I want to give a frontend developer rights only to pull/read from the GitLab container registry. In order to test some things in the frontend he needs also the backend container.
But I dont want to give access to the full gitlab project, so that he can clone the whole repo. I only want to give him access to pull the container from the registry (because how I understand it, he wont have the possibility to access the code then).
Is this even possible with GitLab? Seems like Container Registry access needs whole project access?
If this is not possible with GitLab it should somehow be possible with AWS Registry instead or? (Any suggestions for this usecase I would be very thankfull for.)
While GitLab's user permission scheme lacks some granularity, you might be able to workaround this limitation.
One would be to make the project publicly/internally accessible through its visibility settings. Users only need read ability in order to access the container registry. Obviously, this may not be acceptable if your images are intended to be more private/secret.
One other possible mechanism for granting access to container registry might be to create a project access token with just read_registry scope and distribute that token to your users that need to read the image registry for the project.
The same could be done with group access tokens, too. This may be useful to reduce management overhead if you have many projects with this need.
Related
I am a Solution Architect responsible for setting up a project's infrastructure on Azure. The project should be running in multiple environments (dev, staging, prod). As far as I learned the best practice regarding environment separation in Azure is to use Resource Groups. That's what I did.
However, this is where things start getting tricky. Our application will use Azure AD as OAuth Authorization Server. I want to have my AD isolated, like everything else in my infrastructure. I don't want to accidentally modify a production user from the dev environment and for the dev environment, I want to be able to create a ton of test users which I don't want to see in production. So, isolation.
The problem is I don't see any option on how to do this. My first instinct was to create multiple ADs. But when I do that, they actually need to create a completely new tenant for each of these environments. This seems really messy to me. Have to support as many (almost empty) tenants as I want to have environments.
Please, what is the right way how to do this?
Does Azure AD have some kind of support for isolation I require?
Am I missing something?
Note: this question was also asked in MS Q&A.
You're correct that a tenant is equivalent to a directory and a user is either in the directory or it's not. However, using RBAC, you can restrict the permissions on users so that they can't access particular services. It would be good if you separated permissions by subscription which is what a lot of major companies do and that's how they know which workload a subscription handles.
What are the best practices for accesses permission for programmers working in Azure DevOps? I would like the programmers to be able to use it, by for example having the possibility to create branches.
As far as I can understand by reading documents such as
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/organizations/security/set-git-tfvc-repository-permissions?view=azure-devops#git-repository
The only permission needed is a contributor? Is this correct or have I misunderstood the whole thing? The organization I’m working for have for example set the contributor to be a member of :
Build Administrators, Endpoint creators, Release Administrators
Creating users is different thing and assining rights is different thing. Your are looking for something named Policies.
Check for Branching policies in this case.
EDIT:
I was confused with the branching rights, however you can follow the Repository Permissions and Branch permissions to find how you can give permissions on your projects to users
You need to navigate to project settings and then to repositories. there you will find list of repositories and each repo can have certain rights assigned to it. some are inherited, some assigned. You can modify those to fit your likings.
this is the url: https://dev.azure.com/org_name/project_name/_settings/repositories
For more details, follow this link: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/organizations/security/set-git-tfvc-repository-permissions?view=azure-devops
thanks for you quick answer. Have digged into the documentation and repository permissions. I gave definitely som insight. My concern is that I want a predefined setting for managing the code repository on a team level, thus would no want to give project permission to the programmers. In my azure devops setup I have only on organization with hundreds of teams.
As I understand it, the permission for the repos are set at the project level. I would like to minimize the project level access since it gives to wide accesses in other cases and other teams. So my hope was that giving programmers contributor access would give the more or less all needed access for the repos out of the box. Such as:
1. Clone, fetch, contribute to pull requests, and explore the contents of a repository
2. Contribute to a repository, create branches, create tags, manage notes
Do not really understand why more access are needed. But could for example give the security control to the build admin role by granting the access to change permission. In this case the ones with build amdnin could adminitrate the security for its own team repos.
Any thoughs on this? Apologize if I have misunderstood you answer...
Azure allows partners to manage customer's resources.
But as startups serving enterprise customers, we might be asked to install our software on customer's Azure Linux server resource and manage it, but we dont want them to access the Linux box via shell or clone it entirely thereby making a copy without our knowledge. How do you solve this?
For the install, I'd write a bash script to install your application by wget'ing the binaries and setting some environment settings. If you want to take it a step further, your client can create an ARM template that spins up the VM and installs your app via custom script extension. When it comes to managing the application, you should be able to view log files in Azure using Application Insights and perform administrative functions using the app. If an issue arises that cannot be diagnosed from the log files and the built-in app diagnostics (e.g. the install failed, app cannot write to log files in local dir), I'd do a screen share with the client and troubleshoot.
You could create a web application that would talk to the OS and perform the administrative tasks you wish. This way, you only need to open one port (possiblity 443 - HTTPS) and share login credentials w/ your partner. This way your OS is protected -- administrative tasks can only be performed through a web UI.
By doing a quick Google search, you can find some open-source options:
http://ajenti.org/
http://www.webmin.com/
https://cockpit-project.org/
You need to ensure you create users for your customer with limited access. Get Webdmin as an example: https://doxfer.webmin.com/Webmin/Webmin_Users
A standard, out-of-the-box Webmin installation has only one user
(called root or admin) who can use every feature of every module. On a
home or office system used by just one person, that is all you need.
Even if your system has multiple users, there may be only one who
needed to perform system administration tasks.
However, there are many situations in which the administrator may want
to give some people access to a subset of Webmin's features. For
example, you may have a person in your organization whose job it is to
create and edit DNS zones and records. On a normal Unix system, this
person would have to be given root access so that he can edit the zone
files and re-start the DNS server when necessary. Unfortunately, once
someone is able to login as root he has full control of the system and
can do whatever he wants.
Webmin solves this kind of problem by allowing you to create
additional users who can login, but only access a few modules. You can
further restrict what the user can do within each module, so that he
cannot abuse its features to perform actions that he is not supposed
to. Because Webmin still runs with full root privileges even when used
by a restricted user, it still has access to all the configuration
files and commands that it needs.
My company process sensitive data and needs to restrict access to production environment. How do I organize subscriptons and (storage) accounts so that I have separate environments?
I could have completely distinct subscriptions but I want to give some devs the power to deploy on production while others should only have access to development assets.
In my ideal world, I'd add individuals to security groups. Whenever a thw dev wants to deploy on production, he/she would use his/her credentials plus an extra confirmation step, like an otp. This way I'd avoid mistakes but still keep simple users management. Is that possible in azure?
Eventually what you are wanting to do will be possible, and is possible to some degree depending on the resource. As more of the features of Azure make it into the preview portal (portal.azure.com) they are showing up with Role Based Access Controls, which is what you are looking for. Unfortunately, right now not all of the resources are there and some are there without full RBAC baked in (such as storage accounts).
For now, the best bet is to still separate by subscription. If you need developers to have the ability to perform a deployment you can create a script that performs the deployment (using stored PowerShell credentials or secured management certs) and then give the developers the ability to execute the script.
I want to give the network service account modify permission (root project directory) on start of my Azure webrole, anyone know of a way of doing this? After modification, I would reset this value to keep things secure. Primary purpose is I need to modify the webconfig to change wcf addresses based upon staging/production environment differences, on multiple nodes.
I have tested the routine and it will properly run once permissions are given to the network service account. I wouldn't mind if it was a first-launch modification, but unfortunately directory permissions change upon deployment of a new version, as it swaps VHD's on which the sites reside...
Any help would be awesome...
Thanks!
If you objective is to update web.config to add/modify setting related to your Azure environment, you can do that using Web Administration module by adding proper code to Role Startup() routine. I believe this way you will have an easier and clean solution.
The process is defined in this blog and there may be others who may have much better ways to do it.