In modern Website usually hidden path.
use this
https://google.com/main
instance of this
https://google.com/main.html
but I want to ask why they chose to hidden the file path.
I know that Initial web was use this file path.
But if they chose to cover up it, I think there was some reason.
Because of they just think it doesn't look good?
Or is there a security issue when using a file root?
in tranditional website.all content on the page is static and write in html file.so we can fetch and show the page directly by browser.
in modern internet,the content we browse is dynamic,for example we browse a news page,the content changed every second,so the server handle our request by some function not handle by a static html file,the function always print out latest news,so it is dynamic,not a unchanged static html file.
Related
I need to create a page like http://www.example.com/strong and the file to support that are inside my docroot/strong/index.html.
Inside my docroot there are other folders with their index file as well. For example
docroot/site1/index.html
docroot/site2/index.html
docroot/strong/index.html
So when user types in http://www.example.com/strong it should open docroot/strong/index.html without changing the URL. Can I achieve this?
Enter image description here
It's OK that I can get files in directory public when get localhost:3000/movies, but if I add / to the end of URL, that is localhost:3000/movies/, something goes wrong, the CSS file in public cannot be get. How do I solve this problem if I want to visit localhost:3000/movies/moive with CSS style?
When you are at localhost:3000/movies, think of being in "folder" / and viewing "page" movies. If you are in localhost:3000/movies/blah or in localhost:3000/movies/ then you are viewing pages blah (or / respectively) in the movies location.
The above is true regardless those "pages" exist or not; most likely you just have express route handlers and jade templates structures differently -- but the rationale works for the browser and the requests to absolute URLs it will be performing.
So I cannot say what is wrong without looking at your pages code, but make sure all relative paths (e.g. linking to a CSS file foo/bar.css) are valid from all locations, or alternatively use absolute locations (e.g. /foo/bar.css).
I'm trying to build a chrome extension that overrides a download of a file and displays it in the browser. For example if you click on a link to a '.csv' file I'd like it to render in the browser instead of downloading it.
Chrome already does it for PDF's types and the Xml Tree extension also does exactly that for xml files.
So it should be possible, just not sure how to go about catching that event?
An implementation along the lines indicated by in the previous answers and specifically designed for CSV files can be found in this extension of mine on github:
https://github.com/rgrp/chrome-csv-viewer
Furthermore, with the new(ish) chrome webrequest API a direct approach is also now possible along the following lines:
Listen to onBeforeRequest (this has to be in a background script - see background.js)
Check if this is a CSV file (mimetype or file extension)
If so cancel the request and then display the data using xhr
A working version of this can be found in a branch of that extension: https://github.com/rgrp/chrome-csv-viewer/tree/4-webrequest-intercept
You could always look at the XML Tree code :).
If you only need to work with links, and not opening files from the address bar or File > Open, you could build a content script that adds a click event listener to every link.
In the event listener function:
Add e.preventDefault() in the first line to prevent the browser 'following' the link.
Using the link href value, get the data with XMLHttpRequest.
In the XMLHttpRequest callback, open a new tab and render content accordingly.
Obviously, in many ways, this is not a great solution:
you want 'normal' links to be handled as usual by the browser
how can you tell if a text file contains comma-separated values (for example) except by looking at the file extension which, of course, may not be reliable?
Are you specifically thinking of .csv files -- and/or other specific types of content?
If I load a string containing HTML into a UIWebView, and that string contains objects (hyperlinks) that are relative to that string, i.e. , where there is some object with id "something," then the link works - click on it and the web view jumps to the referenced object.
What I want is to get navigation to a different file in my project, in other words as though the path to the different file were a URL.
I have found that if the href IS a URL, such as href="http://www.amazon.com", then the link works.
If I put the name of a file, OR the [NSBundle mainBundle] pathForResource: ] of that name, in the href, then the link does not work.
Is there some way I can generate the equivalent of a URL pointing to an HTML file that is in the project, so that an can link to that HTML file?
I found a solution at this link:
How to use Javascript to communicate with Objective-c code?
Essentially, the solution is to implement the UIWebViewDelegate protocol's shouldStartLoadWithRequest method, and "trap" a particular value of scheme. So my links, instead of saying something like:
<a href="http://someplace.location">
are like:
<a href="mylink://#filename.ext">
By catching attempts to load anything with scheme "mylink," I can use:
[[request URL] fragment]
within shouldStartLoadWithRequest, and get the filename.ext. I then release my previous UIWebView, load in the contents of the specified file, and make that the contents of a new UIWebView. The effect is that the links work with normal appearance, even though they are being implemented with my code. I return NO because I don't want the usual loading to take place. If the scheme is NOT mylink, I can return YES to allow normal operation.
Regrettably, I still have no way to jump TO a fragment within a web view. In linking to a real URL, you can say something like "www.foo.org#page50" and jump straight to wherever an object on the new page has an id of "page50." With my method, I can only go to the top of the page.
This is also not going to give me a "go-back" function unless I record the filenames and implement it myself.
i updated the code from my website to a 'better' veersion i think,
it works fine but when i try to implement the friendly URL and load it, works, but with no CSS, Javascript or images,
but if i corret the routes for the css to http://website/css/style.css (instead of ./css/style.css) it i do see the CSS properly loaded,
any idea why?
Example: http://keepyourlinks.com/link1.php?id=25 VS http://keepyourlinks.com/keep/25/series-yonkis
(i updated the route of the CSS, but the Javascript is missing an the images asweell)
I really would like not to have to correct al routes :(
./ means the current directory, which isn't where the file is, so it doesn't work.
Your best bet is to start using paths relative to the root of your site from now on, every time you write a link to a stylesheet or javascript or image, on every site. It always works and saves you from problems like this.
/css/style.css points to the same URL no matter what directory the current page is in.