I created my first Chrome Store app and submitted it for review. I was forced to provide my street mailing address and on previewing my app in the Chrome Store it shows my mailing address to the world. I am not too happy about that. Is there any way NOT to have my mailing address on the Chrome Store? I am not a business, just an individual. It worries my that some nut job might show up at my house, or mail me some hate mail.
Related
I have multiple products on Amazon that are being purchased. What I would like to find out is how the buyer found the item on Amazon. Did the buyer search on Amazon? Did the buyer follow a link from a Facebook Post or Tweet?
Is there anyway to retrieve this or any similar information? I don't care if it's from Reports, the MWS API, or anywhere else.
I found an article from 2012 that claims this functionality wasn't available at that time. But perhaps things have changed.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/suwcharmananderson/2012/01/11/amazon-should-give-self-publishers-more-data/#5b1bf155368e
Amazon has no control over how someone may access a particular page. This is more or less inherent in the nature of the internet, where from any location, you can link directly to a website. Furthermore, your browser doesn't 'pass forward' so to speak your browsing history to the Amazon, so it would have no data to record in this regard.
There are certainly methods of tracking this, for instance, if you have a special link that is ONLY posted on facebook, and the link simply records the click, and forwards you to the actual listing, but that would require controlled dissemination of website links, which is basically impossible.
So.. to answer your question, it is theoretically possible, and exceedingly improbably that this information is available.
I want to build an extension on Google Chrome which functions will be forwarding address illicit websites that email to parents, which prohibited it site address using DNS Nawala or something similar, with the extension prevents the expected negative impact of the use of the internet.
What are the steps that I did in building this extension ?
Thank you.
This is a very broad "how do I create my entire project" question, but I'll try to give you some broad advice:
An extension alone will not be enough for this. You're going to need a web service as well. You'll likely need to divide the project into two parts:
A Chrome extension that monitors the websites a person visits. You can do this by using the Tab API. Simply look at each site the user has visited and if they visit any of the illicit sites on a blacklist, take an action, probably by making an API call to the web service mentioned below.
You're almost certainly going to need to use a web service developed with a scripting language like PHP or Java, or something similar. This web service would take care of sending the emails to parents. If we're just talking about sending an email to one parent than this service could be quite simple. The extension would tell the web service to send an email when an illicit site is visited, and that's about it. If you're talking about a commercial project then this service would probably need to be a full fledged website that allows parents to sign up for these emails.
Again, this is a very broad question, and generally speaking Stackoverflow is more for asking specific programming questions. But hopefully this will get you moving in the right direction at least, so you can come back and ask more specific questions. :-)
Backstory: I work at a place where we use Gmail for our business email system. We sell things online, provide a phone number, chat, and email for customer service. We can pull statistics from our phone and chat records, but not email.
This is where Gmail Meter comes into play. We installed it hoping to gain more insight into the statistics of our emails. We did, but some of the numbers seem to be off.
Can anyone explain the backend workings of GMeter a bit in hopes to explain why our numbers appear off?
Also, I looked in the gmail admin panel and the Reports tab only appears to give a high level overview of all accounts, not specific ones, such as Total Mail Usage, User Activity, Total Email Accounts, and Usage.
I'm Ryan from the Gmail Meter team. We understand there are some bugs right now, so not everyone's data is being analyzed properly. It seems some parameters are set up for a couple days' worth, instead of a weeks' worth, of counting.
Feel free to shoot me an email and I'll send you an update when we get it fixed.
Thanks for bringing this to attention!
ryan#shuttlecloud.com
i trying make an internet voting service but the problem is internet is just so easy to cheat by creating multiple accounts and vote same thing. capcha and email is not helping as take just 3 second to pass by human. IP can be changed by proxy. if we put some cookie on voter browser he just clean it next time.
i created this question to ask help for methods we can use with basic futures that all browsers have (javascript etc)to prevent our service being cheated easily.
the first idea i have myself is that possible my website access all cookies user have on his browser by just visiting my site ? because when they clean everything by CCleaner for new accounts then i can understand the browser is empty so the person is perhaps a cheater as most of real users when come to my site always have at least several cookie from different sites
There is no way to address the issue of uniquely identifying real-world assets (here: humans) without stepping out of your virtual system, by definition.
There are various ways to ensure a higher reliability of the mapping "one human to exactly one virtual identity", but none of them is fool-proof.
The most accessible way would be to do it via a smartphone app. A human usually only has one smartphone (and a phone number).
Another way is to send them snail mail to their real address, with a secret code, which you require them to enter in your virtual system.
or the social insurance number
or their fingerprints as log in credentials
The list could go on, but the point is, these things are bound to the physical world. If you combine more such elements, you get a higher accuracy (but never 100% certainty).
The talk of internet town today is the SNAFU that led to dozens of Facebook users being led by Google search to an article on ReadWriteWeb about the Facebook-AOL deal. What ensued in the comments tread is quickly becoming the stuff of internet legend.
However, behind the hilarity is a scary fact that this might be how users browse to all sites, including their banking and other more important sites. A quick search for "my bank website login" and quickly click the first result. Once they are there, the user is willing to submit their credentials even though the site looks nothing like the site they tried to reach. (This is evidenced by the fact that user's comments are connected to their facebook accounts via facebook-connect)
Preventing this scenario is pretty much out of our control and educating our users on the basics of internet browsing may be just as impossible. So how then can we ensure that users know they are on the correct web site before trying to log in? Is something like Bank of America's SiteKey sufficient, or is that another cop-out that shifts responsibility back on the user?
The Internet and web browsers used to have a couple of cool features that might actually have some applicability there.
One was something called "domain names." Instead entering the website name over on the right site of your toolbar, there was another, larger text field on the left where you could enter it. Rather than searching a proprietary Google database running on vast farms of Magic 8-Balls, this arcane "address" field consulted an authoritative registry of "domain names", and would lead you to the right site every time. Sadly, it sometimes required you to enter up to 8 extra characters! This burden was too much for most users to shoulder, and this cumbersome feature has been abandoned.
Another thing you used to see in browsers was something called a "bookmark." Etymologists are still trying to determine where the term "bookmark" originated. They suspect it has something to do with paper with funny squiggles on it. Anyway, these bookmarks allowed users to create a button that would take them directly to the web site of interest. Of course, creating a bookmark was a tedious, intimidating process, sometimes requiring as many as two menu clicks—or worse yet, use of the Ctrl-key!
Ah, the wonders of the ancients.
The site could "personalize" itself by showing some personal information,
easy recognizable by the user, on every page.
There are plenty of ways to implement it. The obvious one:
under first visit, the site requires user to upload some avatar,
and adds user's id to the cookies. After that, every time the user browses
the site, the avatar is shown.
When I set up my online bank account, it asked me to choose from a selection of images. The image I chose is now shown to me every time I login. This assures me that I am on the right website.
EDIT: i just read the link about the BoA SiteKey, this is apparently the same thing (it sounded from the name like a challenge-response dongle)
I suppose the best answer would be a hardware device which required a code from the bank and the user and authenticated both. But any of these things assume that people are actually thinking about the problem, which of course they don't. This was going on before internet banking was common - I had a friend who had her wallet stolen back in the 90s, and theif phoned her pretending to be her bank and persuaded her to reveal her PIN...
When the user first visits the site and logs in, he can share some personal information (even something very trivial) that imposter sites couldn't possible know - high school mascot, first street lived on, etc.
If there's ever any question of site authenticity, the site could share this information back to the user.
Like on TV shows/movies with the evil twin. The good twin always wins trust by sharing a secret that only the person who's trying to figure out who the good twin is would know.
You cannot prevent phishing per-se but you can take several steps each of which do a little bit to mitigate the problem.
1) If you have something like site-key or a sign-in seal, please ensure that these cannot be iframed on a malicious website. Just javascript framebusting may not be enough as IE has security="restricted".
2) Be very consistent about how you ask for user credentials - serve the login form over SSL (not just post-back over SSL). Do not ask for login on several places or sites. Encourage third parties who want to work with user data stored on your site to use OAuth (instead of taking your user's password).
3) You should never ask for information via email (with or without link).
4) Have a security page where you talk about these issues.
5) Send notification on changes to registered phone, email, etc.
Apart from above, monitor user account activity - such as changes to contact information, security Q&A, access, etc (noting time, ip, and there are several subtle techniques).