I know Hierarchical Viewer inherits from Universal Viewer but when to use hierarchical and Universal Viewer in Kentico and what's the main difference between them.
Hierarchical viewer should be used when you want to display some kid of hierarchy, typically it is like displaying the tree structure of the content tree. While the universal viewer displays more flat structure.
Related
In Lotuscript you can manipulate design elements - create them, change them, rename them, etc.
Are you able to do the same thing for Xpages and custom controls design elements?
====================================================================
My question should have been clearer. What I want to accomplish is to copy an existing cc and give it a new name, programatically. The app will then close and reopen (or refresh or get rebuilt) so that the app can "see" the new cc. If I copy the cc it will only have one field on it. I will add custom code later. I could just create a new cc with no code in it, that would work too.
I am not familiar with the DXL exporter but I can research it. Using that can I just export the design of the cc to an XML file in a temp directory, use the transform to change the name, and then import the control?
I think the XPage or Custom Control design elements are probably under MISC_CODE or MISC_FORMAT design elements in a NoteCollection.
However, accessing that design element is the easy part. Doing a create / rename / change etc is a much bigger task.
Remember that the XPage or Custom Control XML file is only a starting point:
XPages and Custom Controls also have a .xsp.metadata file, as you'll see with source control.
Custom Controls will also have (and need) a .xsp-config file.
There are corresponding .java files for every XPage and Custom Control in the Local source folder. They're created by a builder based on parsing the XML. I don't think you'll be able to create those programmatically. I'm not sure of the impact of renaming them.
For Custom Controls, even if you can rename the .java file, it's referenced in the .java files of relevant XPages. Updating those is goiong to be a significant task.
The XPages runtime doesn't even use those .java files. Instead it uses the .class files in WebContent\WEB-INF (you need to use Project Explorer view and modify the filter to see those files). This is compiled byte code, so you won't be able to update the .class files for XPages containing renamed Custom Controls, as far as I know.
Even if you can rename the .class files, the XPages runtime almost certainly won't use them until either a Clean (which will overwrite anything you've done) or an HTTP restart. As far as I can tell they're cached.
Depending on your use cases, it's possible not all these points will be an issue, e.g. if you're modifying the XML files and building with headless designer.
I suspect this is why nothing was added to the NoteCollection object or a specific NotesXPage / NotesCustomControl API class added.
In Lotuscript you can manipulate design elements - create them, change them, rename them, etc.
This is only partially true. There is a LS API to create/alter views and outlines. Good luck with other design elements - although they're standard "notes", so you can access their items, in most cases you won't compile them and there will be some problems with signatures (real experience with TeamStudio CIAO).
Your question has two points of view - do you want to alter design elements in design process or alter running application?
To help a designer you can go the way of Eclipse extensions and enrich tools in IBM Designer to help developer. Something like TeamStudio Designer. In this case you need to look for source design elements, mentioned by Paul.
To enrich application you don't need to alter source design elements. IBM Designer transforms XML in source code to a Java code (JSF framework) - so you can generate your Java code from anything you wish. Take a look inside Local\xsp folder of NSF in Package explorer. You will find Java sources made from your XPages and Custom Controls. So if you don't need to work with design elements, go for Java components - they can be built on the fly.
And of course, there is always the option of DXL framework - so you can clone/alter design of the application through XML transformations. Good starting point: http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/ddwiki.nsf/dx/ls-design-programming.htm
Something I've been wondering. Is there a best practice or rule of thumb on how to store your images? I see 3 ways currently:
Site Collection Images
Images library
Style Library/Images
My rule of thumb has been: if you have only 1 site collection for your project, then use the Site Collection Images. Otherwise, create a folder structure like: /Style Library//images.
What is the difference between Site Collection images and the Images library?
Images lib provides a thumb view by default while the Style lib/images just treat images as files.
Site collection images? I think it's just another name of the Style lib/images of the top site.
Site Collection Images is a carry-over document library from the 2007 Publishing Feature. It's a document library but with multiple content types assigned to it (Image, Audio, Video). There's a thumbnail view associated with some of the content types so you get a nice preview of an image.
Images is a new library called and Asset library but in reality and behind the scenes, it's exactly the same as the old Site Collection Images document library with the three custom content types assigned to it. The only difference I can see is the icon used for the library.
Style Library is just a regular document library with no content types associated with it. It's created as part of the Publishing feature and pre-populated with some basic images, css files, and xsl style sheets (that are used with the DataView Web Part).
My standard (if you want to call it that is this).
A new folder for your site in the Style Library (sitename) with subfolders of "css", "js", and "img". The reason for this naming is that some libraries, plugins, and other addons will look for this type of structure (with CSS doing a relative path to an "img" folder to look for images). So it keeps things compact and identifable.
I choose to put CSS, JavaScript and Images here rather than creating separate libraries for it all. CSS is for (obviously) style sheets. JS is for javascript. This would include jquery (in the root js folder) or jQuery plugins (in a separate folder for each plugin). IMG is for CSS icons, system icons (e.g. twitter badges, etc.). I find this layout just handy and doesn't hurt anything keeping it all together.
I put regular photo content into Site Collection Images since a) it gets automatically populated when you create a publishing site or activate the feature and b) it's easy to find when inserting pictures into a rich content field. I'll just hide or tell the users to ignore the Images library (it can't be deleted because it's part of the Publishing Feature).
Hope that helps. YMMV.
I'd add that the style library is also different in that it's contents are readable by all users even if you have removed their permissions to the library or an item within the library.
What is a Collada scene graph?
Can I take a scene that I've downloaded from Google 3D warehouse and somehow convert it to a Collada scene graph?
Does the process somehow segment the scene?
COLLADA is the standard XML description language available for most if not all 3D applications. Google Earth is using COLLADA for the 3D models placed on to of the earth. Google Sketchup can import and export COLLADA models. Google Warehouse offer most if not all models in the COLLADA format. Google KMZ format is a ZIP file that contains COLLADA (.DAE) files(s), textures, and GIS placement information.
XML is a text based format, so you can look into a COLLADA document with any text editor, although a XML editor is highly recommended for large files, or for easier navigation. COLLADA is defined by its specification (in English and Japanese) and its Schema (.xsd) which enable COLLADA documents to be tested for validation by standard XML tools. Editors such as 'daenotepad' available on github will also provide help editing COLLADA documents based on the information stored in the schema.
A COLLADA document contains many different elements, one of the element is the < visual_scene > which contains the instance of geometries withing the the visual scene organized in a tree of locations. That is what is often referred incorrectly as the 'scene graph'. A scene graph is a run-time technology used by a lot of 3D rendering engines, which is similar to the but has many active run-time attributes such as 'switch' 'Level of detail' 'script' ... which COLLADA is not defining. COLLADA is merely defining the necessary data for enabling any applications, scene graph based or not, modeling tools or graphics engines to find the information they need a and communicate back and forth.
I have a SharePoint list and I need to transform it into a document (any type) and export it to PDF. Would you have any tips on the best way to do this? I have Crystal Reports but not sure if this is the correct use case for this.
You can programatically access the document library using the object model or via web services.
If you use the object model. You can use the SPContext object to get the current site/list. From there, you can iterate through the items or, you can use a method on the SPList object to turn it into a dataset which you could then use to generate a PDF using some kind of PDF library (e.g. PDF4NET). If you go this route the best way to roll it out is by packaging it up as a feature in a solution file (.WSP) which you can deploy to your farm. In this case the code would be running in the share point environment. You can get pretty fancy with this and have something like a "Print PDF" menu option in the action menu for all lists.
On the other hand, you could also access the list remotely using the web services. In such a case you could just use this as a data provider for your reporting package.
The PDFsharepoint tool (http://www.pdfsharepoint.com) can be used to generate the PDF output. Nice thing about this tool is that you will "design" or "import" a template using WYSIWYG editor and only map the data. Without mess of coding your own PDF generator. It is not free tool though ...
I have had much success using MS-Access for creating PDF reports from SharePoint lists. You can even embed the report as a view in the list. When you select the view, it opens Access for you. Plus you can join multiple lists and even other data from within access.
Access 2007 will save a report as a PDF or you can use a PDF printer adapter such as PDFCreator.
The easiest way to export SharePoint list to pdf is, first export the list as Excel file. Then save the Excel file as Pdf document.
There is a 3rd Party product that automates this.
i-PMO's "SharePoint Data Miner" can be used to create a RS Report across any list data, then use the their SharePoint site Report Viewer and Document publisher to output the report as a PDF into a Document Library.
I'm trying to build a form for WSS 3.0 which has the following two characteristics:
Have several sub-records in each records which contains few specific fields.
Can export to HTML or something similar which can be viewed in every browser.
I realize (unless I'm mistaken) I can achieve 1 only by using InfoPath and RepeatingSection/RepeatingTable/etc.
As for 2, I see InfoPath is only capable for exporting to MHT/PDF/XLS, none ideal for me, since the goal is to create a something that can be published to the web.
Any hints about better way to achieve this?
Correction for 2: I meant that the InfoPath form should be editable within our intranet, but exported as a read-only-web-page for our web site. So I meant "exporting" and not "publishing".
One way to do this would be to use a database as the primary data source for your forms, so that all form data is saved there. You could then build a website that queries the database for all info.
Another alternative would be to take the infopath form data (saved as an xml file) and publish it on a web server with an XML Style Sheet to define its format. You could do this via an XML control in ASP.net.
These solutions might require more elbow grease than some other solution, but I believe either would work.
Perhaps creating a custom fieldtype is a possiblity. Create a fieldtype that has some kind of collection as value.
As for 2, I see InfoPath is only
capable for exporting to MHT/PDF/XLS,
none ideal for me, since the goal is
to create a something that can be
published to the web
That's not right, InfoPath forms can be published to the web. When publishing the form to the SharePoint via the InfoPath client, you can select an option saying that this form should be editable within a browser. But beware that some form features of InfoPath are not available when you do that.
Or do you have a different understanding of "can be published to the web"? For me it means, creating a new item in the library to which the InfoPath form is attached to --> Form is opened in the browser --> user fills in the form --> user klicks the save button --> info path document is saved to the library and closed.
Just an idea:
If InfoPath (along with MOSS) is not an option, then perhaps you could mimic its behaviour through a custom edit form, if you want the data to be outputted into a SP list. I'm thinking about a custom edit form with dynamic html controls (for the sub-records), and you can achieve this by dynamically inserting objects into the DOM as your tree structure requires. Then, on form submit, an event handler on the list would parse the data submitted by the form and store it as you see fit (in an xml serialized in a custom field, for example).
If it's not going the be a custom edit form for a list, then the same functionality above can be stored in a site page with code-behind (beware of customizations) and use a hidden SP list as your data storage.
As for the exporting section, perhaps an application page linked in the ECB menu of that list would get the above mentioned xml and display it nicely.