There's a way to run one cucumber scenario 2000 times without using Scenario outline?
Scenario Outline:
Run test n times
| 1 |
| 2 |
Cucumber is a tool to support BDD. And BDD is a way for software teams to work that closes the gap between business people and technical people. This means that you should first think about how you communicate this to other people.
And you already did this in the title of this post. So write that down:
Scenario: Do it lots
Given Jack wants to do a thing
When Jack does the thing 2000 times
Then that wasn't a problem.
So then
private Supplier<Result> doTheThing;
private List<Result> results = new ArrayList<>();
#Given("Jack wants to do a thing")
public void jack_wants_to_do_a_thing() {
doTheThing = ()-> {
// Do the thing, return a result;
return result;
};
}
#When("Jack does the thing {int} times")
public void jack_does_the_thing(int repeat) {
for (int i = 0; i < repeat; i++) {
results.add(doTheThing.get());
}
}
#Then("that was not a problem")
public void that_was_not_a_problemd() {
results.forEach(result -> {
assertTrue(result.isOk(), result + " was not not ok");
});
}
Related
I am a beginner in Unity and I am currently making a simple game. I have a problem managing the flow of my minigame. The minigame is simply finding an object, when I found and tap on the item name below will be shaded or marked or there can be animation just to indicate that the item is found.
What I want to do is to get the name of the objects that need to be found and set them randomly in the three (3) item names below. like every time this minigame opens the names of the items are randomly placed in the 3 texts. And when the item is found the name below will be marked or shaded or anything that will indicate it is found, but for now I will just set it inactive for easier indication. How can I properly do this whole process?
The objects inside the scene are button for them to have onCLick() events
Correction: the term choices are wrong because they just display the name of the items that you need to find, just in case you get confused with the term choice in my minigame. I will fix it.
Here is the visuals for the minigame:
The script I currently have for when the objects was clicked:
using UnityEngine;
using UnityEngine.UI;
using UnityEngine.EventSystems;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using TMPro;
public class ClickObject : MonoBehaviour
{
[SerializeField] Button pillowBtn, pcBtn, lampBtn;
// [SerializeField] TextMeshProUGUI choice1, choice2, choice3;
// FROM THE SOLUTION
[SerializeField] List<GameObject> gameObjectWanted;
[SerializeField] List<TextMeshProUGUI> textBoxes;
// METHOD NAMES IS TEMPORARY
public void pillowClicked()
{
Debug.Log("you found the " + EventSystem.current.currentSelectedGameObject.name);
}
public void desktopClicked()
{
Debug.Log("you found the " + EventSystem.current.currentSelectedGameObject.name);
}
public void lampClicked()
{
Debug.Log("you found the " + EventSystem.current.currentSelectedGameObject.name);
}
}
You asked for a lot and I hope I understood your intention.
first, if you want to randomly choose an amount of game objects from your game, I think the best way to do it is by adding the refernece of all the game objects you want to choose from radomly inside a list of game objects and then randomly take a game object of the list and make it a child of another game object I call "fatherGoTranform" on my code like that:
[SerializeField] List<GameObject> gameObjectWanted;
[SerializeField] float numOfGO = 4;
[SerializeField] Transform fatherGoTranform;
void Start()
{
for(int i=0;i<numOfGO;i++)
{
int index = Random.Range(0, gameObjectWanted.Count-1);
GameObject currentGO = gameObjectWanted[index ];
currentGO.transform.parent = fatherGoTranform;
gameObjectWanted.RemoveAt(index);
}
}
and then to click on a game object and the do with what you want try this:
void Update()
{
//Check for mouse click
if (Input.GetMouseButtonDown(0))
{
RaycastHit raycastHit;
Ray ray = Camera.main.ScreenPointToRay(Input.mousePosition);
if (Physics.Raycast(ray, out raycastHit, 100f))
{
if (raycastHit.transform != null)
{
//Our custom method.
CurrentClickedGameObject(raycastHit.transform.gameObject);
}
}
}
}
I have not checked the code so if there is an error tell me and I will fix it
This is the solution that worked for my problem. I randomly placed numbers to the list according to childCount and every index indicate the index of the text that I want to put them on which I get as a Transform child.
using UnityEngine;
using UnityEngine.UI;
using UnityEngine.EventSystems;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using TMPro;
public class ClickObject : MonoBehaviour
{
// [SerializeField] Button pillowBtn, pcBtn, lampBtn;
[SerializeField] GameObject choices, v1, finishPanel;
// RANDOM NUMBER HOLDER FOR CHECKING
private int randomNumber, foundCount;
// RANDOMIZED NUMBER LIST HOLDER
public List<int> RndmList = new List<int>();
private void Awake()
{
foundCount = 0;
RndmList = new List<int>(new int[v1.transform.childCount]);
for (int i = 0; i < v1.transform.childCount; i++)
{
randomNumber = UnityEngine.Random.Range(0, (v1.transform.childCount) + 1);
while (RndmList.Contains(randomNumber))
{
randomNumber = UnityEngine.Random.Range(0, (v1.transform.childCount) + 1);
}
RndmList[i] = randomNumber;
// Debug.Log(v1.transform.GetChild(randomNumber-1).name);
choices.transform.GetChild(i).GetComponentInChildren<TextMeshProUGUI>().text = v1.transform.GetChild(randomNumber - 1).name;
}
}
public void objectFound()
{
string objectName = EventSystem.current.currentSelectedGameObject.name;
Debug.Log("you found the " + objectName);
for (int i = 0; i < choices.transform.childCount; i++)
{
if (objectName == choices.transform.GetChild(i).GetComponentInChildren<TextMeshProUGUI>().text)
{
// Debug.Log(i);
// choices.transform.GetChild(i).gameObject.SetActive(false);
// choices.transform.GetChild(i).GetComponentInChildren<TextMeshProUGUI>().color = Color.gray;
if(RndmList.Contains(i+1))
{
// Debug.Log(i);
// Debug.Log(v1.transform.GetChild(RndmList[i]-1).name);
choices.transform.GetChild(i).GetComponentInChildren<TextMeshProUGUI>().color = Color.gray;
v1.transform.GetChild(RndmList[i]-1).GetComponent<Button>().enabled = false;
foundCount++;
}
}
}
if(foundCount == v1.transform.childCount)
{
finishPanel.SetActive(true);
}
}
}
I have to update prices of thousands of SKUs calling a third party API hosted in AWS. The third party party has a TPS throttle of 1000, i.e., 1000 API calls are permitted per second. The third party API approximately takes 1.5 seconds for every API invoke.
Now every time if I update the prices sequentially by invoking third party API, for 2,000 products, the price update is taking 2000 * 1.5 = 3000 seconds. By using threading & thread synchronization this should have been achieved in 3 seconds since the TPS throttle is 1000. Here is sample code snippet of my present method:
[HttpPut]
public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> UpdatePrices([FromBody] List<PriceViewModel> prices)
{
int failedAPICalls = 0;
int successAPICalls = 0;
foreach (var p in prices) {
PriceManagement pm = new PriceManagement();
ErrorViewModel error = await pm.UpdateMarketplacePrice(p.SKU, p.Price);
if (error != null) {
failedAPICalls++;
//Error handling code here...
}
else {
successAPICalls++;
//Log price update to database
}
}
var totalApiCalls = successAPICalls + failedAPICalls;
string message = "Total API calls : " + totalApiCalls.ToString() + " | Successfull API Calls: " + successAPICalls.ToString()
+ " | Failed API Calls: " + failedAPICalls.ToString();
return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, message);
}
Here is the sample definition View models:
public class PriceViewModel
{
public string SKU { get; set; }
public decimal Price { get; set; }
}
public class ErrorViewModel
{
public int StatusCode { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
Please help me out to improve performance.
The code you posted is sequential. Asynchronous but still sequential. await will await an already asynchronous operation to complete without blocking, before continuing execution. It won't fire off all requests at the same time.
One easy way to make multiple concurrent calls with a specific limit is to use an ActionBlock<> with a MaxDegreeOfParallelism set to the limit you want, eg :
var options=new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions
{
MaxDegreeOfParallelism = maxDegreeOfParallelism,
BoundedCapacity = capacity
};
var block=new ActionBlock<PriceViewModel>(async p=>{
var pm = new PriceManagement();
var error = await pm.UpdateMarketplacePrice(p.SKU, p.Price);
if (error != null) {
Interlocked.Increment(ref failedAPICalls);
}
else {
Interlocked.Increment(ref successAPICalls);
}
}, options);
Setting MaxDegreeOfParallelism controls how many messages can be processed concurrently. The rest of the messages are buffered.
Once the block is created, we can post messages to it. Each message will be processed by a separate task up to the MaxDOP limit. Once we're done, we tell the block so and wait for it to complete all remaining messages.
foreach(var p in prices)
{
await block.SendAsync(p);
}
//Tell the block we're done
block.Complete();
//Wait until all prices are processed
await block.Completion;
By default, there's no limit to how many items can be buffered. This can be a problem if operations are slow, as the buffer may end up with thousands of items waiting to be processed, essentially duplicating the prices list.
To avoid this, BoundedCapacity can be set to a specific number. When the limit is reached SendAsync will block until a slot becomes available
My code is supposed to simultanously start sorting 3 different lists using different methods and return the first one to finish. However it always performs the first task on the list instead. How can I fix that?
Below is part of my code which seemed relevant to show.
static List<Task<List<int>>> listoftasks = new List<Task<List<int>>>() { QuickSortAsync(list1), BubbleSortAsync(list2), SelectionSortAsync(list3) };
public async static void caller()
{
List<int> result = await Task.WhenAny(listoftasks).Result;
foreach (var item in result)
Console.Write(item + ", ");
}
static Task<List<int>> QuickSortAsync(List<int> l)
{
return Task.Run<List<int>>(() =>
{
l.Sort();
return l;
});
}
Since your list of tasks is static, you're starting all three tasks very early. Then, when you call WhenAny, it's likely that they've already all completed.
I suggest you start the tasks when you call WhenAny:
public static async Task CallerAsync()
{
List<int> result = await await Task.WhenAny(QuickSortAsync(list1),
BubbleSortAsync(list2), SelectionSortAsync(list3));
foreach (var item in result)
Console.Write(item + ", ");
}
Hi i am trying to grab a value from my threading but it seem work not so find to me course i found that my code structure are unstable enough..here is my code i name my thread class as "clsThreadCount" and below is my implementation
public volatile bool Grab = false;
public volatile int count = 0;
public void Initialization(int i)
{
count = i;
}
public void Play()
{
Grab = false;
_shouldStop = false;
ThreadTest();
}
public void Stop()
{
_shouldStop = true;
workerThread.Join(1);
workerThread.Abort();
}
private void ThreadTest()
{
workerThread = new Thread(DoWork);
workerThread.Start();
while (!workerThread.IsAlive) ;
}
private void DoWork()
{
try
{
while (!_shouldStop)
{
if (Grab)
{
count++;
Grab = false;
}
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
Play();
}
finally
{
}
}
when my program(main menu) are starting to run i will trigger the initialize function at pass the parameter as 7
ObjThreadCount.Initialization(7); // count = 7
ObjThreadCount.Play(); // the thread are running
ObjThreadCount.Grab = true; // the grab equal to true, count++ are trigger
Thread.Sleep(100); // wait awhile
lblResult.Text = ObjThreadCount.count.ToString(); // sometime i can get count++ result (e.g. 8)
ObjThreadCount.Stop(); // thread stop
sometime my program can able to get a right counting from the thread but sometime are not.
i realize at my while loop implementation there are something are missing..
something like waitone or waitautoevent..can i ignore Thread.Sleep(100) ?? what are the suitable code should i add in the while loop ?
Please help me~ :S
** sorry in the first upload i forgot to write down "volatile" into the variable
thank you..
If C# (and C and java, and probably C++), you need to declare _shouldStop and Grab as volatile.
Hi
I am working in windows 7 phone based app using silverlight. I have following methods in one of my UI classes, GameScreen.xaml. I am calling startTimer method in the constructor GameScreen. Problem is that when the updateTime method is called and
timeLabel.Text = "Time left: 00 : " + time;
line is executed, the program throws UnauthorizedAccessException on time variable.
private void startTimer()
{
timeThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(startThread));
timeThread.Start();
}
public void startThread()
{
while (timeLeft > 0)
{
Thread.Sleep(1000);
updateTime();
if (timePassed % 10 == 0)
{
findNextBGResource();
changeBackgroundScene();
}
}
}
private void updateTime()
{
// update the view
String time = timeLeft.ToString();
if (timeLeft < 10)
{
time = "0" + time;
}
if (doUpdateTime && timeLeft >= 0)
{
timeLabel.Text = "Time left: 00 : " + time;
}
}
Can anyone please help me in this regard?
Best Regards...
Basically you can't modify the UI from anything other than the dispatcher thread. Two options:
Use Dispatcher.BeginInvoke to execute your ui-modifying code in the dispatcher thread
Use DispatcherTimer instead of starting a new thread and sleeping - that way the "tick" will occur in the UI thread already.
Are you sure it's on the time variable, not on timeLabel?
You can't usually edit the UI from other threads than the one that handles the UI.