I will create an Instagram filter on Spark Ar studio. This filter does not change anything on your face but gives some functionality. I want the user can select another filter (When he or she is using my filter) from the filter gallery and be able to use both my and selected filter. Is this possible?
I don't know how you wanna use exactly two filters at the same time but you can use one effect and apply the second one on top of the first recorded video.
There is no functionality in spark ar to have two effects active since you can only select one at a time. If you can describe the wish scenario better you can send a feature request to spark ar inside the program's reporting tool.
Alternatively if you build a reels video you can apply effects to different videos in the reel.
Related
Is there a way to create a Revit macro/add-in that will be running constantly. My employer is curious if I can write a program that makes a piece of equipment (for example a lighting fixture) a different color if it is not circuited/not connected to a circuit.
Let me know if there is a way or if there is a completely different method I could use to achieve this task.
Be straight with me, because I am willing to make an add-in that you still have to run every time to check the parts for circuitry. But obviously, the background running add-in would be nicer... Thanks!
Possible a couple different ways.
Best way is probably Updaters.
Fall back would be Idling/External Events.
But generally if you want to update something dynamically based on when things change, Updaters are the way to go. I believe that there are samples in the SDK.
There is a much simpler way to do this. You can use a filter in your view to change the color, or other properties, if the element isn't circuited.
In Visibility Graphics, Filter Tab, Create a new filter, for category select Light Fixtures, for the filter criteria, select Circuit Number, for the comparison, choose Less Than, use the value .
This will match fixtures that haven't been powered & fixtures that have been powered but not assigned to a panel.
Begging a pardon in advance for a newbie question.
I'm writing a feature where visitor of the page should see several attributes of an item.
The question is shall I add a separate feature for each attribute or separate scenarios of the same feature or create a single column table in then clause listing all attributes that should be displayed?
I'd put all of the assertions in the same scenario unless there's a good reason to separate them. It would take a lot longer to run if it has to get to the page to assert on multiple times.
The decision to use multiple 'Then ...' lines or to use a table is mainly a matter of personal taste as both will work. Personally if there are only a couple of assertions then I just use multiple Then lines, but if there are more than that I use a table.
I'm creating three approved software lists for my company with SharePoint. One is the general list for all associates the next is the restricted list which will contain software like wireshark that only certain people should have access to and the last is the master list which will be a combination of the other two lists.
What would be ideal is being able to add the software to the master list and have it update the other two lists automagically. The unique key will of course be the software title. The field that will determine which list the row will be added to is the the [group] field. (This is where the uncertainty comes in) There will be 4 values that can go into this [group] field they are: restricted, general, engineering, media.
I would like to have the rows with "restricted" go to the restricted list, obviously, and everything else go to the general list.
I'm very new to SharePoint (~1 week) and I'm trying to simplify this process as much as possible. I'm continuing to read and watch the videos to lean more however, I understand this is a complex application. I thought I'd pose this question to people with more experience than myself to find if it's even possible. If not I'll be able to change my train of thought sooner.
Thank you for your time
This is probably a question for https://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/
But -- what I would do in your situation is only use 1 list and make multiple views.
Each view can be filtered by a different criteria (like your group column in this case) then instead of having 3 distinct lists, you can display or have a link for each view (they all get their own URI in SharePoint) seperately.
This way you only ever have to update 1 list, and you avoid the overhead/complexity of trying to copy into other lists with event recievers or workflows or something else.
If someone reading this needs instructions on views:
You can create/switch views from the 'List' or 'Library' tab when you're viewing the list. Then when you add the list to a web part page, you can select which view to use in the web part properties window.
I need certain custom entity fields to calculate and display values based on operations on the data in the system.
For example an a booking system implementation with contacts and custom entity: tickets. There is a one-many relationship between contact and tickets.I would like to create a field that calculates and displays in the contact form:
frequent flyers: more than 10 tickets bought.
a field that displays yes or no based on whether a first class ticket has ever been purchased. Ticket ref would start with say, FCxxx
If this isn't possible perhaps someone could suggest an alt method for displaying this info?
This is possible and you have some ways to do that: Workflow or Plug-in.
If you make a lot of calculations i think the best way is doing a plug-in. You can register in post create event of tickets entity and there you can make all this calculations and update the custom fields of contact entity.
You can check some tutorials about developing a plug-in:
http://mscrmshop.blogspot.pt/2010/10/crm-2011-plugin-tutorial.html
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg695782.aspx
http://crmconsultancy.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/plugins-in-crm-2011/
Specific information about registering a plug-in:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh237515.aspx
In SDK you can find more examples.
As far I'm aware, it's not possible to achieve without coding. So, if you're looking for a way to customize it by mousing, you might be just out of luck.
If you wish to display that information upon retrieval of the a customer, it's probably fastest to get it using JavaScript. You can add a custom script to onload event. However, that means that you'll have to write JavaScript so if you're not into coding you'll have problems.
If you do know how to code, perhaps creating a plugin with C# is the most preferred way (that's what I'd do at least). The advantage of that lies in extensibility, should you realize that you wish to perform more operations.
Also, if you wish to store the computed values, you'll have to go with a plugin. Otherwise, only GUI operations will perform the computations. If a program will enter/retrieve data in the background, you can't rely that the values will be computed, unless you listen to the messages of Retrieve, Create etc.
We have a requirement in which we need to load around 4000 records in two separate editor tree grids and highlight the differences in each record after doing comparison using values from a particular column in each tree . Everything's fine with a limited number of records but when we go up to 4000 records or more we have huge issues with the data. The tree grid takes around 10 minutes to render as it includes expanding all nodes, calculations to construct the parent child relation and then the highlight.
One solution I considered was trying a similar approach to Live Grid but for the highlighting logic we need all the records as the third record in Grid 'A' may match the 115th record in Grid 'B'.Live Grid would not have the previous selections when it brings the next set of records.
Considering the above, what would be the best way of achieving this? Can I just keep adding new records to the store as I scroll down ? I think it could be done by tracking the scroll position without using the Live Grid but am not sure how to achieve this. I'm not even sure if it's the right approach . Could anybody provide me some sample code to add elements to the store when user reaches the end of vertical scroll in EditorTreeGrid or suggest a better way to achieve this? My trial to add a scroll listener and a listener somehow doesn't kick in .
Also, the Live Grid uses List Store whereas I use the EditorTreeGrid . How do I effectively populate it to a tree store? I used to do getAllModels before and populate them into the TreeStore . Is it the right way to do this ?
In the end we ended up dumping the Tree structure and overrode the LiveGrid and LiveGridView to achieve this . LiveGrid does not load the complete data to the UI but tracks the scroll and brings in data on need basis.