How to zoom a matrix that includes NaN values? - python-3.x

I have a map (2D matrix) of observations. Grid boxes without an observed value is assigned a NaN value.
I would like to use the zoom function in python to upscale the size of the grid boxes from 1°x1° to 10°x10°. When I do that, I want to ignore NaN values. For example, in an extreme scenario, if I have 100 1°x1° grid boxes where only one 1°x1° grid box contains an observation and the other 99 1°x1° grid boxes contain NaN, then I want the zoomed out 10°x10° to only take on the value of the single 1°x1° grid box that contained an observation.
Does anyone have a solution for this problem? Let me know if the question is not clear!
Note that it is only in my dataset that the fill value for no observation is NaN. The fill value could be assigned any value. But I want to be able to zoom the grid box sizes with the zooming ignoring the fill values.
Below is an example code that does not do what I want, since the zoom function assigns a NaN value to the 10°x10° grid box if there is one present in the 100 1°x1° it is built from. But I included it as an attempt to illustrate the problem:
import numpy.ma as ma
import numpy as np
from scipy.ndimage.interpolation import zoom
# Create the fake matrix
A = np.random.uniform(0, 10, 10000)
A[A < 5] = np.nan
A = A.reshape(100,100)
# Print the appearance of A
print('A:')
print(A)
# Zoom out to 10 times larger grid boxes
B = zoom(A,(1/10,1/10),order=1)
# Print the appearance of B
print('B:')
print(B)

Related

How to plot 2 arrays against each other according to their Manhatten distance?

I have 4 arrays namely a,b,c and d. The plotting has to be done between the each pair of values between a,b and c,d in the same plot and preferrably with different markers.The color scheme has to vary as per the manhatten distance. I did the following -
a=[1,2,3]
b=[5,6,7]
c=[9,10,11]
d=[13,14,15]
distance1=[30,40,50]
distance2=[10,20,60]
The pairs to be plotted are (1,5),(2,6),(3,7) for a and b according to the distance array distance1. The other pairs are (9,10),(10,14),(11,15) for c and d according to the distance array distance 2.
I have written the following code
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.scatter(a,b,c=distance1,marker='^',cmap='jet', lw=0,label='ab')
plt.scatter(c,d,c=distance2,marker='*',cmap='jet', lw=0,label='cd')
Thought he plots are getting plotted correctly, the colors are improperly assigned or getting overwritten when second time the plt.scatter is called. How to address this issue?

creating a bubble chart using pandas dataframe

I know this question has been asked before but their solution didn't help me. I have a dataframe of size (391,28) and I want to create a bubble chart like shown here:
bubble chart
My dataframe looks like:
# A B C
# X 0 10 0
# Y 1 2 1
Here I show only a smaller dataframe to give an idea but like I said my dataframe is 391*28 big.
In order to create a bubble chart I do the following:
dfu = df.unstack().reset_index()
dfu.columns = list("XYS")
dfu["S"] *= 20
figure(figsize=(17, 15))
colors = np.random.rand(40)
plt.xticks(rotation=-15)
plt.scatter(x="X", y="Y", s="S", data=dfu)
plt.margins(.4)
plt.show()
But this produces categories on y-axis that are overlapping.
I tried increasing the size but it didn't help. Overlap stays the same. So How can I solve for this? Insights will be appreciated.

How to create a scatter plot where values are across multiple columns?

I have a dataframe in Pandas in which the rows are observations at different times and each column is a size bin where the values represent the number of particles observed for that size bin. So it looks like the following:
bin1 bin2 bin3 bin4 bin5
Time1 50 200 30 40 5
Time2 60 60 40 420 700
Time3 34 200 30 67 43
I would like to use plotly/cufflinks to create a scatterplot in which the x axis will be each size bin, and the y axis will be the values in each size bin. There will be three colors, one for each observation.
As I'm more experienced in Matlab, I tried indexing the values using iloc (note the example below is just trying to plot one observation):
df.iplot(kind="scatter",theme="white",x=df.columns, y=df.iloc[1,:])
But I just get a key error: 0 message.
Is it possible to use indexing when choosing x and y values in Pandas?
Rather than indexing, I think you need to better understand how pandas and matplotlib interact each other.
Let's go by steps for your case:
As the pandas.DataFrame.plot documentation says, the plotted series is a column. You have the series in the row, so you need to transpose your dataframe.
To create a scatterplot, you need both x and y coordinates in different columns, but you are missing the x column, so you also need to create a column with the x values in the transposed dataframe.
Apparently pandas does not change color by default with consecutive calls to plot (matplotlib does it), so you need to pick a color map and pass a color argument, otherwise all points will have the same color.
Here a working example:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
#Here I copied you data in a data.txt text file and import it in pandas as a csv.
#You may have a different way to get your data.
df = pd.read_csv('data.txt', sep='\s+', engine='python')
#I assume to have a column named 'time' which is set as the index, as you show in your post.
df.set_index('time')
tdf = df.transpose() #transpose the dataframe
#Drop the time column from the trasponsed dataframe. time is not a data to be plotted.
tdf = tdf.drop('time')
#Creating x values, I go for 1 to 5 but they can be different.
tdf['xval'] = np.arange(1, len(tdf)+1)
#Choose a colormap and making a list of colors to be used.
colormap = plt.cm.rainbow
colors = [colormap(i) for i in np.linspace(0, 1, len(tdf))]
#Make an empty plot, the columns will be added to the axes in the loop.
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 1)
for i, cl in enumerate([datacol for datacol in tdf.columns if datacol != 'xval']):
tdf.plot(x='xval', y=cl, kind="scatter", ax=axes, color=colors[i])
plt.show()
This plots the following image:
Here a tutorial on picking colors in matplotlib.

Matplotlib not plotting sorted dataset in correct order

I have a similar dataset to the following
Group Values
------- -------
Group A 5
Group B 2
Group C 10
I sorted the dataset by doing:
dataset2 = data.sort_values(by= 'Values', ascending=False)
When I display dataset2 it correctly displays the dataset in the correct descending order. However, when I plot dataset2 with matplotlib it plots it using the original data order; not the sorted one.
left = dataset2.index.values
height = dataset2['Values'] # heights of bars
tick_label = dataset2['Group'] # labels for bars
# plotting a bar chart
plt.bar(left, height, tick_label = tick_label, width = 0.8)
plt.xticks(rotation=90)
plt.show()
I as able to solve this issue doing two things:
1) making a copy of the sorted dataset.
data_sorted = dataset2.copy()
2) Changing the left to:
left = np.arange(len(data_sorted))
for some reason when I was using the index to set up the x axis it was using the original index from the original dataset. I thought that when you sorted the values the index was reset.

Statistics help for computer vision [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I am doing my graduation project in the field of computer vision, and i have only taken one course in statistics that discussed very basic concepts, and now i am facing more difficulty in rather advanced topics, so i need help (book, tutorial, course, ..etc) to grasp and review the basic ideas and concepts in statistics and then dive into the details (statistical details) used in computer vision.
You can calculate False Positives/False negatives, etc with this Confusion Matrix PyTorch example:
import torch
def confusion(prediction, truth):
""" Returns the confusion matrix for the values in the `prediction` and `truth`
tensors, i.e. the amount of positions where the values of `prediction`
and `truth` are
- 1 and 1 (True Positive)
- 1 and 0 (False Positive)
- 0 and 0 (True Negative)
- 0 and 1 (False Negative)
"""
confusion_vector = prediction / truth
# Element-wise division of the 2 tensors returns a new tensor which holds a
# unique value for each case:
# 1 where prediction and truth are 1 (True Positive)
# inf where prediction is 1 and truth is 0 (False Positive)
# nan where prediction and truth are 0 (True Negative)
# 0 where prediction is 0 and truth is 1 (False Negative)
true_positives = torch.sum(confusion_vector == 1).item()
false_positives = torch.sum(confusion_vector == float('inf')).item()
true_negatives = torch.sum(torch.isnan(confusion_vector)).item()
false_negatives = torch.sum(confusion_vector == 0).item()
return true_positives, false_positives, true_negatives, false_negatives
You could use nn.BCEWithLogitsLoss (remove the sigmoid therefore) and set the pos_weight > 1 to increase the recall. Or further optimize it with using Dice Coefficients to penalize the model for false positives, with something like:
def Dice(y_true, y_pred):
"""Returns Dice Similarity Coefficient for ground truth and predicted masks."""
#print(y_true.dtype)
#print(y_pred.dtype)
y_true = np.squeeze(y_true)/255
y_pred = np.squeeze(y_pred)/255
y_true.astype('bool')
y_pred.astype('bool')
intersection = np.logical_and(y_true, y_pred).sum()
return ((2. * intersection.sum()) + 1.) / (y_true.sum() + y_pred.sum() + 1.)
IOU Calculations Explained
Count true positives (TP)
Count false positives (FP)
Count false negatives (FN)
Intersection = TP
Union = TP + FP + FN
IOU = Intersection/Union
The left side is our ground truth, while the right side contains our predictions. The highlighted cells on the left side note which class we are looking at for statistics on the right side. The highlights on the right side note true positives in a cream color, false positives in orange, and false negatives in yellow (note that all others are true negatives — they are predicted as this individual class, and should not be based on the ground truth).
For Class 0, only the top row of the 4x4 matrix should be predicted as zeros. This is a rather simplified version of a real ground truth. In reality, the zeros could be anywhere in the matrix. On the right side, we see 1,0,0,0, meaning the first is a false negative, but the other three are true positives (aka 3 for Intersection as well). From there, we need to find anywhere else where zero was falsely predicted, and we note that happens once on the second row, and twice on the fourth row, for a total of three false positives.
To get the union, we add up TP (3), FP (3) and FN (1) to get seven. The IOU for this class, therefore, is 3/7.
If we do this for all the classes and average the IOUs, we get:
Mean IOU = [(3/7) + (2/6) + (3/4) + (1/6)] / 4 = 0.420
You will also want to learn how to pull the statistics for mAP (Mean Avg Precision):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pM6DJ0ZZee0
https://towardsdatascience.com/breaking-down-mean-average-precision-map-ae462f623a52#1a59
https://medium.com/#hfdtsinghua/calculate-mean-average-precision-map-for-multi-label-classification-b082679d31be
Compute Covariance Matrixes
The variance of a variable describes how much the values are spread. The covariance is a measure that tells the amount of dependency between two variables.
A positive covariance means that the values of the first variable are large when values of the second variables are also large. A negative covariance means the opposite: large values from one variable are associated with small values of the other.
The covariance value depends on the scale of the variable so it is hard to analyze it. It is possible to use the correlation coefficient that is easier to interpret. The correlation coefficient is just the normalized covariance.
A positive covariance means that large values of one variable are associated with big values from the other (left). A negative covariance means that large values of one variable are associated with small values of the other one (right).
The covariance matrix is a matrix that summarises the variances and covariances of a set of vectors and it can tell a lot of things about your variables. The diagonal corresponds to the variance of each vector:
A matrix A and its matrix of covariance. The diagonal corresponds to the variance of each column vector. Let’s check with the formula of the variance:
With n the length of the vector, and x̄ the mean of the vector. For instance, the variance of the first column vector of A is:
This is the first cell of our covariance matrix. The second element on the diagonal corresponds of the variance of the second column vector from A and so on.
Note: the vectors extracted from the matrix A correspond to the columns of A.
The other cells correspond to the covariance between two column vectors from A. For instance, the covariance between the first and the third column is located in the covariance matrix as the column 1 and the row 3 (or the column 3 and the row 1):
The position in the covariance matrix. Column corresponds to the first variable and row to the second (or the opposite). The covariance between the first and the third column vector of A is the element in column 1 and row 3 (or the opposite = same value).
Let’s check that the covariance between the first and the third column vector of A is equal to -2.67. The formula of the covariance between two variables Xand Y is:
The variables X and Y are the first and the third column vectors in the last example. Let’s split this formula to be sure that it is crystal clear:
The sum symbol (Σ) means that we will iterate on the elements of the vectors. We will start with the first element (i=1) and calculate the first element of X minus the mean of the vector X:
Multiply the result with the first element of Y minus the mean of the vector Y:
Reiterate the process for each element of the vectors and calculate the sum of all results:
Divide by the number of elements in the vector.
EXAMPLE - Let’s start with the matrix A:
We will calculate the covariance between the first and the third column vectors:
and
Which is x̄=3, ȳ=4, and n=3 so we have:
Code example -
Using NumPy, the covariance matrix can be calculated with the function np.cov.
It is worth noting that if you want NumPy to use the columns as vectors, the parameter rowvar=False has to be used. Also, bias=True divides by n and not by n-1.
Let’s create the array first:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
A = np.array([[1, 3, 5], [5, 4, 1], [3, 8, 6]])
Now we will calculate the covariance with the NumPy function:
np.cov(A, rowvar=False, bias=True)
Finding the covariance matrix with the dot product
There is another way to compute the covariance matrix of A. You can center A around 0. The mean of the vector is subtracted from each element of the vector to have a vector with mean equal to 0. It is multiplied with its own transpose, and divided by the number of observations.
Let’s start with an implementation and then we’ll try to understand the link with the previous equation:
def calculateCovariance(X):
meanX = np.mean(X, axis = 0)
lenX = X.shape[0]
X = X - meanX
covariance = X.T.dot(X)/lenX
return covariance
print(calculateCovariance(A))
Output:
array([[ 2.66666667, 0.66666667, -2.66666667],
[ 0.66666667, 4.66666667, 2.33333333],
[-2.66666667, 2.33333333, 4.66666667]])
The dot product between two vectors can be expressed:
It is the sum of the products of each element of the vectors:
If we have a matrix A, the dot product between A and its transpose will give you a new matrix:
Visualize data and covariance matrices
In order to get more insights about the covariance matrix and how it can be useful, we will create a function to visualize it along with 2D data. You will be able to see the link between the covariance matrix and the data.
This function will calculate the covariance matrix as we have seen above. It will create two subplots — one for the covariance matrix and one for the data. The heatmap() function from Seaborn is used to create gradients of colour — small values will be coloured in light green and large values in dark blue. We chose one of our palette colours, but you may prefer other colours. The data is represented as a scatterplot.
def plotDataAndCov(data):
ACov = np.cov(data, rowvar=False, bias=True)
print 'Covariance matrix:\n', ACov
fig, ax = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=2)
fig.set_size_inches(10, 10)
ax0 = plt.subplot(2, 2, 1)
# Choosing the colors
cmap = sns.color_palette("GnBu", 10)
sns.heatmap(ACov, cmap=cmap, vmin=0)
ax1 = plt.subplot(2, 2, 2)
# data can include the colors
if data.shape[1]==3:
c=data[:,2]
else:
c="#0A98BE"
ax1.scatter(data[:,0], data[:,1], c=c, s=40)
# Remove the top and right axes from the data plot
ax1.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
ax1.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
Uncorrelated data
Now that we have the plot function, we will generate some random data to visualize what the covariance matrix can tell us. We will start with some data drawn from a normal distribution with the NumPy function np.random.normal().
This function needs the mean, the standard deviation and the number of observations of the distribution as input. We will create two random variables of 300 observations with a standard deviation of 1. The first will have a mean of 1 and the second a mean of 2. If we randomly draw two sets of 300 observations from a normal distribution, both vectors will be uncorrelated.
np.random.seed(1234)
a1 = np.random.normal(2, 1, 300)
a2 = np.random.normal(1, 1, 300)
A = np.array([a1, a2]).T
A.shape
Note 1: We transpose the data with .T because the original shape is (2, 300) and we want the number of observations as rows (so with shape (300, 2)).
Note 2: We use np.random.seed function for reproducibility. The same random number will be used the next time we run the cell. Let’s check how the data looks like:
A[:10,:]
array([[ 2.47143516, 1.52704645],
[ 0.80902431, 1.7111124 ],
[ 3.43270697, 0.78245452],
[ 1.6873481 , 3.63779121],
[ 1.27941127, -0.74213763],
[ 2.88716294, 0.90556519],
[ 2.85958841, 2.43118375],
[ 1.3634765 , 1.59275845],
[ 2.01569637, 1.1702969 ],
[-0.24268495, -0.75170595]])
Nice, we have two column vectors; Now, we can check that the distributions are normal:
sns.distplot(A[:,0], color="#53BB04")
sns.distplot(A[:,1], color="#0A98BE")
plt.show()
plt.close()
We can see that the distributions have equivalent standard deviations but different means (1 and 2). So that’s exactly what we have asked for.
Now we can plot our dataset and its covariance matrix with our function:
plotDataAndCov(A)
plt.show()
plt.close()
Covariance matrix:
[[ 0.95171641 -0.0447816 ]
[-0.0447816 0.87959853]]
We can see on the scatterplot that the two dimensions are uncorrelated. Note that we have one dimension with a mean of 1 (y-axis) and the other with the mean of 2 (x-axis).
Also, the covariance matrix shows that the variance of each variable is very large (around 1) and the covariance of columns 1 and 2 is very small (around 0). Since we ensured that the two vectors are independent this is coherent. The opposite is not necessarily true: a covariance of 0 doesn’t guarantee independence.
Correlated data
Now, let’s construct dependent data by specifying one column from the other one.
np.random.seed(1234)
b1 = np.random.normal(3, 1, 300)
b2 = b1 + np.random.normal(7, 1, 300)/2.
B = np.array([b1, b2]).T
plotDataAndCov(B)
plt.show()
plt.close()
Covariance matrix:
[[ 0.95171641 0.92932561]
[ 0.92932561 1.12683445]]
The correlation between the two dimensions is visible on the scatter plot. We can see that a line could be drawn and used to predict y from x and vice versa. The covariance matrix is not diagonal (there are non-zero cells outside of the diagonal). That means that the covariance between dimensions is non-zero.
From this point with Covariance Matrcies, you can research further on the following:
Mean normalization
Standardization or normalization
Whitening
Zero-centering
Decorrelate
Rescaling

Resources