I'm developing a twilio function on a subaccount that needs to acces a twilio client on the main account. The function is being deployed through a Github action to the subaccount.
For this, on the subaccount function I have:
const mainClient = new twilio(context.MAIN_TWILIO_ACCOUNT_SID, context.MAIN_TWILIO_AUTH_TOKEN);
Then I need to access serverless.services but I'm getting serverless undefined therefore can't access services.
i.e.
return mainClient.serverless.services(...
I tested code locally and it worked but failed on deployment. Is it possible to access services on main account from a subaccount function??
Thanks.
For anyone experiencing a similar issue.
My problem was that deploying without being explicit about dependencies doesnt install the latests version of dependencies.
Deploy through github installed twilio node sdk version 3.29.0 but this version doesn includes serverless api yet. So I explicitly added latest twilio node sdk (3.75.0 at the moment) and that fixed the problem.
Thanks.
Related
I've been using NuxtJS (v2.15.8) with Nuxt Firebase (v7.6.1), running on NodeJS engine 12 (v12.21.0 to be exact) for the web application I've been developping incrementally for the past couple of years and my web app is now quite complex.
I am trying to upgrade NodeJS to the latest LTS version (v16.13.2) and encounter one major issue after switching version of NodeJS (using nvm) and changing the package.json of my five packages from node 12 to node 16 :
package.json :
"engines": {
"node": "16",
..
},
When running exactly the wame web application after these changes, it starts correctly but Firebase Rules seem to break, with this error FirebaseError: false for 'get' # L61, false for 'get' # L268.
It is a cryptic error, but from experience and from all I could find online, it happens when a call to Firestore that gets blocked by defined Firebase Security rules). In my case, it happens on a "onSnapshot" call to listen to the changes of the currently logged in user. Some other calls to Firestore (using "get" and not "onSnapshot") seem to work fine, and the Firebase Authentication works well too.
Here is the full error stack :
loggedInUser.js?384a:65 Error listening to user changes
FirebaseError: false for 'get' # L61, false for 'get' # L268
at new n (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:188:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10426:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10427:1)
at n.onMessage (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10449:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10366:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10397:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:15160:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:15218:1)
The portion of code triggerring the error is :
listenUser({ commit }, userId) {
const userRef = this.$fire.firestore.collection('users').doc(userId);
userListener = userRef.onSnapshot(function(userDoc) {
if (userDoc.exists) {
const user = userConverter.fromFirestoreData(userDoc.data());
commit('SET_LOGGED_IN_USER', user);
}
},
function(error) {
console.error("Error listening to user changes", error);
});
},
As soon as I revert back to Node 12, the same call works fine and isn't blocked by the Firebase rules, so the error doesn't appear.
I therefore have several questions :
Does anyone understand what's happening there ? Is there known changes in the behavior of Firebase rules directly related to the NodeJS engine ?
Do you think this issue can come from Nuxt or its Nuxt Firebase module are not working correctly under NodeJS 16 ?
It is required to also upgrade NuxtJS to a newer version or should it be possible to simply update the Node Engine ?
Is it required to update to a newer version of Firebase (modular implementation) despite the Nuxt Firebase module stating :
"This module does not support the new modular syntax from Firebase v9+. If you plan to use the new modular mode of Version 9, we advise you to implement Firebase manually as described in the following medium article. It is currently unclear when, and if, this module will support the new modular mode."
Source : their Github repo
Any help to understand what's going on here is welcome !!
Thanks a lot for your help !
Regarding your questions:
I'm unaware of what is causing this issue but there are no known changes in the behavior of Firebase Rules depending on the NodeJS version you are using.
It's hard to assess without having more information. However I deployed a sample NuxtJS app following this guide on NodeJS 16 and it worked. Additionally the error code, as you mentioned, is caused when a Firestore Rule blocks a query. Therefore I think the root cause might be in the NuxtJS firebase module.
I wasn't able to find any documentation suggesting that you need to upgrade NuxtJS when upgrading NodeJS. Additionally you mentioned that you are using version 2.15.8 of NuxtJS which according to this release notes is the latest version.
I'm unsure on further support for NuxtJS considering that statement, but according to this Firebase documentation it is recommended to upgrade to version 9.
If you decide to attempt to upgrade to firebase v9 make sure to also upgrade Nuxt Firebase module to version 8.0.0 or higher, this version provides support to the compat library so you can use Firebase v9 although still with the old syntax, more information can be found here.
Lastly, if you'd like to test if a Firebase rule is working as expected you can quickly test it using the Rules Playground.
Long story short : upgrading to Firebase v9 worked.
Before I did that, I got stuck with rules preventing me to access firestore documents as soon as I tried running the project under Node16 engine.
So I had to do the following changes :
updating Firebase to v9
implement the configuration through a plugin rather than the nuxt-firebase module
make all the required changes in my code to make use of v9 modular (I didn't try using the compat version)
Now that I use the latest version of Firebase, I tried again switching to NodeJS 16 and it runs fine, including the Firebase security rules.
I am using this library to implement azure notification hub in react native.
I am able to get the registration ID successfully. But no notification is received.
I am sending test notification from azure portal and it is getting delivered successfully.
I am followed the integration tutorial from here and here.
In my manifest file i am getting this error in red. Could be the reason.
If yes, How do i resolve this ?
I followed the same steps and had the same issue with com.microsoft.windowsazure.notifications.NotificationsBroadcastReceiver being unreferenced. I was able to resolve by adding
dependencies {
...
implementation 'com.microsoft.azure:notification-hubs-android-sdk:0.6#aar'
implementation 'com.microsoft.azure:azure-notifications-handler:1.0.1#aar'
}
repositories {
maven {
url "https://dl.bintray.com/microsoftazuremobile/SDK"
}
}
to my app build.gradle as outlined here
It may or may not make a difference but also make sure you have the x86 Atom image installed to the project
Currently using RestSharp V106.1.0 as well a v2.1.8
While attempting to integrate docusign with our application I received an error off of the loginAPI:
string accountId = loginApi(username, password, integratorKey);
Receiving this error
{"Method not found: 'RestSharp.IRestRequest RestSharp.RestRequest.AddFile(System.String, System.Action`1, System.String, System.String)'."}
I have verified all of the parameters have the correct value and I was able to recreate a working API usage in a brand new project without prior packages installed. This leads me to think it is the version of RestSharp that is giving me this issue.Based on research about others having this issue it was an issue of the library change within updates.
Is there a specific version that is required as the dependancies for Docusign Package in visual studio doesn't mention a Restsharp version requirement?
Thank you in advance.
I've tried to get the setUserContext function with raven-node in my nodejs app, but I cannot find how to set the user context. Has anyone made it work?
I was able to make it work in the client-side, with "Raven.setUserContext" but not in the nodejs backend :(
User context isn't implemented in raven-node: https://github.com/getsentry/raven-node/issues/134
I'm a contributor to the project, and it's my number one priority to have this done shortly – should be a matter of days.
Edit – we just published raven-node 0.10.0 which adds setUserContext.
To play with the demo-sessions app, I've got the oauth2 app mounted on /oauth2 as required.
In arangodb/Foxx doc, the oauth2 endpoints seems to be defined as strings (i.e https://github.com/arangodb-foxx/util-oauth2 )
But when I perform that with correct urls, and try to play with oauth, I've got an error :
...\oauth2\APP\manifest.json\": attribute child \"authEndpoint\" fails because [\"authEndpoint\" must be an object] (was \"[object Object]\").]","...
Oauth endpoints definitions are expected to be objects, not strings.
So what is the correct configuration for Foxx oauth2 ?
Thanks for help,
I can't reproduce your problem but the OAuth2 app has been updated for ArangoDB 2.7. You can still install odler versions of the OAuth2 app from the "install from GitHub" dialog, though.
I understand my mistake. In the code of the oauth2 2.0 release, the manifest just references the export.js file. In the previous release (1.2), a providers.js file was supplied and referenced in the manifest. Then in this previous release, it was possible to use different providers (what I want) as described in the 1.2 setup.js.
var providers = db._collection(providersName);
I just fetch the files providers.js, and setup.js from 1.2 github tag and configure them for my configuration, and that's ok.