I just started my CCNA course. I tried to connect the router to the PC with a crossover cable, but it always shows that the protocol is down. Any configuration I might have missed?
I did the same here. Check the cable again and try to ping the gateway. It's working for me.
Related
I'm trying to host a bottle server on my raspberry pi (4, zero w or zero 2 with newest pi os) to supply some configuration for a project.
The raspberry pi itself will not have internet access but will be its own wifi accespoint.
i set it up in the way the docs describe (search for "Setting up a Routed Wireless Access Point")
I have skipped the "Enable Routing and IP Masquerading" step because i don't need traffic to be rerouted to another network
The tutorial works fine and i'm able to connect to the hotspot. I'm also able to run the bottle server example and connect to it locally.
However, i'm not able to connect to it from a device that is connected to the hotspot. i'm getting an ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED(when supplying the ip of the raspberry and port of the bottle server to the browser)
I don't really know where to start looking
Is there a firewall setting i missed?
Should i have done the "Enable Routing and IP Masquerading" step?
Is there something entirely different i need to look at?
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Try starting bottle on the 0.0.0.0 interface rather than localhost. That makes it listen for incoming connections on all interfaces, whereas if you start on localhost it only listens for connections from the local host.
I'm working on a custom yocto Linux for a Raspberry PI 3 and try to get the WIFI connection working with SSH. However when trying to connect from my PC (Ubuntu 19.10, SSH OpenSSH_8.0p1 Ubuntu-6build1, OpenSSL 1.1.1c 28 May 2019) to the PI on which Dropbear v2019.78 runs, the connection attempt times out. But only when I try this via SSH, and via wlan0. Other TCP/IP traffic works, and also using the same participants but with eth0. As this is for a robot, I would prefer to not use a tether though...
To try & debug this, I
enabled a serial console so I can work on the PI
disabled eth0
started a tcpdump on the PI (ip.host == 192.168.0.105)
started a tcpdump on the PC (ip.host == 192.168.0.106)
used a dirt-simple TCP/IP socket example written in Python (taken from https://realpython.com/python-sockets/#echo-server) to verify I can in fact communicate. The transmission is successful. I am aware that the example is lacking (no proper protocol etc), but that's not the point of it. It just works enough. The PI runs the server listening on port 2222.
attempted a SSH connection, it timed out.
I filtered the resulting PCAP down to contain just TCP, as there is other information (e.g. Dropbox discovery) that I don't think matters and might potentially be information leaking. On the host side (enp4s0-tcp-and-pi.pcap) I also filtered with ip.host == 192.168.0.105 to only contain any traffic to the PI.
Another note on my setup here: I use a TP-Link router which LAN ports the PC is connected to, and who provides the 2.4GHz WIFI for the PI. So both are part of the same subnet, and no special routing or anything is configured.
Also I stopped the dropbear daemon and adapted my Python code to use port 22. It works.
I'm only broadly aware of the inner workings of TCP, so I can't really make much sense of the things I see here. Any insights are more than welcome.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5o4rqr5zdws2wq7/wlan0-tcp-only.pcap?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/amypjtk1nvja4qb/enp4s0-tcp-and-pi.pcap?dl=0
I'm very unfamiliar with Linux so forgive me if this has been answered before, I've read quite a few answers but I'm never sure if they actually relate to my question.
I have a headless raspberry pi that connects to my phone's bluetooth automatically, my phone shares its internet access by tethering. I use this initial and reliable connection to SSH to my raspberry pi, and use the desktop with VNC viewer.
I would like to connect to a WiFi network that uses a captive portal, but the browser always uses the bluetooth connection so it never redirects me to the portal page. The bluetooth connection is just to be able to use the desktop so I can get through the portal, then I would like to either disconnect bluetooth or just not use it, mainly because of the low bandwidth it provides.
I've added wlan0 as a priority interface with ifmetric, but that hasn't worked.
I was thinking that forcing all HTTP connections through the wlan0 interface could solve the problem, but there may be a simpler way, feel free to tell me.
Can you explain in "simple" terms the best way to achieve this ?
Of course, there are multiple solutions. The simplest is making sure that there is only one correct default route.
There are 3 situations:
You are only connected via bluetooth via ssh
You are connected via bluetooth and via wifi, but not yet through the splash
You are through the splash
Each will require a different network configuration.
In 1, your network config will probably be:
some IP address (let's call it IP-bt) and network mask
Default gateway is your phone
With route -n you can verify this.
In 2, the network config will depend a bit on the wifi network, but in general, your network config will be:
you'll still have IP-bt
you will have a new address on the wifi adapter (which we call IP-wifi)
the default gateway should be the gateway on the wifi network.
When you verify this with route -n, you might still see a route with destination 0.0.0.0 towards your phone. You can delete this route. Your phone should be on a directly connected network and your ssh session should therefore not break.
If the default gw is not on the wifi network, you can still remove the route that sets your phone as default gw.
Under 3, the default gw must be on the wifi network, and not on the phone. You will still be able to use your phone, because it is directly connected.
Something to watch out for in this scenario is that your phone will act as a DHCP server. That means once in a while your DHCP lease will refresh, and the bluetooth default route may re-appear. Disconnecting bluetooth will prevent this.
The second solution is to use ifmetric. Instead of making wlan0 a lower metric, make your bluetooth a higher metric. Again verify with route -n that the metrics are as you want them to be. Verify with a traceroute how the packets are moving.
A third, and most complex option would be to install Quagga and configure correct routing.
We are developing small internet connected device that connects via wifi and does some work. It is controlled via mobile app.
For configuration purposes we use wi-fi module that can work in both STA + AP modes simultaneously via two interfaces wlan0 and wlan1. One of the interfaces works in Master mode. Phone connects to the device via wlan1 and sends command for the device to connect to another network and waits for result. Device in turn connects to another wi-fi network using wlan0 and notifies the phone if connection was successful or not.
But there is one issue. Both interfaces (wlan0 and wlan1) must work on the same channel as we have single hardware module. This causes channel of wlan1 to change in order to match of channel for wlan0.
Here comes the problem. When channel changes phone looses connection with the device. Is there a way to change wi-fi channel but keep connection between the device and mobile phone?
Our wi-fi module is rtl8723bu.
Linux 3.4.103.
Wifi daemons: hostapd v0.8.x_rtw_r7475.20130812_beta, wpa_supplicant v2.3.
UPDATE
Here is more clearly description what is going on on device.
Let's assume that the phone already connected to Device wlan1 interface with essid DeviceAp which is on channel 1. We have a Router with essid RouterAp which is on channel 6. Device interface wlan0 is not configured and not running.
(Step1 on image below).
Then the phone sends a request to the device to connect to RouterAp.
(Step2 on image below).
When wlan0 starts connecting to RouterAp it changes working channel. Because WiFi module can work only on one channel. The channel of wlan1 also changes (maybe in hard way). Therefore Phone lost DeviceAp and starts roaming.
(Step3 on image below).
SO the update question is:
Is there a way to tell the Phone (or other device) about network change? Or perhaps increase the likelihood that the phone is connected back to DeviceAP.
This behavior is very similar to the process of setting up Google Chromecast.
Chromecast also has two wireless interfaces and change the channel, but the Phone does not lose connection with it.
Image:
http://postimg.org/image/soh78vd17/
I have a black-box device with a modem attached (which I can send commands to), and would like to be able to connect to send data to a server from it. What connectivity options do I have, is PPP the protocol I need to use or is there a better option?
ppp is certainly the most common solution for getting an IP connection over a modem. There are other solutions, but there's no reason not to use PPP if what you need is an IP connection.
If you don't need an IP connection and you're writing both the client and the server, you could also do a straight serial connection from one modem to another, but that's kind of old-school.
PPP is probably your best option, if you also want an IP gateway and routing. If you only need terminal access to the device, and it runs some form of *nix, you probably have getty+serial communication as an option. You can use any number of modem terminal clients on the other side.