I was checking functionality of resources menu in technical settings under resource. Here is the path: Settings --> Technical --> Resource --> Resources.
But I didn't understand where to use this or what is use of this. I have googled it and also checked Odoo documentation but didn't find the use anywhere. What does this do?
Some modules call on this for their own use. For example, HR apps will use 'human' as a resource.
Related
We're running Jira 7.7.0 and Confluence 6.0.4
Our team is split into 2nd level support and 3rd level (us).
PROBLEM:
We would like to let 2nd level to do as much admin support as possible with as few permissions as needed.
1. The software offers for Core two admin groups, but both offer too many admin rights (Jira Administrators / Jira System Administrators)
2. Confluence has 2 groups Admins and users
DETAIL:
None of the global permissions of either permit, that we allow a group to
- Add Spaces
- Add projects
- Add users
- Add groups
but keep them otherwise out of all the rest
DESIRED
A way to have a super user be able to not just manage >existing<, but also add the entities mentioned above.
OPTIONS?
A) A plugin that enhances users to be "a bit" Administrator, BUT with ADDING feature (this does not seem to exists)
B) A plugin that hides the menu items, but would technically still enable the users to execute the tasks if a URL was known
QUESTION
- Does anyone have a hint on what plugin could manage this? Either permission or menu hiding?
- Is there a way to trick configuration to achieve this (I assume not)
Many thanks!
Carsten
There is an addon called Delegated Project Creator for Jira that address your request. To get it, search for it in the marketplace under "administration".
On the other hand you can tweak the UI of both apps to control access to options using Jquery. The addon Script Runner for JIRA has some options for this.
I would like to know where we can find the list of all the available providers and the related extensions for resources that can be defined in ARM template
Regards
Parimi.
Resource Manager providers, regions, API versions and schemas might be what you're looking for. This includes sections on all of the resource providers and in each of those sections gives links to the REST API docs, schema, and related quickstart templates
Anyone who spends time with Resource Manager would dearly love to have exactly that! Unfortunately it doesn't exist. What documentation does exist is sparse to the point that it is beginner only stuff
Instead we are left picking through Resource Templates, The Resource Explorer and assorted - Source - Code to try to figure out what pieces fit where.
oh and there's a Rest API and Resource Template Schemas which are very useful.
(for a solution that talks about revenues in the billions, you'd think they could afford to pay a couple of tech writers!)
Azure Shared Caching is to be deprecated 1st Sept 2014.
I have been asked to evaluate if a project that I did not build utilizes the Azure Shared Cache.
I know the project does use a form of Azure Caching but I am struggling to identify which one.
How would I know if we use it or not?
According to msdn:
To create and manage caches, you must go to the Cache section.
On the main page of the Management Portal, click Service Bus, Access Control, & Caching at the bottom of the left pane. In the left pane, expand Services, and then click Cache.
I am not sure if this info is still actual.
If you're using Azure Shared Cache, more than likely it will be configured in web.config. That would be the 1st place to start. Under <dataCacheClients> section there look for the following:
<host name="yourcachename.cache.windows.net" cachePort="22233" />
If you're using this, then you're definitely using shared caching.
You may also find this link useful for further identification: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/gg278342.aspx as this link lists down other options as well.
Which of these should I use? When is it appropriate to use SPUtility.ResolvePrincipal() (MSDN) instead of SPUtility.ResolveWindowsPrincipal() (MSDN)? (The MSDN Documentation is not helpful in the least).
Looking at the source code through reflector it seems like
SPUtility.ResolveWindowsPrincipal only tries to resolve Windows user accounts or Groups.
SPUtility.ResolvePrincipal tries to resolve both: Windows User accounts and group as well as Sharepoint Users and Groups.
Now our team is facing new project - creation of new company's intranet portal. Because of some reasons we are considering java open source portals and deciding between Liferay and GateIn.
One of very important requirements is following: portal representation for users must depend on country/language settings of customer computer, it means not only portlets localization but users in US subsidiaries of the company should see probably other structure than users in France.
Is it possible to implement the requirement in Liferay and GateIn?.
This can definitely be achieved through Liferay. Please have a look at the concepts of creating organisations.
Am not sure if this can be done in GateIn. However, there are many other things that you may need to keep in mind before choosing these Portals. I have tried to mention few of them here.
1. Check the stability of the Portal server that you will choose to run on a particular Container. GateIn initially was unstable.
2. You may have to override few files (for your customization) if required. GateIn uses GTMPL view technology for the same. Check how good are you in this. In this case, Liferay is easier (Liferay doesn't use any GTMPL UI framework)
3. Apart from developing a location based Portal, if you are also trying to achieve other things like fully Ajax based pages, a good UI framework (like JSF) etc then check if the Portal server you are choosing runs on a particular Container which supports Ajax, JSF (latest versions)
Above were few and list may grow. But, to conclude I would suggest to go for Liferay :)
This can be achieved with Gatein at different level :
Sites : you can declare multiple sites running on the same portal instance(sharing same User Base). In this case you can automatically redirect user to different country sites, based on the country/language of the user.
Sites Navigations : Gatein provides portal, group and user navigations. Navigation is created dynamically when a user connects to the portal. You can have only websites, navigation will created dynamically by user (based on group and user permissions).
Pages (Dynamics layout rendering): GateIn renders each page dynamically. A page is composed of multiple containers that contains portlets or gadgets.
By setting permissions on each container and by using User Group or Membership of the connected user, it's possible to have different page layout.
Of course, you can also mixed these 3 approaches to build your portal.
Liferay is very buggy, and community is very bad. Unless you pay the support.
GateIn promises much, but still lacks functionality.
You may consider JBoss Juzu and Apache Struts to develop generic portlets in order to void any portal vendor lock-in.
Struts provides features of internationalization, localization, timezones achieve my project.
I make use of struts2-portlet plugin to achieve a reporting portlet running on multiple portals. Here is my sample: code.google.com/p/jasperrocks/wiki/Features