I have a PDF file which will contains some data like below structure.
I want to use Azure Form Recognizer to get the data.
How can I set the label with Table.
While tagging with Table, it need to specify the Column and Row.
You must select a table from the Form recognizer tag insertion field. The important thing here is to choose the table type (fixed sized or row dynamic).
Then you must point to the fields in the table by manually creating the columns. If there are no columns, I recommend you to label the fields one by one, or you can create imaginary columns and then delete these imaginary columns by writing a script.
You can find more detailed information at the link below.
Use table tags to train your custom template model
Form Recognizer should extract this table automatically as part of the layout information extract from a document. Did Layout succeed to extract the table ? Do you also want to structure it in a certain structure ? If yes, you can also train a custom model (template) and label the table. Labeling the table can be done in any format. That table you label does not need to be in the same structure. For example You can create a 4 column table form this data with Age, Name, Weight, Hight as the columns or if this is a single row table you can also label it as key value pairs.
Try out the Form Recognizer Generic Document pre-built it might extract these as key value pairs out of the box - https://formrecognizer.appliedai.azure.com/studio/document
Related
I'm looking for a way to build a table in a docusign template where the rows could be bound dynamically using the input data. For example, in the sample below the "Selected Options" is the table and the rows are dynamic user inputs :
**Selected Options**
2 bedroom
lake facing
non-smoking
Thanks
DocuSign does not support generic "tables" in the documents, so if you want to use a table it will have to be created at the document layer then uploaded into DocuSign.
One possible option is to create a the layout for a table in your document and leave spaces where the data will eventually go, then read or otherwise designate those locations on the document where the fields are, then finally you can place DocuSign tabs at those locations and that would in turn populate your table.
As Ergin says, DocuSign doesn't support dynamic creation of tables in a Document, such that the length (size) of the table will automatically vary according to how much data (i.e., how many rows) are specified. Your Create Envelope request specifies a (static) document, and you use DocuSign tabs to overlay data on top of that static document in specific locations.
That said, few options you might consider:
Create the table in your (static) document to contain the maximum number of columns/rows that it could ever possibly contain. Then, place tabs in every cell -- but in the Create Envelope request, only populate the tabs that correspond to the data the user provides. The down side of this approach would be that you could end up with a table that has several blank/empty rows, if the user doesn't specify much data.
OR
A more complex approach would be not define the Document in the Template itself, but rather, have the Create Envelope API request dynamically specify the Document, based on how much data the user provides. For example, if the table could contain between 1-3 rows, you could create 3 static documents -- the first with a one-row table, the second with a 2-row table, and the third with a 3-row table. Then, include logic in your code to determine how much data the user provides (1 row, 2 rows, or 3 rows), and specify the appropriate Document in the Create Envelope request. (Hint: you'd need to use 'Composite Templates' structure in the API request to accomplish this -- there's lots of info about that here on StackOverflow.) Biggest upside of this approach would be that the table in the document would always be the right size to exactly accommodate the user-provided data -- but obviously this approach could be challenging to implement and maintain if your document contains multiple tables and/or a large number of max potential rows in each table.
OR
Finally, in the same spirit as option #2 above -- if there's just a small number of variations of table size (for example: the table will always contain 1, 2, or 3 rows), you could simply create 3 Templates via the DocuSign web UI -- the first Template containing a Document with a one-row table, the second Template containing a Document with a 2-row table, and the third Template containing a Document with a 3-row table. Then, include logic in your code to dynamically choose the right template to use in the Create Envelope request, based upon how much data the user provides (1 row, 2 rows, or 3 rows).
I am a bit confused about terminology. In SharePoint we have a List and it consists of List columns but I have read in one of the site that this can be meta data too.
Taking an example if we have a SharePoint list and if we have a List Columns with name, Job description, age and Income, will this be termed as column, field or metadata?
If this is metadata then how can you define fields/columns/site column?
You may know that Meta Data is nothing but data about data.
In share point context Meta Data can be used as list column also. Consider any excel documents which are classified using Phase , Category, Document Type etc. So when ever you see these columns you can identify what kind of document it is.
As per my knowledge key words are nothing but taxonomy. By using these keywords you can classify the items.
Site Column is different. Site Column can be used as list column in any list. For eg. Consider the Age. In your site you are using Age column repeatedly in your lists/libraries. So instead of creating Age column in each list you can create only one site column and you can add to required list. In simple words reusable purpose.
Fields are nothing but a columns/site columns. These are related to list.
As Mihir states, the word "metadata" means "data about data". So to have metadata you need to have data. In SharePoint the most relevant example would be documents. Documents are data and you can have data (metadata) about these documents. Mihirs Excel example is an example of this.
Say, you want a document library in SharePoint and these documents have a document type chosen from a list of choices.
To achieve this you need to be able to put a document type on the documents. Since Document libraries in SharePoint is a special kind of list, you can create columns=fields on the list - and the data in these columns becomes metadata for your document.
So on the library you create a field, DocumentType, e.g. as a choice field. The field is setup with possible choices for the document type. So the list fields/columns are used to define metadata on the document(s).
When it comes to pure SP lists it becomes more difficult to talk about metadata. For what is it data about? In case of an employee I don't think you can define it as metadata, expect if you treat the physical person as "the data". However, I don't think it technical make a difference. You have your datamodel of the employees and implement it using SP lists - that's what they are there for!
So - I'm making a data view that is to contain a list. This list has a field that will be used to match up against two other lists. If there is an entry for this value, it should show the value from the other list, otherwise show a link to add a new one.
So, what I need to do is make a data source consisting of the rows from list 1, and fill in the Ticket field with a value from the Tickets table matching the ID value from list 1. The same should be done for the Change Type field.
Can anyone point me in the right direction to accomplish this? I've found a few tutorials, but they seem to be for showing all the data together and not match up on any specific columns for linkage.
Thank you
What you are aiming at is not available in SharePoint out of the box.
There are two approaches you can look at:
Create your own custom lookup field template for single/multiple field
selection with some sort of field
editor. Create your own controls and
program the associated code behind
logic.
Use some existing custom solutions. One such sample is on codeplex:
SharePoint Filtered Lookup Field
I would create two separate lists, and have the data entered in list 1 populate some of the data columns in table 2. Example: Request Name (single line of text), Description (Multi lines of text), Type of Request (Choice), and Completion Date (date).
When I go to the second list, I select 'Lookup', then 'Get information from:', select the first list, and all I see are "ID", "Content Type", "Version" and the "Title".
What do I need to do to get the columns from list 1 to appear in the 'Lookup' section of table 2?
The lookup field will only use text columns (regular text, calculated field with output type of text and computed columns that output text). You could probably fill out the additional fields by the means of a simple SharePoint Designer workflow that will run on item creation in the second list and fill out the columns.
I have been able to do this by creating a Feature with a custom List Definition using the FieldRef, JoinColName, JoinRowOrdinal, and JoinType attributes.
For more information, see SharePoint 2010: Set field value from query triggered by choice box selection.
I think programming will be needed you will have to use something like smartpart and create your own asp.net control that will read from database and show the data as you need it
I have a portal in my contacts table layout that shows related mention in a second "mentions" table. This related table has a relationship to a third "sources" table that I want the user to select from when they view the data in the "mentions" portal of my "contacts" layout. This works for the most part. The problem comes when the user changes the "source" in the portal then attempts to change the "source" in the next portal row t will change the "source" to the last select source regardless to make a selection
any ideas ?
here are some screen shots of how I have it setup
portal and specified field
and field control setup
and the relationship
You are modifying the value of the source field in the sources table, which is not what you want. You only want to use that data to populate your value list and store the serial number of that source (or the source text) in your mentions table.
1) Create a value list from sources using all values from the sources field.
2) Create a new field in the Mentions table called 'source.'
3) Add that field to the portal and remove the current sources field.
4) Apply the value list to your new field.
It sounds like your portal isn't actually the mentions table, but the sources table. Either that or the field that you're using to change the "source" is not in the mentions table, or is not the correct Table Occurrence.
The portal should be based on the Mentions table, and should contain a field in that table that refers to the sources table, not a field from the sources table.
Either way, to diagnose it further, I'd probably need more detail.