I am working on learning Hybris. I have successfully install hybris, there are lots and lots of blogs out there that talk about getting the core hybris install with your own custom moduleds to make changes to, such as this one:
http://javainsimpleway.com/hybris-b2b-installation/
In the blog above the gentleman creates a mystore. The question I have is this: Once you have this all setup, you have made changes to the mystore modules and you want get those changes onto a new developers machine (or productions machine), who do you do it?
What I have tried, which does not work is this:
zipped up the bin/custom/mystore, config/local.properties, and localextensions.xml
followed his steps 1 thru 4
unzipped the files on the new machine
jumped down to step 12 where he does an ant clean all initialize
One difference between his process and mine is that I am adding some addon's. It is my impression that all those changes happen with custom/mystore, but to be safe between my steps 3 & 4 I have rerun the ant addoninstall for all four addon's.
The process I have documented, SmartEdit was not working and I found SAP's documentation about running ant npminstall because Hybris does not include npm-related 3rd party JavaScript libraries. This are blowing up when I go to run ant npminstall.
I really feel like I am trying to recreate the wheel here. I would imagine what I am trying to do is very common to any Hybris team, but I cannot find documentation on how to do it. Does anyone know of a blog out there that talks about how to migrate the source from one machine to another?
there are lots and lots of blogs out there that talk about getting the
core hybris install with your own custom moduleds to make changes to
Although they may be helpful, I would suggest you stick to official Hybris documentation (e.g. https://help.sap.com/viewer/4c33bf189ab9409e84e589295c36d96e/1905/en-US/8acc8a5a86691014a20781b3f738213e.html) which is quite rich.
Once you have this all setup, you have made changes to the mystore
modules and you want get those changes onto a new developers machine
(or productions machine), who do you do it?
For production deployment, please go through https://wiki.hybris.com/display/hybrisALF/Ant+Production+for+Continuous+Integration
However, for simply copying the things from one machine to another machine, whatever artefacts you have already copied to the target machine (after you have installed Hybris on the target machine), are correct. If you are working in a team, you typically set up an SCM (e.g. git, SVN etc.) code repository and then it becomes easier.
It is my impression that all those changes happen with custom/mystore
This is a wrong impression. When you run addon install it creates/updates the project.properties file in the addon; not in your custom/mystore. So, if the addon is part of the code repository (which is typically not the case unless it is a custom addon), anyone pulling your code on their machine will automatically get the addon project.properties and therefore they will not require to run addon install on their machines; otherwise, they need to run addon install on their machines. A workaround is to copy the content of the addon project.properties to the local.properties (and thus getting the changes to the target machine when the local.properties is copied to the target machine).
This are blowing up when I go to run ant npminstall.
Make sure to run ant npminstall as an admin user. Please check https://answers.sap.com/questions/12771768/smart-edit-unable-to-find-local-grunt.html for another option.
I have the following boxes:
a) A Windows box with Eclipse CDT,
b) A Linux box, accessible for me only via SSH.
Both the compiler and the hardware required to build and run my project is only on machine B.
I'd like to work "transparently" from a Windows box on that project using Eclipse CDT and be able to build, run and debug the project remotely from within the IDE.
How do I set up that:
The building will work? Any simpler solutions than writing a local makefile which would rsync the project and then call a remote makefile to initiate the actual build? Does Eclipse managed build have a feature for that?
The debugging will work?
Preferably - the Eclipse CDT code indexing will work? Do I have to copy all required header files from machine B to machine A and add them to include path manually?
Try the Remote System Explorer (RSE). It's a set of plug-ins to do exactly what you want.
RSE may already be included in your current Eclipse installation. To check in Eclipse Indigo go to Window > Open Perspective > Other... and choose Remote System Explorer from the Open Perspective dialog to open the RSE perspective.
To create an SSH remote project from the RSE perspective in Eclipse:
Define a new connection and choose SSH Only from the Select Remote System Type screen in the New Connection dialog.
Enter the connection information then choose Finish.
Connect to the new host. (Assumes SSH keys are already setup.)
Once connected, drill down into the host's Sftp Files, choose a folder and select Create Remote Project from the item's context menu. (Wait as the remote project is created.)
If done correctly, there should now be a new remote project accessible from the Project Explorer and other perspectives within eclipse. With the SSH connection set-up correctly passwords can be made an optional part of the normal SSH authentication process. A remote project with Eclipse via SSH is now created.
The very simplest way would be to run Eclipse CDT on the Linux Box and use either X11-Forwarding or remote desktop software such as VNC.
This, of course, is only possible when you Eclipse is present on the Linux box and your network connection to the box is sufficiently fast.
The advantage is that, due to everything being local, you won't have synchronization issues, and you don't get any awkward cross-platform issues.
If you have no eclipse on the box, you could thinking of sharing your linux working directory via SMB (or SSHFS) and access it from your windows machine, but that would require quite some setup.
Both would be better than having two copies, especially when it's cross-platform.
I'm in the same spot myself (or was), FWIW I ended up checking out to a samba share on the Linux host and editing that share locally on the Windows machine with notepad++, then I compiled on the Linux box via PuTTY. (We weren't allowed to update the ten y/o versions of the editors on the Linux host and it didn't have Java, so I gave up on X11 forwarding)
Now... I run modern Linux in a VM on my Windows host, add all the tools I want (e.g. CDT) to the VM and then I checkout and build in a chroot jail that closely resembles the RTE.
It's a clunky solution but I thought I'd throw it in to the mix.
My solution is similar to the SAMBA one except using sshfs. Mount my remote server with sshfs, open my makefile project on the remote machine. Go from there.
It seems I can run a GUI frontend to mercurial this way as well.
Building my remote code is as simple as: ssh address remote_make_command
I am looking for a decent way to debug though. Possibly via gdbserver?
I tried ssh -X but it was unbearably slow.
I also tried RSE, but it didn't even support building the project with a Makefile (I'm being told that this has changed since I posted my answer, but I haven't tried that out)
I read that NX is faster than X11 forwarding, but I couldn't get it to work.
Finally, I found out that my server supports X2Go (the link has install instructions if yours does not). Now I only had to:
download and unpack Eclipse on the server,
install X2Go on my local machine (sudo apt-get install x2goclient on Ubuntu),
configure the connection (host, auto-login with ssh key, choose to run Eclipse).
Everything is just as if I was working on a local machine, including building, debugging, and code indexing. And there are no noticeable lags.
I had the same problem 2 years ago and I solved it in the following way:
1) I build my projects with makefiles, not managed by eclipse
2) I use a SAMBA connection to edit the files inside Eclipse
3) Building the project:
Eclipse calles a "local" make with a makefile which opens a SSH connection
to the Linux Host. On the SSH command line you can give parameters which
are executed on the Linux host. I use for that parameter a makeit.sh shell script
which call the "real" make on the linux host.
The different targets for building you can give also by parameters from
the local makefile --> makeit.sh --> makefile on linux host.
The way I solved that one was:
For windows:
Export the 'workspace' directory from the Linux machine using samba.
Mount it locally in windows.
Run Eclipse, using the mounted 'workspace' directory as the eclipse workspace.
Import the project you want and work on it.
For Linux:
Mount the 'workspace' directory using sshfs
Run Eclipse.
Run Eclipse, using the mounted 'workspace' directory as the eclipse workspace.
Import the project you want and work on it.
In both cases you can either build and run through Eclipse, or build on the remote machine via ssh.
For this case you can use ptp eclipse https://eclipse.org/ptp/ for source browsing and building.
You can use this pluging to debug your application
http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/direct-remote-c-debugging
How to edit in Eclipse locally, but use a git-based script I wrote (sync_git_repo_from_pc1_to_pc2.sh) to synchronize and build remotely
The script I wrote to do this is sync_git_repo_from_pc1_to_pc2.sh.
Readme: README_git-sync_repo_from_pc1_to_pc2.md
Update: see also this alternative/competitor: GitSync:
How to use Sublime over SSH
https://github.com/jachin/GitSync
This answer currently only applies to using two Linux computers [or maybe works on Mac too?--untested on Mac] (syncing from one to the other) because I wrote this synchronization script in bash. It is simply a wrapper around git, however, so feel free to take it and convert it into a cross-platform Python solution or something if you wish
This doesn't directly answer the OP's question, but it is so close I guarantee it will answer many other peoples' question who land on this page (mine included, actually, as I came here first before writing my own solution), so I'm posting it here anyway.
I want to:
develop code using a powerful IDE like Eclipse on a light-weight Linux computer, then
build that code via ssh on a different, more powerful Linux computer (from the command-line, NOT from inside Eclipse)
Let's call the first computer where I write the code "PC1" (Personal Computer 1), and the 2nd computer where I build the code "PC2". I need a tool to easily synchronize from PC1 to PC2. I tried rsync, but it was insanely slow for large repos and took tons of bandwidth and data.
So, how do I do it? What workflow should I use? If you have this question too, here's the workflow that I decided upon. I wrote a bash script to automate the process by using git to automatically push changes from PC1 to PC2 via a remote repository, such as github. So far it works very well and I'm very pleased with it. It is far far far faster than rsync, more trustworthy in my opinion because each PC maintains a functional git repo, and uses far less bandwidth to do the whole sync, so it's easily doable over a cell phone hot spot without using tons of your data.
Setup:
Install the script on PC1 (this solution assumes ~/bin is in your $PATH):
git clone https://github.com/ElectricRCAircraftGuy/eRCaGuy_dotfiles.git
cd eRCaGuy_dotfiles/useful_scripts
mkdir -p ~/bin
ln -s "${PWD}/sync_git_repo_from_pc1_to_pc2.sh" ~/bin/sync_git_repo_from_pc1_to_pc2
cd ..
cp -i .sync_git_repo ~/.sync_git_repo
Now edit the "~/.sync_git_repo" file you just copied above, and update its parameters to fit your case. Here are the parameters it contains:
# The git repo root directory on PC2 where you are syncing your files TO; this dir must *already exist*
# and you must have *already `git clone`d* a copy of your git repo into it!
# - Do NOT use variables such as `$HOME`. Be explicit instead. This is because the variable expansion will
# happen on the local machine when what we need is the variable expansion from the remote machine. Being
# explicit instead just avoids this problem.
PC2_GIT_REPO_TARGET_DIR="/home/gabriel/dev/eRCaGuy_dotfiles" # explicitly type this out; don't use variables
PC2_SSH_USERNAME="my_username" # explicitly type this out; don't use variables
PC2_SSH_HOST="my_hostname" # explicitly type this out; don't use variables
Git clone your repo you want to sync on both PC1 and PC2.
Ensure your ssh keys are all set up to be able to push and pull to the remote repo from both PC1 and PC2. Here's some helpful links:
https://help.github.com/en/github/authenticating-to-github/connecting-to-github-with-ssh
https://help.github.com/en/github/authenticating-to-github/generating-a-new-ssh-key-and-adding-it-to-the-ssh-agent
Ensure your ssh keys are all set up to ssh from PC1 to PC2.
Now cd into any directory within the git repo on PC1, and run:
sync_git_repo_from_pc1_to_pc2
That's it! About 30 seconds later everything will be magically synced from PC1 to PC2, and it will be printing output the whole time to tell you what it's doing and where it's doing it on your disk and on which computer. It's safe too, because it doesn't overwrite or delete anything that is uncommitted. It backs it up first instead! Read more below for how that works.
Here's the process this script uses (ie: what it's actually doing)
From PC1: It checks to see if any uncommitted changes are on PC1. If so, it commits them to a temporary commit on the current branch. It then force pushes them to a remote SYNC branch. Then it uncommits its temporary commit it just did on the local branch, then it puts the local git repo back to exactly how it was by staging any files that were previously staged at the time you called the script. Next, it rsyncs a copy of the script over to PC2, and does an ssh call to tell PC2 to run the script with a special option to just do PC2 stuff.
Here's what PC2 does: it cds into the repo, and checks to see if any local uncommitted changes exist. If so, it creates a new backup branch forked off of the current branch (sample name: my_branch_SYNC_BAK_20200220-0028hrs-15sec <-- notice that's YYYYMMDD-HHMMhrs--SSsec), and commits any uncommitted changes to that branch with a commit message such as DO BACKUP OF ALL UNCOMMITTED CHANGES ON PC2 (TARGET PC/BUILD MACHINE). Now, it checks out the SYNC branch, pulling it from the remote repository if it is not already on the local machine. Then, it fetches the latest changes on the remote repository, and does a hard reset to force the local SYNC repository to match the remote SYNC repository. You might call this a "hard pull". It is safe, however, because we already backed up any uncommitted changes we had locally on PC2, so nothing is lost!
That's it! You now have produced a perfect copy from PC1 to PC2 without even having to ensure clean working directories, as the script handled all of the automatic committing and stuff for you! It is fast and works very well on huge repositories. Now you have an easy mechanism to use any IDE of your choice on one machine while building or testing on another machine, easily, over a wifi hot spot from your cell phone if needed, even if the repository is dozens of gigabytes and you are time and resource-constrained.
Resources:
The whole project: https://github.com/ElectricRCAircraftGuy/eRCaGuy_dotfiles
See tons more links and references in the source code itself within this project.
How to do a "hard pull", as I call it: How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
Related:
git repository sync between computers, when moving around?
I'm having some troubles with a situation and I would like to get your help. I'm using CruiseControl.NET to create the packages of my builds and it creates them correctly. The package versions are beeing stored at a folder in a remote machine.
However, when I use Octopus, I set a local feed with the correct URI for that folder. The folder has the right permissions (read/write). But when I try to create a release of the package in Octopus, it can't reach the version of the package. Plus, when I test it to get the list of packages, the list is always empty. So, I don't get the version when I try to create the release.
I already tried to change the credentials for the access (using another user), and I already changed the directory. I can ping the remote machine, I can enter via remote connection with those users, and I can reach the folder in Explorer. Plus, I double checked the folder permissions... But I'm still getting the same problem. I don't know what is going on and Octopus doesn't allow me to deploy the package without a version.
I'm running Octopus 1.5.1.1652 and CruiseControl.NET 1.8.3.0.
What I want and achieved so far:
I want to create a custom vagrant box including a configuration and an application to reuse it in different client or serve environments.
Specifically I managed to create vagrant box, based on Ubuntu (precise/64), that has node.js installed, and package it on my dev machine with
vagrant package my-box --output filename.box
I am able to copy the filename.box to a remote server and vagrant up the box there. Node.js is installed within the vagrant box as expected.
The problem is, that I am not able to package the files in the synced folder vagrant. After starting the box on the remote server, the synced folder is empty
Therefore the application I developed on the local machine is not included in the box.
I tried to find a solution or any information about this behavior, but apart from this unanswered Post i couldn't find anything on the net.
My questions:
How can i preserve the files in the synced folder and package them in the filename.box for reuse in the server environment.
Is this even possible? Is the behavior I see a bug or is Vagrant not meant to package the files also?
I didn't do any configuration for the synced folders so far. Is it possible to package files from a different synced folder than the regular /vagrant?
If this is not possible at all, what are best practices for deployment or reusage of vagrant environments including applications?
1-3) No. This is not possible and not intended to work in the way you expect it to work.
Think of VirtualBox's shared folder as a mounted volume on a remote machine. It's not part of the file system of your virtual machine. The actual data is saved on the host machine, not the virtual one.
4) If you want to add data into your box, just copy your data over to the vm before you pack it. No need to use shared folders.
You cannot package a synced folder but what you are desiring is absolutely possible.
The easiest way to accomplish this is to put the data in some other directory in the box (thus ensuring it gets packaged with the box). And during the Vagrant box's provisioning, move or copy the data to the synced directory.
Once the box is up and running, the synced directory will have the files you want in it.
I have a web dev. client using a shared host that doesn't allow shell access, and thus no access to SVN, Git, etc. I've tried to convince him to move to one of the many cheap options that allow it, but he won't do it. If I use version control on my staging server, are there any tools that will allow me to replicate the changes to production via ftp? Locally I have both mac & windows, the staging server is linux, so something that works on any of those platforms....
Using your Linux staging server you could keep a separate checked out copy that you use specifically for that host and then use a utility to mirror that directory with the host server.
LFTP is useful for this kind of thing. Its available for most Linux distributions and includes a 'mirror' function:
Mirror specified source directory to
local target directory. If target
directory ends with a slash, the source base name is appended to
target
directory name. Source and/or target can be URLs pointing to
directories.
Some kind of ftp mirror software is what you need. Not tested it but a quick search gave me this Java application. You could run that over your up-to-date checked out repository.
Good thing for keeping SVN repo and FTP copy in sync is svn2web. May I suggest creating separate branch for production copy and do merges to that branch for uploading to production server.
You probably need to write a batch file that is able to
Export the SVN repository
Upload the exported files to your Linux server via FTP
Short of finding / implementing some FUSE based CoW file system that supports immutable versions .. I'd just find another (more developer friendly) host. As far as I know, no FTP server supports this natively, nor can I think of any elegant means of putting it in place with script hackery.
I could be wrong.
This question (and answer) really helped me just now as I implemented version control via gitolite on a separate server and lftp.
Here’s what I did:
Set up gitolite on my ubuntu staging server
created base repo (i.e. foo.git) on staging server
cloned foo.git into working directory on staging server
cloned foo.git into working directory on local development machine
Developed locally
Pushed changes to foo.git repo on staging server
On staging server, logged into working directory, and pulled in changes from foo.git
lftp-ed into shared host (like you mention above)
Once in shared host, ran:
mirror -R --only-newer --delete --parallel=10 /source/directory/ /target/directory
Notes on the mirror command options:
-R - this pushes the source/directory to the target/directory. (mirror pulls in from target to source without this, think reverse)
—only-newer - without this option, even if you only changed one file, the mirror command will send all the files in the source directory over to the target directory. with this option only the changed (newer) files are transferred over the wire.
—delete - deletes files that are no longer in the source directory but still in the target directory. one of my pushes involved deleting expired assets. without this option, the same files would have stayed put on my shared host after executing the mirror command.
—parallel=10 - transfers 10 files at once (instead of 1 by default). this made the process much faster
While this is what worked for me, I’m sure there are ways to improve on this. I was grateful for this question and thought i’d share my experience.
Rsync will do this over an FTP connection. You probably already have it installed if you’re on a Unix-like system.