I want to read the delta data after a certain timestamp/version. The logic here suggests to read the entire data and read the specific version, and then find the delta. As my data is huge, I would prefer not to read the entire data and if somehow be able to read only the data after certain timestamp/version.
Any suggestions?
If you need data that have timestamp after some specific date, then you still need to shift through all data. But Spark & Delta Lake may help here if you organize your data correctly:
You can have time-based partitions, for example, store data by day/week/month, so when Spark will read data it may read only specific partitions (perform so-called predicate pushdown), for example, df = spark.read.format("delta").load(...).filter("day > '2021-12-29'") - this will work not only for Delta, but for other formats as well. Delta Lake may additionally help here because is supports so-called generated columns where you don't need to create a partition column explicitly, but allow Spark to generate it for you based on other columns
On top of partitioning, formats like Parquet (and Delta that is based on Parquet) allow to skip reading all data because they maintain the min/max statistics inside the files. But you will still need to read these files
On Databricks, Delta Lake has more capabilities for selective read of the data - for example, that min/max statistics that Parquet has inside the file, could be saved into the transaction log, so Delta won't need to open file to check if timestamp in the given range - this technique is called data skipping. Additional performance could come from the ZOrdering of the data that will collocate data closer to each other - that's especially useful when you need to filter by multiple columns
Update 14.04.2022: Data Skipping is also available in OSS Delta, starting with version 1.2.0
Related
I'm trying to convert large parquet files to delta format for performance optimization and a faster job run.
I'm trying to research the best practices to migrate huge parquet files to delta format on Databricks.
There are two general approaches to that, but it's really depends on your requirements:
Do in-place upgrade using the CONVERT TO DELTA (SQL Command) or corresponding Python/Scala/Java APIs (doc). You need to take into account following consideration - if you have a huge table, then default CONVERT TO DELTA command may take too long as it will need to collect statistics for your data. You can avoid this by adding NO STATISTICS to the command, and then it will run faster. With it, you won't be able to get benefits of data skipping, and other optimizations, but these statistics could be collected later when executing OPTIMIZE command.
Create a copy of your original table by reading original Parquet data & writing as a Delta table. After you check that everything is correct, you may remove original table. This approach have following benefits:
You can change partitioning schema if you have too many levels of partitioning in your original table
You can change the order of columns in the table to take advantage of data skipping for numeric & date/time data types - it should improve the query performance.
With the Databricks Lakehouse platform, it is possible to create 'tables' or to be more specific, delta tables using a statement such as the following,
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS People10M;
CREATE TABLE People10M
USING parquet
OPTIONS (
path "/mnt/training/dataframes/people-10m.parquet",
header "true"
);
What I would like to know is, what exactly happens behind the scenes when you create one of these tables? What exactly is a table in this context? Because the data is actually contained in files in data lake (data storage location) that delta lake is running on top of.. right? Are tables some kind of abstraction that allows us to access the data stored in these files using something like SQL?
What does the USING parquet portion of this statement do? Are parquet tables different to CSV tables in some way? Or does this just depend on the format of the source data?
Any links to material that explains this idea would be appreciated? I want to understand this in depth from a technical point of view.
There are few aspects here. Your table definition is not a Delta Lake, it's Spark SQL (or Hive) syntax to define a table. It's just a metadata that allows users easily use the table without knowing where it's located, what data format, etc. You can read more about databases & tables in Databricks documentation.
The actual format for data storage is specified by the USING directive. In your case it's parquet, so when people or code will read or write data, underlying engine will first read table metadata, figure out location of the data & file format, and then will use corresponding code.
Delta is another file format (really a storage layer) that is built on the top of Parquet as data format, but adding additional capabilities such as ACID, time travel, etc. (see doc). If you want to use Delta instead of Parquet then you either need to use CONVERT TO DELTA to convert existing Parquet data into Delta, or specify USING delta when creating a completely new table.
I'm trying to write delta tables in Kedro. Changing file format to delta makes the write as delta tables with mode as overwrite.
Previously, a node in the raw layer (meta_reload) creates a dataset that determines what's the start date for incremental load for each dataset. each node uses that raw dataset to filter the working dataset to apply the transformation logic and write partitioned parquet tables incrementally.
But now writing delta with mode as overwrite with just file type change to delta makes current incremental data overwrite all the past data instead of just those partitions. So I need to use replaceWhere option in save_args in the catalog.
How would I determine the start date for replaceWhere in the catalog when I need to read the meta_reload raw dataset to determine the date.
Is there a way to dynamically pass the save_args from inside the node?
my_dataset:
type: my_project.io.pyspark.SparkDataSet
filepath: "s3://${bucket_de_pipeline}/${data_environment_project}/${data_environment_intermediate}/my_dataset/"
file_format: delta
layer: intermediate
save_args:
mode: "overwrite"
replaceWhere: "DATE_ID > xyz" ## what I want to implement dynamically
partitionBy: [ "DATE_ID" ]
I've answered this on the GH discussion. In short you would need to subclass and define your own SparkDataSet we avoid changing the underlying API of the datasets at a Kedro level, but you're encouraged to alter and remix this for your own purposes.
I'm exploring ways to store a high volume of data from sensors (time series data), in a way that's scalable and cost-effective.
Currently, I'm writing a CSV file for each sensor, partitioned by date, so my filesystem hierarchy looks like this:
client_id/sensor_id/year/month/day.csv
My goal is to be able to perform SQL queries on this data, (typically fetching time ranges for a specific client/sensor, performing aggregations, etc) I've tried loading it to Postgres and timescaledb, but the volume is just too large and the queries are unreasonably slow.
I am now experimenting with using Spark and Parquet files to perform these queries, but I have some questions I haven't been able to answer from my research on this topic, namely:
I am converting this data to parquet files, so I now have something like this:
client_id/sensor_id/year/month/day.parquet
But my concern is that when Spark loads the top folder containing the many Parquet files, the metadata for the rowgroup information is not as optimized as if I used one single parquet file containing all the data, partitioned by client/sensor/year/month/day. Is this true? Or is it the same to have many parquet files or a single partitioned Parquet file? I know that internally the parquet file is stored in a folder hierarchy like the one I am using, but I'm not clear on how that affects the metadata for the file.
The reason I am not able to do this is that I am continuously receiving new data, and from my understanding, I cannot append to a parquet file due to the nature that the footer metadata works. Is this correct? Right now, I simply convert the previous day's data to parquet and create a new file for each sensor of each client.
Thank you.
You can use Structured Streaming with kafka(as you are already using it) for real time processing of your data and store data in parquet format. And, yes you can append data to parquet files. Use SaveMode.Append for that such as
df.write.mode('append').parquet(path)
You can even partition your data on hourly basis.
client/sensor/year/month/day/hour which will further provide you performance improvement while querying.
You can create hour partition based on system time or timestamp column based on type of query you want to run on your data.
You can use watermaking for handling late records if you choose to partition based on timestamp column.
Hope this helps!
I could share my experience and technology stack that being used at AppsFlyer.
We have a lot of data, about 70 billion events per day.
Our time-series data for near-real-time analytics are stored in Druid and Clickhouse. Clickhouse is used to hold real-time data for the last two days; Druid (0.9) wasn't able to manage it. Druid holds the rest of our data, which populated daily via Hadoop.
Druid is a right candidate in case you don't need a row data but pre-aggregated one, on a daily or hourly basis.
I would suggest you let a chance to the Clickhouse, it lacks documentation and examples but works robust and fast.
Also, you might take a look at Apache Hudi.
I've got 100G text files coming in daily, and I wish to create an efficient "database" accessible from Spark. By "database" I mean the ability to execute fast queries on the data (going back about a year), and incrementally add data each day, preferably without read locks.
Assuming I want to use Spark SQL and parquet, what's the best way to achieve this?
give up on concurrent reads/writes and append new data to the existing parquet file.
create a new parquet file for each day of data, and use the fact that Spark can load multiple parquet files to allow me to load e.g. an entire year. This effectively gives me "concurrency".
something else?
Feel free to suggest other options, but let's assume I'm using parquet for now, as from what I've read this will be helpful to many others.
My Level 0 design of this
Use partitioning by date/time (if your queries are based on date/time to avoid scanning of all data)
Use Append SaveMode where required
Run SparkSQL distributed SQL engine so that
You enable querying of the data from multiple clients/applications/users
cache the data only once across all clients/applications/users
Use just HDFS if you can to store all your Parquet files
I have very similar requirement in my system. I would say if load the whole year's data -for 100g one day that will be 36T data ,if you need to load 36TB daily ,that couldn't be fast anyway. better to save the processed daily data somewhere(such as count ,sum, distinct result) and use that to go back for whole year .