed in by the user with an acronym.
I have a feeling I'm not doing it right. For my testing I'm copy-pasting the correct answer to make sure the spelling is correct however I keep getting the feedback that the answer is incorrect.
My question is, am I comparing correctly?
Here's my code:
var arrQuestions:Array = [["LOL","Laughing Out Loud"], ["OMG", "Oh My God"], ["BTW", "By The Way"]];
var i:Number=0;
function setup():void {
quiztext_txt.text = arrQuestions[i][0];
trace(quiztext_txt.text);
trace(arrQuestions[i][1]);
check_btn.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, clickHandler);
}//End of Setup()
setup();
function clickHandler(event:MouseEvent):void {
var givenString:String;
var inputString:String;
inputString = userinput_txt.text;
givenString = arrQuestions[i][1];
if (inputString == givenString) {
feedback_txt.text = "Correct!";
} else {
feedback_txt.text = "Wrong!";
}
}
Is there any whitespace before/after the user input? Is the value of i changing in between?
else
{
//what does it trace?
trace("given answer: " + inputString + "\ncorrect answer: " + givenString);
feedback_txt.text = "Wrong!";
}
try clearing the text field in your setup function like so:
function setup():void
{
userinput_txt.text = "";
quiztext_txt.text = arrQuestions[i][0];
trace(quiztext_txt.text);
trace(arrQuestions[i][1]);
check_btn.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, clickHandler);
}//End of Setup()
For any kind of string matching I would strongly recommend looking into regular expressions (RegExp). In the regular expression written below I am matching each word, then I say [ ]+ which means "at least one or more spaces", then at the end of the expression I use /gi to say that the expression is case insensitive. In the code above if I type the phrase in lowercase its not going to match, a quick fix for this would be to use this if(inputString.toLowerCase() == givenString.toLowerCase()) which would catch this. Heres the regexp example:
// testString could easily equal myTextField.text
var testString:String = "lauGHing OuT loUD";
// you could store each one in an array, as you were before
var regEx:RegExp = /laughing[ ]+out[ ]+loud/gi
trace( regEx.test( testString ) ); //returns true,test() returns a Boolean
Hope this helps.