I have an app using Auth0, made with ReactJS and NodeJS. Things are working fine for the most part.
The design is such that we decorate each request with an admin flag, and I have the Auth0 profile encoded in my JWT token.
This way I can do things like:
server.route({
method: 'POST',
url: '/.../...',
preValidation: server.authenticate,
handler: async (req, res) => {
const { user } = req;
if (!user['admin']) {
...
}
...
}
});
I am happy, with this approach, except for one problem that I have not resolved. How to deal with a request coming from the user to update their own profile. After the profile is updated, JWT stays the same and has outdated profile information.
Can anything be done about this, short of logging users out on each profile update? Is there a way to update JWT without ending the session?
This is practically impossible as it defeats the purpose of statelessness of jwts. However, in this particular usecase, after the profile is updated, you can create a new jwt and add it as part of the response, so the client picks up on the new token and uses it for further requests
Based on my research, the solution is to:
Repeat the login automatically after each profile update or notify the end-user that and let them choose if they want to repeat the login.
Related
I'm working on an Ionic application.
On the one hand I have an auth basic form in which people fill in their username and password. On the other hand I'd like to implement authentification with JSON Web Tokens and Node JS.
The workflow would be this one : as soon as a user fills in his credentials, they will be sent with a POST request. If these credentials are correct, the user can access to the application and gets an access token as a response.
The thing is that I'm a little bit lost with all that concepts. I built a form and sent informations with a POST request. I managed to create some APIs with Node JS and that's ok. I see how to build a authentified webservice too (e.g : https://github.com/jkasun/stack-abuse-express-jwt/blob/master/auth.js).
But I concretely don't understand the links between the html form and the authorisation check part..
To be clearer, how is it possible to make the html part and the Node JS scripts communicate together ?
Before posting that question I made many researches and found many stuff on building an authentified API. But there was very few advice on how to make it communicate with the client part (I mean the form), which is what I have to do.
If anyone has any ressources (document, Github examples..) on that, I'll greatly appreciate. But I would be very happy too if someone try to make me understand these concepts. I guess I have to improve my knowledge on all that so that I could test some POCs.
Many thanks in advance !
JWT General flow:
1- Authenticate using a strategy (You done it)
2- Deliver an accessToken along with response (You done it)
3- The client MUST store this accessToken (LocalStorage is the best place, not cookies: They are vulnerable to csrf attacks)
4- On every request you are going to make to a protected area (where user is supposed to be authenticated and authorized), make sure to send you accessToken along with it, you can put it on Authorization header, a custom header, directly in body of the request... Basicaly just make sure to send it properly.
5- On the server receiving client requests, you NEED to verify that token (You verify it by checking the signature of the accessToken).
6- If he is authorized, great, if not, send back an HTTP Unauthorized Error.
Here is my implementation using an accessToken on a header + passportjs-jwt:
Client code
To store token:
localStorage.setItem('accessToken', myAccessToken);
To send it:
const myAccessToken = localStorage.getItem('accessToken');
{
headers: {'Authorization', `Bearer ${myAccessToken}`}
}
Server code
1- Configure passport
passport.use('jwt', new JwtStrategy({
jwtFromRequest: jwtPassport.ExtractJwt.fromAuthHeaderAsBearerToken(),
secretOrKey: myAccessTokenSecret,
passReqToCallback: true
}, (req, payload, done: (err?, user?) => void): void {
User
.findOne({where: {id: req.params.id}})
.then((user: User) => {
if (!user) {
return done(new Error(`No user found with id: ${req.params.id}`), null);
}
return done(null, user);
})
.catch((e: Error) => done(e, null));
}));
Pay attention to callback: If your callback is called, it means that passport has successfuly verified the token (It is valid). In my example, i get the user details in database and this is the user that will be returned and put in req.user object passed to my controller below:
2- Finally, the controller route (protected area):
.get('/users/:id', passport.authenticate('jwt'), (req, res, next) => {
// do stuff in protected area.
}
And that's it. If you want more security, check refreshTokens implementation.
I used passport because i found it relevant in my case, but you can write your own handler, by using jsonwebtoken and just calling its "verify" function.
You can find documentation of passport jwt strategy here => http://www.passportjs.org/packages/passport-jwt/
So I'm currently learning/building a REST API backend server for my web application using NodeJS, ExpressJS and JWT as the authentication. My query is regarding the best practice to identify the owner of the JWT token in the server without having to send a payload from the web application - as this limits the use of the GET HTTP method which I don't want to do.
You may ask why do I want to identify the owner of the JWT token, well all of the example tutorials from which I have learnt from have all taken the user to be the object required, which makes sense to simply have an endpoint saying GET /user/:userId. However for other user specific endpoints, such as a blog post, I really don't want to resort to GET /user/:userId/blog/:id and hence the pickle I'm in.
It is possible that I am overthinking this and that the simplest solution is staring me in my face - to which I apologise. But I have thought about a few ideas, including the one I am currently using, and I would like your feedback on it or if there is a better way of doing it.
Scenario: User is already logged in and they would like to view their blog at the endpoint GET /blog/:id but the server needs to validate that the user have access to view that blog
1. Pass the user id inside the header (The one I'm currently using)
This is probably the simplest way to do it. I simply include the User ID inside the headers.
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
Authorization: `Bearer ${jwtToken}`,
UserId: userId
}
Is it good practice to enforce the need of sending additional data inside the header for all calls to the server, and more importantly is it safe to do so?
2. Force all endpoints to include /user/:userId
Another simple one so that it becomes GET /user/:userId/blog/:id. While this is fine, I just feel icky with the solution. But if this is considered the common practice, then so be it.
3. Cache the token against the user ID
This is probably the "best" solution I can think of as it additionally serves as a another layer of authentication, and also easily identifies the owner of the token. However it adds another layer of complexity to the server which is fine if necessary, but I always feel that less is better.
4. Temporarily save the token in the DB
Similar to the number 3, and is probably even easier than having to add a caching layer. However I don't know if there are any implications of using the DB as a temporary storage.
So that's where I'm currently at. I very much appreciate your time and response. Thank you in advance.
The user id is normally encoded in the JWT token and the JWT middleware then sets the attribute request.user.
when user login , from backend you have to provide jwt token :
jwt.sign(payload,JWT_SECRET_KEY,{ expiresIn: JWT_EXPIRATION },(err, token) => {
res.json({
success: true,
token: 'Bearer ' + token
});
});
now from frontend side you have to save this token inside cookie or localStorage
now when you have to access data which requires user id , for that you have to pass below headers in request :
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": `Bearer ${jwtToken}`,
}
now you have to define route that requires user id like below :
router.get('/user', passport.authenticate('jwt', { session: false }),controllers.auth.user);
and you can simply get user information in req.user
code for controllers.auth.user :
module.exports=(req,res)=>{
res.json({
user:req.user
});
}
passport middleware will handle request that requires user is
authenticated or not , if user is authenticated you can get user in
req.user
passport.authenticate('jwt', { session: false })
I currently have a webapp I'm writing in Node/Vuejs with Passport handling authentication, and I've run into a problem. I was thinking about how I have authentication currently set up and I realized I had a glaring security hole.
In short, I have my Vuex store hitting a local API endpoint /api/me. That endpoint does a simple return of req.user. For the sake of brevity, a typical response looks like this:
{
username: 'Bob',
roles: [] // normal user has no roles,
email: 'someguy#bob.com'
}
My admin route /admin has a beforeEnter check, as shown below, that incorporates this check using the Vuex store, so I can have a cached version of user data accessible on the frontend.
{
path: '/admin',
name: '/admin',
component: Admin,
beforeEnter: (to, from, next) => {
store.dispatch('getMe').then(() => {
if (store.getters.user.roles && store.getters.user.roles.includes('administrator')) {
next();
return;
}
next({ path: '/' });
});
}
}
Here's the thing though - I realized that someone could easily game the system. In fact, I tried it myself with a test, non-Adminstrator account, and I was able to get in by returning the following from a local server set up for this purpose in Postman:
{
username: 'Super Admin Joe',
roles: ['administrator'] // normal user has no roles,
email: 'admin#bob.com'
}
And viola! The user now has full access to admin pages.
My question is, how could I prevent against this?
I need to check that the user is authenticated on every page, but a potential attacker could quite easily proxy any request (in this case it's /api/me) to make themselves any user they want. They can login normally with their own account, open the Network tab and copy the response payload, then change the user data as they wish. There needs to be some sort of encryption between the frontend and backend when checking a users' logged-in status, I believe.
I tried thinking about how I could prevent this from happening, but anything on my end (server-side, at least) seems useless as any request could easily be redirected to an attacker's local machine.
Any advice on how to "sign" my requests to make sure they aren't being proxied? Thanks in advance!
You shouldn’t have to be signing the response body of an api request. The typical way to do authentication is to establish a signed session cookie that acts either as an identifier to session information in an external database, or contains session information itself. This cookie should be in the header of your response and passport should give you a way to administer this cookie without you even realizing it.
This way the user can’t tamper with the information sent from the server in a way that’s easy to detect, and since it’s a cookie it will automatically be sent with each request by your browser (although if you’re using some AJAX library you may have to explicitly specify you’d like to send the cookie). What MadEard was referring to in the comment is where the cookie information is able to be accessed using passprt which is the ‘user’ property in the ‘req’ object.
After reading your github files:
server.get("/admin", function(req, res){
if(req.user && req.user.roles.includes("administrator")){
//user is an administrator, render the admin panel view
}else{
//is not an admin, redirect or send error message
}
});
In every Express route, after authentication with Passport, you have the req.user object.
It is established by checking the request cookie connect.sid, and checking which session this cookie belongs to on the server.
As such, you can trust that in any Express route, the object req.user contains the information relevant to that cookie and you can act upon it.
A little note: doing server-side validation should become a reflex for you over time.
The client is meant to display information. If, at any point, you are making the client take any decision that could be a security liability, take a step back and think it again.
I am new to Next.js and I am struggling with the authentication system using jwt token. I want to know what is the best / standard way to store the jwt token and routing with the authentication system. I have been trying different approaches, from different tutorials/articles, but do not quite understand it. Here are what I have tried.
When the user login, it sends username/password to a separated API server (ex. new project that handles backend stuff), the server will respond with the access-token, then in Next.js project, I set the cookie with that received token. In Next.js project, protected routes will be wrapped with a withAuth hoc, which will check for the token in a cookie. The problem with this approach is that it is vulnerable to XSS because the cookie has no httpOnly flag.
This is similar to 1.) but using localStorage, the problem is access-token could not be sent to the server on the first request. (This one I'm not sure, but in my understanding, in every HTTP request, I must stick my access-token manually, so what about requests that I have no control over? ex. first request or using <a> tag).
I wrote authentication backend inside Next.js server (custom express server). When the user login, the server will validate it and then set an httpOnly cookie. Then the problem is, with client-side routing (go to URL using Next.js Router), it could not check for token. For example, if a page is wrapped with withAuth hoc, but it cannot access the token inside cookies with javascript.
And I've seen a lot of people, in getInitialProps of the protected route, they only check for existence token in cookie / localStorage, then what if the token is being revoked or blacklisted, how do they handle it because they did not send the token to the server? Or do I have to send the token to the server in every client-side page change?
Since we are on quarantine I have enough time to answer this question. It will be a long answer.
Next.js uses the App component to initialize the pages. _app page is responsible for rendering our pages. We authenticate users on _app.js because anything that we return from getInitialProps can be accessed by all of the other pages. We authenticate user here, authentication decision will be passed to pages, from pages to header, so each page can decide if the user is authenticated or not. (Note that it could be done with redux without prop drilling but it would make the answer more complex)
static async getInitialProps({ Component, router, ctx }) {
let pageProps = {};
const user = process.browser
? await auth0.clientAuth()
: await auth0.serverAuth(ctx.req); // I explain down below
//this will be sent to all the components
const auth = { user, isAuthenticated: !!user };
if (Component.getInitialProps) {
pageProps = await Component.getInitialProps(ctx);
}
return { pageProps, auth };
}
render() {
const { Component, pageProps, auth } = this.props;
return <Component {...pageProps} auth={auth} />;
}
}
If we are on the browser and need to check if a user is authenticated, we just retrieve the cookie from the browser, which is easy. But we always have to verify the token. It is the same process used by browser and server. I will explain down below. But if we are on the server. we have no access to the cookies in the browser. But we can read from the "req" object because cookies are attached to the req.header.cookie. this is how we access to cookies on the server.
async serverAuth(req) {
// console.log(req.headers.cookie) to check
if (req.headers.cookie) {
const token = getCookieFromReq(req, "jwt");
const verifiedToken = await this.verifyToken(token);
return verifiedToken;
}
return undefined;
}
here is getCookieFromReq(). remember we have to think functional.
const getCookieFromReq = (req, cookieKey) => {
const cookie = req.headers.cookie
.split(";")
.find((c) => c.trim().startsWith(`${cookieKey}=`));
if (!cookie) return undefined;
return cookie.split("=")[1];
};
Once we get the cookie, we have to decode it, extract the expiration time to see if it is valid or not. this part is easy. Another thing we have to check is if the signature of the jwt is valid. Symmetric or asymmetric algorithms are used to sign the jwt. You have to use private keys to validate the signature of symmetric algorithms. RS256 is the default asymmetric algorithms for APIs. Servers that use RS256, provide you with a link to get jwt to use the keys to validate the signature. You can either use [jwks-rsa][1] or you can do on your own. You have to create a certificate and then verify if the token is valid.
Assume that our user authenticated now. You said, "And I've seen a lot of people, in getInitialProps of the protected route, they only check for existence token in cookie / localStorage,". We use protected routes to give access only to the authorized users. In order to access those routes, users have to show their jwt tokens and express.js uses middlewares to check if the user's token is valid. Since you have seen a lot of examples, I will skip this part.
"then what if the token is being revoked or blacklisted, how do they handle it because they did not send the token to the server? Or do I have to send the token to a server in every client-side page changing?"
with verifying token process we are 100% sure if the token is valid or not. When a client asks the server to access some secret data, the client has to send the token to the server. Imagine when you mount the component, component asks the server to get some data from the protected routes. The server will extract the req object, take the jwt and use it to fetch data from the protected routes. Implementation of the fetching data for browser and server are different. And if the browser makes a request, it just needs the relative path but the server needs an absolute path. As you should know fetching data is done getInitialProps() of the component and this function executed on both client and server. here is how you should implement it. I just attached the getInitialProps() part.
MyComponent.getInitialProps = async (ctx) => {
const another = await getSecretData(ctx.req);
//reuslt of fetching data is passed to component as props
return { superValue: another };
};
const getCookieFromReq = (req, cookieKey) => {
const cookie = req.headers.cookie
.split(";")
.find((c) => c.trim().startsWith(`${cookieKey}=`));
if (!cookie) return undefined;
return cookie.split("=")[1];
};
const setAuthHeader = (req) => {
const token = req ? getCookieFromReq(req, "jwt") : Cookies.getJSON("jwt");
if (token) {
return {
headers: { authorization: `Bearer ${token}` },
};
}
return undefined;
};
export const getSecretData = async (req) => {
const url = req ? "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/secret" : "/api/v1/secret";
return await axios.get(url, setAuthHeader(req)).then((res) => res.data);
};
[1]: https://www.npmjs.com/package/jwks-rsa
With the introduction of Next.JS v8, there are examples placed in the NextJS example page. The basic idea to follow is:
JWT
Using cookies to store the token (you may choose to further encrypt it or not)
Sending the cookies as authorization headers
OAuth
Using a third-party authentication service such as OAuth2.0
Using Passport
This question might need an updated answer, now middlewares are there in Next.js 12 (october 2021): https://nextjs.org/docs/middleware
I am drafting a comprehensive answer to explain auth in Next.js more deeply, you can follow the progress there on GitHub
Here I'll try to propose a summary for Next.js, using middlewares.
Verifying the token after auth and redirecting accordingly
Most of the answer from #Yilmaz from april 2020 is still relevant. However, previously, we had to use getInitialProps in _app to process the request OR a custom server.
This is no longer the case.. Using a middleware let's you achieve a similar purpose, with cleaner code. Because middleware are specifically designed for such use cases.
Here, I suppose you get a JWT access token using an asymetrical algorithm like RS256, exactly like in this previous answer.
Here is a possible implementation:
import { NextFetchEvent, NextRequest, NextResponse } from "next/server";
const removeCookie = (res: NextResponse, cookieName: string) => {
res.headers.append("Set-Cookie", `${cookieName}=; Max-Age=-1; Path=/`);
return res;
};
export default async function middleware(
req: NextRequest,
ev: NextFetchEvent
) {
const { pathname } = req.nextUrl;
const isPublic = isPublicRoute(pathname);
if (isPublic) {
return NextResponse.next();
}
const accessToken = req.cookies[TOKEN_PATH];
if (!accessToken) {
return NextResponse.redirect(LOGIN_HREF);
}
const isValidToken = await checkAccessToken(accessToken);
if (!isValidToken) {
let res = NextResponse.redirect(LOGIN_HREF);
res = removeCookie(res, TOKEN_PATH);
return res;
}
return NextResponse.next();
}
How to verify the token
In my example, the checkAccessToken should verify the token (not decode, verify the signature).
This is where things are the most complicated imo.
When using the RSA256 algorithm
You also get a PUBLIC certificate (in addition to the SECRET key that must be... kept secret). Eventhough you do the check in the middleware, which is private and server-only code, that's good news because it means you could even use it in the browser, in theory.
So, you can either fetch the token validation endpoint provided by your auth server, or verify the token yourself.
Fetching is not the recommended option because it might break Vercel/Next edge capabilities and add latency, according to the documentation.
I must admit that I did not succeed to verify the token yet using Next.js :) I'll update this answer if I manage to have a code sample that works.
When using a symmetrical encryption
You have only a PRIVATE secret passphrase. It means that the decoding have to happen server-side (good news, you are writing a middleware).
Login/logout
This doesn't change with middlewares. You store your access token as an httpOnly cookie. When logging out, you unset this cookie.
Managing those Set-Cookies headers are the responsibility of your auth server.
This is a basic workflow but it should work. You can then add a refresh token in the mix with a similar approach.
About token revokation
If you verify the token in your middleware, there is no immediate revokation mechanism for the access token. Because there is no call to a database.
Therefore, in this scenario, you'd want to opt-in for short lived access token (eg 5 minutes) coupled with a refresh token. You can revoke the refresh token, so basically revoking works but takes a few minutes.
If a 3rd party server verifies the token: then it could check for blacklisted tokens.
Caveats
Also, some piece of advice: most articles, tutorials etc. online are focused on server-to-server communication. Or client-to-API. They completely suck when it comes to check authentication before accessing web pages.
For instance, setting the Authorization header is not possible in the browser. It works only when communicating with an API. Cookies are mandatory for web pages.
Even then, if this API is meant to be called from a browser, it should preferably accept a cookie.
When discussing with experts on the field, you need to always clarify the Next.js use case.
Open questions: about session-based authentication
Some frameworks seem to prefer relying on the database. They store a hashed token in the db, which acts as a session. If you want to check auth, you need a server that will check the user's token against the stored token (= checking that there is an active session with this token).
I am thinking of Meteor for instance.
I couldn't find the name of this mechanism and its actual relation to JWT however. Are they simply variations of the JWT approach?
Next.js official authentication doc is not showing middlewares at the time of writing, but instead use getServerSideProps. I really don't like this pattern.
It uses a kind of session system but I am not clear about the internals of it, I am not even sure of the name (is that session-based auth?).
Vercel edge handles examples shows how to secure an API route, but not a page (at the time of writing)
Using Asana's NodeJS module (https://github.com/Asana/node-asana) with OAuth, how should I handle expiration of the access_token? Does the client provide some mechanism that I should use to detect this? Does it provide something I should use to get a new access_token using the refresh_token? I haven't been able to find any discussion of the refresh_token in the documentation.
I've registered my app and I'm able to successfully get credentials using the Client.app.accessTokenFromCode API. Something like this:
function handleOauthCallback(req, res) {
var client = Asana.Client.create({
clientId: CLIENT_ID,
clientSecret: CLIENT_SECRET,
redirectUri: computeRedirectUrl(req)
});
client.app.accessTokenFromCode(req.query.code).then(function(credentials) {
// store credentials
}
}
I'm storing the entire credentials object that comes back from this call and later creating a client using those credentials. Something like this:
var client = Asana.Client.create({
clientId: CLIENT_ID,
clientSecret: CLIENT_SECRET,
redirectUri: computeRedirectUrl(req)
});
var storedCredentials = getStoredCredentials();
client.useOauth({ credentials : storedCredentials });
Now that I've got a client that's initialized with the credentials I got back from Asana (which includes an access_token and refresh_token), how should I handle expiration of the access_token? Do I need to check whether it's still valid myself and ask for a new token using the refresh token? Or will the client handle it for me automatically? If the client handles it, how do I find out when it gets a new access token?
Update
Reading the code, it appears that the client will try to use the refresh token if the access token is no longer valid. But I don't see any kind of notification that I can hook into to find out that there's a new access token. Is there a recommended strategy to handle this?
(I work at Asana). This is a great question, and we should add answers to the documentation.
The dispatcher can be passed an option called handleUnauthorized which is a callback to run when it gets a 401 (which if you started with good credentials should only happen when your token expires). It's documented in the code.
The default behavior of this option is to call Dispatcher.maybeReauthorize, which will make the backend request to get a new access token if it has a refresh token.
So if you just want the dispatcher to transparently refresh the access token, you don't need to do anything, it should "just work"! But if you want to intercept this process, you can pass handleUnauthorized in the dispatch options and then do whatever you want, possibly including calling the default method.
If you want to see the new access token, well .. the Authenticator class is abstract and we haven't provided a robust way to extract credentials from it; maybe we can add that. If you really need this, you could assume it's the oauth flavor with something like:
handleUnauthorized: function() {
return Dispatcher.maybeReauthorize.call(dispatcher).then(
function(reauthorized) {
if (reauthorized) {
onCredentials(dispatcher.authenticator.credentials);
}
return reauthorized;
});
}
This isn't beautiful, but it should work for you. Just be aware we may evolve this interface a bit over time and you may have to tweak it in the future.