How to delete/release a named semaphore from linux command prompt? - linux

I have a code as under.It crashes when accessing the semaphore and I have created "named semaphores" that I am unable to delete from command prompt after the crash. How can I delete them using a command prompt utility? The code is trying to create Rock,Paper,Scissors game that can be run from 2 producer(player) command prompts and one consumer (result) command prompt. I would also appreciate suggestions to fix/correct/improve the code.
//compiled by executing --> gcc -pthread logic.c -lrt
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/fcntl.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
//don't need an exec call just based on paramters run the processes
typedef struct sync_tools
{
int pid;
void* shm_ptr;
sem_t* sem_array[2];
} sync_tools;
void producer(void * ctx)
{
char choice;
sync_tools *ctxt=(sync_tools*)ctx;
while(1)
{
printf ("Enter the following for input \n");
printf ("R. Rock\n");
printf ("P. Paper\n");
printf ("S. Scissors\n");
scanf ("%c",&choice);
if (ctxt->pid==1)
{
printf ("Process1\n");
sem_wait(ctxt->sem_array[0]);
sprintf((char*) ctxt->shm_ptr, "%c\n", choice);
sem_post(ctxt->sem_array[0]);
printf ("Process1\n");
}
else
{
printf ("Process2\n");
sem_wait(ctxt->sem_array[1]);
sprintf((char*) (ctxt->shm_ptr+1), "%c\n", choice);
sem_post(ctxt->sem_array[1]);
}
}
}
//need 2 semphores for sync
void consumer(void *ctx)
{
sync_tools *ctxt=(sync_tools*)ctx;
char data[2]={0x00};
int flag=1;
while(1)
{
sem_wait(ctxt->sem_array[0]);
sem_wait(ctxt->sem_array[1]);
scanf ((char *) ctxt->shm_ptr, "%c", &data[0]);
scanf ((char *) (ctxt->shm_ptr+1), "%c", &data[1]);
switch(data[0])
{
case 'R':
case 'r':
if ((data[1] =='p')|| (data[1]=='P'));
flag=0;
break;
case'P':
case'p':
if ((data[1] =='s')|| (data[1]=='S'));
flag=0;
break;
case 's':
case'S':
if ((data[1] =='R')|| (data[1]=='R'));
flag=0;
break;
}
if (flag)
printf("Process 1 wins \n");
else
printf("Process 2 wins \n");
sem_post(ctxt->sem_array[0]);
sem_post(ctxt->sem_array[1]);
}
}
int main (int argc, char* argv[])
{
char choice;
int SIZE=4096;
char *name="SHM_WQ";
sync_tools cntxt={}; //initialize without memset
//calling sem_open as I want a named semaphore which is not locally available by copy like in forked processes.
cntxt.sem_array[0]= sem_open ("P1C", O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0644, 1);
cntxt.sem_array[1]= sem_open ("P2C", O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0644, 1);
/* shared memory file descriptor */
int shm_fd;
/* pointer to shared memory object */
void* ptr;
/* create the shared memory object */
shm_fd = shm_open(name, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0666);
/* configure the size of the shared memory object */
ftruncate(shm_fd, SIZE);
/* memory map the shared memory object */
ptr = mmap(0, SIZE, PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, shm_fd, 0); //sys/mman.h
cntxt.shm_ptr=ptr;
//pass the shared memory and semaphores to all the threads and spawn them
if(strcmp(argv[1], "p1") == 0)
cntxt.pid=1;
else if (strcmp(argv[1], "p2") ==0)
cntxt.pid=2;
else if (strcmp(argv[1], "c") ==0)
cntxt.pid=3;//don't care
producer(&cntxt);
consumer(&cntxt);
}

Modified my code as under:
cntxt.sem_array[0] = sem_open("P1C", 0);
cntxt.sem_array[1] = sem_open("P2C", 0);
if (cntxt.sem_array[0] == NULL)
{
cntxt.sem_array[0]= sem_open ("P1C", O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0644, 2);
}
if (cntxt.sem_array[1] == NULL)
{
cntxt.sem_array[1]= sem_open ("P2C", O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0644, 2);
}
if ((cntxt.sem_array[0] == NULL) || (cntxt.sem_array[1] == NULL))
printf("SEM_OPEN ERROR");
Also as mentioned in the comment, created a small utility that takes semname and unlinks it from kernel.

Related

Why mmap throws error while using MAP_FIXED?

Using Ubuntu 16.04, kernel 4.17.4
I am trying the following code where I have defined a shared memory and mapped current process's address space to the shared memory. When I use MAP_FIXED in mmap() it shows:
mmap: Invalid argument
The code is as follows:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#define STORAGE_ID "/SHM_TEST"
#define STORAGE_SIZE 4096
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int res, temp;
int fd;
int len;
pid_t pid;
void *addr;
char data[STORAGE_SIZE];
fd = shm_open(STORAGE_ID, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
if (fd == -1)
{
perror("open");
return 10;
}
res = ftruncate(fd, STORAGE_SIZE);
if (res == -1)
{
perror("ftruncate");
return 20;
}
addr = mmap(NULL, STORAGE_SIZE, PROT_WRITE, MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
if (addr == MAP_FAILED)
{
perror("mmap");
return 30;
}
res = munmap(addr, STORAGE_SIZE);
if (res == -1)
{
perror("munmap");
return 40;
}
// shm_open cleanup
fd = shm_unlink(STORAGE_ID);
if (fd == -1)
{
perror("unlink");
return 100;
}
return 0;
}
The reason I am using MAP_FIXED is I will manually put an address instead of NULL (tried this and got same error). What do I need to do to use MAP_FIXED with mmap()?

How can i make sure that only a single instance of the process on Linux? [duplicate]

What would be your suggestion in order to create a single instance application, so that only one process is allowed to run at a time? File lock, mutex or what?
A good way is:
#include <sys/file.h>
#include <errno.h>
int pid_file = open("/var/run/whatever.pid", O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0666);
int rc = flock(pid_file, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB);
if(rc) {
if(EWOULDBLOCK == errno)
; // another instance is running
}
else {
// this is the first instance
}
Note that locking allows you to ignore stale pid files (i.e. you don't have to delete them). When the application terminates for any reason the OS releases the file lock for you.
Pid files are not terribly useful because they can be stale (the file exists but the process does not). Hence, the application executable itself can be locked instead of creating and locking a pid file.
A more advanced method is to create and bind a unix domain socket using a predefined socket name. Bind succeeds for the first instance of your application. Again, the OS unbinds the socket when the application terminates for any reason. When bind() fails another instance of the application can connect() and use this socket to pass its command line arguments to the first instance.
Here is a solution in C++. It uses the socket recommendation of Maxim. I like this solution better than the file based locking solution, because the file based one fails if the process crashes and does not delete the lock file. Another user will not be able to delete the file and lock it. The sockets are automatically deleted when the process exits.
Usage:
int main()
{
SingletonProcess singleton(5555); // pick a port number to use that is specific to this app
if (!singleton())
{
cerr << "process running already. See " << singleton.GetLockFileName() << endl;
return 1;
}
... rest of the app
}
Code:
#include <netinet/in.h>
class SingletonProcess
{
public:
SingletonProcess(uint16_t port0)
: socket_fd(-1)
, rc(1)
, port(port0)
{
}
~SingletonProcess()
{
if (socket_fd != -1)
{
close(socket_fd);
}
}
bool operator()()
{
if (socket_fd == -1 || rc)
{
socket_fd = -1;
rc = 1;
if ((socket_fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) < 0)
{
throw std::runtime_error(std::string("Could not create socket: ") + strerror(errno));
}
else
{
struct sockaddr_in name;
name.sin_family = AF_INET;
name.sin_port = htons (port);
name.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl (INADDR_ANY);
rc = bind (socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *) &name, sizeof (name));
}
}
return (socket_fd != -1 && rc == 0);
}
std::string GetLockFileName()
{
return "port " + std::to_string(port);
}
private:
int socket_fd = -1;
int rc;
uint16_t port;
};
For windows, a named kernel object (e.g. CreateEvent, CreateMutex). For unix, a pid-file - create a file and write your process ID to it.
You can create an "anonymous namespace" AF_UNIX socket. This is completely Linux-specific, but has the advantage that no filesystem actually has to exist.
Read the man page for unix(7) for more info.
Avoid file-based locking
It is always good to avoid a file based locking mechanism to implement the singleton instance of an application. The user can always rename the lock file to a different name and run the application again as follows:
mv lockfile.pid lockfile1.pid
Where lockfile.pid is the lock file based on which is checked for existence before running the application.
So, it is always preferable to use a locking scheme on object directly visible to only the kernel. So, anything which has to do with a file system is not reliable.
So the best option would be to bind to a inet socket. Note that unix domain sockets reside in the filesystem and are not reliable.
Alternatively, you can also do it using DBUS.
It's seems to not be mentioned - it is possible to create a mutex in shared memory but it needs to be marked as shared by attributes (not tested):
pthread_mutexattr_t attr;
pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr);
pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&attr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED);
pthread_mutex_t *mutex = shmat(SHARED_MEMORY_ID, NULL, 0);
pthread_mutex_init(mutex, &attr);
There is also shared memory semaphores (but I failed to find out how to lock one):
int sem_id = semget(SHARED_MEMORY_KEY, 1, 0);
No one has mentioned it, but sem_open() creates a real named semaphore under modern POSIX-compliant OSes. If you give a semaphore an initial value of 1, it becomes a mutex (as long as it is strictly released only if a lock was successfully obtained).
With several sem_open()-based objects, you can create all of the common equivalent Windows named objects - named mutexes, named semaphores, and named events. Named events with "manual" set to true is a bit more difficult to emulate (it requires four semaphore objects to properly emulate CreateEvent(), SetEvent(), and ResetEvent()). Anyway, I digress.
Alternatively, there is named shared memory. You can initialize a pthread mutex with the "shared process" attribute in named shared memory and then all processes can safely access that mutex object after opening a handle to the shared memory with shm_open()/mmap(). sem_open() is easier if it is available for your platform (if it isn't, it should be for sanity's sake).
Regardless of the method you use, to test for a single instance of your application, use the trylock() variant of the wait function (e.g. sem_trywait()). If the process is the only one running, it will successfully lock the mutex. If it isn't, it will fail immediately.
Don't forget to unlock and close the mutex on application exit.
It will depend on which problem you want to avoid by forcing your application to have only one instance and the scope on which you consider instances.
For a daemon — the usual way is to have a /var/run/app.pid file.
For user application, I've had more problems with applications which prevented me to run them twice than with being able to run twice an application which shouldn't have been run so. So the answer on "why and on which scope" is very important and will probably bring answer specific on the why and the intended scope.
Here is a solution based on sem_open
/*
*compile with :
*gcc single.c -o single -pthread
*/
/*
* run multiple instance on 'single', and check the behavior
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#define SEM_NAME "/mysem_911"
int main()
{
sem_t *sem;
int rc;
sem = sem_open(SEM_NAME, O_CREAT, S_IRWXU, 1);
if(sem==SEM_FAILED){
printf("sem_open: failed errno:%d\n", errno);
}
rc=sem_trywait(sem);
if(rc == 0){
printf("Obtained lock !!!\n");
sleep(10);
//sem_post(sem);
sem_unlink(SEM_NAME);
}else{
printf("Lock not obtained\n");
}
}
One of the comments on a different answer says "I found sem_open() rather lacking". I am not sure about the specifics of what's lacking
Based on the hints in maxim's answer here is my POSIX solution of a dual-role daemon (i.e. a single application that can act as daemon and as a client communicating with that daemon). This scheme has the advantage of providing an elegant solution of the problem when the instance started first should be the daemon and all following executions should just load off the work at that daemon. It is a complete example but lacks a lot of stuff a real daemon should do (e.g. using syslog for logging and fork to put itself into background correctly, dropping privileges etc.), but it is already quite long and is fully working as is. I have only tested this on Linux so far but IIRC it should be all POSIX-compatible.
In the example the clients can send integers passed to them as first command line argument and parsed by atoi via the socket to the daemon which prints it to stdout. With this kind of sockets it is also possible to transfer arrays, structs and even file descriptors (see man 7 unix).
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/un.h>
#define SOCKET_NAME "/tmp/exampled"
static int socket_fd = -1;
static bool isdaemon = false;
static bool run = true;
/* returns
* -1 on errors
* 0 on successful server bindings
* 1 on successful client connects
*/
int singleton_connect(const char *name) {
int len, tmpd;
struct sockaddr_un addr = {0};
if ((tmpd = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) < 0) {
printf("Could not create socket: '%s'.\n", strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
/* fill in socket address structure */
addr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
strcpy(addr.sun_path, name);
len = offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + strlen(name);
int ret;
unsigned int retries = 1;
do {
/* bind the name to the descriptor */
ret = bind(tmpd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, len);
/* if this succeeds there was no daemon before */
if (ret == 0) {
socket_fd = tmpd;
isdaemon = true;
return 0;
} else {
if (errno == EADDRINUSE) {
ret = connect(tmpd, (struct sockaddr *) &addr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_un));
if (ret != 0) {
if (errno == ECONNREFUSED) {
printf("Could not connect to socket - assuming daemon died.\n");
unlink(name);
continue;
}
printf("Could not connect to socket: '%s'.\n", strerror(errno));
continue;
}
printf("Daemon is already running.\n");
socket_fd = tmpd;
return 1;
}
printf("Could not bind to socket: '%s'.\n", strerror(errno));
continue;
}
} while (retries-- > 0);
printf("Could neither connect to an existing daemon nor become one.\n");
close(tmpd);
return -1;
}
static void cleanup(void) {
if (socket_fd >= 0) {
if (isdaemon) {
if (unlink(SOCKET_NAME) < 0)
printf("Could not remove FIFO.\n");
} else
close(socket_fd);
}
}
static void handler(int sig) {
run = false;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
switch (singleton_connect(SOCKET_NAME)) {
case 0: { /* Daemon */
struct sigaction sa;
sa.sa_handler = &handler;
sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
if (sigaction(SIGINT, &sa, NULL) != 0 || sigaction(SIGQUIT, &sa, NULL) != 0 || sigaction(SIGTERM, &sa, NULL) != 0) {
printf("Could not set up signal handlers!\n");
cleanup();
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
struct msghdr msg = {0};
struct iovec iovec;
int client_arg;
iovec.iov_base = &client_arg;
iovec.iov_len = sizeof(client_arg);
msg.msg_iov = &iovec;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
while (run) {
int ret = recvmsg(socket_fd, &msg, MSG_DONTWAIT);
if (ret != sizeof(client_arg)) {
if (errno != EAGAIN && errno != EWOULDBLOCK) {
printf("Error while accessing socket: %s\n", strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
printf("No further client_args in socket.\n");
} else {
printf("received client_arg=%d\n", client_arg);
}
/* do daemon stuff */
sleep(1);
}
printf("Dropped out of daemon loop. Shutting down.\n");
cleanup();
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
case 1: { /* Client */
if (argc < 2) {
printf("Usage: %s <int>\n", argv[0]);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
struct iovec iovec;
struct msghdr msg = {0};
int client_arg = atoi(argv[1]);
iovec.iov_base = &client_arg;
iovec.iov_len = sizeof(client_arg);
msg.msg_iov = &iovec;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
int ret = sendmsg(socket_fd, &msg, 0);
if (ret != sizeof(client_arg)) {
if (ret < 0)
printf("Could not send device address to daemon: '%s'!\n", strerror(errno));
else
printf("Could not send device address to daemon completely!\n");
cleanup();
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
printf("Sent client_arg (%d) to daemon.\n", client_arg);
break;
}
default:
cleanup();
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
cleanup();
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
All credits go to Mark Lakata. I merely did some very minor touch up only.
main.cpp
#include "singleton.hpp"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
SingletonProcess singleton(5555); // pick a port number to use that is specific to this app
if (!singleton())
{
cerr << "process running already. See " << singleton.GetLockFileName() << endl;
return 1;
}
// ... rest of the app
}
singleton.hpp
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <cerrno>
#include <string>
#include <cstring>
#include <stdexcept>
using namespace std;
class SingletonProcess
{
public:
SingletonProcess(uint16_t port0)
: socket_fd(-1)
, rc(1)
, port(port0)
{
}
~SingletonProcess()
{
if (socket_fd != -1)
{
close(socket_fd);
}
}
bool operator()()
{
if (socket_fd == -1 || rc)
{
socket_fd = -1;
rc = 1;
if ((socket_fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) < 0)
{
throw std::runtime_error(std::string("Could not create socket: ") + strerror(errno));
}
else
{
struct sockaddr_in name;
name.sin_family = AF_INET;
name.sin_port = htons (port);
name.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl (INADDR_ANY);
rc = bind (socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *) &name, sizeof (name));
}
}
return (socket_fd != -1 && rc == 0);
}
std::string GetLockFileName()
{
return "port " + std::to_string(port);
}
private:
int socket_fd = -1;
int rc;
uint16_t port;
};
#include <windows.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
// ensure only one running instance
HANDLE hMutexH`enter code here`andle = CreateMutex(NULL, TRUE, L"my.mutex.name");
if (GetLastError() == ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS)
{
return 0;
}
// rest of the program
ReleaseMutex(hMutexHandle);
CloseHandle(hMutexHandle);
return 0;
}
FROM: HERE
On Windows you could also create a shared data segment and use an interlocked function to test for the first occurence, e.g.
#include <Windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <conio.h>
#pragma data_seg("Shared")
volatile LONG lock = 0;
#pragma data_seg()
#pragma comment(linker, "/SECTION:Shared,RWS")
void main()
{
if (InterlockedExchange(&lock, 1) == 0)
printf("first\n");
else
printf("other\n");
getch();
}
I have just written one, and tested.
#define PID_FILE "/tmp/pidfile"
static void create_pidfile(void) {
int fd = open(PID_FILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0);
close(fd);
}
int main(void) {
int fd = open(PID_FILE, O_RDONLY);
if (fd > 0) {
close(fd);
return 0;
}
// make sure only one instance is running
create_pidfile();
}
Just run this code on a seperate thread:
void lock() {
while(1) {
ofstream closer("myapplock.locker", ios::trunc);
closer << "locked";
closer.close();
}
}
Run this as your main code:
int main() {
ifstream reader("myapplock.locker");
string s;
reader >> s;
if (s != "locked") {
//your code
}
return 0;
}

IPC - How to redirect a command output to a shared memory segment in child

I tried to redirect (write) a Unix command output to a shared memory segment in the child,
and then have the parent read the output back out from the same shared memory segment in the parent process. I don't have a lot of success after few futile attempts. Can anyone show me a way?
thanks in advance.
My code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#define SHM_SIZE 1024
int main()
{
key_t key; int shmid; char* data;
pid_t cpid=fork();
if (cpid<0)
{
fprintf(stderr,"Fork error!\n");
exit (-1);
}
else if (cpid==0) // child process
{
if ((key = ftok("mysh.c", 'R')) == -1)
{
perror("ftok");
exit(1);
}
// Connect to shared memory
if ((shmid = shmget(key, SHM_SIZE, 0644 | IPC_CREAT)) == -1)
{
perror("shmget");
exit(1);
}
// Attach to the segment
data = shmat(shmid, (void *) 0, 0);
if (data == (char *) (-1))
{
perror("shmat");
exit(1);
}
system("ls -l");
// Stuck: How to redirect the output of "ls -l"
// to a shared memmory segment "data", so that parent process
// can retrieve it later?? Tried to
// do pipe and dup2 but none worked.
// Attempt via read?, but only garbage
read(STDIN_FILENO, data, SHM_SIZE);
}
else
{ // parent process
int st;
wait(&st);
printf("Output read from the child:\n");
if ((write(STDOUT_FILENO, data, SHM_SIZE)) < 0 )
{
perror("write 2");
exit(1);
}
}
}
======================
system("ls -l");
// Stuck: How to redirect the output of "ls -l"
// to a shared memmory segment "data", so that parent process
// can retrieve it later?? Tried to
// do pipe and dup2 but none worked.
For test purpose, I suggest you read from stdin, then write them to data.
Here is an example using POSIX shared memory (POSIX IPC API is better than SYSV IPC API), which child read from stdin to a shared memory region, and parent write the content of this shared memory region to stdout:
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
const char *shm_name = "/dummy_cat_shm";
int shm_fd;
off_t shm_length;
const char *read_sem_name = "/dummy_cat_read";
const char *write_sem_name = "/dummy_cat_write";
sem_t *read_sem, *write_sem;
pid_t pid;
int buf_length;
char *write_ptr, *read_ptr;
buf_length = 1024;
shm_length = sizeof(buf_length) + buf_length;
/* Create semaphore */
read_sem = sem_open(read_sem_name, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, 0);
if (read_sem == SEM_FAILED) {
perror("sem_open");
goto clean_up3;
}
write_sem = sem_open(write_sem_name, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, 1);
if (write_sem == SEM_FAILED) {
perror("sem_open");
goto clean_up2;
}
/* Create shared memory segment */
shm_fd = shm_open(shm_name, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
if (shm_fd < 0) {
perror("shm_open");
goto clean_up1;
}
if (ftruncate(shm_fd, shm_length) < 0) {
perror("ftruncate");
goto clean_up0;
}
if ((pid = fork()) < 0) {
perror("fork");
goto clean_up0;
}
else if (pid == 0) {
write_ptr = mmap(NULL, shm_length, PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, shm_fd, 0);
if (write_ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
goto clean_up0;
}
char *buf = write_ptr+sizeof(buf_length);
while (sem_wait(write_sem) == 0) {
if (fgets(buf, buf_length, stdin) != NULL) {
*(int *)write_ptr = 1;
sem_post(read_sem);
}
else {
*(int *)write_ptr = 0;
sem_post(read_sem);
break;
}
}
munmap(write_ptr, shm_length);
}
else {
read_ptr = mmap(NULL, shm_length, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, shm_fd, 0);
if (read_ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
goto clean_up0;
}
char *buf = read_ptr + sizeof(buf_length);
while (sem_wait(read_sem) == 0) {
if (*(int *)read_ptr > 0) {
printf("%s", buf);
sem_post(write_sem);
}
else {
break;
}
}
munmap(read_ptr, shm_length);
}
clean_up0:
shm_unlink(shm_name);
clean_up1:
sem_unlink(write_sem_name);
clean_up2:
sem_unlink(read_sem_name);
clean_up3:
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
Note: these two mmap() could be put before fork() in this case.
Compiling:
gcc shm_exp.c -pthread -lrt
Running:
$ ls / | ./a.out
bin/ home/ lib32/ mnt/ run/ sys/ vmlinuz#
boot/ initrd.img# lib64/ opt/ sbin/ tmp/ vmlinuz.old#
dev/ initrd.img.old# lost+found/ proc/ selinux/ usr#
etc/ lib/ media/ root/ srv/ var/
How to redirect stdout of the ls -l
We must shed more light on the processes (parent and children) involved into this code.
How many processes your program creates during its run?
The correct answer is - three.
Two processes are the parent and the explicitly forked child.
The third one is created by the system("ls -l") call.
This function implicitly forks another process that executes (by calling an exec family function) the "ls -l" sell command. What you need to redirect is the output of the child process created by the system() function. It is sad, but the system() does not establish IPC between the participators. If you need to manipulate with the output, do not use system().
I agree with #leeduhem, popen() could be the best approach.
It works exactly as the system(), i.e. forks a new process and executes "ls -l".
In addition, it also establishes a pipe IPC between the participators, so it is easy to catch the child output and to do with it whatever you want:
char buff[1024];
FILE *fd;
// instead of system("ls -l")
fd = popen("ls -l", "r");
// check for errors
while(fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fd) != NULL)
{
// write to the shared memory
}
pclose(fd);
If you do not want to use the popen() function, you may write a similar one.
The general approach is
open a pipe()
fork() a new process
redirect stdout using dup2
call a suitable exec() function (probably execl()) executing "ls -l"
read from the descriptor you are duplicating by dup2.

using c executables / methods in an android ndk project

I'm trying to use canutils in an android ndk-project.
the package canutils usually compiles to executable files, but i didnt find a way yet to inlude these executables in an ndk-project.
so what im doing at the moment is just loading the shared libraries like this:
static{
System.loadLibrary("cansend");
}
public native void cansend();
that for I've changes the android-mk to build shared libraries instead.
still my c-code looks like this cansend.c as an example :
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <net/if.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <linux/can.h>
#include <linux/can/raw.h>
#include "lib.h"
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int s; /* can raw socket */
int required_mtu;
int mtu;
int enable_canfd = 1;
struct sockaddr_can addr;
struct canfd_frame frame;
struct ifreq ifr;
/* check command line options */
if (argc != 3) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <device> <can_frame>.\n", argv[0]);
return 1;
}
/* parse CAN frame */
required_mtu = parse_canframe(argv[2], &frame);
if (!required_mtu){
fprintf(stderr, "\nWrong CAN-frame format! Try:\n\n");
fprintf(stderr, " <can_id>#{R|data} for CAN 2.0 frames\n");
fprintf(stderr, " <can_id>##<flags>{data} for CAN FD frames\n\n");
fprintf(stderr, "<can_id> can have 3 (SFF) or 8 (EFF) hex chars\n");
fprintf(stderr, "{data} has 0..8 (0..64 CAN FD) ASCII hex-values (optionally");
fprintf(stderr, " seperated by '.')\n");
fprintf(stderr, "<flags> a single ASCII Hex value (0 .. F) which defines");
fprintf(stderr, " canfd_frame.flags\n\n");
fprintf(stderr, "e.g. 5A1#11.2233.44556677.88 / 123#DEADBEEF / 5AA# / ");
fprintf(stderr, "123##1 / 213##311\n 1F334455#1122334455667788 / 123#R ");
fprintf(stderr, "for remote transmission request.\n\n");
return 1;
}
/* open socket */
if ((s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW)) < 0) {
perror("socket");
return 1;
}
addr.can_family = AF_CAN;
strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, argv[1]);
if (ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr) < 0) {
perror("SIOCGIFINDEX");
return 1;
}
addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex;
if (required_mtu > CAN_MTU) {
/* check if the frame fits into the CAN netdevice */
if (ioctl(s, SIOCGIFMTU, &ifr) < 0) {
perror("SIOCGIFMTU");
return 1;
}
mtu = ifr.ifr_mtu;
if (mtu != CANFD_MTU) {
printf("CAN interface ist not CAN FD capable - sorry.\n");
return 1;
}
/* interface is ok - try to switch the socket into CAN FD mode */
if (setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FD_FRAMES,
&enable_canfd, sizeof(enable_canfd))){
printf("error when enabling CAN FD support\n");
return 1;
}
/* ensure discrete CAN FD length values 0..8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 64 */
frame.len = can_dlc2len(can_len2dlc(frame.len));
}
/* disable default receive filter on this RAW socket */
/* This is obsolete as we do not read from the socket at all, but for */
/* this reason we can remove the receive list in the Kernel to save a */
/* little (really a very little!) CPU usage. */
setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER, NULL, 0);
if (bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)) < 0) {
perror("bind");
return 1;
}
/* send frame */
if (write(s, &frame, required_mtu) != required_mtu) {
perror("write");
return 1;
}
close(s);
return 0;
}
I want to be able to use this cansend method in my android-ndk-project.
Do I need to adjust the c-code and make a shared library out of the code or do i need to use the executable and call and include it in my project in a certain way to be able to use it?
Rename your main function or put another wrapper around it.
If you want your native function to be named as cansend(), your wrapper function should be something like this:
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
JNIEXPORT
void
Java_com_aaa_bbb_ccc_cansend( JNIEnv* env, jobject thiz);
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
Here, com_aaa_bbb_ccc comes from your package name of your java code which contains public native void cansend();.
For example, if your package name is com.example.test, your function name will be:
Java_com_example_test_cansend();

Can not get proper response from select() using writefds

Parent receives SIGPIPE sending chars to aborted child process through FIFO pipe.
I am trying to avoid this, using select() function. In the attached sample code,
select() retruns OK even after the child at the other end of pipe having been terminated.
Tested in
RedHat EL5 (Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5)
GNU C Library stable release version 2.5
Any help appreciated. Thnak you.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <unistd.h>
static void sigpipe_fct();
main()
{
struct stat st;
int i, fd_out, fd_in, child;
char buf[1024];
#define p_out "/tmp/pout"
signal(SIGPIPE, sigpipe_fct);
if (stat(p_out, &st) != 0) {
mknod(p_out, S_IFIFO, 0);
chmod(p_out, 0666);
}
/* start receiving process */
if ((child = fork()) == 0) {
if ((fd_in = open(p_out, O_RDONLY)) < 0) {
perror(p_out);
exit(1);
}
while(1) {
i = read(fd_in, buf, sizeof(buf));
fprintf(stderr, "child %d read %.*s\n", getpid(), i, buf);
lseek(fd_in, 0, 0);
}
}
else {
fprintf(stderr,
"reading from %s - exec \"kill -9 %d\" to test\n", p_out, child);
if ((fd_out = open(p_out, O_WRONLY + O_NDELAY)) < 0) { /* output */
perror(p_out);
exit(1);
}
while(1) {
if (SelectChkWrite(fd_out) == fd_out) {
fprintf(stderr, "SelectChkWrite() success write abc\n");
write(fd_out, "abc", 3);
}
else
fprintf(stderr, "SelectChkWrite() failed\n");
sleep(3);
}
}
}
static void sigpipe_fct()
{
fprintf(stderr, "SIGPIPE received\n");
exit(-1);
}
SelectChkWrite(ch)
int ch;
{
#include <sys/select.h>
fd_set writefds;
int i;
FD_ZERO(&writefds);
FD_SET (ch, &writefds);
i = select(ch + 1, NULL, &writefds, NULL, NULL);
if (i == -1)
return(-1);
else if (FD_ISSET(ch, &writefds))
return(ch);
else
return(-1);
}
From the Linux select(3) man page:
A descriptor shall be considered ready for writing when a call to an
output function with O_NONBLOCK clear would not block, whether or not
the function would transfer data successfully.
When the pipe is closed, it won't block, so it is considered "ready" by select.
BTW, having #include <sys/select.h> inside your SelectChkWrite() function is extremely bad form.
Although select() and poll() are both in the POSIX standard, select() is much older and more limited than poll(). In general, I recommend people use poll() by default and only use select() if they have a good reason. (See here for one example.)

Resources