I have an api call which triggers an async function doSomething. Inside this function I have another async function that creates a notification for the user but I do not want to wait for it until it is finished. So I removed the await statement. The code works but is this a bad idea or bad practice because I get a "Missing await for an async function call" warning.
public async createNotification(createdStuff: CreatedStuff): Promise<void> {
const userNotification = new Notifcation(..);
await userNotification.save();
}
public async doSomething(): Promise<CreatedStuff> {
const createdStuff = await this.createStuff();
await createdStuff.save();
// here I removed the await statement
this.notificationService.createNotification(createdStuff);
return createdStuff;
}
If createLogPlayNotification(...) rejects, you will run into an unhandledRejection event which you probably don't want as it will crash your app depending on your NodeJS version (see this link for more information).
This does not mean you have to await it, you can simply add a .catch-handler on the returned promise:
// ..
this.notificationService.createLogPlayNotification(loggedPLay)
.catch(err => {
// do something with err, e.g. log it
});
return createdStuff;
I have created a saperate js file in node js and I am trying to connect to postgres sql using below code but it never worked. always promise is pending. code is not waiting at this line (await client.connect()). I Could not understand what the issue is. can any one please help me on this.
const pg = require('pg');
async function PostgresConnection(query,config) {
const client = new pg.Client(config);
await client.connect(); //not waiting for the connection to succeed and returning to caller and exit
const pgData = await client.query(query);
await client.end();
return pgData;
}
async function uploadDataToPostgres(config) {
var query="select * from firm_data";
await PostgresConnection(query, config);
}
module.exports = {
uploadDataToPostgres
}
I am trying to call above method from other page
function ProcessData()
{
var result = uploadDataToPostgres(config);
}
When you invoke an async function from outside an async function, you need to treat it as a Promise. Change your invoker function to look like this:
function ProcessData() {
uploadDataToPostgres(config)
.then(function success(result) {
/* do something useful with your result */
console.log(result)
})
.catch(function error(err) {
console.error('uploadDataToPostgres failure', err)
})
}
Your code, var result = uploadDataToPostgres(config), stashes a Promise object in result. But the code behind the promise (the code in your async function) doesn't run until you invoke .then() or .else() on it.
It's a bit confusing until you completely grasp the similarity between async functions and Promises: async functions are Promise functions with nice syntax.
It's possible your uploadDataToPostgres() function throws an error (failure to connect to the db?) and the .catch() will catch that.
I wrote this code in lib/helper.js:
var myfunction = async function(x,y) {
....
return [variableA, variableB]
}
exports.myfunction = myfunction;
Then I tried to use it in another file :
var helper = require('./helper.js');
var start = function(a,b){
....
const result = await helper.myfunction('test','test');
}
exports.start = start;
I got an error:
await is only valid in async function
What is the issue?
The error is not refering to myfunction but to start.
async function start() {
....
const result = await helper.myfunction('test', 'test');
}
// My function
const myfunction = async function(x, y) {
return [
x,
y,
];
}
// Start function
const start = async function(a, b) {
const result = await myfunction('test', 'test');
console.log(result);
}
// Call start
start();
I use the opportunity of this question to advise you about an known anti pattern using await which is : return await.
WRONG
async function myfunction() {
console.log('Inside of myfunction');
}
// Here we wait for the myfunction to finish
// and then returns a promise that'll be waited for aswell
// It's useless to wait the myfunction to finish before to return
// we can simply returns a promise that will be resolved later
// useless async here
async function start() {
// useless await here
return await myfunction();
}
// Call start
(async() => {
console.log('before start');
await start();
console.log('after start');
})();
CORRECT
async function myfunction() {
console.log('Inside of myfunction');
}
// Here we wait for the myfunction to finish
// and then returns a promise that'll be waited for aswell
// It's useless to wait the myfunction to finish before to return
// we can simply returns a promise that will be resolved later
// Also point that we don't use async keyword on the function because
// we can simply returns the promise returned by myfunction
function start() {
return myfunction();
}
// Call start
(async() => {
console.log('before start');
await start();
console.log('after start');
})();
Also, know that there is a special case where return await is correct and important : (using try/catch)
Are there performance concerns with `return await`?
To use await, its executing context needs to be async in nature
As it said, you need to define the nature of your executing context where you are willing to await a task before anything.
Just put async before the fn declaration in which your async task will execute.
var start = async function(a, b) {
// Your async task will execute with await
await foo()
console.log('I will execute after foo get either resolved/rejected')
}
Explanation:
In your question, you are importing a method which is asynchronous in nature and will execute in parallel. But where you are trying to execute that async method is inside a different execution context which you need to define async to use await.
var helper = require('./helper.js');
var start = async function(a,b){
....
const result = await helper.myfunction('test','test');
}
exports.start = start;
Wondering what's going under the hood
await consumes promise/future / task-returning methods/functions and async marks a method/function as capable of using await.
Also if you are familiar with promises, await is actually doing the same process of promise/resolve. Creating a chain of promise and executes your next task in resolve callback.
For more info you can refer to MDN DOCS.
When I got this error, it turned out I had a call to the map function inside my "async" function, so this error message was actually referring to the map function not being marked as "async". I got around this issue by taking the "await" call out of the map function and coming up with some other way of getting the expected behavior.
var myfunction = async function(x,y) {
....
someArray.map(someVariable => { // <- This was the function giving the error
return await someFunction(someVariable);
});
}
I had the same problem and the following block of code was giving the same error message:
repositories.forEach( repo => {
const commits = await getCommits(repo);
displayCommit(commits);
});
The problem is that the method getCommits() was async but I was passing it the argument repo which was also produced by a Promise. So, I had to add the word async to it like this: async(repo) and it started working:
repositories.forEach( async(repo) => {
const commits = await getCommits(repo);
displayCommit(commits);
});
If you are writing a Chrome Extension and you get this error for your code at root, you can fix it using the following "workaround":
async function run() {
// Your async code here
const beers = await fetch("https://api.punkapi.com/v2/beers");
}
run();
Basically you have to wrap your async code in an async function and then call the function without awaiting it.
The current implementation of async / await only supports the await keyword inside of async functions Change your start function signature so you can use await inside start.
var start = async function(a, b) {
}
For those interested, the proposal for top-level await is currently in Stage 2: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-top-level-await
async/await is the mechanism of handling promise, two ways we can do it
functionWhichReturnsPromise()
.then(result => {
console.log(result);
})
.cathc(err => {
console.log(result);
});
or we can use await to wait for the promise to full-filed it first, which means either it is rejected or resolved.
Now if we want to use await (waiting for a promise to fulfil) inside a function, it's mandatory that the container function must be an async function because we are waiting for a promise to fulfiled asynchronously || make sense right?.
async function getRecipesAw(){
const IDs = await getIds; // returns promise
const recipe = await getRecipe(IDs[2]); // returns promise
return recipe; // returning a promise
}
getRecipesAw().then(result=>{
console.log(result);
}).catch(error=>{
console.log(error);
});
If you have called async function inside foreach update it to for loop
Found the code below in this nice article: HTTP requests in Node using Axios
const axios = require('axios')
const getBreeds = async () => {
try {
return await axios.get('https://dog.ceo/api/breeds/list/all')
} catch (error) {
console.error(error)
}
}
const countBreeds = async () => {
const breeds = await getBreeds()
if (breeds.data.message) {
console.log(`Got ${Object.entries(breeds.data.message).length} breeds`)
}
}
countBreeds()
Or using Promise:
const axios = require('axios')
const getBreeds = () => {
try {
return axios.get('https://dog.ceo/api/breeds/list/all')
} catch (error) {
console.error(error)
}
}
const countBreeds = async () => {
const breeds = getBreeds()
.then(response => {
if (response.data.message) {
console.log(
`Got ${Object.entries(response.data.message).length} breeds`
)
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.log(error)
})
}
countBreeds()
In later nodejs (>=14), top await is allowed with { "type": "module" } specified in package.json or with file extension .mjs.
https://www.stefanjudis.com/today-i-learned/top-level-await-is-available-in-node-js-modules/
This in one file works..
Looks like await only is applied to the local function which has to be async..
I also am struggling now with a more complex structure and in between different files. That's why I made this small test code.
edit: i forgot to say that I'm working with node.js.. sry. I don't have a clear question. Just thought it could be helpful with the discussion..
function helper(callback){
function doA(){
var array = ["a ","b ","c "];
var alphabet = "";
return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
array.forEach(function(key,index){
alphabet += key;
if (index == array.length - 1){
resolve(alphabet);
};
});
});
};
function doB(){
var a = "well done!";
return a;
};
async function make() {
var alphabet = await doA();
var appreciate = doB();
callback(alphabet+appreciate);
};
make();
};
helper(function(message){
console.log(message);
});
A common problem in Express:
The warning can refer to the function, or where you call it.
Express items tend to look like this:
app.post('/foo', ensureLoggedIn("/join"), (req, res) => {
const facts = await db.lookup(something)
res.redirect('/')
})
Notice the => arrow function syntax for the function.
The problem is NOT actually in the db.lookup call, but right here in the Express item.
Needs to be:
app.post('/foo', ensureLoggedIn("/join"), async function (req, res) {
const facts = await db.lookup(something)
res.redirect('/')
})
Basically, nix the => and add async function .
"await is only valid in async function"
But why? 'await' explicitly turns an async call into a synchronous call, and therefore the caller cannot be async (or asyncable) - at least, not because of the call being made at 'await'.
Yes, await / async was a great concept, but the implementation is completely broken.
For whatever reason, the await keyword has been implemented such that it can only be used within an async method. This is in fact a bug, though you will not see it referred to as such anywhere but right here. The fix for this bug would be to implement the await keyword such that it can only be used TO CALL an async function, regardless of whether the calling function is itself synchronous or asynchronous.
Due to this bug, if you use await to call a real asynchronous function somewhere in your code, then ALL of your functions must be marked as async and ALL of your function calls must use await.
This essentially means that you must add the overhead of promises to all of the functions in your entire application, most of which are not and never will be asynchronous.
If you actually think about it, using await in a function should require the function containing the await keyword TO NOT BE ASYNC - this is because the await keyword is going to pause processing in the function where the await keyword is found. If processing in that function is paused, then it is definitely NOT asynchronous.
So, to the developers of javascript and ECMAScript - please fix the await/async implementation as follows...
await can only be used to CALL async functions.
await can appear in any kind of function, synchronous or asynchronous.
Change the error message from "await is only valid in async function" to "await can only be used to call async functions".
How to use the asynchronous Await in Node.js by using these function and how
The request.get() function returns a Promise by which user will await...
I have tried the Below code so far and also gave the explanation below
async function fun1(req, res){
let response = await request.get('http://localhost:3000');
if (response.err) { console.log('error');}
else { console.log('fetched response');
}
The code above basically asks the javascript engine running the code to wait for the request.get() function to complete before moving on to the next line to execute it. The request.get() function returns a Promise for which user will await . Before async/await, if it needs to be made sure that the functions are running in the desired sequence, that is one after the another, chain them one after the another or register callbacks.
async function fun1(req, res){
let response = await request.get('http://localhost:3000');
if (response.err) { console.log('error');}
else { console.log('fetched response');
}
request package does not use return promise. Use the request-promise package which wraps the request with Promise.
You can use it like:
const rp = require('request-promise')
async function getSomeData() {
try {
const url = 'http://some.com'
// waits for promise to resolve
const data = await rp(url)
// data contains resolved value if successfull
// continue some other stuff
...
} catch (e) {
// handle error if error occurred
console.error(e)
}
}
I am trying to make res.locals.info available on every single page.
I'm trying to do this by middleware but I'm getting an error.
Apparently res.locals.info is not ready yet when the page render, thus I get an error info is not defined. How do I solve this?
app.use(function(req,res,next){
async function getInfo(user) {
let result = await info.search(user);
setInfo(result);
}
function setInfo(result){
res.locals.info= result;
}
getInfo(req.user);
return next();
})
search():
module.exports.search= function (user) {
var query=`SELECT count(*) as Info from dbo.InfoUsers WHERE user= '${user}' ;`
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
sequelize
.query(`${query}`, {model: InformationUser})
.then((info) => {
resolve(info);
})
})
};
You were calling next() before your getInfo() function had done its work, thus res.locals.info had not yet been set when you were trying to use it.
An async function returns a promise. It does NOT block until the await is done. Instead, it returns a promise immediately. You will need to use await or .then() on getInfo() so you know when it's actually done.
If info.search() returns a promise that resolves to the desired result, then you could do this:
app.use(function(req,res,next){
// this returns a promise that resolves when it's actually done
async function getInfo(user) {
let result = await info.search(user);
setInfo(result);
}
function setInfo(result){
res.locals.info= result;
}
// use .then() to know when getInfo() is done
// use .catch() to handle errors from getInfo()
getInfo(req.user).then(result => next()).catch(next);
});
And, you can remove the deferred anti-pattern from your search function and fix the error handling (which is a common issue when you use the anti-pattern). There is no need to wrap an existing promise in another promise.:
module.exports.search = function (user) {
var query=`SELECT count(*) as Info from dbo.InfoUsers WHERE user= '${user}' ;`
// return promise directly so caller can use .then() or await on it
return sequelize.query(`${query}`, {model: InformationUser});
};