I need to get the parameters types of a method in a java file.
public static void main(String[] args) {
myMethod();
}
Like in this code I wanna to get just String[] without anything infront or behind it.
I use ANTLR4TS with the Java9Parser file distributed by them. Maybe somebody here knows how to do it?
Got it, its the enterFormalParameter.
enterFormalParameter (ctx: FormalParameterContext){
ctx.getChild(0).text;
}
Thats the way to get it.
Related
Maybe this is more of an ASP.NET MVC question than an Orchard question but I'm relatively new to both and I don't know the answer in either case.
ASP.NET MVC applications don't technically have a single point of entry, so where am I supposed to put code that I want to always run each and every time someone visits any page, regardless of layer or origin or permissions? Is there a specific Orchard way of doing this?
If it makes a difference, what I'm specifically trying to do at the moment is to restrict the IP range that has access to my website. I want to look at every incoming request and check if the user is either authenticated or has an IP in the allowed range that I configured in my custom settings.
I can think of some quick and dirty ways to achieve this like putting the check in Layout and wrap a condition around all of my zones or implement IThemeSelector to switch to a different Theme but I'd like to do it properly.
All what should you do to achieve this, is implementing new IActionFilter or IAuthorizationFilter like the following:
public class CheckAccessFilter : FilterProvider, IActionFilter, IAuthorizationFilter {
public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext) {
// here you can check the incoming request, and how the system will deal with it,
// before executing the action
}
public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext) {
}
public void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationContext filterContext) {
// here you can authorize any request
}
}
But if you want only to authorize based on content items (like: Widgets, Pages, Projections), you can implement IAuthorizationServiceEventHandler:
public class IPAuthorizationEventHandler : IAuthorizationServiceEventHandler {
public void Checking(CheckAccessContext context) {
}
public void Adjust(CheckAccessContext context) {
}
public void Complete(CheckAccessContext context) {
}
}
The best sample you can follow to implement this approach is SecurableContentItemsAuthorizationEventHandler, you can find it in Orchard.ContentPermissions module.
We are facing one issue in our Mule Adapter related to JAXB context, needed some opinion on the same
We are using xpath to evaluate some expressions in the choice blocks in our adapter like below for instance,
<choice doc:name="Choice">
<when expression="//env:abc/env:Body/ref:dataelement/ref:/ref:element" evaluator="xpath">
......
</when>
Now, this works perfectly fine in our application but the problem arises when one of other team uses this Adapter as a jar in their application.
When they try to use this adapter, they are getting below error,
Message : More than one object of type class javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext registered but only one expected.
Type : org.mule.api.registry.RegistrationException
Code : MULE_ERROR--2
JavaDoc : http://www.mulesoft.org/docs/site/current3/apidocs/org/mule/api/registry /RegistrationException.html.
After debugging with the help of loggers etc, we narrowed down to the choice block used above which is causing this particular issue. Also, googled a bit and found one of the posts pointing out the same issue.
Also, to confirm we commented out the choice block having xpath expression and the flow went ahead but broke again where was xpath used in some other way.
https://www.mulesoft.org/jira/browse/MULE-5926
Can anyone please suggest any suitable workaround to resolve this issue?
I agree with you. It is an unresolved issue in Mule.
One solution we have implemented is not define the jaxb context in the config you are providing in the jar file.
Along with the jar file, give instructions to the end application using it, to include the JAXB packages in their JAXB Context object definition.
This way there will be only one JAXB context and it will work smoothly.
Hope this helps.
This is a bit late however the solution that worked was
<mulexml:jaxb-context name=“JAXB_Context“ packageNames=“org.example.test1:org.example.test2“ doc:name=“JAXB Context1“ />
Please note that there must be no space between package names.
Thanks to: http://dominikbial.de/quicktipp-working-with-more-than-one-package-name-in-a-jaxb-context-config-in-mule-esb/
As of now we cannot add more than one JAXBContext in mule. As an alternative you can write your custom transformer.
I implemented something like
public interface MyAppJaxbObj2XmlComponent<I,O> extends
MyAppComponent<I,O>,Callable {
public O marshal(I input) throws Exception;
}
Abstart transformer
public abstract class AbstractMyAppJaxbObj2XmlComponent<I,O> implements
MyAppJaxbObj2XmlComponent<I,O>{
private Class<I> inputType;
public AbstractMyAppJaxbObj2XmlComponent(){
this.inputType = (Class<I>) new TypeToken<I>(getClass())
{}.getRawType();
}
public AbstractMyAppJaxbObj2XmlComponent(Class<I> type){
this.inputType = type;
}
#Override
public Object onCall(MuleEventContext eventContext) throws Exception {
I input = eventContext.getMessage().getPayload(inputType);
O output = marshal(input);
return output;
}
}
Your flow transformer this will load your needed jaxb during startup.
#Component
public class MyFlowJaxbObj2XmlComponent extends
AbstractMyAppJaxbObj2XmlComponent<RequestPayloadType,String> {
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
//Load your schema during startup
}
}
You can also implement a fluid interface as an alternative for this.
My application is built in MFC.After the application executes I need to open the help file provided with exe.
But as I press F1 application gives an error message saying the file cannot be found. This happens because no such file of that name exist.
One would think how about changing the name of help file itself? well that cannot be done I have to change the path as well.
I need to know how does the function of F1 button work and where can I find the same?
I am using VC++ 6.0 (I know its very old, but I am stuck with it).
Thank you.
To show your specific help file, you have to overwrite CWinApp::OnHelp. The path to the standard help file is stored in CWinApp::m_pszHelpFilePath. In this example, I use my own m_path variable.
void CMyApp::OnHelp()
{
::HtmlHelp(((CMainFrame*)AfxGetMainWnd())->m_hWnd,m_path,HH_DISPLAY_TOPIC,NULL);
}
If I remember correctly, by default it's handled by CWinApp::OnHelp() so take a look at your override of the application class first, you may find the ON_COMMAND handler there.
I had an class that extends CWinApp, so overwriting the OnHelp function worked this way:
In the header:
class MyApp : public CWinApp
{
public:
afx_msg void OnHelp();
}
In the cpp file:
BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(MyApp, CWinApp)
ON_COMMAND(ID_HELP, MyApp::OnHelp)
END_MESSAGE_MAP()
void MyApp::OnHelp()
{
// your own help function
}
I think i understood how CDI works and in order to dive deep in it, i would like to try using it with something real world example. I am stuck with one thing where i need your help to make me understand. I would really appreciate your help in this regard.
I have my own workflow framework developed using Java reflection API and XML configurations where based on specific type of "source" and "eventName" i load appropriate Module class and invoke "process" method on that. Everything is working fine in our project.
I got excited with CDI feature and wanted to give it try with workflow framework where i am planning inject Module class instead of loading them using Reflection etc...
Just to give you an idea, I will try to keep things simple here.
"Message.java" is a kind of Transfer Object which carries "Source" and "eventName", so that we can load module appropriately.
public class Message{
private String source;
private String eventName;
}
Module configurations are as below
<modules>
<module>
<source>A</source>
<eventName>validate</eventName>
<moduleClass>ValidatorModule</moduleClass>
</module>
<module>
<source>B</source>
<eventName>generate</eventName>
<moduleClass>GeneratorModule</moduleClass>
</module>
</modules>
ModuleLoader.java
public class ModuleLoader {
public void loadAndProcess(Message message){
String source=message.getSource();
String eventName=message.getEventName();
//Load Module based on above values.
}
}
Question
Now , if i want to implement same via CDI to inject me a Module (in ModuleLoader class), I can write Factory class with #Produce method , which can do that. BUT my question is,
a) how can pass Message Object to #Produce method to do lookup based on eventName and source ?
Can you please provide me suggestions ?
Thanks in advance.
This one is a little tricky because CDI doesn't work the same way as your custom solution (if I understand it correctly). CDI must have all the list of dependencies and resolutions for those dependencies at boot time, where your solution sounds like it finds everything at runtime where things may change. That being said there are a couple of things you could try.
You could try injecting an InjectionPoint as a parameter to a producer method and returning the correct object, or creating the correct type.
There's also creating your own extension of doing this and creating dependencies and wiring them all up in the extension (take a look at ProcessInjectionTarget, ProcessAnnotatedType, and 'AfterBeanDiscovery` events. These two quickstarts may also help get some ideas going.
I think you may be going down the wrong path regarding a producer. Instead it more than likely would be much better to use an observer especially based on what you've described.
I'm making the assumption that the "Message" transfer object is used abstractly like a system wide event where basically you fire the event and you would like some handler defined in your XML framework you've created to determine the correct manager for the event, instantiate it (if need be), and then call the class passing it the event.
#ApplicationScoped
public class MyMessageObserver {
public void handleMessageEvent(#Observes Message message) {
//Load Module based on above values and process the event
}
}
Now let's assume you want to utilize your original interface (I'll guess it looks like):
public interface IMessageHandler {
public void handleMessage(final Message message);
}
#ApplicationScoped
public class EventMessageHandler implements IMessageHandler {
#Inject
private Event<Message> messageEvent;
public void handleMessage(Message message) {
messageEvent.fire(message);
}
}
Then in any legacy class you want to use it:
#Inject
IMessageHandler handler;
This will allow you to do everything you've described.
May be you need somthing like that:
You need the qualifier. Annotation like #Module, which will take two paramters source and eventName; They should be non qualifier values. See docs.
Second you need a producer:
#Produces
#Module
public Module makeAmodule(InjectionPoint ip) {
// load the module, take source and eventName from ip
}
Inject at proper place like that:
#Inject
#Module(source="A", eventName="validate")
Module modulA;
There is only one issue with that solution, those modules must be dependent scope, otherwise system will inject same module regardles of source and eventName.
If you want to use scopes, then you need make source and eventName qualified parameters and:
make an extension for CDI, register programmatically producers
or make producer method for each and every possible combinations of source and eventName (I do not think it is nice)
I would like to know the best practice for a class oriented DDD.
Since i am doing domain validation in custom setters named ChangeX(string x) i might be pushed to use this as property.
public virtual string example { get;
private set; }
However, that not very good since it disable me from using the object initialization feature such as :
new Object { Example = "Some example"
}
So i though why not passing the custom set into the property set ? like this
public virtual string Example { get {
return Example; } set {
ChangeExample(value); } }
Is this can lead to any problems ? it is against best practices ?
Thanks.
Real problem here is using setters as such. Why do You need them?
When You use setters, You lose isolation - You can modify state of objects from outside w/o them knowing that. That leads to procedural code.
In contrast - You should ask objects to do something (not just modify their state) that would eventually might lead to them changing their own state.
I think this solution is fine. One reason to have setters is to make sure your under laying fields never hold incorrect values.